Homosexuals violate the rights of normal people

rupol2000

Gold Member
Aug 22, 2021
18,215
2,621
138
Normal people have the right to protect normal culture and traditions, they do not want the rotting of society and do not want to expose their children to the risk of molestation. This is categorically incompatible with the "rights" of homosexuals to corrupt society and seduce normal people, since they are not able to isolate themselves so that normal people do not see them, and they do not even try to do this, but do the opposite.

Therefore, homosexuals are de facto outlawed by the absolute majority and interests of absolute majority have priority in democracy.
 
Normal people have the right to protect normal culture and traditions, they do not want the rotting of society and do not want to expose their children to the risk of molestation. This is categorically incompatible with the "rights" of homosexuals to corrupt society and seduce normal people, since they are not able to isolate themselves so that normal people do not see them, and they do not even try to do this, but do the opposite.

Therefore, homosexuals are de facto outlawed by the absolute majority and interests of absolute majority have priority in democracy.

More children are molested by a straight man than by gay men. And by a wide margin.

You have no "right to not see homosexuals". There is no right to not see people you dislike.
 
No such thing as "normal".

This is fallacious because social norms are not the same as norms found in nature or norms that are synonymous with the ideal function of a created system
.

1657165183851.png
 
Normal people have the right to protect normal culture and traditions, they do not want the rotting of society and do not want to expose their children to the risk of molestation. This is categorically incompatible with the "rights" of homosexuals to corrupt society and seduce normal people, since they are not able to isolate themselves so that normal people do not see them, and they do not even try to do this, but do the opposite.

Therefore, homosexuals are de facto outlawed by the absolute majority and interests of absolute majority have priority in democracy.
Get real. If you have gay guys hitting on you, and you can't handle it the way a woman brushes off an unwanted guy at a bar, the problem is yours, not theirs.
 
There is. These are norms that are generally accepted and time-tested. For example, fucking with children, animals and persons of their own sex is accepted as abnormal behavior

There was a time when fucking someone of another race was considered abnormal behavior. Fucking children and animals is abnormal because a child or an animal cannot give consent. If two consenting adults want to have sex, in private, it is absolutely none of your business. I don't care what you think. Each person has that freedom.
 
Normal people have the right to protect normal culture and traditions, they do not want the rotting of society and do not want to expose their children to the risk of molestation. This is categorically incompatible with the "rights" of homosexuals to corrupt society and seduce normal people, since they are not able to isolate themselves so that normal people do not see them, and they do not even try to do this, but do the opposite.

Therefore, homosexuals are de facto outlawed by the absolute majority and interests of absolute majority have priority in democracy.

Are you gay or had a gay experience?

I read the more someone hates gay people, the more likely they are to have had a gay experience or are gay themselves.




Is there something you would like to tell us?
 
Get real. If you have gay guys hitting on you, and you can't handle it the way a woman brushes off an unwanted guy at a bar, the problem is yours, not theirs.
This is a problem of society as a whole.

But even if we assume that this is the problem to which you reduce everything, apart from visual seduction, moral corruption, and so on, it's not so simple. Touching a man's ass is considered a disgrace, for which fag should be punished, otherwise you drop honor. But in this case, if you accidentally kill a faggot by beating him, the court does not recognize this as adequate self-defense, we do not have such a definition as the protection of honor
 
This is a problem of society as a whole.

But even if we assume that this is the problem to which you reduce everything, apart from visual seduction, moral corruption, and so on, it's not so simple. Touching a man's ass is considered a disgrace, for which fag should be punished, otherwise you drop honor. But in this case, if you accidentally kill a faggot by beating him, the court does not recognize this as adequate self-defense, we do not have such a definition as the protection of honor

Because your honor is intact if someone touches your ass.

Its funny, you don't want to kill men who touch a woman's ass. That is the same violation. Are you afraid of men doing to you what you have done to women for years?
 
There is. These are norms that are generally accepted and time-tested. For example, fucking with children, animals and persons of their own sex is accepted as abnormal behavior

Rape, murder, pedophilia, harassment, torment, and cruelty all widely accepted by DemonicRats and Libturdz, and their Snowflake, SJW, BLM, and KKK buddies.

CIVILIZED people won't put up with that shit.
 
Because your honor is intact if someone touches your ass.

Its funny, you don't want to kill men who touch a woman's ass. That is the same violation. Are you afraid of men doing to you what you have done to women for years?
Don't play dumb
 

Forum List

Back
Top