How Jesus became god'... from not being one. Bart Ehrman.

[LittleNipper]

The only reason the majority of American citizens were against Communism was because they (the Communists) espoused ATHEISM --- closing churches, ejected and murdered missionaries, controlled education and, wanted the US to be an atheistic country eventually (the sooner the better). Once the US becomes indifferent to Atheism, the war is over...

my take on the McCarthy era is that americans were MISLED about communism and the atheism libel was the ONE that charlatans FOCUSED upon. Communism was presented as IMMORAL AND ANTI-JESUS. Its faults are far more significant than THAT---but it is probably true that the overwhelming majority of the people of the USA would not understand the threat if it had not been for the ANTI-JESUS issue. I was used because it WORKED

McCarthy wasn't entirely wrong. Communism is atheistic. They did close churches. Communists clearly saw Christianity as a serious threat to their control of the public at large. The communist were very "moral" from their point of view. They saw the United States as highly decadent. That said, it didn't matter if the high party members lived in luxury; however, for them to live in luxury, everyone else needed to scrape by ---- particularly where it didn't matter how hard someone worked, when the citizens all were paid the same and lived in comparable accommodations. This excluding the head officials (who gleaned the best of everything). No, I believe McCarthy was used and mislead in order to make him appear a clown and cause America to let down its guard. Clearly, by turning those hearings into a charade, and seeing communists everywhere (to the joy of liberals), and not being sympathetic to the vast problems stemming from the Great Depression, and the mistakes of a more turbulent time in our history; everyone was being accused of being a "card carrying" communist. And in so doing the real conspirators continued to destroy America from within. It's funny that within less than a decade the Bible would be removed from basic public community functions and education would become very liberal without its conservative influence. Just watch episodes of Leave It To Beaver. Note the interaction between the teacher, student, and parents. This isn't just make believe. Beaver ended its syndication in June of 1963. The Bible hadn't been removed from the morning exercises YET. They didn't show this on the program ----- it was an obvious given in most all communities. A very early episode shows the Beaver singing a Christmas Carol in a school Christmas Program with his classmates (of course Beaver is wearing a knit hat because of a BAD haircut).
The teachers on the show were pretty much spot-on in their views and scholastic opinions. Parents would lay down the law if they was called into school to the Principle's Office. Threatening a teacher seemed a death-wish (I'm sure that there were moments). However, the teacher then was seen as an extension of the parents, as were Sunday School Teachers, and police officers. Talking back was a big no-no! A letter home from school meant big TROUBLE! All this would rapidly change after 1963. And the Kennedy Assassination seemed to just push the Baby-boomer Generation to the brink. But again, simply make a conservative look like a prudish buffoon, and well --- one can go about his own agenda much more freely... Exclude the Messiah/Christ and you are excluding GOD and reaping the inevitable consequences.

 

[zaangalewa]

... What was the approximate date of the first epic poem?

Sîn-leqe-unnīnnī wrote down the last version of Gilgamesh epos in the 13th century before Christ. But before existed also versions of this epos from the king of Uruk and his friend Enkidu.

What did they write on and how was it stored so that losers could waste their time reading it

Try to read it and you will find out how strange you sound in my view to see the world. The textes of the bible are for sure much more easy able to be understood. Nevertheless I like Enkidu and the Gilgamesh epos, what doesn't mean I understand this way to live. But I also don't understand the way to live of the US-American weapon fetishists and the slavery of all US-Americans in context of criminal organsations as for example the NRA, which makes the whole USA to a victim of the drug "sword". Guns make no one free in the USA.

Yes, it makes so much sense for a German to look down on Americans.

It is as I said it here. You demonstrate very well with this words that your only argument is destruction and death any longer. You know nothing about Germans and Germany. You justify with your crude absurde racism only your own dead ears.

No, my post wasn't destructive. My post was sarcastic.

The USA had not any reason to begin a war against Germany - but you feel damned proud that you wan this war against your grandparents. That's sarcasm.

Your post - the post I responded to with sarcasm - was the destructive post.

Way to accuse me of what you did.

Dead ears.

Leave it to you to blame America instead of Germany for WWII.

I spoke not about world war 2. I spoke about one war. Worls war 1+2 are the same war for me. And now your nation is on the direct way into world war 3.

Again, Germans literally have zero room to talk about starting wars.

I'm only pretty sure American citizens owning guns won't start a war. Stop being a drama queen and get the sand out of your vagina. Mind your own business. Germans don't get a say on American citizens owning guns.

I don't have any idea how to translate your last sentence here - after the nonsense you said before - into the German language.

It means stop being overly emotional and start using your brain.

Frankenstein, this helps not to translate the strange sentence "Germans don't get a say on American citizens owning guns". Makes the structure of sentence in the English language any sense? It's by the way worse enough that the mad man Donald Trump created irreversible damages in the world economy without asking and/or listening to anyone else except his US-American narcissism. The attitude of US-Americans first to destroy and afterwards to ask what it was is more than only mad.

 

[zaangalewa]

You know nothing about Germans and Germany. You justify with your crude absurde racism only your own dead ears.

I know exactly as much about Germany as you do about America, you hypocritical fool.

And now the same sentence in German please. Not even the ambassadors of the USA in Germany speak German any longer - asides that there is no ambassador of the USA in Germany any longer - what's perhaps better than to have to hear the totally absurde and idiotic things, which your ambassadors say.

Apparently you misunderstood my post. Germans have about as much business interjecting themselves in American issues as Americans have in interjecting themselves in German issues. Now do you understand?

I don't like to reduce the USA to 1/3 of its size and power and murder many innocent US-Americans only on reason you think it would be fair to do so.

As for my comment about your hypocrisy that should have been self evident but if it wasn't let me know and I will find a ten year old to explain it to you.

I guess you should slowly start to read and to try to understand what I said to you. You will not find what I think in your own "allknowing ignorance".

Oh, I am understanding you perfectly. You are against peaceable law abiding citizens owning firearms. So were the Nazi's.

Good grief. You have absolutelly not any idea what you speak about. Nazis were exactly like the agressive racist weapon fetishists of the USA. This extremist right wingers and the extremist Commie left wingers killed in their street fights the democracy of Weimar. In the end the people were happy that one of this idiots wan, because they thought the disasters will stop. But the disasters did not stop.

Germans don't have a seat at this discussion.

Because you don't like to hear the truth that the weapone fetishism of the people in the USA is a damned ugly thing?

It's not your country.

Not really. About 40% of all US-Americans have a German ancestor. And you would be astonished if you would know how many institutions of the USA were founded from Germans. England was by the way also founded from Germans. France too. Same with Netherland, Switzerland and others. And Germans have by the way also Roman ancestors (Italians).

Your people have fucked up the world enough already.

Germany never had done anything bad to the USA. The USA is somehow like a kind of granchild for us. We are astonishing patient with the USA.

 

[ding]

In ~ 1935 Adolf enacted the NUREMBERG code which is not much more or less than the Canon Law enacted
by CONSTANTINE in the time that he was Emperor of the HOLEY roman empire. It include disarmament of all "enemies" which in Germany (and for Constantine) largely referred to jews. Adolf did not impose disarmament on christian german citizens---but I believe he insisted on registration of fire arms. The ban was supposed to include conquered nations too

And your point?

several points would be clear to all but the brainless----VERY IMPORTANT is the fact that disarming this or that population was NOTHING NEW in the "holy
roman empire" -----for the record---the THIRD REICH actually means THE THIRD HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE. I consider it a fascinating point that the NUREMBERG LAWS are nothing more than a recapitulation of the original laws of the holy roman empire. The Spartans disarmed the HELOTS---also
an oppressed underclass being "not greek"

Still not getting your point, dearie. What does that have to do with today?

 

[ding]

... What was the approximate date of the first epic poem?

Sîn-leqe-unnīnnī wrote down the last version of Gilgamesh epos in the 13th century before Christ. But before existed also versions of this epos from the king of Uruk and his friend Enkidu.

What did they write on and how was it stored so that losers could waste their time reading it

Try to read it and you will find out how strange you sound in my view to see the world. The textes of the bible are for sure much more easy able to be understood. Nevertheless I like Enkidu and the Gilgamesh epos, what doesn't mean I understand this way to live. But I also don't understand the way to live of the US-American weapon fetishists and the slavery of all US-Americans in context of criminal organsations as for example the NRA, which makes the whole USA to a victim of the drug "sword". Guns make no one free in the USA.

Yes, it makes so much sense for a German to look down on Americans.

It is as I said it here. You demonstrate very well with this words that your only argument is destruction and death any longer. You know nothing about Germans and Germany. You justify with your crude absurde racism only your own dead ears.

No, my post wasn't destructive. My post was sarcastic.

The USA had not any reason to begin a war against Germany - but you feel damned proud that you wan this war against your grandparents. That's sarcasm.

Your post - the post I responded to with sarcasm - was the destructive post.

Way to accuse me of what you did.

Dead ears.

Leave it to you to blame America instead of Germany for WWII.

I spoke not about world war 2. I spoke about one war. Worls war 1+2 are the same war for me. And now your nation is on the direct way into world war 3.

Again, Germans literally have zero room to talk about starting wars.

I'm only pretty sure American citizens owning guns won't start a war. Stop being a drama queen and get the sand out of your vagina. Mind your own business. Germans don't get a say on American citizens owning guns.

I don't have any idea how to translate your last sentence here - after the nonsense you said before - into the German language.

It means stop being overly emotional and start using your brain.

Frankenstein, this helps not to translate the strange sentence "Germans don't get a say on American citizens owning guns". Makes the structure of sentence in the English language any sense? It's by the way worse enough that the mad man Donald Trump created irreversible damages in the world economy without asking and/or listening to anyone else except his US-American narcissism. The attitude of US-Americans first to destroy and afterwards to ask what it was is more than only mad.

I can't help you. But I can totally understand why Germans might think that the attitude of US-Americans first to destroy and afterwards to ask what it was.

 

[ding]

You know nothing about Germans and Germany. You justify with your crude absurde racism only your own dead ears.

I know exactly as much about Germany as you do about America, you hypocritical fool.

And now the same sentence in German please. Not even the ambassadors of the USA in Germany speak German any longer - asides that there is no ambassador of the USA in Germany any longer - what's perhaps better than to have to hear the totally absurde and idiotic things, which your ambassadors say.

Apparently you misunderstood my post. Germans have about as much business interjecting themselves in American issues as Americans have in interjecting themselves in German issues. Now do you understand?

I don't like to reduce the USA to 1/3 of its size and power and murder many innocent US-Americans only on reason you think it would be fair to do so.

As for my comment about your hypocrisy that should have been self evident but if it wasn't let me know and I will find a ten year old to explain it to you.

I guess you should slowly start to read and to try to understand what I said to you. You will not find what I think in your own "allknowing ignorance".

Oh, I am understanding you perfectly. You are against peaceable law abiding citizens owning firearms. So were the Nazi's.

Good grief. Younahvbe absliteolyn oit aqny ide whatbyiunaoke abgaort. Nazis were exacxtly like the agressive weapon fetishists of the USA. This ro0ght wonger adn teh commie left wingers kileldintheir street fight the democracy of Weimar. IN then end the nepoe were hapey thatineof tehirteosw wan. ebcaeu tehy thousght the distattert will stop. But it did not stop.

Germans don't have a seat at this discussion.

Because you don't like to hear the truth that the weapone fetishism of the people in the USA is a damned ugly thing?

It's not your country.

Not really. About 40% of all US-Americans have a German ancestor. And you would be astonished if you would know how many institutions of the USA were founded from Germans. England was by the way also founded from Germans. France too. Sa,me wtnNetdland and others. And Germans have by the way also Roman ancestors.

Your people have fucked up the world enough already.

Germany never had done anything bad to the USA. And the USA is somehow like a kind of granchild for us.

The Right to Bear Arms (i.e. the 2nd Amendment) was seen by our Founding Fathers as the last check against tyranny. They knew that the best line of defense against a standing army was an armed populace.

"If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government, and which against the usurpations of the national rulers, may be exerted with infinitely better prospect of success than against those of the rulers of an individual state. In a single state, if the persons intrusted with supreme power become usurpers, the different parcels, subdivisions, or districts of which it consists, having no distinct government in each, can take no regular measures for defense. The citizens must rush tumultuously to arms, without concert, without system, without resource; except in their courage and despair." - Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 28

"If circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people while there is a large body of citizens, little, if at all, inferior to them in discipline and the use of arms, who stand ready to defend their own rights and those of their fellow-citizens. This appears to me the only substitute that can be devised for a standing army, and the best possible security against it, if it should exist." - Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 28

The people who wish to preserve liberty and are capable of bearing arms are the militia.

“A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves…and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms… "To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them." - Richard Henry Lee, Federal Farmer No. 18, January 25, 1788

The Founding Fathers believed that peaceable law abiding citizens should never have their right to bear arms be infringed upon.

"And that the said Constitution be never construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the Press, or the rights of Conscience; or to prevent the people of the United States, WHO ARE PEACEABLE CITIZENS, from keeping their own arms; …" Samuel Adams quoted in the Philadelphia Independent Gazetteer, August 20, 1789, "Propositions submitted to the Convention of this State"

The fundamental purpose of the militia is to serve as a check upon a standing army, the words “well regulated” referred to the necessity that the armed citizens making up the militia have the level of equipment and training necessary to be an effective and formidable check upon the national government’s standing army.

"I ask who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers." - George Mason, Address to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 4, 1788

"Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops." - Noah Webster, An Examination of the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution, October 10, 1787

"The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country." - James Madison, I Annals of Congress 434, June 8, 1789

“A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves…and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms… "To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them." - Richard Henry Lee, Federal Farmer No. 18, January 25, 1788

Well regulated does not mean regulations. When the Constitution specifies regulations it specifically states who and what is being regulated. The phrase "well-regulated" was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order. Something that was well-regulated was calibrated correctly, functioning as expected. The fundamental purpose of the militia was to serve as a check upon a standing army, the words “well regulated” referred to the necessity that the armed citizens making up the militia have the necessary equipment and training necessary to be an effective and formidable check upon the national government’s standing army. Establishing government oversight of the people's arms was not only not the intent in using the phrase in the 2nd amendment, it was precisely to render the government powerless to do so that the founders wrote it.

 

[zaangalewa]

In ~ 1935 Adolf enacted the NUREMBERG code which is not much more or less than the Canon Law enacted
by CONSTANTINE in the time that he was Emperor of the HOLEY roman empire. It include disarmament of all "enemies" which in Germany (and for Constantine) largely referred to jews. Adolf did not impose disarmament on christian german citizens---but I believe he insisted on registration of fire arms. The ban was supposed to include conquered nations too

And your point?

several points would be clear to all but the brainless----VERY IMPORTANT is the fact that disarming this or that population was NOTHING NEW in the "holy
roman empire" -----for the record---the THIRD REICH actually means THE THIRD HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE.

The Holy Roman Empire of German (=united) Nation was not a nation state. It was founde in 800 and ended in 1806. Afterwards existed no empire any longer. The "empire" which was founded in 1870 in Versailles was not reaqlly a German emapiurre as it is often called - it was a Prussian empire, the Prussain overtook Germany with their militaristic structure. The Austrian empire for example was excluded from this Germany - and many other German traibes or nartion were seen from Berlin only as "colonies of Prussia".

Hitler used in his propagda the words "third empire" instead of "republic of Weimar" because he made clear the time for democracies is over - but he made nothing to reorganize in Germany anythin in sense of the holy empire. The Nazis had nothing to do with the Christian religion nor with Christains valeus. They were a military dictatorship.

I consider it a fascinating point that the NUREMBERG LAWS are nothing more than a recapitulation of the original laws of the holy roman empire. The Spartans disarmed the HELOTS---also an oppressed underclass being "not greek

The Nurnberg laws were modern racists laws comparable with the racist laws in the USA. The antisemitism of the Nazis had biological, darwinstsic reasons. Nothing what the Nazis did do had to do with the holy empire. The holy empire was not racistic - the holy empire was a elitarian society. Everyone was born in functions and had a speciel place in the society with special rules. That's absolutelly not comparable with the 1000 years empire of the Nazis from 1933-1945.

 

[zaangalewa]

... What was the approximate date of the first epic poem?

Sîn-leqe-unnīnnī wrote down the last version of Gilgamesh epos in the 13th century before Christ. But before existed also versions of this epos from the king of Uruk and his friend Enkidu.

What did they write on and how was it stored so that losers could waste their time reading it

Try to read it and you will find out how strange you sound in my view to see the world. The textes of the bible are for sure much more easy able to be understood. Nevertheless I like Enkidu and the Gilgamesh epos, what doesn't mean I understand this way to live. But I also don't understand the way to live of the US-American weapon fetishists and the slavery of all US-Americans in context of criminal organsations as for example the NRA, which makes the whole USA to a victim of the drug "sword". Guns make no one free in the USA.

Yes, it makes so much sense for a German to look down on Americans.

It is as I said it here. You demonstrate very well with this words that your only argument is destruction and death any longer. You know nothing about Germans and Germany. You justify with your crude absurde racism only your own dead ears.

No, my post wasn't destructive. My post was sarcastic.

The USA had not any reason to begin a war against Germany - but you feel damned proud that you wan this war against your grandparents. That's sarcasm.

Your post - the post I responded to with sarcasm - was the destructive post.

Way to accuse me of what you did.

Dead ears.

Leave it to you to blame America instead of Germany for WWII.

I spoke not about world war 2. I spoke about one war. Worls war 1+2 are the same war for me. And now your nation is on the direct way into world war 3.

Again, Germans literally have zero room to talk about starting wars.

I'm only pretty sure American citizens owning guns won't start a war. Stop being a drama queen and get the sand out of your vagina. Mind your own business. Germans don't get a say on American citizens owning guns.

I don't have any idea how to translate your last sentence here - after the nonsense you said before - into the German language.

It means stop being overly emotional and start using your brain.

Frankenstein, this helps not to translate the strange sentence "Germans don't get a say on American citizens owning guns". Makes the structure of sentence in the English language any sense? It's by the way worse enough that the mad man Donald Trump created irreversible damages in the world economy without asking and/or listening to anyone else except his US-American narcissism. The attitude of US-Americans first to destroy and afterwards to ask what it was is more than only mad.

I can't help you. But I can totally understand why Germans might think that the attitude of US-Americans first to destroy and afterwards to ask what it was.

This sentence is not complete. Complete it please.

 

[ding]

... What was the approximate date of the first epic poem?

Sîn-leqe-unnīnnī wrote down the last version of Gilgamesh epos in the 13th century before Christ. But before existed also versions of this epos from the king of Uruk and his friend Enkidu.

What did they write on and how was it stored so that losers could waste their time reading it

Try to read it and you will find out how strange you sound in my view to see the world. The textes of the bible are for sure much more easy able to be understood. Nevertheless I like Enkidu and the Gilgamesh epos, what doesn't mean I understand this way to live. But I also don't understand the way to live of the US-American weapon fetishists and the slavery of all US-Americans in context of criminal organsations as for example the NRA, which makes the whole USA to a victim of the drug "sword". Guns make no one free in the USA.

Yes, it makes so much sense for a German to look down on Americans.

It is as I said it here. You demonstrate very well with this words that your only argument is destruction and death any longer. You know nothing about Germans and Germany. You justify with your crude absurde racism only your own dead ears.

No, my post wasn't destructive. My post was sarcastic.

The USA had not any reason to begin a war against Germany - but you feel damned proud that you wan this war against your grandparents. That's sarcasm.

Your post - the post I responded to with sarcasm - was the destructive post.

Way to accuse me of what you did.

Dead ears.

Leave it to you to blame America instead of Germany for WWII.

I spoke not about world war 2. I spoke about one war. Worls war 1+2 are the same war for me. And now your nation is on the direct way into world war 3.

Again, Germans literally have zero room to talk about starting wars.

I'm only pretty sure American citizens owning guns won't start a war. Stop being a drama queen and get the sand out of your vagina. Mind your own business. Germans don't get a say on American citizens owning guns.

I don't have any idea how to translate your last sentence here - after the nonsense you said before - into the German language.

It means stop being overly emotional and start using your brain.

Frankenstein, this helps not to translate the strange sentence "Germans don't get a say on American citizens owning guns". Makes the structure of sentence in the English language any sense? It's by the way worse enough that the mad man Donald Trump created irreversible damages in the world economy without asking and/or listening to anyone else except his US-American narcissism. The attitude of US-Americans first to destroy and afterwards to ask what it was is more than only mad.

I can't help you. But I can totally understand why Germans might think that the attitude of US-Americans first to destroy and afterwards to ask what it was.

This sentence is not complete. Complete it please.

No wonder... it was copied from one of your posts.

 

[irosie91]

In ~ 1935 Adolf enacted the NUREMBERG code which is not much more or less than the Canon Law enacted
by CONSTANTINE in the time that he was Emperor of the HOLEY roman empire. It include disarmament of all "enemies" which in Germany (and for Constantine) largely referred to jews. Adolf did not impose disarmament on christian german citizens---but I believe he insisted on registration of fire arms. The ban was supposed to include conquered nations too

And your point?

several points would be clear to all but the brainless----VERY IMPORTANT is the fact that disarming this or that population was NOTHING NEW in the "holy
roman empire" -----for the record---the THIRD REICH actually means THE THIRD HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE.

The Holy Roman Empire of German (=united) Nation was not a nation state. It was founde in 800 and ended in 1806. Afterwards existed no empire any longer. The "empire" which was founded in 1870 in Versailles was not reaqlly a German emapiurre as it is often called - it was a Prussian empire, the Prussain overtook Germany with their militaristic structure. The Austrian empire for example was excluded from this Germany - and many other German traibes or nartion were seen from Berlin only as "colonies of Prussia".

Hitler used in his propagda the words "third empire" instead of "republic of Weimar" because he made clear the time for democracies is over - but he made nothing to reorganize in Germany anythin in sense of the holy empire. The Nazis had nothing to do with the Christian religion nor with Christains valeus. They were a military dictatorship.

I consider it a fascinating point that the NUREMBERG LAWS are nothing more than a recapitulation of the original laws of the holy roman empire. The Spartans disarmed the HELOTS---also an oppressed underclass being "not greek

The Nurnberg laws were modern racists laws comparable with the racist laws in the USA. The antisemitism of the Nazis had biological, darwinstsic reasons. Nothing what the Nazis did do had to do with the holy empire. The holy empire was not racistic - the holy empire was a elitarian society. Everyone was born in functions and had a speciel place in the society with special rules. That's absolutelly not comparable with the 1000 years empire of the Nazis from 1933-1945.

you are playing with semantics. Whatever the composition of the REICHS (I should add----that
I am descended from persons of the SECOND
REICH ----ie jews of the Austria-Hungarian EMPIRE------so I know what the REICH LAWS that fell on the heads of Jews were in DA REICH The REICHS involved ever shifting borders and appellations and
treaties and power holders. However----the RACIST CANON LAWS were carried thru all the way from
the EMPEROR OF THE HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE---
CONSTANTINE thru the last EMPEROR of the third
reich, to wit adolf-----the NUREMBERG LAWs-- and included not only complete disarmament but also DISTINCTIVE MARKINGS ON CLOTHES even down to the color YELLOW Of course you did not learn about it in Sunday School. But the victims knew.
Interestingly-----the makers of Shariah law APED
the filth. Denying these facts is about as silly as denying JIM CROW laws
.

 

[ding]

you are playing with semantics.

Of course, he's a troll.

 

[esalla]

... What was the approximate date of the first epic poem?

Sîn-leqe-unnīnnī wrote down the last version of Gilgamesh epos in the 13th century before Christ. But before existed also versions of this epos from the king of Uruk and his friend Enkidu.

What did they write on and how was it stored so that losers could waste their time reading it

Try to read it and you will find out how strange you sound in my view to see the world. The textes of the bible are for sure much more easy able to be understood. Nevertheless I like Enkidu and the Gilgamesh epos, what doesn't mean I understand this way to live. But I also don't understand the way to live of the US-American weapon fetishists and the slavery of all US-Americans in context of criminal organsations as for example the NRA, which makes the whole USA to a victim of the drug "sword". Guns make no one free in the USA.

Yes, it makes so much sense for a German to look down on Americans.

It is as I said it here. You demonstrate very well with this words that your only argument is destruction and death any longer. You know nothing about Germans and Germany. You justify with your crude absurde racism only your own dead ears.

No, my post wasn't destructive. My post was sarcastic.

The USA had not any reason to begin a war against Germany - but you feel damned proud that you wan this war against your grandparents. That's sarcasm.

Your post - the post I responded to with sarcasm - was the destructive post.

Way to accuse me of what you did.

Dead ears.

Leave it to you to blame America instead of Germany for WWII.

I spoke not about world war 2. I spoke about one war. Worls war 1+2 are the same war for me. And now your nation is on the direct way into world war 3.

Again, Germans literally have zero room to talk about starting wars.

I'm only pretty sure American citizens owning guns won't start a war. Stop being a drama queen and get the sand out of your vagina. Mind your own business. Germans don't get a say on American citizens owning guns.

I don't have any idea how to translate your last sentence here - after the nonsense you said before - into the German language.

It means stop being overly emotional and start using your brain.

Frankenstein, this helps not to translate the strange sentence "Germans don't get a say on American citizens owning guns". Makes the structure of sentence in the English language any sense? It's by the way worse enough that the mad man Donald Trump created irreversible damages in the world economy without asking and/or listening to anyone else except his US-American narcissism. The attitude of US-Americans first to destroy and afterwards to ask what it was is more than only mad.

Donald Trump is not in charge of the World economy you Nazi shit

 

[esalla]

you are playing with semantics.

Of course, he's a troll.

And you are the genius solving all the Worlds problems in your schizophrenic mind

 

[ding]

you are playing with semantics.

Of course, he's a troll.

And you are the genius solving all the Worlds problems in your schizophrenic mind

Nope. Never claimed that. Don't know where you would get such a silly idea from.

 

[irosie91]

you are playing with semantics.

Of course, he's a troll.

And you are the genius solving all the Worlds problems in your schizophrenic mind

Nope. Never claimed that. Don't know where you would get such a silly idea from.

Esalla it is impossible to talk a psychotic OUT of his
delusions

 

[ding]

you are playing with semantics.

Of course, he's a troll.

And you are the genius solving all the Worlds problems in your schizophrenic mind

Nope. Never claimed that. Don't know where you would get such a silly idea from.

Esalla it is impossible to talk a psychotic OUT of his
delusions

Did you mean to reply to me?

 

[irosie91]

you are playing with semantics.

Of course, he's a troll.

And you are the genius solving all the Worlds problems in your schizophrenic mind

Nope. Never claimed that. Don't know where you would get such a silly idea from.

Esalla it is impossible to talk a psychotic OUT of his
delusions

Did you mean to reply to me?

I addressed my comment to Esalla.

 

[ding]

you are playing with semantics.

Of course, he's a troll.

And you are the genius solving all the Worlds problems in your schizophrenic mind

Nope. Never claimed that. Don't know where you would get such a silly idea from.

Esalla it is impossible to talk a psychotic OUT of his
delusions

Did you mean to reply to me?

I addressed my comment to Esalla.

Your post was to me. So your comment was addressed to me.

I had such high hopes for you.

 

[esalla]

you are playing with semantics.

Of course, he's a troll.

And you are the genius solving all the Worlds problems in your schizophrenic mind

Nope. Never claimed that. Don't know where you would get such a silly idea from.

You claim to have the answers to all the worlds problems every time you post here, the only person who does not see that is you

 

[esalla]

you are playing with semantics.

Of course, he's a troll.

And you are the genius solving all the Worlds problems in your schizophrenic mind

Nope. Never claimed that. Don't know where you would get such a silly idea from.

Esalla it is impossible to talk a psychotic OUT of his
delusions

Yea I know but he is funny