How Do Gay Couples Feel about not being able to have children?

[Bonzi]

If you are gay or if you know any gay couples, do you know if it bothers them that they can not have children together of their own?

If it were "mean to be" and it "totally natural" why are same sex couples not afforded a natural way to procreate?

Our daughter would be totally surprised to hear she doesn't exist.

Who knows or cares. Maybe it's natures way of telling us that every couple on earth having children might not be such a good idea.

Oh. No. You did NOT!

 

[rightwinger]

They do have children
Especially lesbian couples......they have multiple children

Watchoo talking about Willis?

Where have you been?

Most lesbian couples have children
It is more difficult for gay men but many do

So, genetically, their kids are both of them, just like a man and a woman? Is this done via genetic alteration or some sort of modified artificial insemination? How can this be done without male sperm?

Who cares?
They are your children and you love them

Don't you understand basic parenting?

 

[rightwinger]

They do have children
Especially lesbian couples......they have multiple children

Not together. Which was the question.

Yes.....both are there at the birth and they are the only parents the child knows

 

[Bonzi]

They do have children
Especially lesbian couples......they have multiple children

Watchoo talking about Willis?

Where have you been?

Most lesbian couples have children
It is more difficult for gay men but many do

So, genetically, their kids are both of them, just like a man and a woman? Is this done via genetic alteration or some sort of modified artificial insemination? How can this be done without male sperm?

Who cares?
They are your children and you love them

Don't you understand basic parenting?

I do. But do you think that genetics plays no roles at all?

 

[JoeB131]

True, but 100% of homosexual couples can not have a biological child.

sure they can. Surrogacy, artificial insemination, adoption. They can have a child and it will be a biological organism that shits and eats and will make you crazy when it hits puberty.

 

[bodecea]

If you are gay or if you know any gay couples, do you know if it bothers them that they can not have children together of their own?

If it were "mean to be" and it "totally natural" why are same sex couples not afforded a natural way to procreate?

Why would you create a thread about gay people who can't have kids in the usual way.?? There are lots of straight couples who can't either. I have to wonder what you're trying to get at here.

There are, and, I'm sure it bothers them too... but, I wonder why you care about what I am getting at?

I just find it curious that you decided to focus on same sex couples, when the issue of not being able to have biological children is not going to effect gays as a group any differently than others. They are all people first and foremost.

Considering that most of the technology used by gay coupled to have children was created for straight couples who couldn't have children.

 

[Bonzi]

True, but 100% of homosexual couples can not have a biological child.

sure they can. Surrogacy, artificial insemination, adoption. They can have a child and it will be a biological organism that shits and eats and will make you crazy when it hits puberty.

Meh. That's spin. Try again.

 

[JoeB131]

Meh. That's spin. Try again.

I think I nailed it.

 

[miketx]

They do have children
Especially lesbian couples......they have multiple children

Not together. Which was the question.

Yes.....both are there at the birth and they are the only parents the child knows

Massive deflection here, as expected, not an honest particle is his body.

 

[Pop23]

They do have children
Especially lesbian couples......they have multiple children

No, no lesbian couple have ever conceived a biological child sharing dna

That is what the OP is about.

Not just yet anyway

Scientific Breakthrough: Same-Sex Couples Could Have Babies With Genes From Both Parents

What I’ve read is the reality is it still requires some of the male dna to make it work and there are more than a few scientists that doubt it could ever work.

 

[miketx]

I'm not a homophobe, I'm just scared of queers.

Okay. Why?

I'm asking this as serious question. some people are gay. why does this scare you?

It has no effect on my life one way or the other, other than the enjoyment I get out of watching religious assholes squirm.

I'm not scared of them, that's a joke response. Most time when I say "Not homoph...just scared of quee..." Immediately libtards jump on me and say how ignorant I am etc etc....don't know what homophobic means...lol!

 

[rightwinger]

They do have children
Especially lesbian couples......they have multiple children

No, no lesbian couple have ever conceived a biological child sharing dna

That is what the OP is about.

So?

 

[rightwinger]

If you are gay or if you know any gay couples, do you know if it bothers them that they can not have children together of their own?

If it were "mean to be" and it "totally natural" why are same sex couples not afforded a natural way to procreate?

Our daughter would be totally surprised to hear she doesn't exist.

Come on Bod, you know that is not what I'm saying... give it a rest.

They have children and raise families ...that is what it is about

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

If you are gay or if you know any gay couples, do you know if it bothers them that they can not have children together of their own?

If it were "mean to be" and it "totally natural" why are same sex couples not afforded a natural way to procreate?

Because we did not evolve to be mentally content. And no, it doesn't "bother them", any more than it bothers a woman past menopause, or an infertile couple. They have access to adoption and surrogate services, just like everyone else..

Your implication that our evolutionary origins should dictate our behavior is idiotic. No offense. Don't believe me? Okay, go rape your neighbor's wife, to help ensure the survival of your genes. You know, like the good old days. Check back after to let us know what happened after.

 

[miketx]

If you are gay or if you know any gay couples, do you know if it bothers them that they can not have children together of their own?

If it were "mean to be" and it "totally natural" why are same sex couples not afforded a natural way to procreate?

Our daughter would be totally surprised to hear she doesn't exist.

Come on Bod, you know that is not what I'm saying... give it a rest.

They have children and raise families ...that is what it is about

Can't stop lying can you?

 

[depotoo]

Some have family members that have been surrogates for them.

They do have children
Especially lesbian couples......they have multiple children

Watchoo talking about Willis?

Where have you been?

Most lesbian couples have children
It is more difficult for gay men but many do

So, genetically, their kids are both of them, just like a man and a woman? Is this done via genetic alteration or some sort of modified artificial insemination? How can this be done without male sperm?

 

[depotoo]

Actually it does bother a lot of gays. If they could, they would.

If you are gay or if you know any gay couples, do you know if it bothers them that they can not have children together of their own?

If it were "mean to be" and it "totally natural" why are same sex couples not afforded a natural way to procreate?

Because we did not evolve to be mentally content. And no, it doesn't "bother them", any more than it bothers a woman past menopause, or an infertile couple. They have access to adoption and surrogate services, just like everyone else..

Your implication that our evolutionary origins should dictate our behavior is idiotic. No offense. Don't believe me? Okay, go rape your neighbor's wife, to help ensure the survival of your genes. You know, like the good old days. Check back after to let us know what happened after.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Actually it does bother a lot of gays. If they could, they would.

If you are gay or if you know any gay couples, do you know if it bothers them that they can not have children together of their own?

If it were "mean to be" and it "totally natural" why are same sex couples not afforded a natural way to procreate?

Because we did not evolve to be mentally content. And no, it doesn't "bother them", any more than it bothers a woman past menopause, or an infertile couple. They have access to adoption and surrogate services, just like everyone else..

Your implication that our evolutionary origins should dictate our behavior is idiotic. No offense. Don't believe me? Okay, go rape your neighbor's wife, to help ensure the survival of your genes. You know, like the good old days. Check back after to let us know what happened after.

But no more than any other infertile couple.

 

[Sunni Man]

Children raised in homo households will be mentally damaged and need psychological help for the rest of their lives to help repair the damage. ....

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Children raised in homo households will be mentally damaged and need psychological help for the rest of their lives to help repair the damage. ....

Literally every gay person I know is more intelligent, more well-adjusted, and kinder than you are.