How Do Gay Couples Feel about not being able to have children?

[jillian]

If you are gay or if you know any gay couples, do you know if it bothers them that they can not have children together of their own?

If it were "mean to be" and it "totally natural" why are same sex couples not afforded a natural way to procreate?

if they want children, they adopt children or have a surrogate.

why do you care?

and do you believe that older couples who are no longer capable of having kids shouldn't marry?

or people who are infertile?

Marriage has nothing to do with it.

I am talking biology

If you are naturally attracted to the same sex then your natural sexual orientation excludes reproduction.
People can be infertile but still be attracted to the opposite sex so their sexual orientation does not exclude reproduction even if they themselves cannot reproduce.

If it is your nature to be attracted to the opposite sex then seeking to reproduce is contrary to that nature.

and I am talking about the fact that many people can't have kids for many reasons.

kids are not the purpose of marriage..... they are only one aspect.

 

[Sunni Man]

Any parent who lets their child be around a homosexual is just asking for trouble. .....

 

[rightwinger]

If people are naturally drawn to the other sex shouldn't that mean they wouldn't want children?

Why would that be?

If your natural sexual orientation is to be with a person of the same sex then your natural state is one that can never produce children so why act contrary to your natural state?

That makes no sense

Homosexuals can still love kids....just like us

It makes perfect sense.

If you are naturally gay there should be no compulsion to have children

You can be gay and still love children

The number of same sex couples with kids prove you wrong

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

If people are naturally drawn to the other sex shouldn't that mean they wouldn't want children?

Why would that be?

If your natural sexual orientation is to be with a person of the same sex then your natural state is one that can never produce children so why act contrary to your natural state?

That makes no sense

Homosexuals can still love kids....just like us

It makes perfect sense.

If you are naturally gay there should be no compulsion to have children

Where do you get this shit from?? Just more stupidity!!

 

[Skull Pilot]

If people are naturally drawn to the other sex shouldn't that mean they wouldn't want children?

Why would that be?

If your natural sexual orientation is to be with a person of the same sex then your natural state is one that can never produce children so why act contrary to your natural state?

That makes no sense

Homosexuals can still love kids....just like us

It makes perfect sense.

If you are naturally gay there should be no compulsion to have children

You can be gay and still love children

The number of same sex couples with kids prove you wrong

I never said gay people can't love children I said their nature excludes them from procreation so there should be no compulsion to have kids

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Why would that be?

If your natural sexual orientation is to be with a person of the same sex then your natural state is one that can never produce children so why act contrary to your natural state?

That makes no sense

Homosexuals can still love kids....just like us

It makes perfect sense.

If you are naturally gay there should be no compulsion to have children

You can be gay and still love children

The number of same sex couples with kids prove you wrong

I never said gay people can't love children I said their nature excludes them from procreation so there should be no compulsion to have kids

It's the voices in your head that's telling you that. Get help !! Gay people are not sterile.

 

[rightwinger]

Why would that be?

If your natural sexual orientation is to be with a person of the same sex then your natural state is one that can never produce children so why act contrary to your natural state?

That makes no sense

Homosexuals can still love kids....just like us

It makes perfect sense.

If you are naturally gay there should be no compulsion to have children

You can be gay and still love children

The number of same sex couples with kids prove you wrong

I never said gay people can't love children I said their nature excludes them from procreation so there should be no compulsion to have kids

Their nature does no exclude them from procreating. They do it all the time
Not all sex leads to procreation

 

[Skull Pilot]

If your natural sexual orientation is to be with a person of the same sex then your natural state is one that can never produce children so why act contrary to your natural state?

That makes no sense

Homosexuals can still love kids....just like us

It makes perfect sense.

If you are naturally gay there should be no compulsion to have children

You can be gay and still love children

The number of same sex couples with kids prove you wrong

I never said gay people can't love children I said their nature excludes them from procreation so there should be no compulsion to have kids

Their nature does no exclude them from procreating. They do it all the time
Not all sex leads to procreation

gay sex never leads to procreation and never will

 

[Skull Pilot]

If your natural sexual orientation is to be with a person of the same sex then your natural state is one that can never produce children so why act contrary to your natural state?

That makes no sense

Homosexuals can still love kids....just like us

It makes perfect sense.

If you are naturally gay there should be no compulsion to have children

You can be gay and still love children

The number of same sex couples with kids prove you wrong

I never said gay people can't love children I said their nature excludes them from procreation so there should be no compulsion to have kids

It's the voices in your head that's telling you that. Get help !! Gay people are not sterile.

Where did I ever say gay people were sterile?

please quote it.

 

[Skull Pilot]

If people are naturally drawn to the other sex shouldn't that mean they wouldn't want children?

Why would that be?

If your natural sexual orientation is to be with a person of the same sex then your natural state is one that can never produce children so why act contrary to your natural state?

That makes no sense

Homosexuals can still love kids....just like us

It makes perfect sense.

If you are naturally gay there should be no compulsion to have children

Where do you get this shit from?? Just more stupidity!!

It's biology Idiot.

If you are only sexually attracted to the same sex then your sexual activity cannot result in procreation.

 

[Moonglow]

That makes no sense

Homosexuals can still love kids....just like us

It makes perfect sense.

If you are naturally gay there should be no compulsion to have children

You can be gay and still love children

The number of same sex couples with kids prove you wrong

I never said gay people can't love children I said their nature excludes them from procreation so there should be no compulsion to have kids

Their nature does no exclude them from procreating. They do it all the time
Not all sex leads to procreation

gay sex never leads to procreation and never will

It will if it's a bisexual three way..

 

[Skull Pilot]

It makes perfect sense.

If you are naturally gay there should be no compulsion to have children

You can be gay and still love children

The number of same sex couples with kids prove you wrong

I never said gay people can't love children I said their nature excludes them from procreation so there should be no compulsion to have kids

Their nature does no exclude them from procreating. They do it all the time
Not all sex leads to procreation

gay sex never leads to procreation and never will

It will if it's a bisexual three way..

Technically bisexual is not homosexual.

 

[Unkotare]

Couldn't this same question be posed to any parents who adopt?

 

[Moonglow]

Couldn't this same question be posed to any parents who adopt?

Or seniors that marry while seniors?

 

[Unkotare]

Couldn't this same question be posed to any parents who adopt?

Or seniors that marry while seniors?

Sometimes they can still procreate. Up to a point.

 

[bodecea]

Any parent who lets their child be around a homosexual is just asking for trouble. .....

Not as much trouble as if you let them around fundamentalist religions...especially the patriarchal ones.

 

[Moonglow]

Couldn't this same question be posed to any parents who adopt?

Or seniors that marry while seniors?

Sometimes they can still procreate. Up to a point.

If they get around to it..Most just live in sin,,,and keep their SS benefits...

 

[anotherlife]

If you are gay or if you know any gay couples, do you know if it bothers them that they can not have children together of their own?

If it were "mean to be" and it "totally natural" why are same sex couples not afforded a natural way to procreate?

if they want children, they adopt children or have a surrogate.

why do you care?

and do you believe that older couples who are no longer capable of having kids shouldn't marry?

or people who are infertile?

Marriage has nothing to do with it.

I am talking biology

If you are naturally attracted to the same sex then your natural sexual orientation excludes reproduction.
People can be infertile but still be attracted to the opposite sex so their sexual orientation does not exclude reproduction even if they themselves cannot reproduce.

If it is your nature to be attracted to the opposite sex then seeking to reproduce is contrary to that nature.

and I am talking about the fact that many people can't have kids for many reasons.

kids are not the purpose of marriage..... they are only one aspect.

In one of his letters, the apostle St. Paul wrote, that for women, having kids and giving birth is the justification for existence.

 

[bodecea]

If you are gay or if you know any gay couples, do you know if it bothers them that they can not have children together of their own?

If it were "mean to be" and it "totally natural" why are same sex couples not afforded a natural way to procreate?

if they want children, they adopt children or have a surrogate.

why do you care?

and do you believe that older couples who are no longer capable of having kids shouldn't marry?

or people who are infertile?

Marriage has nothing to do with it.

I am talking biology

If you are naturally attracted to the same sex then your natural sexual orientation excludes reproduction.
People can be infertile but still be attracted to the opposite sex so their sexual orientation does not exclude reproduction even if they themselves cannot reproduce.

If it is your nature to be attracted to the opposite sex then seeking to reproduce is contrary to that nature.

and I am talking about the fact that many people can't have kids for many reasons.

kids are not the purpose of marriage..... they are only one aspect.

In one of his letters, the apostle St. Paul wrote, that for women, having kids and giving birth is the justification for existence.

That's nice.....who cares, really?

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

That makes no sense

Homosexuals can still love kids....just like us

It makes perfect sense.

If you are naturally gay there should be no compulsion to have children

You can be gay and still love children

The number of same sex couples with kids prove you wrong

I never said gay people can't love children I said their nature excludes them from procreation so there should be no compulsion to have kids

Their nature does no exclude them from procreating. They do it all the time
Not all sex leads to procreation

gay sex never leads to procreation and never will

So what.? What is your point. Most hetero sex does not lead to procreation either.