Excusing his killer makes you an apologist.Excusing Kirk's hate just makes you an apologist
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Excusing his killer makes you an apologist.Excusing Kirk's hate just makes you an apologist
It has everything to do with party. The democrat party. That party has been completely co-opted by Marxist/globalists and is America’s greatest threat.The question has nothing to do with party, it's ideology.
In brief, our 2020 review concluded that, “In weighing the existing evidence, we conclude that no direct connection between antidepressants and violence has been reliably established.”13 Since then, nothing in more recent studies have given us reason to alter our conclusion. That said, we should note that a study by Lagerberg et al found that SSRI treatment was associated with a modestly increased risk of violent crime (HR, 1.10)—particularly in those ages 15 to 25 years and ages 25 to 34 years (HR, 1.19 and 1.16, respectively).14He had a college scholarship but dropped out. He must have been depressed and on antidepressants.
They will NEVER disclose that he was on SSRIs. Big Pharma has seen to that.
How did Tyler Robinson get to a place where he hated Kirk so much he murders him?
Whatever it was, he offended millions of people and one of them was pushed over the edge. The wild card is that Americans settle their grudges with guns.
So Democrats think the killer was right to murder Kirk. Read it above folks.
Unfortunately I can't say that's wrongWhatever it was, he offended millions of people and one of them was pushed over the edge.
The wild card is that Americans settle their grudges with guns.
So far nobody has posted any examples of Kirk's hatred.Robinson got to a place where he hated Kirk that much not from anything Kirk said or did (because Kirk said or did little to actually offend anyone), but because of what leftist media lead people like Robinson to think, because few leftists ever listened to or follow Trump, Kirk, Fox News, etc., all they can go by is what other lefties in media tell them to think and they just go with it trusting that they must be experts in the know...
I've listened to about 30 Leftists now rant on about all of the things they hated about Kirk, and how Kirk spread hate, etc., problem is--- NONE OF IT IS TRUE. I've challenged several lefties to post a link to Kirk spewing hate about anything and so far, I've gotten zilch back. Meanwhile, all the Left do is spew hate, anger and fear. For the past 2 years or so that I listened to Kirk 2-3 times a week on his daily spot on Real America's Voice and at public rallies where he dared lefties to prove him wrong, I never once heard Kirk hate anything and instead, he was a bright, cheerful, friendly, polite man who engaged people with facts, reason and logic, while promoting a moral way of living through unity, peace, trust, love, and non-violence.
The real Charlie Kirk was world's apart from the hateful shrew painted by the media. If Trump shuts down a bunch of leftwing media now spewing lies that led to things like Steve Scalise, Donald Trump or Charlie Kirk being shot, I won't complain at all.
Actually, by the democrats own spoken standards, if conservatives went out now gunning down leftists by the droves now, the Left would say they all deserved it.
So far nobody has posted any examples of Kirk's hatred.
All trueBut...but... Charlie just HATED so much!!! He hated enough that the Left can justify his murder, but just not enough that they can even find nor show a single example of it.
But they know he was a fascist (whatever that is) because MSNBC told him so and that he advocated for peace, brotherhood, and unity.
I wonder if the Left has figured out yet that they just vindicated and justified any and all actions taken by capitol protesters on J6?
Oooops! Wait, even then, none of the rightwingers there actually shot anyone or murdered anyone, in fact, the fighting and violence was actually initiated by the Capitol police and the crowd was mostly just fighting back. They were not going to have any more of it.
Then a leftist cap cop shot an unarmed girl veteran (in the neck) just for walking through a doorway.
And that may have been monitored, cultivated and exploited to the advantage of much larger entities with a very large axe to grind.Tyler Robinsons is a psychopath triggered by the relentless hate speech from democrats and the media against conservatives.
His eyes look like pools of Haldol franklyTyler Robinsons is a psychopath triggered by the relentless hate speech from democrats and the media against conservatives.
There is a point there. Preaching peace usually gets the speaker dead.With what? Preaching peace?
Speaking hate
Speaking hate
Bottom line: He murdered a top Trump supporter. From what I hear, a great person and future President. Duh if he's not a random execution he was targeted. Common sense says an Anti-Trumper targeted him.
1. Either sent out to act? Paid? Unlikely.
2. Brainwashed young mind by LibStain school or College professors,? Very likely.
SHUP Stain. Like always, when election glitches gain only DEM votes, if it stinks its' clearly a DEMCommie in action.
He was taught to hate Kirk.
The answer - two fold.
1) Nearly all of the left media and shows like The View etc. that painted Kirk as a horrible person. Almost NONE of them ever invited Kirk on their shows. The View, who were so saaad yesterday?? Never invited Kirk, but always had plenty to say about him.
2) Social media that is absolutely filled to the brim with hate. And due to the design of social media AI - it bombards people with that hate over and over and over. If you view a post that says "Charlie Kirk sucks" - the AI models will show you more. You click on more - and again you will get more and more.
This radicalizes people. The sheer volume of misinformation and hate on social media is a problem, this country has never faced.
Both sides BTW.
Also to ask the question - is social media really free speech? Is it? For the reasons I state above. How is it "free and open speech" when the people who run these sites - specifically, by design, limit you to see only speech you are likely to agree with.
That is NOT free speech.
He had a college scholarship but dropped out. He must have been depressed and on antidepressants.
They will NEVER disclose that he was on SSRIs. Big Pharma has seen to that.
A family member has said after Trump won re election something snapped in him... today you don't need college to be radicalized... PBS... CNN and MSNBC can do that.... sadly...According to reports I heard, he had a scholarship to college but dropped out after one semester. Not time enough for indoctrination by anyone.
Where did all these people who hate Trump with every fiber of their being come from? They are manipulated and manufactured into the group think collective without even knowing it.The answer - two fold.
1) Nearly all of the left media and shows like The View etc. that painted Kirk as a horrible person. Almost NONE of them ever invited Kirk on their shows. The View, who were so saaad yesterday?? Never invited Kirk, but always had plenty to say about him.
2) Social media that is absolutely filled to the brim with hate. And due to the design of social media AI - it bombards people with that hate over and over and over. If you view a post that says "Charlie Kirk sucks" - the AI models will show you more. You click on more - and again you will get more and more.
This radicalizes people. The sheer volume of misinformation and hate on social media is a problem, this country has never faced.
Both sides BTW.
Also to ask the question - is social media really free speech? Is it? For the reasons I state above. How is it "free and open speech" when the people who run these sites - specifically, by design, limit you to see only speech you are likely to agree with.
That is NOT free speech.