How did Tyler Robinson get to a place where he hated Kirk so much he murders him?

Tyler Robinsons is a psychopath triggered by the relentless hate speech from democrats and the media against conservatives.
We will find out about him
Neighbors say he was very intelligent
 

How did Tyler Robinson get to a place where he hated Kirk so much he murders him?​


Probably from reading Kirk’s rhetoric and watching his videos
I can't speak for Tyler Robinson so why don't you give us his reasons?
 
He was unhappy and miserable. Probably had a micro dick and needed somewhere to hide. That is very often one of the contributing factors to frustrated sexuality. Now he's probably going to get fried. Can't see how he's going to dodge it unless the widow makes a plea for him or her or it.

Sorry to be so crude but there it is. There's a lot more to this story to be heard yet ...my God the poor family ..they're gonna be hounded into the ground now
He believed democrats when they said Republicans were all fascists angd nazis and need to be killed.
 
The answer - two fold.
1) Nearly all of the left media and shows like The View etc. that painted Kirk as a horrible person. Almost NONE of them ever invited Kirk on their shows. The View, who were so saaad yesterday?? Never invited Kirk, but always had plenty to say about him.
2) Social media that is absolutely filled to the brim with hate. And due to the design of social media AI - it bombards people with that hate over and over and over. If you view a post that says "Charlie Kirk sucks" - the AI models will show you more. You click on more - and again you will get more and more.
This radicalizes people. The sheer volume of misinformation and hate on social media is a problem, this country has never faced.
Both sides BTW.

Also to ask the question - is social media really free speech? Is it? For the reasons I state above. How is it "free and open speech" when the people who run these sites - specifically, by design, limit you to see only speech you are likely to agree with.
That is NOT free speech.
Isn't the answer obvious?

He was a Christian white Republican, or at least that is what the Left is saying.

:auiqs.jpg:
 

How did Tyler Robinson get to a place where he hated Kirk so much he murders him?​


Probably from reading Kirk’s rhetoric and watching his videos
I've done both of those none of them are hate inspiring....
 
He was unhappy and miserable. Probably had a micro dick and needed somewhere to hide. That is very often one of the contributing factors to frustrated sexuality. Now he's probably going to get fried. Can't see how he's going to dodge it unless the widow makes a plea for him or her or it.

Sorry to be so crude but there it is. There's a lot more to this story to be heard yet ...my God the poor family ..they're gonna be hounded into the ground now
He had a college scholarship but dropped out. He must have been depressed and on antidepressants.
They will NEVER disclose that he was on SSRIs. Big Pharma has seen to that.
 
He had a college scholarship but dropped out. He must have been depressed and on antidepressants.
They will NEVER disclose that he was on SSRIs. Big Pharma has seen to that.
Ahhhhh...... Five will get you Ten it was some type of antidepressant.....
 
15th post
The answer - two fold.
1) Nearly all of the left media and shows like The View etc. that painted Kirk as a horrible person. Almost NONE of them ever invited Kirk on their shows. The View, who were so saaad yesterday?? Never invited Kirk, but always had plenty to say about him.
2) Social media that is absolutely filled to the brim with hate. And due to the design of social media AI - it bombards people with that hate over and over and over. If you view a post that says "Charlie Kirk sucks" - the AI models will show you more. You click on more - and again you will get more and more.
This radicalizes people. The sheer volume of misinformation and hate on social media is a problem, this country has never faced.
Both sides BTW.

Also to ask the question - is social media really free speech? Is it? For the reasons I state above. How is it "free and open speech" when the people who run these sites - specifically, by design, limit you to see only speech you are likely to agree with.
That is NOT free speech.
The question has nothing to do with party, it's ideology.
 
He had a college scholarship but dropped out. He must have been depressed and on antidepressants.
They will NEVER disclose that he was on SSRIs. Big Pharma has seen to that.
Mental capacity will come up as part of his defense
 
Back
Top Bottom