Homophobia: Fun Fact

[JakeStarkey]

By definition, SM is not evolved.

The word "evolved" is the new leftist euphemism for communist.........

The word evolved means not a ******* moron..

Then by that definition; you are definitely not evolved................

 

[Quantum Windbag]

The word evolved means not a ******* moron..

Not when you are using it to refer to yourself.

Heres the social definition of evolved for the generation that will live longer than yours and produce all of the legislation when you are old and dying:
Gay marriage: Legal
Abortion: Available for all who want it
Evolution: Taught in all schools as fact
Equal pay for Women in every job

These arent debates, they are just notions one generation holds as liberal until the next generation takes power and they are all passed. Its not a matter of if, nor is it really a debate. All of things I just listed will be passed and accepted in 30 years and there is really nothing you can do about it. Sorry im not sorry

Here is my position on those subjects.

Gay marriage: None of my, or the governments, business.
Abortion: Ending life should always be a last resort. Come to think of it, I also oppose the death penalty.
Evolution: Since it cannot be accurately explained without teaching graduate level biology, and really doesn't make a difference to anyone who is not a biologist, why argue about it?
Equal pay for Women in every job: Why should women be forced to accept less money?

Go play with your toys, you aren't qualified to debate, or argue, with me.

 

[YoungRepublican]

Not when you are using it to refer to yourself.

Heres the social definition of evolved for the generation that will live longer than yours and produce all of the legislation when you are old and dying:
Gay marriage: Legal
Abortion: Available for all who want it
Evolution: Taught in all schools as fact
Equal pay for Women in every job

These arent debates, they are just notions one generation holds as liberal until the next generation takes power and they are all passed. Its not a matter of if, nor is it really a debate. All of things I just listed will be passed and accepted in 30 years and there is really nothing you can do about it. Sorry im not sorry

Here is my position on those subjects.

Gay marriage: None of my, or the governments, business.
Abortion: Ending life should always be a last resort. Come to think of it, I also oppose the death penalty.
Evolution: Since it cannot be accurately explained without teaching graduate level biology, and really doesn't make a difference to anyone who is not a biologist, why argue about it?
Equal pay for Women in every job: Why should women be forced to accept less money?

Go play with your toys, you aren't qualified to debate, or argue, with me.

Then what part of my philosiphy isnt evolved? We agree on all of those issues besides evolution and how we shouldnt stop homosexuals from marrying and even that we sort of align.. I dont really understand why I should "Go play with my toys", because trust me I am well equiped to argue any position. Ive done my homework and unlike many young people actually have an interest in things that concern my future..

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Heres the social definition of evolved for the generation that will live longer than yours and produce all of the legislation when you are old and dying:
Gay marriage: Legal
Abortion: Available for all who want it
Evolution: Taught in all schools as fact
Equal pay for Women in every job

These arent debates, they are just notions one generation holds as liberal until the next generation takes power and they are all passed. Its not a matter of if, nor is it really a debate. All of things I just listed will be passed and accepted in 30 years and there is really nothing you can do about it. Sorry im not sorry

Here is my position on those subjects.

Gay marriage: None of my, or the governments, business.
Abortion: Ending life should always be a last resort. Come to think of it, I also oppose the death penalty.
Evolution: Since it cannot be accurately explained without teaching graduate level biology, and really doesn't make a difference to anyone who is not a biologist, why argue about it?
Equal pay for Women in every job: Why should women be forced to accept less money?

Go play with your toys, you aren't qualified to debate, or argue, with me.

Then what part of my philosiphy isnt evolved? We agree on all of those issues besides evolution and how we shouldnt stop homosexuals from marrying and even that we sort of align.. I dont really understand why I should "Go play with my toys", because trust me I am well equiped to argue any position. Ive done my homework and unlike many young people actually have an interest in things that concern my future..

Philosophy is the realm of children, adults use science because it tests things and looks for answers.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Well, QWB definitely has demonstrated neither philosopher nor scientist is he.

Maybe in the future but not now. His posturing is pathetic.

 

[MaryL]

Animals do a lot of weird stuff, eat their poo and sniff each other’s butts, lick puddles of urine. I don't know how many species do that, but we humans have different standards. Then again, animals don’t marry each other, do they? This is a human trait, and a decidedly heterosexual one. Marriage is about providing a stable home to offspring, not some kind of cheap empty symbol of societal acceptance gays would have it become.

 

[Sunni Man]

By definition, SM is not evolved.

If murdering unborn babies by abortion, and championing perverted homo marriage, are seen by you as some kind of evolving.

Then no, I am not evolved.........

 

[mjollnir]

By definition, SM is not evolved.

If murdering unborn babies by abortion, and championing perverted homo marriage, are seen by you as some kind of evolving.

Then no, I am not evolved.........

Indeed: your particular type of stupidity is a genetic cul de sac.

 

[Samson]

By definition, SM is not evolved.

If murdering unborn babies by abortion, and championing perverted homo marriage, are seen by you as some kind of evolving.

Then no, I am not evolved.........

Indeed: your particular type of stupidity is a genetic cul de sac.

Squeel Sunni!

Any man that does not believe in having anal sex with other men must be intellectually inferiour!

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Well, QWB definitely has demonstrated neither philosopher nor scientist is he.

Maybe in the future but not now. His posturing is pathetic.

Philosophers gave us Earth as the center of the universe with everything revolving around it because they could look around and see that we were not moving. That explains why you prefer philosophy to science.

 

[MaryL]

How many other species of animals has poetry, art or mathematics? How many other animals make love face-to-face? (Not gays though). How many other animals feel a need to justify their sexual preferences? Just one. Homo sapiens. Is that a fun fact or what? Probably not.

 

[Seawytch]

How many other species of animals has poetry, art or mathematics? How many other animals make love face-to-face? (Not gays though). How many other animals feel a need to justify their sexual preferences? Just one. Homo sapiens. Is that a fun fact or what? Probably not.

Gays and lesbians can also make love face to face. This is the age of the Internet...

We aren't "justifying" anything. We are demanding equal treatment under the law.

 

[mjollnir]

How many other species of animals has poetry, art or mathematics? How many other animals make love face-to-face? (Not gays though). How many other animals feel a need to justify their sexual preferences? Just one. Homo sapiens. Is that a fun fact or what? Probably not.

How would you know how gays make love, fuckwit?

The can engage in the same positions that we do, without any apparent problems.

Please pull your head out of your ass and seek help for your condition.

 

[Cecilie1200]

How many other species of animals has poetry, art or mathematics? How many other animals make love face-to-face? (Not gays though). How many other animals feel a need to justify their sexual preferences? Just one. Homo sapiens. Is that a fun fact or what? Probably not.

Gays and lesbians can also make love face to face. This is the age of the Internet...

We aren't "justifying" anything. We are demanding equal treatment under the law.

No, you're demanding a radical redefinition of everything in society to fit your particular idiosyncratic view of "equal".

The shame of it is that so many people in this country are functionally illiterate that while they know what you're selling is gift-wrapped horseshit, they don't have the education to articulate WHY.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Let's see how it goes this time, Cecilie1200. You have a right to your opinion, Cecilie1200, but no on has to respect it. Twelve states and DC now recognize universal marriage and another state removed any state constitutional impediment, DOMA is on the ropes going into SCOTUS, DADT is dead in the military and can never be resurrected, and the homophobes have taken an incredible smack in the metaphorical mouth. Americans 30 and under stare at you as if you had just escaped from the hyena cage at the zoo for ultra right crazies.

Throwing hissy fits reminiscent of bigrebnc at his worst probably won't end your headache.

 

[YoungRepublican]

How many other species of animals has poetry, art or mathematics? How many other animals make love face-to-face? (Not gays though). How many other animals feel a need to justify their sexual preferences? Just one. Homo sapiens. Is that a fun fact or what? Probably not.

Gays and lesbians can also make love face to face. This is the age of the Internet...

We aren't "justifying" anything. We are demanding equal treatment under the law.

No, you're demanding a radical redefinition of everything in society to fit your particular idiosyncratic view of "equal".

The shame of it is that so many people in this country are functionally illiterate that while they know what you're selling is gift-wrapped horseshit, they don't have the education to articulate WHY.

Um the U.S. has a literacy rate of 99 percent.. Our functionally illiterate often come from poor states that are the first to advocate banning same sex marriage. I find it really funny how you think it’s the uneducated preaching tolerance, while the brilliant protest it. Quite a paradox you have going on inside your head. And by the way It is you who is demanding a radical definition of equal. Two people aren’t equal in your eyes because they love one another. Quite a shame really. I have a pretty darn good education, and that is what leads me to the tolerant views on same sex marriage that I have. You never did answer my question of what college/grad school you attended.. Love to know the answer to that one..

 

[AmyNation]

Homophobia is dying out, give it 30 years and they will go the way of the racists, shamed into the closet

 

[YoungRepublican]

Homophobia is dying out, give it 30 years and they will go the way of the racists, shamed into the closet

Short and concise. All that needs to be said on this topic.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

How many other species of animals has poetry, art or mathematics? How many other animals make love face-to-face? (Not gays though). How many other animals feel a need to justify their sexual preferences? Just one. Homo sapiens. Is that a fun fact or what? Probably not.

Gays and lesbians can also make love face to face. This is the age of the Internet...

We aren't "justifying" anything. We are demanding equal treatment under the law.

No, you're demanding a radical redefinition of everything in society to fit your particular idiosyncratic view of "equal".

The shame of it is that so many people in this country are functionally illiterate that while they know what you're selling is gift-wrapped horseshit, they don't have the education to articulate WHY.

Wrong again, as usual.

The Constitution requires equal protection of (access to) the law, it has nothing to do with what gays and lesbians ‘want’ or ‘demand.’ The Constitution requires there be a consistent application of the law and civil liberties, and compels the state to justify any deviation from that mandate – citizens are not required to justify their exercising of a civil right.

And same-sex couples are opposed to a ‘radical redefinition’ of any aspect of society, including marriage. They simply seek access to their state’s marriage law, unchanged, unaltered, just as made available to opposite-sex couples, just as mandated by the 14th Amendment.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Gays and lesbians can also make love face to face. This is the age of the Internet...

We aren't "justifying" anything. We are demanding equal treatment under the law.

No, you're demanding a radical redefinition of everything in society to fit your particular idiosyncratic view of "equal".

The shame of it is that so many people in this country are functionally illiterate that while they know what you're selling is gift-wrapped horseshit, they don't have the education to articulate WHY.

Um the U.S. has a literacy rate of 99 percent.. Our functionally illiterate often come from poor states that are the first to advocate banning same sex marriage. I find it really funny how you think it’s the uneducated preaching tolerance, while the brilliant protest it. Quite a paradox you have going on inside your head. And by the way It is you who is demanding a radical definition of equal. Two people aren’t equal in your eyes because they love one another. Quite a shame really. I have a pretty darn good education, and that is what leads me to the tolerant views on same sex marriage that I have. You never did answer my question of what college/grad school you attended.. Love to know the answer to that one..

Look up "functionally illiterate", and then ponder where this post classifies YOU on that scale.

Not that you deserve an explanation or will understand it, but I didn't say "the uneducated preach tolerance"; you just WANTED me to have said it, and I'm not responsible for the words you want to shove into my mouth. I actually was saying that virtually everyone in this country is deplorably uneducated and ignorant. Believe me, that includes you, and whoever told you that you have "a pretty darn [sic] good education" was either lying or not much better-educated than you are.

I also never said anything about who's "equal" or not, or "tolerance". That's YOUR schtick, not mine, so please don't assume that my arguments are going to be framed according to your half-assed parameters and media buzzwords.

And finally, there's a reason why I didn't answer your question about my personal life, which anyone with a modicum of maturity, life experience, and basic common sense would have figured out before asking: it's PERSONAL, otherwise known as "none of your frigging business".

Your debate is with my words, not with my curricum vitae, and no Internet claims of this degree or that college are going to make the exact same words more right or more wrong. Deal with the words, and don't be a nosy little buttinski.