How does a child live with this?

[OnePercenter]

Not everyone is intelligent enough to drive a care either but that's just something we have to live with in a free society.

That's why there is liability insurance and laws requiring insurance. Since you agree that 'Not everyone is intelligent'; should gun owners be required to carry insurance?

 

[S.J.]

Not everyone is intelligent enough to drive a care either but that's just something we have to live with in a free society.

That's why there is liability insurance and laws requiring insurance. Since you agree that 'Not everyone is intelligent'; should gun owners be required to carry insurance?

No, because self defense is a right, not a privilege, like driving.

 

[Pogo]

That's right, make fun of a tragedy, funny guy. Are you proud of yourself?

It's the stupidity that caused the tragedy.

That's true, and it's stupidity that caused pogo to laugh about it.

There's nothing "laughable" about this. Perhaps you and RGS could get a package deal on that reading course.

 

[OnePercenter]

No, because self defense is a right, not a privilege, like driving.

You're the one that tied gun ownership with driving.

 

[OnePercenter]

That's right, make fun of a tragedy, funny guy. Are you proud of yourself?

It's the stupidity that caused the tragedy.

That's true, and it's stupidity that caused pogo to laugh about it.

There's nothing "laughable" about this. Perhaps you and RGS could get a package deal on that reading course.

The stupidity is laughable.

 

[S.J.]

No, because self defense is a right, not a privilege, like driving.

You're the one that tied gun ownership with driving.

No I didn't, idiot. Go back and read it again. Damn, you're stupid!

That's right, make fun of a tragedy, funny guy. Are you proud of yourself?

It's the stupidity that caused the tragedy.

That's true, and it's stupidity that caused pogo to laugh about it.

There's nothing "laughable" about this. Perhaps you and RGS could get a package deal on that reading course.

You were making light of it, you POS. Own up to your disgusting behavior.

 

[OnePercenter]

No, because self defense is a right, not a privilege, like driving.

You're the one that tied gun ownership with driving.

No I didn't, idiot. Go back and read it again. Damn, you're stupid!

That's right, make fun of a tragedy, funny guy. Are you proud of yourself?

It's the stupidity that caused the tragedy.

That's true, and it's stupidity that caused pogo to laugh about it.

There's nothing "laughable" about this. Perhaps you and RGS could get a package deal on that reading course.

You were making light of it, you POS. Own up to your disgusting behavior.

How does a child live with this?

 

[S.J.]

No, because self defense is a right, not a privilege, like driving.

You're the one that tied gun ownership with driving.

No I didn't, idiot. Go back and read it again. Damn, you're stupid!

That's right, make fun of a tragedy, funny guy. Are you proud of yourself?

It's the stupidity that caused the tragedy.

That's true, and it's stupidity that caused pogo to laugh about it.

There's nothing "laughable" about this. Perhaps you and RGS could get a package deal on that reading course.

You were making light of it, you POS. Own up to your disgusting behavior.

How does a child live with this?

As the post clearly shows, I wasn't saying they are the same thing, stupid. You're not too good at reading comprehension, are you?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

The child won't have to "live with it" as the child won't have any memory of it. It is a sad, tragic, and ultimately preventable incident that the anti gun drones will flock to in an effort to create outrage and discord all in a vain attempt to drum up support for their failed gun grabbing attempts.

The facts are that you are far more likely to die from almost anything more than a gun. The gun grabbers don't try and deal with those issues, they always go after the gun because so long as people are armed they can't force their collectivist nightmare down the throats of the people and that just pisses them off.

Oh come ON...

A two-year old toddler, who's by definition dependent on and bonded with its mother, isn't going to have questions about where she went? Certainly it's too young to comprehend what exactly went down (besides her). That isn't the point. The question of "guilt" didn't even occur to me -- of course it's not the child's fault. Not the point. That will have to be explained, and not explaining it or lying about it is probably worse than never addressing it. Still not the point.

The point is that child is going to have to wonder what kind of fucked up world has it been brought into that walks around with a loaded gun in its purse. As should we all.

You gun fetishists can see only down the barrel of your own fetish object. Your ultimate concern seems to be, "oh that's a tragedy, but the question is -- how is this gonna affect Numero Uno?"

And again I repeat, you don't like our rights? Change the Constitution.

Wanna quote where I said jack shit about anyone's "rights"?

Didn't think so.

Go git chew a remedial reading course.

And of course you support the 2nd Amendment, the right to be armed openly and concealed carry.

 

[westwall]

The child won't have to "live with it" as the child won't have any memory of it. It is a sad, tragic, and ultimately preventable incident that the anti gun drones will flock to in an effort to create outrage and discord all in a vain attempt to drum up support for their failed gun grabbing attempts.

The facts are that you are far more likely to die from almost anything more than a gun. The gun grabbers don't try and deal with those issues, they always go after the gun because so long as people are armed they can't force their collectivist nightmare down the throats of the people and that just pisses them off.

Oh come ON...

A two-year old toddler, who's by definition dependent on and bonded with its mother, isn't going to have questions about where she went? Certainly it's too young to comprehend what exactly went down (besides her). That isn't the point. The question of "guilt" didn't even occur to me -- of course it's not the child's fault. Not the point. That will have to be explained, and not explaining it or lying about it is probably worse than never addressing it. Still not the point.

The point is that child is going to have to wonder what kind of fucked up world has it been brought into that walks around with a loaded gun in its purse. As should we all.

You gun fetishists can see only down the barrel of your own fetish object. Your ultimate concern seems to be, "oh that's a tragedy, but the question is -- how is this gonna affect Numero Uno?"

No, she won't. After a year has passed she will no longer have a memory of her. When she's older and she finds out what happened, then she might have feelings. But not until then.

 

[Indofred]

It was exactly that....an accident.....

No, it was a moron with a gun, but without a clue.
Actually, her death turns out to be a good thing.
She appears to have worked in the nuclear industry; imaging the careless bitch making a mistake at work.

 

[Carla_Danger]

The child won't have to "live with it" as the child won't have any memory of it. It is a sad, tragic, and ultimately preventable incident that the anti gun drones will flock to in an effort to create outrage and discord all in a vain attempt to drum up support for their failed gun grabbing attempts.

The facts are that you are far more likely to die from almost anything more than a gun. The gun grabbers don't try and deal with those issues, they always go after the gun because so long as people are armed they can't force their collectivist nightmare down the throats of the people and that just pisses them off.

Oh come ON...

A two-year old toddler, who's by definition dependent on and bonded with its mother, isn't going to have questions about where she went? Certainly it's too young to comprehend what exactly went down (besides her). That isn't the point. The question of "guilt" didn't even occur to me -- of course it's not the child's fault. Not the point. That will have to be explained, and not explaining it or lying about it is probably worse than never addressing it. Still not the point.

The point is that child is going to have to wonder what kind of fucked up world has it been brought into that walks around with a loaded gun in its purse. As should we all.

You gun fetishists can see only down the barrel of your own fetish object. Your ultimate concern seems to be, "oh that's a tragedy, but the question is -- how is this gonna affect Numero Uno?"

No, she won't. After a year has passed she will no longer have a memory of her. When she's older and she finds out what happened, then she might have feelings. But not until then.

That's ridiculous. A toddler losing a parent is a very traumatic event, on so many levels.

 

[westwall]

The child won't have to "live with it" as the child won't have any memory of it. It is a sad, tragic, and ultimately preventable incident that the anti gun drones will flock to in an effort to create outrage and discord all in a vain attempt to drum up support for their failed gun grabbing attempts.

The facts are that you are far more likely to die from almost anything more than a gun. The gun grabbers don't try and deal with those issues, they always go after the gun because so long as people are armed they can't force their collectivist nightmare down the throats of the people and that just pisses them off.

Oh come ON...

A two-year old toddler, who's by definition dependent on and bonded with its mother, isn't going to have questions about where she went? Certainly it's too young to comprehend what exactly went down (besides her). That isn't the point. The question of "guilt" didn't even occur to me -- of course it's not the child's fault. Not the point. That will have to be explained, and not explaining it or lying about it is probably worse than never addressing it. Still not the point.

The point is that child is going to have to wonder what kind of fucked up world has it been brought into that walks around with a loaded gun in its purse. As should we all.

You gun fetishists can see only down the barrel of your own fetish object. Your ultimate concern seems to be, "oh that's a tragedy, but the question is -- how is this gonna affect Numero Uno?"

No, she won't. After a year has passed she will no longer have a memory of her. When she's older and she finds out what happened, then she might have feelings. But not until then.

That's ridiculous. A toddler losing a parent is a very traumatic event, on so many levels.

I have an eight year old girl. She has no memory of ANYTHING that happened when she was two. She has peripheral memories of events when she was three. That is normal for children.

 

[Carla_Danger]

The child won't have to "live with it" as the child won't have any memory of it. It is a sad, tragic, and ultimately preventable incident that the anti gun drones will flock to in an effort to create outrage and discord all in a vain attempt to drum up support for their failed gun grabbing attempts.

The facts are that you are far more likely to die from almost anything more than a gun. The gun grabbers don't try and deal with those issues, they always go after the gun because so long as people are armed they can't force their collectivist nightmare down the throats of the people and that just pisses them off.

Oh come ON...

A two-year old toddler, who's by definition dependent on and bonded with its mother, isn't going to have questions about where she went? Certainly it's too young to comprehend what exactly went down (besides her). That isn't the point. The question of "guilt" didn't even occur to me -- of course it's not the child's fault. Not the point. That will have to be explained, and not explaining it or lying about it is probably worse than never addressing it. Still not the point.

The point is that child is going to have to wonder what kind of fucked up world has it been brought into that walks around with a loaded gun in its purse. As should we all.

You gun fetishists can see only down the barrel of your own fetish object. Your ultimate concern seems to be, "oh that's a tragedy, but the question is -- how is this gonna affect Numero Uno?"

No, she won't. After a year has passed she will no longer have a memory of her. When she's older and she finds out what happened, then she might have feelings. But not until then.

That's ridiculous. A toddler losing a parent is a very traumatic event, on so many levels.

I have an eight year old girl. She has no memory of ANYTHING that happened when she was two. She has peripheral memories of events when she was three. That is normal for children.

Children and toddlers that lose parents still have psychological issues even though they may have no memory of losing the parent.

 

[Pogo]

The child won't have to "live with it" as the child won't have any memory of it. It is a sad, tragic, and ultimately preventable incident that the anti gun drones will flock to in an effort to create outrage and discord all in a vain attempt to drum up support for their failed gun grabbing attempts.

The facts are that you are far more likely to die from almost anything more than a gun. The gun grabbers don't try and deal with those issues, they always go after the gun because so long as people are armed they can't force their collectivist nightmare down the throats of the people and that just pisses them off.

Oh come ON...

A two-year old toddler, who's by definition dependent on and bonded with its mother, isn't going to have questions about where she went? Certainly it's too young to comprehend what exactly went down (besides her). That isn't the point. The question of "guilt" didn't even occur to me -- of course it's not the child's fault. Not the point. That will have to be explained, and not explaining it or lying about it is probably worse than never addressing it. Still not the point.

The point is that child is going to have to wonder what kind of fucked up world has it been brought into that walks around with a loaded gun in its purse. As should we all.

You gun fetishists can see only down the barrel of your own fetish object. Your ultimate concern seems to be, "oh that's a tragedy, but the question is -- how is this gonna affect Numero Uno?"

No, she won't. After a year has passed she will no longer have a memory of her. When she's older and she finds out what happened, then she might have feelings. But not until then.

That's ridiculous. A toddler losing a parent is a very traumatic event, on so many levels.

I have an eight year old girl. She has no memory of ANYTHING that happened when she was two. She has peripheral memories of events when she was three. That is normal for children.

Don't think so. I think this event is now etched in that child's mind forever. Even though too young to comprehend what happened or why, it cannot not have noticed (a) the extreme loud bang, for an immediate thing; (b) the fact that everybody around went into panic mode; (c) the fact that everything in its life just changed. Those cannot be ignored.

 

[Carla_Danger]

There's no telling what this child will have to suffer through if there isn't enough support from other family members.

 

[Gunman]

Was going around the internet where a DOG knocked a gun over and Killer his Owner... But How dose the Dod Feel...? ? ? and the man is still Dead...! ! !

 

[Gunman]

O-Yes it's 12:20 TEXAS Time---- Happy New Years Yall....

 

[DigitalDrifter]

By the way, hopefully no one calls her "stupid", since she was a nuclear scientist.

 

[Politico]

Don't think so. I think this event is now etched in that child's mind forever. Even though too young to comprehend what happened or why, it cannot not have noticed (a) the extreme loud bang, for an immediate thing; (b) the fact that everybody around went into panic mode; (c) the fact that everything in its life just changed. Those cannot be ignored.

At two it is etched as much as what they had for dinner last night.