House Judiciary Committee has released the video of special prosecutor Jack Smith’s deposition

[Nostra]

So, you want legal votes thrown out. The voters did nothing wrong when casting their ballots.

And you want them thrown out.

They are illegal, stupid.

 

[Nostra]

So, you want to throw out legal votes.

They are illegal, Simp.

 

[Nostra]

That was plan B (or C or D depending on how you look at it) and occurred after the state legislators refused to replace the validly chosen electors as he wanted.

Link to this plan?

Betcha can’t, Moroner.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Because they were attempting to cheat, or at least muddy the waters.

"Trump's people" don't get to file contingent electors, the electors are submitted not by the party but by the Executive Authority of the State.

BTW - if you attempt to go back to Hawaii in 1960. The contingent electors were submitted under court order and by the Executive Authority of the state. Not the party.

WW

legally. still haven't shown the law broken. post it.

Parties don't submit Electoral Votes certificatiaon, they must be submitted under Executive Authority of the State government.

WW
.
.
.

 

[Marener]

Link to this plan?

Betcha can’t, Moroner.

https://www.justice.gov/storage/Report-of-Special-Counsel-Smith-Volume-1-January-2025.pdf

 

[jc456]

Parties don't submit Electoral Votes certificatiaon, they must be submitted under Executive Authority of the State government.

WW
.
.
.

View attachment 1200515

That doesn’t say trump violated any laws

 

[Marener]

If this then that or maybe not isn’t even reality much less fraud and it’s just another feeling you fools cling to

Trump’s fraud didn’t succeed. That doesn’t make it legal.

 

[Delldude]

So he challenged in court, and lost.

And if He won, He'd need contingent electors who had already cast their votes or the other candidate wins.

Parties don't submit Electoral Votes certificatiaon, they must be submitted under Executive Authority of the State government.

I didn't say they did. They legally cast their contingent votes by the Dec 14th deadline...........

That was plan B (or C or D depending on how you look at it) and occurred after the state legislators refused to replace the validly chosen electors as he wanted.

They all cast their votes by the legal deadline......so why would you do something legally if you were intent on breaking the law?

 

[WorldWatcher]

That doesn’t say trump violated any laws

I didn't say "he" did.

I said that parties attempting to submit contingent electors were, the law showing that was just posted.

WW

 

[Marener]

And if He won, He'd need contingent electors who had already cast their votes or the other candidate wins.


I didn't say they did. They legally cast their contingent votes by the Dec 14th deadline...........



They all cast their votes by the legal deadline......so why would you do something legally if you were intent on breaking the law?

There was nothing legal about pretending to be a validly chosen elector.

Trump wanted Mike Pence to use the fraudulent electors on January 6th.

But this is a separate fraudulent scheme to try to steal the election than what I was talking about earlier.

 

[WorldWatcher]

And if He won, He'd need contingent electors who had already cast their votes or the other candidate wins.


I didn't say they did. They legally cast their contingent votes by the Dec 14th deadline...........



They all cast their votes by the legal deadline......so why would you do something legally if you were intent on breaking the law?

Where they broke the law was submitting them to the National Archivist and Congress as real and true electoral votes, which they weren't. The party can get anyone they want together and cast what ever "votes" they want. That isn't illegal.

Sending them to the Federal Government (National Archivest and Congress) as the valid EC votes of the states IS illegal as only the Executive Authority of the State can certify EC votes.

WW

 

[jc456]

I didn't say "he" did.

I said that parties attempting to submit contingent electors were, the law showing that was just posted.

WW

It didn’t say that in what you highlighted, the link didn’t work

 

[jc456]

Trump’s fraud didn’t succeed. That doesn’t make it legal.

Doesn’t make it illegal

 

[Marener]

Doesn’t make it illegal

The fraud is what makes it illegal.

 

[WorldWatcher]

It didn’t say that in what you highlighted, the link didn’t work

It wasn't a link, it was a screen shot of the United States Code.

Here is the link if you think I made it up in photoshop or something.

WW

3 U.S. Code § 5 - Certificate of ascertainment of appointment of electors

www.law.cornell.edu

 

[jc456]

Where they broke the law was submitting them to the National Archivist and Congress as real and true electoral votes, which they weren't. The party can get anyone they want together and cast what ever "votes" they want. That isn't illegal.

Sending them to the Federal Government (National Archivest and Congress) as the valid EC votes of the states IS illegal as only the Executive Authority of the State can certify EC votes.

WW

Post the link to the law

 

[jc456]

It wasn't a link, it was a screen shot of the United States Code.

Here is the link if you think I made it up in photoshop or something.

WW

3 U.S. Code § 5 - Certificate of ascertainment of appointment of electors

www.law.cornell.edu

What you highlighted didn’t say he broke a law. Can you highlight the section?

 

[Rawley]

As far as I can tell, he was asking Raffensperger to take away valid votes

We know you hate the man, but even through your hatred, do you really think the man is stupid enough to explicitly tell someone to a commit a serious felony on an open phone with 40 people listening? Really? Has your hatred truly blinded you that much?

 

[WorldWatcher]

Post the link to the law

Dude, I gave you a screen shot and a link.

Enough sea lioning from you, which is your normal mode.

WW
.
.
.
.

 

[WorldWatcher]

What you highlighted didn’t say he broke a law. Can you highlight the section?

See post #149.

WW