How Ginny Thomas Proves Judge Jackson Can't Be Trusted On The Supreme Court

[Biff_Poindexter]

Ginni Thomas urged Trumpâs chief of staff to overturn election results

In texts to Mark Meadows, the wife of supreme court justice Clarence Thomas pushed Trump’s ‘big lie’

www.theguardian.com

"In one of 29 messages seen by the news outlets, Thomas wrote to Mark Meadows on 10 November: “Help This Great President stand firm, Mark!!! … You are the leader, with him, who is standing for America’s constitutional governance at the precipice. The majority knows Biden and the Left is attempting the greatest Heist of our History.” “This is a fight of good versus evil,” Meadows wrote in a 24 November message. “Evil always looks like the victor until the King of Kings triumphs. The text messages – 21 of which are from Thomas and eight from Meadows – contain references to conspiracy theories. Thomas, for instance, highlighted a claim popular among QAnon followers that the president had watermarked certain ballots as a means of identifying fraud.

She also suggested the Bidens were behind supposed fraud. “Biden crime family & ballot fraud co-conspirators … are being arrested & detained for ballot fraud right now & over coming days, & will be living in barges off GITMO to face military tribunals for sedition,” she wrote. When the supreme court rejected Trump challenges over the election in February 2021, Clarence Thomas dissented, calling the decision “baffling”, the Post notes."

Ginny Thomas essentially proves why Jackson can't be trusted to sit on the highest court in the land. Everyone knows that Ginny is a staunch political activist and a crusader against evil forces..... but she knows not to ever involve her husband in her activism or try to encourage him to do something that would give off appearances of impropriety...and Clarence being the man of the house, would never allow a woman to have influence over him....He knows his wife is a bit nutty and he knows how to put her in her place if she acts up....

However, Jackson is not the leader of her household...her husband is....and we know about her husband's strong ties to Antifa and other racist anti-American organizations....do we honestly think she won't use her power as a Supreme Court justice to do what her husband tells her to do?? What will happen when Biden loses in 2024?? You know he will order Kamala to do what Pence should have done....do you think for a minute that Jackson's husband won't tell her to support Biden's effort to overturn the election?? She must be stopped....anyone who will assist a president in nullifying a legitimate Republican victory; should be arrested for treason.

 

[Mac1958]

This kind of thing is just another obvious illustration of how MAGA World™ pulled itself away from reality and has put our very electoral process on the edge of collapse by believing, following and enabling a profoundly damaged, hypersensitive, neurotic, unstable New York City billionaire.

That said, I don't see how her deeply disturbing texts are illegal or actionable. And her hubby isn't legally required to do (or NOT do) anything, no matter how insane this looks. Hell, into today's otherworldly post-reality environment, this is just another twig in the forest. Par for the course.

And speaking of him, it's interesting that his public disappearance coincides with this little news leak.

 

[Big Bend Texas]

Ginni Thomas urged Trumpâs chief of staff to overturn election results

In texts to Mark Meadows, the wife of supreme court justice Clarence Thomas pushed Trump’s ‘big lie’

www.theguardian.com

"In one of 29 messages seen by the news outlets, Thomas wrote to Mark Meadows on 10 November: “Help This Great President stand firm, Mark!!! … You are the leader, with him, who is standing for America’s constitutional governance at the precipice. The majority knows Biden and the Left is attempting the greatest Heist of our History.” “This is a fight of good versus evil,” Meadows wrote in a 24 November message. “Evil always looks like the victor until the King of Kings triumphs. The text messages – 21 of which are from Thomas and eight from Meadows – contain references to conspiracy theories. Thomas, for instance, highlighted a claim popular among QAnon followers that the president had watermarked certain ballots as a means of identifying fraud.

She also suggested the Bidens were behind supposed fraud. “Biden crime family & ballot fraud co-conspirators … are being arrested & detained for ballot fraud right now & over coming days, & will be living in barges off GITMO to face military tribunals for sedition,” she wrote. When the supreme court rejected Trump challenges over the election in February 2021, Clarence Thomas dissented, calling the decision “baffling”, the Post notes."

Ginny Thomas essentially proves why Jackson can't be trusted to sit on the highest court in the land. Everyone knows that Ginny is a staunch political activist and a crusader against evil forces..... but she knows not to ever involve her husband in her activism or try to encourage him to do something that would give off appearances of impropriety...and Clarence being the man of the house, would never allow a woman to have influence over him....He knows his wife is a bit nutty and he knows how to put her in her place if she acts up....

However, Jackson is not the leader of her household...her husband is....and we know about her husband's strong ties to Antifa and other racist anti-American organizations....do we honestly think she won't use her power as a Supreme Court justice to do what her husband tells her to do?? What will happen when Biden loses in 2024?? You know he will order Kamala to do what Pence should have done....do you think for a minute that Jackson's husband won't tell her to support Biden's effort to overturn the election?? She must be stopped....anyone who will assist a president in nullifying a legitimate Republican victory; should be arrested for treason.

Ok, this whole thing is more than just a bit nutty.

My first question would be the legitimacy of the supposed text messages. If they exist, there's no way either Thomas or Meadows would release them publicly so if this is true, someone has committed a crime.

Anyone willing to commit a crime to smear them cannot be trusted period so either this whole story is a fraud or someone needs to go to jail.

The bit about the man of the house schtick makes no sense at all.

She's a horribly unqualified candidate with one of the highest rates of being reversed on appeal in the entire federal judiciary, is soft on those trafficking in child porn, even apologizing to one offender because the law would not allow her to sentence him to less than three years, a man who as it turned out appeared before her multiple times later for reoffending while still in supervised custody at a halfway house.

Leave the crazy stuff out and just stick to the facts.

 

[wamose]

Democracy thrives in sunshine, but the way Brown was trying so hard not to answer questions or flat out refusing to answer them indicates that Brown will not serve our constitution or the American people in the least. She'll do whatever SHE wants. That's not the kind of person who belongs on the SC.

 

[Big Bend Texas]

Democracy thrives in sunshine, but the way Brown was trying so hard not to answer questions or flat out refusing to answer them indicates that Brown will not serve our constitution or the American people in the least. She'll do whatever SHE wants. That's not the kind of person who belongs on the SC.

Her only qualification seems to be avoiding straight answers.

Anyone that deceptive by nature has no place on the bench period much less a seat on the highest court in the land.

 

[Penelope]

Ginni Thomas urged Trumpâs chief of staff to overturn election results

In texts to Mark Meadows, the wife of supreme court justice Clarence Thomas pushed Trump’s ‘big lie’

www.theguardian.com

"In one of 29 messages seen by the news outlets, Thomas wrote to Mark Meadows on 10 November: “Help This Great President stand firm, Mark!!! … You are the leader, with him, who is standing for America’s constitutional governance at the precipice. The majority knows Biden and the Left is attempting the greatest Heist of our History.” “This is a fight of good versus evil,” Meadows wrote in a 24 November message. “Evil always looks like the victor until the King of Kings triumphs. The text messages – 21 of which are from Thomas and eight from Meadows – contain references to conspiracy theories. Thomas, for instance, highlighted a claim popular among QAnon followers that the president had watermarked certain ballots as a means of identifying fraud.

She also suggested the Bidens were behind supposed fraud. “Biden crime family & ballot fraud co-conspirators … are being arrested & detained for ballot fraud right now & over coming days, & will be living in barges off GITMO to face military tribunals for sedition,” she wrote. When the supreme court rejected Trump challenges over the election in February 2021, Clarence Thomas dissented, calling the decision “baffling”, the Post notes."

Ginny Thomas essentially proves why Jackson can't be trusted to sit on the highest court in the land. Everyone knows that Ginny is a staunch political activist and a crusader against evil forces..... but she knows not to ever involve her husband in her activism or try to encourage him to do something that would give off appearances of impropriety...and Clarence being the man of the house, would never allow a woman to have influence over him....He knows his wife is a bit nutty and he knows how to put her in her place if she acts up....

However, Jackson is not the leader of her household...her husband is....and we know about her husband's strong ties to Antifa and other racist anti-American organizations....do we honestly think she won't use her power as a Supreme Court justice to do what her husband tells her to do?? What will happen when Biden loses in 2024?? You know he will order Kamala to do what Pence should have done....do you think for a minute that Jackson's husband won't tell her to support Biden's effort to overturn the election?? She must be stopped....anyone who will assist a president in nullifying a legitimate Republican victory; should be arrested for treason.

Clarence Thomas should resign.

 

[Penelope]

Ok, this whole thing is more than just a bit nutty.

My first question would be the legitimacy of the supposed text messages. If they exist, there's no way either Thomas or Meadows would release them publicly so if this is true, someone has committed a crime.

Anyone willing to commit a crime to smear them cannot be trusted period so either this whole story is a fraud or someone needs to go to jail.

The bit about the man of the house schtick makes no sense at all.

She's a horribly unqualified candidate with one of the highest rates of being reversed on appeal in the entire federal judiciary, is soft on those trafficking in child porn, even apologizing to one offender because the law would not allow her to sentence him to less than three years, a man who as it turned out appeared before her multiple times later for reoffending while still in supervised custody at a halfway house.

Leave the crazy stuff out and just stick to the facts.

It was found out by the Jan 6th committee.

Meadows turned over thousands of text messages before he stopped cooperating with the committee. The texts have proven to hold a treasure trove of information about what was going on in the White House in the days leading up to the insurrection, and what people in Trump's orbit were thinking.
The text messages in the committee's possession are only part of the tranche of documents that Meadows provided to the committee during the short period of time he was cooperating with their investigation. They do not necessarily represent the sum total of communication between Thomas and Meadows during that period of time.

January 6 committee has text messages between Ginni Thomas and Mark Meadows

The House Select Committee investigating the January 6 riot has in its possession more than two dozen text messages, 29 in total, between former Trump White House chief of staff Mark Meadows and Virginia "Ginni" Thomas, a conservative activist and the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence...

www.cnn.com

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Her only qualification seems to be avoiding straight answers.

Anyone that deceptive by nature has no place on the bench period much less a seat on the highest court in the land.

So why did the same folks voting against her now; voted for her last year??

Were they just too dumb to know all of the stuff they are suddenly outraged about now??

Or do they know their base voters are morons and will twist themselves into pretzels to justify how full of shit you all are?

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Ok, this whole thing is more than just a bit nutty.

My first question would be the legitimacy of the supposed text messages. If they exist, there's no way either Thomas or Meadows would release them publicly so if this is true, someone has committed a crime.

Anyone willing to commit a crime to smear them cannot be trusted period so either this whole story is a fraud or someone needs to go to jail.

The bit about the man of the house schtick makes no sense at all.

She's a horribly unqualified candidate with one of the highest rates of being reversed on appeal in the entire federal judiciary, is soft on those trafficking in child porn, even apologizing to one offender because the law would not allow her to sentence him to less than three years, a man who as it turned out appeared before her multiple times later for reoffending while still in supervised custody at a halfway house.

Leave the crazy stuff out and just stick to the facts.

And yes....the texts are real..and have been confirmed by Meadows' own lawyer...

"Meadows’ lawyer, George Terwilliger III, acknowledged the messages’ existence to the Post but said they did not raise “legal issues”

So now you are saying anyone who released the texts committed a crime....but the folks who were actually pushing for overturning a fucking election, those people are just A-OK??

 

[Tommy Tainant]

The interrogation of this lady was a shameful episode. That idiiot Cruz holding up a chiildrens book was one of the most racist things I have ever seen.
There is no way that a white man would get asked a question like that. It was a jaw dropping moment and even more shocking is that they seemed blissfully unaware of what they ere doing.
Perhaps the vetting should be taken away from partisans and given to top legal minds ?.

 

[candycorn]

Ginni Thomas urged Trumpâs chief of staff to overturn election results

In texts to Mark Meadows, the wife of supreme court justice Clarence Thomas pushed Trump’s ‘big lie’

www.theguardian.com

"In one of 29 messages seen by the news outlets, Thomas wrote to Mark Meadows on 10 November: “Help This Great President stand firm, Mark!!! … You are the leader, with him, who is standing for America’s constitutional governance at the precipice. The majority knows Biden and the Left is attempting the greatest Heist of our History.” “This is a fight of good versus evil,” Meadows wrote in a 24 November message. “Evil always looks like the victor until the King of Kings triumphs. The text messages – 21 of which are from Thomas and eight from Meadows – contain references to conspiracy theories. Thomas, for instance, highlighted a claim popular among QAnon followers that the president had watermarked certain ballots as a means of identifying fraud.

She also suggested the Bidens were behind supposed fraud. “Biden crime family & ballot fraud co-conspirators … are being arrested & detained for ballot fraud right now & over coming days, & will be living in barges off GITMO to face military tribunals for sedition,” she wrote. When the supreme court rejected Trump challenges over the election in February 2021, Clarence Thomas dissented, calling the decision “baffling”, the Post notes."

Ginny Thomas essentially proves why Jackson can't be trusted to sit on the highest court in the land. Everyone knows that Ginny is a staunch political activist and a crusader against evil forces..... but she knows not to ever involve her husband in her activism or try to encourage him to do something that would give off appearances of impropriety...and Clarence being the man of the house, would never allow a woman to have influence over him....He knows his wife is a bit nutty and he knows how to put her in her place if she acts up....

However, Jackson is not the leader of her household...her husband is....and we know about her husband's strong ties to Antifa and other racist anti-American organizations....do we honestly think she won't use her power as a Supreme Court justice to do what her husband tells her to do?? What will happen when Biden loses in 2024?? You know he will order Kamala to do what Pence should have done....do you think for a minute that Jackson's husband won't tell her to support Biden's effort to overturn the election?? She must be stopped....anyone who will assist a president in nullifying a legitimate Republican victory; should be arrested for treason.

Thats a pretty polluted stream of consciousness.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

The interrogation of this lady was a shameful episode. That idiiot Cruz holding up a chiildrens book was one of the most racist things I have ever seen.
There is no way that a white man would get asked a question like that. It was a jaw dropping moment and even more shocking is that they seemed blissfully unaware of what they ere doing.
Perhaps the vetting should be taken away from partisans and given to top legal minds ?.

Well, there was a time where there were no confirmation hearings at all....but it was cool tho because it was only Christian white men allowed on the court.....so obviously they belonged....

The discriminatory history of the Senate confirmation process that started when a Jewish person was first nominated for the Supreme Court in 1916

"The nastiness is the same," one historian told Insider, comparing the treatment of Ketanji Brown Jackson to the first Senate confirmation hearing in 1916 when a Jewish man, Justice Louis Brandeis, was nominated to serve on the Supreme Court.

www.businessinsider.com

It wasn't until that shifty Jew, Justice Brandeis was nominated that they started having confirmation hearings.....But you know, just me knowing the history of all of this and telling others about it is CRT and stuff...

 

[Harpy Eagle]

She's a horribly unqualified candidate with one of the highest rates of being reversed on appeal in the entire federal judiciary,

Can you give us her reversal rates and then those of other members of the federal judiciary?

Thanks in advance.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Her only qualification seems to be avoiding straight answers.

Anyone that deceptive by nature has no place on the bench period much less a seat on the highest court in the land.

She was no better or worse at answering the questions than the last 3 justices put on the court

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

She was no better or worse at answering the questions than the last 3 justices put on the court

For the Republicans who want to pretend Judge Jackson isn't well-versed in the Constitution and jurisprudence....

 

[lantern2814]

Clarence Thomas should resign.

Racist ^^^^

 

[lantern2814]

For the Republicans who want to pretend Judge Jackson isn't well-versed in the Constitution and jurisprudence....

And Jackson has no idea what the Dred Scott case was about. Checkmate.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Well, there was a time where there were no confirmation hearings at all....but it was cool tho because it was only Christian white men allowed on the court.....so obviously they belonged....

The discriminatory history of the Senate confirmation process that started when a Jewish person was first nominated for the Supreme Court in 1916

"The nastiness is the same," one historian told Insider, comparing the treatment of Ketanji Brown Jackson to the first Senate confirmation hearing in 1916 when a Jewish man, Justice Louis Brandeis, was nominated to serve on the Supreme Court.

www.businessinsider.com

It wasn't until that shifty Jew, Justice Brandeis was nominated that they started having confirmation hearings.....But you know, just me knowing the history of all of this and telling others about it is CRT and stuff...

I guess its important that the right sort of darkie gets the job.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

And Jackson has no idea what the Dred Scott case was about. Checkmate.

If you delude yourself into believing that, so be it...

However, how can she both be one of the "purveyors of CRT" and also know nothing about Dred Scott?

Even tho Dred Scott perfectly illustrates the point CRT makes about the history of jurisprudence in America

 

[Polishprince]

Clarence Thomas should resign.

And I'm sure he will- right after President Trump retakes the throne in 2025.

Allowing a doofus like Brandon to replace him with an Extremist would be a catastrophe. The Democrats have ZERO respect for maintaining political balance on the court.