Hillary Quietly Trying To Steal The Election. She Should Have Been Asked If She Would Accept Result

[mudwhistle]

Rosie O'Donnell?

both of us

I wouldn't take the job.
What I would do my first 100 days would make liberals fear for their lives.....and probably cause them to leave the country to escape my wrath.

I am a registered democrat-------I feel threatened

Being a Democrat and an American liberal is 2 different things.

OH?? please expand on that concept

American Liberals are snowflakes. Easily offended. Fascists assholes. Democrats are aren't necessarily Liberals. Many are very conservative.

 

[irosie91]

Soros no doubt has his teams working overtime trying to gut our election process in his favor. However, the most votes Hillary lost, tipping her chances state by frustrating state were to the 3rd party candidate Johnson.

In short, Hillary was Ralph-Nadered out of the Whitehouse. It's the oldest trick in the book. I'm surprised Soros didn't offer Johnson a healthy sum to step out of the race. He had his eyes trained on the front while a little stoner boy snuck up from behind and slit him by the throat.

TRICK???? who "TRICKED" whom?-----the accepted system-----did what the USA accepts as a valid election. As to Soros-----
WAT'S IN IT FOR HIM?

Running a 3rd party candidate whose ideals (Johnson: Pot smoker deluxe) run along the lines of the party whose vote you want to divide and conquer is the oldest trick in the book. A man named Ralph Nader used to do this to screw the democrats over and over. Johnson was this year's Ralph Nader. In a close race, if you run a 3rd party vote-splitter of the party you want to lose: it will lose. Just by "that much". And if you check Johnson's vote tally state by state, and add his votes (which would've otherwise gone to Clinton), it amounts to exactly enough to have put her comfortably ahead of Trump. She would be the president-elect today if not for Johnson.

As for Soros, he's a power monger LGBT prick who loves to build up or destroy countries for fun with his money. I'm surprised after what he did to Russia actually that he's still alive. His latest pet project (via Obama and he hoped, Hillary) is to toy with the US until we are either a gay-mecca or we crumble for refusing to become said. He's basically a rich, old twisted pervert who senses his time is running short so he's pushing his money hard on "an earth I want to leave behind". His fantasy is buttsexutopia. Russia didn't want that. So they "paid the price of Soros' wrath". And he apparently is now trying to inspire a revolution because he failed to simply buy Johnson off the ticket: which would've made his puppet (Hillary) win the election.

HUH? they way you describe events----SOROS (the power-mad diddler of little boys and cannabis eater loved Hillary but decided to screw her chances (??? )))))))

 

[GLASNOST]

.... and eventually she'll use that as her excuse. "I never said that I'd accept the election results and we never shook hands on it ....... and anyway, I had my fingers crossed behind my back! So I got dibs on the presidency and I get to sit shotgun every morning! Na, na, na na-na!"

they nevah SHOOK HANDS ON IT?? ------sheeeesh----can I use that ploy IN COURT?

No. Only Hillary can.

 

[OldLady]

You know, when the election results first came out, it occurred to me that maybe some "rigging" had gone on, just on the other side, not the side being blamed for it. I don't really think it was, but if there were irregularities, I suppose it should be checked. But I thought we were assured that the voting machines couldn't be "hacked." So what do they think actually happened?

 

[irosie91]

You know, when the election results first came out, it occurred to me that maybe some "rigging" had gone on, just on the other side, not the side being blamed for it. I don't really think it was, but if there were irregularities, I suppose it should be checked. But I thought we were assured that the voting machines couldn't be "hacked." So what do they think actually happened?

magic

 

[theHawk]

Let the ******* snowflakes try. They don't have the balls to fight for anything, at least not more than crying like a four year old.

 

[mudwhistle]

You know, when the election results first came out, it occurred to me that maybe some "rigging" had gone on, just on the other side, not the side being blamed for it. I don't really think it was, but if there were irregularities, I suppose it should be checked. But I thought we were assured that the voting machines couldn't be "hacked." So what do they think actually happened?

I think the reason Hillary leads in the popular vote is because they stuffed ballot boxes in Western states with illegal votes. It wasn't enough to overcome Trump's victories in the rest of the country. Looking at county by county vote totals, Trump creamed Hillary. The only blue appears to be in sanctuary cities and isolated areas close by.

2016 Election Results County By County

Sanctuary Cities

 

[OldLady]

You know, when the election results first came out, it occurred to me that maybe some "rigging" had gone on, just on the other side, not the side being blamed for it. I don't really think it was, but if there were irregularities, I suppose it should be checked. But I thought we were assured that the voting machines couldn't be "hacked." So what do they think actually happened?

I think the reason Hillary leads in the popular vote is because they stuffed ballot boxes in Western states with illegal votes. It wasn't enough to overcome Trump's victories in the rest of the country. Looking at county by county vote totals, Trump creamed Hillary. The only blue appears to be in sanctuary cities and isolated areas close by.

2016 Election Results County By County

Sanctuary Cities

I'm not able to get Google today to check my accuracy, but I believe the question is in three of the midwest rust belt states that used computer ballots? Wisconsin, I think, was one? And Clinton didn't bring it up--the folks monitoring the voting did. She may leave it at this point. Having a recount and finding she won would make this country completely NUTS. I hope she doesn't pursue it.

 

[JoeMoma]

Donald Trump was asked if he would accept the results of the election. This was with the assumption that Hillary was a shoe in. Now that she's lost it appears that she has no intention of accepting the results. All of that work trying to cheat her way into the White House went up in smoke on November 8th, and some are claiming that the election was rigged. Sure it was rigged....in her favor, yet she still lost.

"During the weeks before the final day of the campaign, both the Clinton camp and the media attacked Donald Trump for refusing to say he would automatically accept the outcome of the vote on Election Day. But now Clinton’s campaign chief is taking meetings with groups urging him to do just that by considering a challenge to the final vote in several of the key states that gave Trump the White House.
Reports from several sources revealed on November 22 that Clinton campaign chief John Podesta was taking meetings with a group claiming it had discovered “irregularities” in several counties of some of the states that Trump won.

group of prominent academics & election lawyers held conference call w/ Podesta and Elias last week lobbying recounthttps://t.co/EnHq9woAcw

— Gabriel Sherman (@gabrielsherman) November 22, 2016

Apparently a “group of prominent computer scientists and election lawyers” met with Podesta to express their belief that they “found persuasive evidence that results in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania may have been manipulated or hacked,” according to New York magazine.

The academics presented findings showing that in Wisconsin, Clinton received 7 percent fewer votes in counties that relied on electronic-voting machines compared with counties that used optical scanners and paper ballots. Based on this statistical analysis, Clinton may have been denied as many as 30,000 votes; she lost Wisconsin by 27,000.

In order to overturn the election, these challenges would have to succeed in multiple counties and multiple states all at the same time to swing the Electoral College to Clinton, so it certainly seems like a desperate long shot.

It is such a long shot that even the left’s favorite numbers guru, Nate Silver, essentially dismissed the effort."

Clinton Campaign Looking into Challenging Outcome of Election to Undermine the Vote - Breitbart​

It was a far more comprehensive project than you could possibly imagine------IN FACT.....
the real duly elected PRES----is ROSIE

Rosie O'Donnell or irosie?

 

[AvgGuyIA]

Even Nixon, who may have won the 1960 election, realized that a long drawn out challenge was not good for the country.

Democrats don't give a shit what's good for the country.

 

[AvgGuyIA]

There are news reports that 6 electors have been bribed to switch their vote from Trump to Clinton. We need to find out who they are, where they live, where their children attend school, what church they attend and send a message to them as a warning to other electors who might think they can switch votes and subvert the will of the People.y

 

[mudwhistle]

You know, when the election results first came out, it occurred to me that maybe some "rigging" had gone on, just on the other side, not the side being blamed for it. I don't really think it was, but if there were irregularities, I suppose it should be checked. But I thought we were assured that the voting machines couldn't be "hacked." So what do they think actually happened?

I think the reason Hillary leads in the popular vote is because they stuffed ballot boxes in Western states with illegal votes. It wasn't enough to overcome Trump's victories in the rest of the country. Looking at county by county vote totals, Trump creamed Hillary. The only blue appears to be in sanctuary cities and isolated areas close by.

2016 Election Results County By County

Sanctuary Cities

I'm not able to get Google today to check my accuracy, but I believe the question is in three of the midwest rust belt states that used computer ballots? Wisconsin, I think, was one? And Clinton didn't bring it up--the folks monitoring the voting did. She may leave it at this point. Having a recount and finding she won would make this country completely NUTS. I hope she doesn't pursue it.

Her media cohorts claim that she isn't behind this, but she is. Insiders say that she didn't give a concession speech until she finished screaming obscenities at anyone in the general vicinity, and she was throwing whatever she could get her hands on at anyone who didn't run from her like a scared rabbit. Once she realized it was useless screaming and abusing everyone, she started everyone on a new mission.....explore every option to steal the election. Hillary tried to steal the election by rigging voting machines....and in Wisconsin anyone who mentions irregularities is just talking about their own cheating that didn't work.

Electors have been getting nasty calls all hours of the night, even death threats since the election. Her campaign was behind the violence at Trump events and this is just more of the same ole thing.
You have been tricked into believing Hillary time after time after time. This is yet another trick being pulled on you. I don't like Alex Jones......but he talked about it before the election.

 

[mudwhistle]

 

[mudwhistle]

Now that she's lost....we're supposed to forget all of the fun she had a Trump's expense....

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

yeah that is just what we need...the Presidential election held up in court for months on end.

If they overturned these results of Trump being the winner, America would never go to the polls again with confidence. If it had been officially challenged immediately, I can see a reason to do it, but this all is ridiculous.