House Judiciary Committee has released the video of special prosecutor Jack Smith’s deposition

[otto105]

"Jack Smith’s Twisted, Machiavellian Lawfare Mindset Paints a Dystopian Future for the USA if not Dispatched Quickly
January 1, 2026 | Sundance | 19 Comments


I don’t care if you support Donald Trump, Ron DeSantis or the Easter Bunny, any American who doesn’t realize the tenuous future of our union after reviewing the information within this testimony is going to forever live in a collapsed dystopian nightmare, if they vote for any political representative who support it.


The House Judiciary Committee has released the [VIDEO] and [TRANSCRIPT] of special prosecutor Jack Smith’s deposition. What is outlined within it is alarming in the extreme. I strongly urge anyone with any platform to review the details and quickly highlight the content therein. There is no time to waste.

Jack Smith appeared before the committee with three personal lawyers to support him. The content of the deposition is chilling in the extreme. While many will focus on the granular details of the testimony, I wish to highlight one of the more alarming aspects to the bigger picture."

Jack Smith's Twisted, Machiavellian Lawfare Mindset Paints a Dystopian Future for the USA if Not Dispatched Quickly - The Last Refuge

I don’t care if you support Donald Trump, Ron DeSantis or the Easter Bunny, any American who doesn’t realize the tenuous future of our union, after reviewing the information within this testimony, is going to forever live in a collapsed dystopian nightmare, if they vote for any political...

theconservativetreehouse.com

Smith's political witch hunt against Trump on behalf of Joe Biden was shut down by the voters. Now, Jack Smith gets to testify under oath and the ballots in Fulton co GA will eventually be examined by the DOJ. This is the will of the American People.

Yes, Shitler! is dirty.

We all know that, but some will deny and cry

 

[Dragonlady]

F all you election stealing Dem assholes! We got our man back in the White House, now we get our REVENGE on you!

Let’s see. All charges against Democrats have been dropped, and the attempts at prosecution are being labelled as “malicious” and “politically motivated”.

Revenge???? That’s not even a valid reason for charges.

 

[otto105]

Are you talking about Raffensperger? I believe the hearing touched on that. Apparently trump never said “find me 11,000 votes”, his legal team, at that point, had found that there was enough detectable fraud to have recounts issued but the courts were dragging their feet in getting all this pushed through, and trump had said that they already knew there were more than the threshold needed for disputes and investigations. Trump said “I have to find 11,000 votes”.

The way I understood it, trump never asked him to find any votes


Where did trump tell anyone to not count the votes? He suggested that pence should not certify the election, but never TOLD him to not do it

We can all listen to the call fuckup where Shitler! asked him to find the votes.

 

[jc456]

Yes, it's called the OP article.

Here's a clip:

he said that without a smile. I can't believe it. wow, just wow. mother of all insanity.

 

[j-mac]

You’re not. You’re just being fed more lies and distortions. As you’ve demonstrated, these are distortions you’re very eager and conditioned to believe without question.

However, being delusional is not a valid defense. You can’t just believe absurd crazy crap and use that to commit fraud. The law requires you behave somewhat rationally.

Could this be an argument to incarcerate Trump supporters should progressives ever get back in power?

 

[jc456]

Are you talking about Raffensperger? I believe the hearing touched on that. Apparently trump never said “find me 11,000 votes”, his legal team, at that point, had found that there was enough detectable fraud to have recounts issued but the courts were dragging their feet in getting all this pushed through, and trump had said that they already knew there were more than the threshold needed for disputes and investigations. Trump said “I have to find 11,000 votes”.

The way I understood it, trump never asked him to find any votes


Where did trump tell anyone to not count the votes? He suggested that pence should not certify the election, but never TOLD him to not do it

well fk dude, Georgia already admitted to 315k of fraudulent votes for biden. Hilarious. Let's tell Jack that.

Fulton County admits to verifying 315,000 votes in 2020 without poll worker signatures​

MSN

www.msn.com

 

[otto105]

well fk dude, Georgia already admitted to 315k of fraudulent votes for biden. Hilarious. Let's tell Jack that.

Fulton County admits to verifying 315,000 votes in 2020 without poll worker signatures​

MSN

www.msn.com

Hilarious

So, you want to throw out legal votes.

 

[Delldude]

He attempted to have state governments reject the choice of the voters to appoint electors for him after the election.

Nope. He had the legal framework in place to challenge vote totals in states He contested if His challenges were successful.

 

[Marener]

Nope. He had the legal framework in place to challenge vote totals in states He contested if His challenges were successful.

Calling state legislators and telling them to change the electors based on your false claims is not a legal framework to challenge vote totals.

 

[jc456]

Hilarious

So, you want to throw out legal votes.

if they aren't certified, they aren't legal votes. so no, only illegal ones should be thrown out. pay attention.

 

[Delldude]

Calling state legislators and telling them to change the electors based on your false claims is not a legal framework to challenge vote totals.

That's not true.

 

[Marener]

That's not true.

What’s not true? Trump called state legislators and told them to change the electors. This is well documented in testimony.

They talked about it openly when it was going on.

 

[jc456]

Calling state legislators and telling them to change the electors based on your false claims is not a legal framework to challenge vote totals.

you know that happened for hitlery in 2016 right? In fact, there was one or two who voted for Hitlery rather than for trump when trump won Texas. Check it out.

2016 United States presidential election in Texas - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

but two faithless electors chose other candidates, making Texas the only state in 2016 to give Trump fewer than the assigned electoral votes.

 

[jc456]

What’s not true? Trump called state legislators and told them to change the electors. This is well documented in testimony.

They talked about it openly when it was going on.

post #113

Educate yourself for fk sake.

 

[Marener]

you know that happened for hitlery in 2016 right? In fact, there was one or two who voted for Hitlery rather than for trump when trump won Texas. Check it out.

2016 United States presidential election in Texas - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

but two faithless electors chose other candidates, making Texas the only state in 2016 to give Trump fewer than the assigned electoral votes.

You’re confused. Clinton did not ask state legislatures to replace their electors.

 

[jc456]

You’re confused. Clinton did not ask state legislatures to replace their electors.

then how come they changed their votes? hahahaahahahahaha
you can fool many, but you can't fool us all. I don't fall for foolishness.

Post Misleadingly Equates 2016 Democratic Effort to Trump's 2020 'Alternate Electors' - FactCheck.org

After the 2016 presidential election, some progressive Democrats tried to convince electors for Donald Trump to switch their Electoral College votes to Hillary Clinton. But a conservative commentator misleadingly claimed in a social media post that the Democrats were "calling for alternate...

www.factcheck.org

 

[Nostra]

Let’s see. All charges against Democrats have been dropped, and the attempts at prosecution are being labelled as “malicious” and “politically motivated”.

Revenge???? That’s not even a valid reason for charges.

Lies.

 

[Marener]

then how come they changed their votes? hahahaahahahahaha

You can’t possibly be this stupid.

An elector is a person who casts a vote for the president in the electoral college.

 

[jc456]

You can’t possibly be this stupid.

An elector is a person who casts a vote for the president in the electoral college.

yep, it was the discussion.

 

[Nostra]

Hilarious

So, you want to throw out legal votes.

They are all illegal without the signature, Simp. It’s the law. Oh wait, your Cult doesn’t follow laws.