Hillary Resurrects Vietnam War Strategy

Flanders

ARCHCONSERVATIVE
Sep 23, 2010
7,628
748
205
Hillary is now attacking Americans who oppose her political agenda. That is the same strategy Vietnam era traitors like her husband used. The traitors attacked Americans while they made it look like they only opposed an unjust war. Hillary attacks Americans while she makes it look like she only opposes Donald Trump.

“You could put half of Trump’s supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right,” Clinton said, drawing laughter and applause as she addressed about 1,000 donors at an LGBT for Hillary fundraising gala in New York City, “The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic – you name it.” Adding that Trump had “given voice” to many of those elements through his campaign rhetoric and retweets, she continued that, “some of those folks – they are irredeemable, but thankfully they are not America.”​

Look what Hillary thinks of other half of voters
Posted By -NO AUTHOR- On 09/10/2016 @ 3:39 pm

Look what Hillary thinks of other half of voters

The fact is: Vietnam era traitors supported the enemy in a war at the same time men and women were fighting and dying for their country. That strategy amounted to saying the men and women who knowingly knew what they were fighting for in Vietnam were “deplorable.” Veterans were certainly treated that way when they returned home.

The Left’s Vietnam era strategy brought defeat to their own country. The same thing will happen if Hillary wins the election. Our defeat in Vietnam had an insidious, long-lasting, effect. The defeat Hillary Clinton & Company is engineering will be far more pernicious, and last a lot longer than did defeat in Vietnam.

NOTE: Hillary Clinton will only defend this country as part of an international coalition. In plain English, to Hillary “No boots on the ground” can be ignored when America’s military is defending this country under the banner of a United Nations coalition.

Finally, I cannot prove it, but I firmly believe that the scandals surrounding the Veterans Administration is deeply rooted in the Left’s hatred of Americans fighting against Communism in Vietnam. To this day Vietnam era traitors permeate every administration, Congress, the courts, and federal bureaucracies; so I am not stretching it too far to suggest that Democrats believe that everybody who fought against Communism deserve the worst treatment possible. I would go so far as to propose that if elected Democrats could get away with it they would deny benefits of any kind to every vet who served in the military during the Vietnam War.

Incidentally, Democrats ain’t too happy about veterans who fought in Iraq without the UN’s approval:




p.s. Here is another take on the Vietnam War:

What these modern war memorials have in common with each other is nothing. They portray nothingness. They have no people in them, never mind men carrying guns or swords, statues of Winged Victory, or even doves of peace. Just death and names -- grief without glory.​

November 11, 2007
Monuments to Wimpdom
By Duncan Maxwell Anderson

http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/11/monuments_to_wimpdom_1.html

I was always uncomfortable with the design of the Vietnam War Memorial but never said anything against it. I felt that any criticism would be twisted by Lefties into a slur against the men and women whose names appear on the “Wall.” The anti-Vietnam War traitors defending America’s fallen heroes because of something I said would have been more than I can bear. Unfortunately I was right. Whenever I broached the topic in the following years the Left’s perpetually outraged morality had a field day criticizing my objections.

Parenthetically, since 2007, the worst people in our society have acquired more political power than they ever had since they worked so hard to give America’s enemy in Vietnam a victory at any cost.

XXXXX

There is a subliminal political message involved in Anderson’s “grief without glory” aspect of the Vietnam War Memorial’s design. Traditional designs honor the sacrifice as well as those who made it. The Vietnam War Memorial is different in that the dead are listed, but the message is that their sacrifice was a waste. How many visiting the Wall remember that the Vietnam War was fought against Communism? That was not a waste.

The political message incorporated in the Vietnam War Memorial also justifies the anti-Vietnam War demonstrations by American Communists who did not, and do not, care one iota about the men and women who gave their lives fighting against Communism.​

http://www.usmessageboard.com/threads/1-00-000-000-question-marks.374499/
 
Last edited:
How many visiting the Wall remember that the Vietnam War was fought against Communism? That was not a waste.
Yeah? What the fuck is it to America what economic system Vietnam chooses? What a waste.

Too, who would be happy to have to ignore that a large part of one's forces took part in a crime against peace, war crimes and crimes against humanity, all encompassed in the invasion of Iraq?
 
Last edited:
How many visiting the Wall remember that the Vietnam War was fought against Communism? That was not a waste.
Yeah? What the fuck is it to America what economic system Vietnam chooses? What a waste.

Too, who would be happy to have to ignore that a large part of one's forces took part in a crime against peace, war crimes and crimes against humanity?

boatpeople_005.jpg


vietnamese_boatpeople300.jpg


511719.jpg


The first two pictures is of the people who apparently cared a great deal. The last, is the people who didn't make it to the boats, and were sent to the now infamous 're-education camps' of Vietnam... where they no longer cared.

But you are right who cares? Like Hillary Clinton.... right? "What difference does it make?".

You people always claim to stand for what is right. Then when an estimated million are killed by people pushing left-wing ideology... ah who cares. What difference does it make? Forget those unimportant Vietnamese.
 
What the fuck is it to America what economic system Vietnam chooses?
To cnm: It doesn’t —— so long as it is not a military threat.

Incidentally, Communism is a form of government not an economic system.

Too, who would be happy to have to ignore that a large part of one's forces took part in a crime against peace, war crimes and crimes against humanity, all encompassed in the invasion of Iraq?
To cnm: You can take your Socialist horseshit and shove it where the sun never shines. Better still, go preach your garbage in countries where governments slaughter their own people.
 
You people always claim to stand for what is right. Then when an estimated million are killed by people pushing left-wing ideology... ah who cares. What difference does it make? Forget those unimportant Vietnames
Yeah, as though the two million odd dead as a result of the conflict from people pushing capitalism weren't a waste.

As to your estimated million, that wouldn't have happened if America hadn't started shooting Vietnamese but had worked to let the agreed elections go forward.
 
To cnm: It doesn’t —— so long as it is not a military threat.
Yeah, you were hiding under your beds quivering at the thought of the first wave of Viet landing craft motoring up the Hudson, right.
 
Last edited:
And so, nearly fifty years on, you think Vietnam was not a waste? 50,000 odd US and two million odd Viets and for what? So fatuous bloviators like you can wibble about the communist menace?

What a waste.
 
So why is it compared to capitalism?
To cnm: Only by the parasite class.

Capitalism is an economic system that works to perfection in a limited form of government. Socialism is a parasitic form of government. The two will always be incompatible no matter how hard Socialists try to combine them.


At the beginning of the Cold War the folks on the Left said “Capitalism and Communism will meet in the middle and everything will be fine.” That idiocy qualifies as the most successful lie they ever told —— mainly because they said an economic system would meet a form of government in the middle. The primary problem among many is that equal distribution of the wealth stood in the way of the two meeting anywhere.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/religion-and-ethics/326841-pontius-pilate-vetoed-christianity.html

Rank & file Socialists believe, and never stop trying to convince others, that Socialism and capitalism can co-exist; whereas, capitalists know better. The very definition of laissez faire is proof that capitalism is not a form of government, nor does it lead to a form of government.

laissez faire also laisser faire (noun)

1. An economic doctrine that opposes governmental regulation of or interference in commerce beyond the minimum necessary for a free-enterprise system to operate according to its own economic laws.

2. Noninterference in the affairs of others.​

Socialists/Communists demand the power of government in order to tell people what to do rather than what not to do because Socialism/Communism cannot survive without tax dollars. Aside from idiots like Harry Reid, who would voluntary contribute to Socialism?


Funny you should mention that.

Young black men killed by US police at highest rate in year of 1,134 deaths
To cnm: I will mention it when you tell me how many police officers killed in self defense. You might even tell me how many police officers out of your 1,134 were convicted of murder? You might also tell me how many police officers were killed by black men.
 
She can spin her way out of her idiot remark about Donald Trump’s supporters:

“Last night I was ‘grossly generalistic,’ and that's never a good idea. I regret saying ‘half’ — that was wrong,” Clinton said in a statement.​

September 10, 2016, 02:25 pm
Clinton: It was wrong to call half of Trump supporters 'deplorable'
By Harper Neidig

Clinton: It was wrong to call half of Trump supporters 'deplorable'

but she cannot spin her way out of the America-haters in her base.
 
Better still, go preach your garbage in countries where governments slaughter their own people.
Funny you should mention that.

Young black men killed by US police at highest rate in year of 1,134 deaths

https://www.theguardian.com

And nearly all of this justified to protect law abiding citizens. That's a far cry from Vietnam, where citizens were murdered without cause, for an ideological left-wing policy. Not even remotely comparable.
 

Forum List

Back
Top