How climate nonsense gets started

[otto105]

My posts is still 100% unchallenged.

Hilarious

 

[otto105]

No it is a roll call of YOUR continual failure to debate is what exposes you.

Hilarious

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Yeah, you get that a lot.

Yeah, green idiots are crying like little babies all over the place.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Ah, the non sequitur.

For when you cant quite articulate a relevant thought...

Fossil fuels are killing us, he whined, while continuing to use fossil fuels.

 

[EMH]

When a popular and stupid social media person flaps yap and totally misinterprets a scientific paper, all the MAGAts cheer and yell hooray, without ever checking his source. When not quoting nonexistent papers they totally misrepresent a real paper. Rogan is a prime example, and we have many here on this board using his nonsense. Even the author of the paper noted how badly Rogan misinterpreted her paper.

MSN

www.msn.com

The ACTUAL DATA refutes "Global Warming," always has...


NO WARMING in the ATMOSPHERE
NO WARMING in the OCEANS
NO ONGOING NET ICE MELT
NO BREAKOUT in CANE ACTIVITY
NO OCEAN RISE
NO RISE in SURFACE AIR PRESSURE


= EARTH NOT WARMING

 

[Old Rocks]

The ACTUAL DATA refutes "Global Warming," always has...


NO WARMING in the ATMOSPHERE
NO WARMING in the OCEANS
NO ONGOING NET ICE MELT
NO BREAKOUT in CANE ACTIVITY
NO OCEAN RISE
NO RISE in SURFACE AIR PRESSURE


= EARTH NOT WARMING

No matter how often you repeat a lie, it remains a lie.

 

[EMH]

No matter how often you repeat a lie, it remains a lie.

That is all true and easily documented as such.

The ACTUAL DATA... starting with the satellites and balloons...

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.




Gotta love NBC, "suggested." The outside thermometer "suggested" it was 80F outside, but the taxpayer funded "top climate scientist" "corrected" that to show 90F....

 

[otto105]

That is all true and easily documented as such.

The ACTUAL DATA... starting with the satellites and balloons...

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.




Gotta love NBC, "suggested." The outside thermometer "suggested" it was 80F outside, but the taxpayer funded "top climate scientist" "corrected" that to show 90F....

20 years s ago climate toddler

 

[EMH]

20 years s ago climate toddler

So when did "Global Warming" start??

LOL!!!

 

[otto105]

So when did "Global Warming" start??

LOL!!!

You offered one article (as you have done before) from 2005 as evidence of what climate toddler.

 

[EMH]

You offered one article (as you have done before) from 2005 as evidence of what climate toddler.

evidence of THE FACT that the ACTUAL DATA from satellites and balloons showed NO WARMING in ATMOSPHERE for more than 3 decades.... then CO2 FRAUD FUDGED the data...

 

[otto105]

evidence of THE FACT that the ACTUAL DATA from satellites and balloons showed NO WARMING in ATMOSPHERE for more than 3 decades.... then CO2 FRAUD FUDGED the data...

What does current ACTUAL DATA from satellites inform us on climate change.

Debunk this.

 

[EMH]

What does current ACTUAL DATA from satellites inform us on climate change.

Debunk this.

There is the ACTUAL DATA and there is the FUDGE, and a requirement to be DUMB ENOUGH to fall for CO2 FRAUD is


NOT KNOWING THE DIFFERENCE...

 

[otto105]

There is the ACTUAL DATA and there is the FUDGE, and a requirement to be DUMB ENOUGH to fall for CO2 FRAUD is


NOT KNOWING THE DIFFERENCE...

Yes, you don’t know the difference and just post climate toddler nonsense.

 

[otto105]

There is the ACTUAL DATA and there is the FUDGE, and a requirement to be DUMB ENOUGH to fall for CO2 FRAUD is


NOT KNOWING THE DIFFERENCE...

Debunk this climate toddler.

Carbon dioxide (CO2) is a greenhouse gasthat absorbs and radiates heat, trapping it in the Earth's atmosphere, which leads to a rise in global temperatures. A significant increase in atmospheric CO2 levels, primarily from human industrial activity, intensifies this natural greenhouse effect, causing the Earth's average surface temperature to increase. While CO2 levels and temperature changes have historically corresponded, modern data shows human emissions are driving the current rise in both CO2 and temperature, with CO2 acting as a principal "thermostat" for the planet.

 

[EMH]

Debunk this climate toddler.

The linked article above does, shows that as CO2 increased, temps in atmosphere did not, until FUDGED...

If Earth's atmosphere was warming, surface air pressure would increase, but that is not happening either.


CO2 absorbs IR, which is weak EM. O3 (Ozone) absorbs UV, 10k fold more powerful. Adding CO2 to atmosphere does precisely..

....


NOTHING...

 

[otto105]

The linked article above does, shows that as CO2 increased, temps in atmosphere did not, until FUDGED...

If Earth's atmosphere was warming, surface air pressure would increase, but that is not happening either.


CO2 absorbs IR, which is weak EM. O3 (Ozone) absorbs UV, 10k fold more powerful. Adding CO2 to atmosphere does precisely..

....


NOTHING...

So, not actual science just your usual nonsense.

Can you provide one climate science organization that backs your climate toddler narrative?

Or not?

 

[EMH]

So, not actual science just your usual nonsense.

Can you provide one climate science organization that backs your climate toddler narrative?

Or not?

Science is not about

1. PARROTING
2. FUDGING DATA
3. FRAUD


all you "understand" about "the science" is PARROTING MSNBC, which is not science...

 

[otto105]

Science is not about

1. PARROTING
2. FUDGING DATA
3. FRAUD


all you "understand" about "the science" is PARROTING MSNBC, which is not science...

Dismissed

 

[EMH]

Dismissed

IN OTTO's world "the science" really is just PARROTING...