How climate nonsense gets started

No it was a legitimate question to ask since the paper runs solely on PROXY data and nothing else, thus resolution values are indeed important.

It is revealing that you didn't know that.......


:abgg2q.jpg:
Sure it does.

We all look forward to your published critique.

🤣
 
LOL More dumb fuckery. Every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University in the world has policy statements that AGW is real and a clear and present danger. Against that we have people that barely have GED's telling us that scientists with PhD's and years of research under their belt don't know what they are talking about.

Sheesh, you accuse the Dems of what the present senile demented President is doing. Trump will go down not only as the worst President in our history, but also as the most corrupt. Wind and solar are the least expensive and quickest to build of all the present forms of generation. They also require the least infrastructure. No railroads or pipelines to maintain. And with agri-voltaics and solar over parking lots and canals the land can serve two functions. Maybe you should catch up to what is going on in the EV world. There are many EV's that are competing with ICE vehicles in price. And Tesla is just one of the manufactures making EV's now.

Talk about fake crisis. Trump has visions of being a fascist dictator, and his move to use military in our cities to stop legal protests is proof of that. His illegal use of emergency powers is not only unconstitutional, it is exactly the way that Hitler solidified power in Germany.
I bet they are going to feel foolish when the AMOC switches off.
 
I bet they are going to feel foolish when the AMOC switches off.
The peole who dedicated their lives to studying that and who are predicting that may happen will be surprised?

It's like I know less after every visit to USMB, haha
 
The peole who dedicated their lives to studying that and who are predicting that may happen will be surprised?

It's like I know less after every visit to USMB, haha
Every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University in the world that made policy statements that AGW is real will feel foolish.
 
Sure it does.

We all look forward to your published critique.

🤣

I already did several times in this thread which is proven too difficult for you deal with which is why you are playing the science illiterate boy role so well as you don't even notice it.

:itsok:

Post 13 consist of two published papers and a chart based on the GISP2 data.

Post 14 is a published rebuttal of the published science paper

Post 15 is a published rebuttal of the published science paper

Post 24 is straight from the NASA website showing a published science paper discussing increased CO2 greening effect on the planet.
 
Every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University in the world that made policy statements that AGW is real will feel foolish.

They are ALL under the influence of governments which is why they do this if they want to continue to get funding.
 
Shhh...Listen... it's the sound of ding missing the point by a country mile...
Given there are no clear and present dangers from climate catastrophes that can be attributed to an incremental 120 ppm of a relatively weak GHG, I’m going to say it’s you who has missed the point.
 
"Doesn't affect me personally, therefore I don't care."

Right wingers have always been the same.

If the planet on which we stand is in imminent danger of destruction because of human activity, which he proclaims on an hourly basis, then that would affect me.

I only ask, one thing. What “precisely” is the proposed solution and how much danger that solution, if implemented, would be to me.

I’m not minded to “take one for the team” without informed consent.
 
15th post
If the planet on which we stand is in imminent danger of destruction because of human activity, which he proclaims on an hourly basis, then that would affect me.

I only ask, one thing. What “precisely” is the proposed solution and how much danger that solution, if implemented, would be to me.

I’m not minded to “take one for the team” without informed consent.
You already have
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom