How Do Gay Couples Feel about not being able to have children?

[Syriusly]

There is only 1 reason that gays want to have kids or adopt them.

And it ain't good.......

That says more about your perverted mind than homosexuals.

 

[Syriusly]

There is only 1 reason that gays want to have kids or adopt them.

And it ain't good.......

Maybe they love children like the rest of us

They make great god-parents.

 

[Sunni Man]

Allowing children to be around homo's.

Is like letting the fox guard the hen house.

Bad things are gonna happen. .....

 

[rightwinger]

If people are naturally drawn to the other sex shouldn't that mean they wouldn't want children?

Why would that be?

If your natural sexual orientation is to be with a person of the same sex then your natural state is one that can never produce children so why act contrary to your natural state?

That makes no sense

Homosexuals can still love kids....just like us

 

[rightwinger]

Allowing children to be around homo's.

Is like letting the fox guard the hen house.

Bad things are gonna happen. .....

More children are sexually abused by heterosexual parents

 

[jillian]

If you are gay or if you know any gay couples, do you know if it bothers them that they can not have children together of their own?

If it were "mean to be" and it "totally natural" why are same sex couples not afforded a natural way to procreate?

if they want children, they adopt children or have a surrogate.

why do you care?

and do you believe that older couples who are no longer capable of having kids shouldn't marry?

or people who are infertile?

 

[rightwinger]

They have children and raise families ...that is what it is about

Can't stop lying can you?

Gay families are very happy with their children

Why aren't you?

You've spoken to every gay family? All of them are happy with their children? Wow. Everyone should be raised by a gay family!!

Have you seen any gay families that are miserable?

I don't need to. The law of large numbers leads to the conclusion that the percentage of "gay" families that are unhappy (or happy) with their children is about the same percentage as in normal families.

It's a law now?

 

[jillian]

If people are naturally drawn to the other sex shouldn't that mean they wouldn't want children?

Why would that be?

If your natural sexual orientation is to be with a person of the same sex then your natural state is one that can never produce children so why act contrary to your natural state?

That makes no sense

Homosexuals can still love kids....just like us

it makes them feel better to trash others.

 

[Zander]

Children raised in homo households will be mentally damaged and need psychological help for the rest of their lives to help repair the damage. ....

You mean like these??

Studies estimate that between 1 and 9 million children in the United States have at least one parent who is lesbian or gay. There are approximately 594,000 same-sex partner households, according to the 2000 Census, and there are children living in approximately 27 percent of those households.

Same-sex Parents and Their Children

If children of gay people are damaged, it's because of the shameless, ignorant bigots like you

Between 1 and 9 million? that is a huge range! Who did this study? A drunkard?

From the link which you apparently did not read:

It is difficult to obtain an accurate count of same-sex parent families because many lesbians and gay men are not open about their sexual orientation due to fears of discrimination, such as loss of employment, loss of child custody, and antigay violence.

Rendering all demographic data about "gays" useless.

Can't stop lying can you?

Gay families are very happy with their children

Why aren't you?

You've spoken to every gay family? All of them are happy with their children? Wow. Everyone should be raised by a gay family!!

Have you seen any gay families that are miserable?

I don't need to. The law of large numbers leads to the conclusion that the percentage of "gay" families that are unhappy (or happy) with their children is about the same percentage as in normal families.

It's a law now?

Your ignorance of Probability Theory is duly noted.

 

[rightwinger]

If people are naturally drawn to the other sex shouldn't that mean they wouldn't want children?

Why would that be?

If your natural sexual orientation is to be with a person of the same sex then your natural state is one that can never produce children so why act contrary to your natural state?

That makes no sense

Homosexuals can still love kids....just like us

it makes them feel better to trash others.

But...but.....they are not genetically both their children

How can you still love them?

 

[rightwinger]

Children raised in homo households will be mentally damaged and need psychological help for the rest of their lives to help repair the damage. ....

You mean like these??

Studies estimate that between 1 and 9 million children in the United States have at least one parent who is lesbian or gay. There are approximately 594,000 same-sex partner households, according to the 2000 Census, and there are children living in approximately 27 percent of those households.

Same-sex Parents and Their Children

If children of gay people are damaged, it's because of the shameless, ignorant bigots like you

Between 1 and 9 million? that is a huge range! Who did this study? A drunkard?

From the link which you apparently did not read:

It is difficult to obtain an accurate count of same-sex parent families because many lesbians and gay men are not open about their sexual orientation due to fears of discrimination, such as loss of employment, loss of child custody, and antigay violence.

Rendering all demographic data about "gays" useless.

Gay families are very happy with their children

Why aren't you?

You've spoken to every gay family? All of them are happy with their children? Wow. Everyone should be raised by a gay family!!

Have you seen any gay families that are miserable?

I don't need to. The law of large numbers leads to the conclusion that the percentage of "gay" families that are unhappy (or happy) with their children is about the same percentage as in normal families.

It's a law now?

Your ignorance of Probability Theory is duly noted.

I am an expert ......within an 80 percent confidence level

 

[Skull Pilot]

If people are naturally drawn to the other sex shouldn't that mean they wouldn't want children?

Why would that be?

If your natural sexual orientation is to be with a person of the same sex then your natural state is one that can never produce children so why act contrary to your natural state?

That makes no sense

Homosexuals can still love kids....just like us

It makes perfect sense.

If you are naturally gay there should be no compulsion to have children

 

[Skull Pilot]

If you are gay or if you know any gay couples, do you know if it bothers them that they can not have children together of their own?

If it were "mean to be" and it "totally natural" why are same sex couples not afforded a natural way to procreate?

if they want children, they adopt children or have a surrogate.

why do you care?

and do you believe that older couples who are no longer capable of having kids shouldn't marry?

or people who are infertile?

Marriage has nothing to do with it.

I am talking biology

If you are naturally attracted to the same sex then your natural sexual orientation excludes reproduction.
People can be infertile but still be attracted to the opposite sex so their sexual orientation does not exclude reproduction even if they themselves cannot reproduce.

If it is your nature to be attracted to the opposite sex then seeking to reproduce is contrary to that nature.

 

[Syriusly]

Allowing children to be around homo's.

Is like letting the fox guard the hen house.

Bad things are gonna happen. .....

Yeah- yeah- all gays are child molesters, all black men want to rape white women and all Jews are going to cheat you.

Don't you ever get tired of spewing your crap?

 

[Syriusly]

If people are naturally drawn to the other sex shouldn't that mean they wouldn't want children?

Why would that be?

If your natural sexual orientation is to be with a person of the same sex then your natural state is one that can never produce children so why act contrary to your natural state?

That makes no sense

Homosexuals can still love kids....just like us

It makes perfect sense.

If you are naturally gay there should be no compulsion to have children

LOL- 'naturally gay' 'should be'

What the hell do you imagine one has to do with the other?

A hell of a lot of straight men don't have 'a compulsion' to have kids- they have a compulsion to stick their dicks in vaginas- and if their kids are lucky- stick around and deal with the consequences of their actions.

Gay men and women are attracted to the same gender- that has nothing to do with whether or not they would like to have kids. Some do- some don't.

 

[Syriusly]

If you are gay or if you know any gay couples, do you know if it bothers them that they can not have children together of their own?

If it were "mean to be" and it "totally natural" why are same sex couples not afforded a natural way to procreate?

if they want children, they adopt children or have a surrogate.

why do you care?

and do you believe that older couples who are no longer capable of having kids shouldn't marry?

or people who are infertile?

Marriage has nothing to do with it.

I am talking biology

If you are naturally attracted to the same sex then your natural sexual orientation excludes reproduction.
People can be infertile but still be attracted to the opposite sex so their sexual orientation does not exclude reproduction even if they themselves cannot reproduce.

If it is your nature to be attracted to the opposite sex then seeking to reproduce is contrary to that nature.

If you are naturally attracted to a woman who is infertile then your natural sexual orientation precludes reproduction.

Sorry- the desire to have and raise children is not related to the gender that you are attracted to.

 

[Skull Pilot]

If you are gay or if you know any gay couples, do you know if it bothers them that they can not have children together of their own?

If it were "mean to be" and it "totally natural" why are same sex couples not afforded a natural way to procreate?

if they want children, they adopt children or have a surrogate.

why do you care?

and do you believe that older couples who are no longer capable of having kids shouldn't marry?

or people who are infertile?

Marriage has nothing to do with it.

I am talking biology

If you are naturally attracted to the same sex then your natural sexual orientation excludes reproduction.
People can be infertile but still be attracted to the opposite sex so their sexual orientation does not exclude reproduction even if they themselves cannot reproduce.

If it is your nature to be attracted to the opposite sex then seeking to reproduce is contrary to that nature.

If you are naturally attracted to a woman who is infertile then your natural sexual orientation precludes reproduction.

Sorry- the desire to have and raise children is not related to the gender that you are attracted to.

Not if you don't know the woman is infertile.

Many women and men do not know if they are infertile until they try to have kids and many marriages end in divorce because of it.

If you are attracted to the same sex then your nature excludes procreation.

 

[frigidweirdo]

If you are gay or if you know any gay couples, do you know if it bothers them that they can not have children together of their own?

If it were "mean to be" and it "totally natural" why are same sex couples not afforded a natural way to procreate?

Well that's the way it is. I'm angry I don't have 4 arms, I can't do anything about it.

 

[Syriusly]

If you are gay or if you know any gay couples, do you know if it bothers them that they can not have children together of their own?

If it were "mean to be" and it "totally natural" why are same sex couples not afforded a natural way to procreate?

if they want children, they adopt children or have a surrogate.

why do you care?

and do you believe that older couples who are no longer capable of having kids shouldn't marry?

or people who are infertile?

Marriage has nothing to do with it.

I am talking biology

If you are naturally attracted to the same sex then your natural sexual orientation excludes reproduction.
People can be infertile but still be attracted to the opposite sex so their sexual orientation does not exclude reproduction even if they themselves cannot reproduce.

If it is your nature to be attracted to the opposite sex then seeking to reproduce is contrary to that nature.

If you are naturally attracted to a woman who is infertile then your natural sexual orientation precludes reproduction.

Sorry- the desire to have and raise children is not related to the gender that you are attracted to.

Not if you don't know the woman is infertile.

Many women and men do not know if they are infertile until they try to have kids and many marriages end in divorce because of it.

If you are attracted to the same sex then your nature excludes procreation.

If you are attracted to a woman who is infertile- then your nature precludes procreation- together.

Lots of people who cannot procreate together- have kids anyway- both through assistance (other peoples sperm or ovum) or through adoption.

Sexual attraction doesn't have anything to do with the inclination to have kids- or not have kids.

 

[Skull Pilot]

If you are gay or if you know any gay couples, do you know if it bothers them that they can not have children together of their own?

If it were "mean to be" and it "totally natural" why are same sex couples not afforded a natural way to procreate?

if they want children, they adopt children or have a surrogate.

why do you care?

and do you believe that older couples who are no longer capable of having kids shouldn't marry?

or people who are infertile?

Marriage has nothing to do with it.

I am talking biology

If you are naturally attracted to the same sex then your natural sexual orientation excludes reproduction.
People can be infertile but still be attracted to the opposite sex so their sexual orientation does not exclude reproduction even if they themselves cannot reproduce.

If it is your nature to be attracted to the opposite sex then seeking to reproduce is contrary to that nature.

If you are naturally attracted to a woman who is infertile then your natural sexual orientation precludes reproduction.

Sorry- the desire to have and raise children is not related to the gender that you are attracted to.

Not if you don't know the woman is infertile.

Many women and men do not know if they are infertile until they try to have kids and many marriages end in divorce because of it.

If you are attracted to the same sex then your nature excludes procreation.

If you are attracted to a woman who is infertile- then your nature precludes procreation- together.

Lots of people who cannot procreate together- have kids anyway- both through assistance (other peoples sperm or ovum) or through adoption.

Sexual attraction doesn't have anything to do with the inclination to have kids- or not have kids.

I disagree if you nature precludes you from procreating it is contrary to your nature to do so.

FYI I never said anything about adoption did I?

It's the compulsion of homosexuals to have their own biological children that I am referencing.