House Judiciary Committee has released the video of special prosecutor Jack Smith’s deposition

[Delldude]

According to Bush v Gore, that’s not possible.

Anything is possible in a court of law.

They claimed to have been duly elected and qualified.

That's why several were charged with forging. They changed the wording in Pennsylvania.

You miss the point that even thought these contingent electors weren't duly appointed, if Trump would have won any of those states challenges, He would have electors who voted in place and would win that state. The issue of validity as contingent would have to be settled in court.

 

[Rawley]

They claimed to have been duly elected and qualified.

They weren’t.

View attachment 1200527

They truly believed they were elected. No intent, no fraud.

 

[meaner gene]

Prove fraud

Actually you have it backwards. Trump had to prove fraud in court, and failed miserably. Trump lost half a dozen lawyers who were sanctioned or disbarred because their fraud claims were frivolous.

 

[Marener]

They truly believed they were elected. No intent, no fraud.

Did they have the certificate of ascertainment from the governor?

Nope.

They knew they hadn’t been elected. Elected people don’t sneak into the back door of the Capitol and sign a document they printed off of Microsoft word to cast a vote for President.

 

[meaner gene]

If Trump would have won any of those lawsuits and had these contingent electors listed, He would have won that state. They would have had had to have a court, state legislature or Congress to recognize them as valid.

If my aunt had balls .......

 

[Marener]

Anything is possible in a court of law.

Further evidence it was unconstitutional and the law means nothing.

That's why several were charged with forging. They changed the wording in Pennsylvania.

You miss the point that even thought these contingent electors weren't duly appointed, if Trump would have won any of those states challenges, He would have electors who voted in place and would win that state. The issue of validity as contingent would have to be settled in court.

They were never valid and since they had already passed the legislative safe harbor date, their votes couldn’t be counted.

We know the plan for the fraudulent electors was to use them to interfere with the vote counting on January 6th. It’s in the Eastman memo.

 

[Rawley]

Did they have the certificate of ascertainment from the governor?

I'll repeat, for a second time. THey didn't say they did.

Nope.

They knew they hadn’t been elected. Elected people don’t sneak into the back door of the Capitol and sign a document they printed off of Microsoft word to cast a vote for President.

Sigh.

 

[Marener]

I'll repeat, for a second time. THey didn't say they did.

Sigh.

To become a duly elected and qualified elector, you have to have a certificate of ascertainment from the governor.

It’s how the process works.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So, in review:

Only one criminal conspiracy to steal the 2020 election was ever uncovered. And it was led by Donald Trump.

 

[Delldude]

If my aunt had balls .......

Knowing your politics, she probably does.........

They were never valid and since they had already passed the legislative safe harbor date, their votes couldn’t be counted.

Passed the safe harbor date due to the courts had Trump's lawsuits tied up in court.

To become a duly elected and qualified elector, you have to have a certificate of ascertainment from the governor.

Or do what they did and have Congress, the state or the courts decide on their validity in the event of a win.

 

[meaner gene]

Anything is possible in a court of law.


That's why several were charged with forging. They changed the wording in Pennsylvania.

You miss the point that even thought these contingent electors weren't duly appointed, if Trump would have won any of those states challenges, He would have electors who voted in place and would win that state. The issue of validity as contingent would have to be settled in court.

You think that Arizona having 22 republican chosen and supposedly certified electors is kosher?

 

[Concerned American]

“Someone else said so” is not a valid excuse to engage in fraud. As Jack Smith was pointing out, they had been told their beliefs were false.

LOL, like Cassidy Hutchinson did when she testified to hearsay?

 

[Marener]

Knowing your politics, she probably does.........


Passed the safe harbor date due to the courts had Trump's lawsuits tied up in court.

Gore had more reason to complain about that than Trump. Trump just kept filing more and more bullshit lawsuits.

Or do what they did and have Congress, the state or the courts decide on their validity in the event of a win.

The states never authorized the electors, which is what makes them fraudulent. They were never valid and never would be.

 

[meaner gene]

They truly believed they were elected. No intent, no fraud.

It isn't what they believed, not after the courts told them what the truth was.
No different than a parent in a divorce believing they had custody of the children, and a judge rules custody to the other spouse.
Even if they believed they had custody, they would be charged and convicted of kidnapping.

 

[meaner gene]

Or do what they did and have Congress, the state or the courts decide on their validity in the event of a win.

Again:

You think that Arizona having 22 republican chosen and supposedly certified electors is kosher?

 

[Rawley]

It isn't what they believed, not after the courts told them what the truth was.
No different than a parent in a divorce believing they had custody of the children, and a judge rules custody to the other spouse.
Even if they believed they had custody, they would be charged and convicted of kidnapping.

1,000 Ratty. Kudos

 

[WEATHER53]

Trump’s fraud didn’t succeed. That doesn’t make it legal.

He never initiated any action
It’s a thought crime charge brought by an insipid feeler

 

[Delldude]

You think that Arizona having 22 republican chosen and supposedly certified electors is kosher?

They had 11 and they traditionally voted for the candidate who wins the vote total. Az was one of the states being contested, in this case, yes.

The states never authorized the electors, which is what makes them fraudulent. They were never valid and never would be.

You don't know that. If Biden was found to have participated in voting hanky panky, should he still take that state? By having those electors for Trump would present a strange and unusual subject for the courts to decide.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Again:

You think that Arizona having 22 republican chosen and supposedly certified electors is kosher?

The trial of the Arizona faction of Trump's criminal conspiracy begins on Monday.

Expect several of those charged to change their pleas to guilty, on Monday morning.

 

[Marener]

He never initiated any action
It’s a thought crime charge brought by an insipid feeler

He was the one calling up state legislators, getting people to sign fake electors certificates, telling Pence to jack with the counting of votes on Jan 6th.

He initiated all this.