House Judiciary Committee has released the video of special prosecutor Jack Smith’s deposition

Yeah, I just don’t see it the same way as you.

Well, I’m sorry about that. I’m only giving you the words of the conversation verbatim as they spoke them.


Trump constantly refused to accept any evidence to the contrary. Trying to paint him as open minded and just wanting an investigation just doesn’t fly.

Take this paragraph. He’s not calling for an investigation. He just wants them to meet tomorrow and change the result:
President Donald Trump: Well, you have to, under law, you’re not allowed to give faulty election results. OK, you’re not allowed to do that. And that’s what you’ve done. This is a faulty election result. And honestly, this should go very fast. You should meet tomorrow because you have a big election, election coming up and because of what you’ve done to the president, you know, the people of Georgia know that this was a scam.

And because of what you’ve done to the president, a lot of people aren’t going out to vote and a lot of Republicans are going to vote negative because they hate what you did to the president. OK. They hate him. And they’re going to vote. And you would be respected if really respected if this thing could be straightened out before the election. You have a big election coming up on Tuesday. And therefore, I think that it really is important that you meet tomorrow and work out on these numbers, because I know, Brad, that if if you think we’re right, I think you’re going to say and I’m not looking to blame anybody. I’m not, I’m just saying that that, you know, you know, under new counts and under new views of the election results, we won the election

Nothing in there says “let’s meet tomorrow and change the election”. All I can say is read the transcript, it’s all in there, and it’s not what the media said.
 
Well, I’m sorry about that. I’m only giving you the words of the conversation verbatim as they spoke them.




Nothing in there says “let’s meet tomorrow and change the election”. All I can say is read the transcript, it’s all in there, and it’s not what the media said.
You’re desperately trying to ignore what he’s say by moving the goalposts.
 
You’re desperately trying to ignore what he’s say by moving the goalposts.

I am giving you exactly what they said. I believe it is you all who are desperately clinging to a narrative that doesn’t exist.

Nobody yet has been able to point to where trump asked Raffensperger to do anything illegal, and none of you want to acknowledge the literal words of their conversation.
 
I am giving you exactly what they said. I believe it is you all who are desperately clinging to a narrative that doesn’t exist.

Nobody yet has been able to point to where trump asked Raffensperger to do anything illegal, and none of you want to acknowledge the literal words of their conversation.
You read what they said and then demand one step above and beyond.

First you say Trump just wanted an investigation

Then I point out that he didn’t want an investigation, he wanted Raffensperger to announce a change the next day.

To which you replied that he didn’t ask to meet with Raffensperger to change the election tomorrow.

As if that makes any sense or is at all essential to the point being made.

It’s 100% clear Trump was NOT asking for an investigation.
1. He rejected the results of actual investigations
2. He said his evidence was conclusive
3. He wanted Raffensperger to change the results the next day
4. He said what result he expected

You ignore what is inconvenient. None of this is merely asking for an investigation.
 
You read what they said and then demand one step above and beyond.

First you say Trump just wanted an investigation

He did, he said so multiple times.

Then I point out that he didn’t want an investigation,

He did, he said so multiple times.

he wanted Raffensperger to announce a change the next day.

No, he never said that.

Germany: Well, that’s not the case sir. There are things that you guys are entitled to get. And there’s things that under the law, we are not allowed to give out.

Trump: Well, you have to. Well, under the law you’re not allowed to give faulty election results, OK? You’re not allowed to do that. And that’s what you done. This is a faulty election result. And honestly, this should go very fast. You should meet tomorrow because you have a big election coming up and because of what you’ve done to the president — you know, the people of Georgia know that this was a scam. And because of what you’ve done to the president, a lot of people aren’t going out to vote and a lot of Republicans are going to vote negative because they hate what you did to the president. Okay? They hate it. And they’re going to vote. And you would be respected. Really respected, if this thing could be straightened out before the election. You have a big election coming up on Tuesday. And therefore I think that it is really important that you meet tomorrow and work out on these numbers.

He was saying they need to meet and look at the numbers. There was never a point where trump said “I want you to overturn an election that I lost”, there was never a point where trump said “I want you to just change the election”, it simply did not happen. Read the whole conversation and you’ll see that.


To which you replied that he didn’t ask to meet with Raffensperger to change the election tomorrow.

He didn’t. Read above.

As if that makes any sense or is at all essential to the point being made.

It’s 100% clear Trump was NOT asking for an investigation.

He did so many times in the call.

1. He rejected the results of actual investigations

He wasn’t satisfied, he said his information didn’t match up with theirs.


2. He said his evidence was conclusiv
Ok.


3. He wanted Raffensperger to change the results the next day

He said he wanted to to meet the next day and look at the numbers.

4. He said what result he expected
He said what results their information led to. He has a right to challenge the election.

You ignore what is inconvenient. None of this is merely asking for an investigation.

I’m only showing you what the transcript says without any outside spin.
 
He did, he said so multiple times.



He did, he said so multiple times.



No, he never said that.



He was saying they need to meet and look at the numbers. There was never a point where trump said “I want you to overturn an election that I lost”, there was never a point where trump said “I want you to just change the election”, it simply did not happen. Read the whole conversation and you’ll see that.




He didn’t. Read above.



He did so many times in the call.



He wasn’t satisfied, he said his information didn’t match up with theirs.



Ok.




He said he wanted to to meet the next day and look at the numbers.


He said what results their information led to. He has a right to challenge the election.



I’m only showing you what the transcript says without any outside spin.
Trump wasn’t satisfied with any investigation that didn’t give him the result he wanted.

That’s how you know he wasn’t really asking for an investigation.
 
Trump wasn’t satisfied with any investigation that didn’t give him the result he wanted.

That’s how you know he wasn’t really asking for an investigation.

Read the transcript…
 
Read the transcript…
Grand juries read the transcript. 3 different ones. All voted in favor of criminal charges for Trump.

But maybe you can ask enough bad faith questions and ignore the answers and waste enough strangers' time that reality will somehow contort and change just for you and the cult.
 
Grand juries read the transcript. 3 different ones. All voted in favor of criminal charges for Trump.

But maybe you can ask enough bad faith questions and ignore the answers and waste enough strangers' time that reality will somehow contort and change just for you and the cult.


Yeah, and and they found a jury to convict trump of sexual assault despite having zero evidence presented…


Grand jury sure did. Did YOU read the transcript? If you did and you got the same answer as the grand jury did, then maybe you can point to the part in the transcript where trump tried to solicit Raffensperger to illegally change the election, because nobody here has done so yet.
 
And yet everyone on the call instantly knew the fat rapist charity thief had committed a crime.

It's like they aren't brainwashed cultists, or something.
 
Read the transcript…
Use your head. You said yourself “Trump wasn’t satisfied”. You’re halfway there. What would have satisfied him? The answer is obvious.
 
I am giving you exactly what they said. I believe it is you all who are desperately clinging to a narrative that doesn’t exist.

Nobody yet has been able to point to where trump asked Raffensperger to do anything illegal, and none of you want to acknowledge the literal words of their conversation.
Trump was radiating unspoken mind waves to change votes or at least intended to
Lib 101
 
Use your head. You said yourself “Trump wasn’t satisfied”. You’re halfway there. What would have satisfied him? The answer is obvious.

Yes, trump wasn’t satisfied, as is his right if he wants. Him wanting recounts is not illegal. You all are trying to pin him with some crime that didn’t happen. He doesn’t have to accept the results if he believed that there was fraud. He was well within his right to ask for investigations. Nothing in that phone call was illegal or fraudulent. You all want to believe there is…..


Read the transcript..it’s all there
 
15th post
Back
Top Bottom