Hillary Clinton was a paid Russian agent who sold the Russians our uranium supplies...

[Moonglow]

But wait- you keep telling us the New York Times is fake news!

LOL

Meanwhile- of course Hillary Clinton had no authority- or ability to sell uranium to anyone- you are just lying again.

Among the agencies- 9 total- Hillary Clinton was one person who signed off on the deal.

Which then had to be approved of by the Nuclear Regulatory Agency.

And then had to be approved by President Obama.

So Hillary was one of at least 10 people who had to approve this deal.

She didn't sell anything.

Sooo .. you fully support the Clintons receiving millions from the Russians, no problem at all, not the least bit suspicious... correct..?

The FOUNDATION did- a great charity, dupe.

I don't believe you ... Pecker Head...

US election: Why is Clinton's foundation so controversial? - BBC News
www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37168505
Aug 23, 2016 - The Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation is an international charitable ... and that there was no evidence that Mrs Clinton did anything improper. ... There have been no clear quid-pro-quoconnections found in any of ...

I'm not satisfied, I want a full investigation by reputable investigators, not your fake news sources.. Duppy

Where is Perry Mason when you need him?

 

[Lumpy 1]

After considerable research I've found incontrovertible visual proof of Clinton collusion!!!!

View attachment 138484

It looks like Melania is keeping Bill from groping her butt...

The Trumps just did quick photo ops- He's a fraud.

Bill's a pedophile, a rapist and a sexual harasser but you like that, don't Ya....

...
Flight logs show Bill Clinton flew on sex offender's jet much more than previously known

 

[Lumpy 1]

Given this history, the chances that Russia would prefer Trump over Hillary Clinton are practically nil.

She was already a paid agent of the FSB.

And she committed treason.

All investigated, no evidence of ANY quid pro quo ANYWHERE. We'll see if the Trumps do so well in their investigation...And of course she had no control over the sale.

You are correct, it took 9 federal agencies to okay the deal..

mmm ... all under the Obama administration... correct

mmmm, I think so..Yet it is not unusual..since the GOP and Russia re such good buddies, right?

huh...

 

[Moonglow]

After considerable research I've found incontrovertible visual proof of Clinton collusion!!!!

View attachment 138484

It looks like Melania is keeping Bill from groping her butt...

The Trumps just did quick photo ops- He's a fraud.

Bill's a pedophile, a rapist and a sexual harasser but you like that, don't Ya....

...
Flight logs show Bill Clinton flew on sex offender's jet much more than previously known

He liked the petting zoo there..

 

[Lumpy 1]

After considerable research I've found incontrovertible visual proof of Clinton collusion!!!!

View attachment 138484

It looks like Melania is keeping Bill from groping her butt...

The Trumps just did quick photo ops- He's a fraud.

Bill's a pedophile, a rapist and a sexual harasser but you like that, don't Ya....

...
Flight logs show Bill Clinton flew on sex offender's jet much more than previously known

He liked the petting zoo there..

psssssst. just hopefully making Franco extra frothy...

 

[WaitingFor2020]

...in return for a bribe to her husband, Bill.

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

This story was in the NEW YORK TIMES so liberals, do not bother to impeach the source as biased against the Clintons.

Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.

So now you think the New York Times is legit? When it serves your purpose?

 

[Blackrook]

...in return for a bribe to her husband, Bill.

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

This story was in the NEW YORK TIMES so liberals, do not bother to impeach the source as biased against the Clintons.

Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.

So now you think the New York Times is legit? When it serves your purpose?

Since your source for many of your anti-Trump stories is the New York Times, you can't call them liars unless you admit that you are a liar.

 

[idb]

...in return for a bribe to her husband, Bill.

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

This story was in the NEW YORK TIMES so liberals, do not bother to impeach the source as biased against the Clintons.

Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.

So now you think the New York Times is legit? When it serves your purpose?

Since your source for many of your anti-Trump stories is the New York Times, you can't call them liars unless you admit that you are a liar.

Look...high above...is that the point?!!!!

 

[francoHFW]

After considerable research I've found incontrovertible visual proof of Clinton collusion!!!!

View attachment 138484

It looks like Melania is keeping Bill from groping her butt...

The Trumps just did quick photo ops- He's a fraud.

Bill's a pedophile, a rapist and a sexual harasser but you like that, don't Ya....

...
Flight logs show Bill Clinton flew on sex offender's jet much more than previously known

Garbage hate propaganda, hater dupe.

 

[WaitingFor2020]

...in return for a bribe to her husband, Bill.

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

This story was in the NEW YORK TIMES so liberals, do not bother to impeach the source as biased against the Clintons.

Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.

So now you think the New York Times is legit? When it serves your purpose?

Since your source for many of your anti-Trump stories is the New York Times, you can't call them liars unless you admit that you are a liar.

Idiot. I don't call the NYT liars. YOU DO. You idiots call them "fake news" until they print an article...from 2015..that you happen to like.
******* hypocrite. Do you realize how stupid you look right now?

 

[deanrd]

...in return for a bribe to her husband, Bill.

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

This story was in the NEW YORK TIMES so liberals, do not bother to impeach the source as biased against the Clintons.

Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.

Did Clinton help Russia obtain uranium for donations? Nope

.
Running The Data On PolitiFact Shows Bias Against Conservatives

Notice how you didn't dispute Politifact's article- you just screamed 'bias'.

Lets go to what Politifact said- and see if you can contradict the article

First, the State Department did approve of Russia’s gradual takeover of a company with significant U.S. uranium assets, but it didn’t act unilaterally. State was one of nine government agencies, not to mention independent federal and state nuclear regulators, that had to sign off on the deal.

The Kremlin’s 2010 purchase of a controlling stake in Uranium One had to be approved by the nine members of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States.

That included Clinton as secretary of state, but also the secretaries of the Treasury (the chairman of the committee), Defense, Justice, Commerce, Energy and Homeland Security as well as the the heads of the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative and the Office of Science and Technology Policy. The deal also had to be okayed by the independent Nuclear Regulatory Commission as well as Utah’s nuclear regulator.

While it’s conceivable Clinton advocated for the deal, the author of Clinton Cash Peter Schweizer himself admitted that he doesn’t have "direct evidence" proving Clinton played a part. The State Department’s principal representative on the committee, Jose Fernandez, told Time that Clinton "never intervened with me on any CFIUS matter."

I see you gettin all snowflakey but notice, I merely posted a link..

It should all be fully investigated, wouldn't you agree, soooo many questions need answers, don't you think..?

Your link has the questions and the answers. But at least you admit you didn't read it. Only "imagined" what it said.

 

[deanrd]

After considerable research I've found incontrovertible visual proof of Clinton collusion!!!!

View attachment 138484

Protect your nads.

 

[edthecynic]

Given this history, the chances that Russia would prefer Trump over Hillary Clinton are practically nil.

She was already a paid agent of the FSB.

And she committed treason.

How much uranium has gone out of the country to Russia?

According to pathological liar Limbaugh, 75%, so you know the truth is NONE.

Jul 11, 2017
RUSH: Not only that — you’re exactly right — look, this Ukrainian deal and the uranium deal with the Russians and the Clintons, we have documented this so many times, I’m sick of talking about it. Hillary Clinton facilitated the sale of, what, 75% of our uranium stocks to Ukraine all in exchange for money to the Clinton Foundation.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

I have learned from experience that attempting to explain facts that run counter to narrative is a fool's errand. But nevertheless, I admittedly have somewhat of a compulsion to inform. So here goes.

1. Russia did not purchase "our uranium". They bought a company that owns uranium mines in the US. The balance of uranium possesion between the US and Russia did not change, and no uranium was moved as a result of the sale.

2. Clinton did not have the power to "approve" or "deny" the sale. Only the President has that power. As SoS, Clinton did (nominally) sit on CFIUS, the Commitee for Foreign Investment in the United States, but so did 19 other cabinet members and officials, with the committee being chaired by the Secretary of the Treasury. This committee does not have veto power over such a sale, they are only there to advise the President. The advice to approval the sale was unanimous, and Clinton was almost certainly not even present when that advice was decided, since she has a record of not attending the meetings or paying attention, and voting with the rest of the committee.

 

[Blackrook]

I have learned from experience that attempting to explain facts that run counter to narrative is a fool's errand. But nevertheless, I admittedly have somewhat of a compulsion to inform. So here goes.

1. Russia did not purchase "our uranium". They bought a company that owns uranium mines in the US. The balance of uranium possesion between the US and Russia did not change, and no uranium was moved as a result of the sale.

2. Clinton did not have the power to "approve" or "deny" the sale. Only the President has that power. As SoS, Clinton did (nominally) sit on CFIUS, the Commitee for Foreign Investment in the United States, but so did 19 other cabinet members and officials, with the committee being chaired by the Secretary of the Treasury. This committee does not have veto power over such a sale, they are only there to advise the President. The advice to approval the sale was unanimous, and Clinton was almost certainly not even present when that advice was decided, since she has a record of not attending the meetings or paying attention, and voting with the rest of the committee.

You forgot to mention the $500,000 pay off, which was not reported.

But nice try covering for your sweetheart, that girl you love who can do no wrong no matter how many people end up dead.

 

[bodecea]

Given this history, the chances that Russia would prefer Trump over Hillary Clinton are practically nil.

She was already a paid agent of the FSB.

And she committed treason.

How much uranium has gone out of the country to Russia?

An excellent question....Blackrook, could you let us know the answer please?

 

[bodecea]

What gets me is that here we have is actual proof that Hillary Clinton is a paid Russian agent, who treasonously sold American uranium supplies for a $500,000 bribe.

'proof'?

You do realize that no one 'sold American uranium supplies'? Right?

He emphasized that multiple United States agencies, as well as the Canadian government, had signed off on the deal and that, in general, such matters were handled at a level below the secretary. “To suggest the State Department, under then-Secretary Clinton, exerted undue influence in the U.S. government’s review of the sale of Uranium One is utterly baseless,” he added.

But you believe Putin orchestrated a US election? Pot kettle hilarious!

Occam's Razor.

 

[miketx]

What gets me is that here we have is actual proof that Hillary Clinton is a paid Russian agent, who treasonously sold American uranium supplies for a $500,000 bribe.

'proof'?

You do realize that no one 'sold American uranium supplies'? Right?

He emphasized that multiple United States agencies, as well as the Canadian government, had signed off on the deal and that, in general, such matters were handled at a level below the secretary. “To suggest the State Department, under then-Secretary Clinton, exerted undue influence in the U.S. government’s review of the sale of Uranium One is utterly baseless,” he added.

But you believe Putin orchestrated a US election? Pot kettle hilarious!

Occam's Razor.

Then why hasn't Clinton done time?

 

[Lumpy 1]

...in return for a bribe to her husband, Bill.

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

This story was in the NEW YORK TIMES so liberals, do not bother to impeach the source as biased against the Clintons.

Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.

Did Clinton help Russia obtain uranium for donations? Nope

.
Running The Data On PolitiFact Shows Bias Against Conservatives

Notice how you didn't dispute Politifact's article- you just screamed 'bias'.

Lets go to what Politifact said- and see if you can contradict the article

First, the State Department did approve of Russia’s gradual takeover of a company with significant U.S. uranium assets, but it didn’t act unilaterally. State was one of nine government agencies, not to mention independent federal and state nuclear regulators, that had to sign off on the deal.

The Kremlin’s 2010 purchase of a controlling stake in Uranium One had to be approved by the nine members of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States.

That included Clinton as secretary of state, but also the secretaries of the Treasury (the chairman of the committee), Defense, Justice, Commerce, Energy and Homeland Security as well as the the heads of the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative and the Office of Science and Technology Policy. The deal also had to be okayed by the independent Nuclear Regulatory Commission as well as Utah’s nuclear regulator.

While it’s conceivable Clinton advocated for the deal, the author of Clinton Cash Peter Schweizer himself admitted that he doesn’t have "direct evidence" proving Clinton played a part. The State Department’s principal representative on the committee, Jose Fernandez, told Time that Clinton "never intervened with me on any CFIUS matter."

I see you gettin all snowflakey but notice, I merely posted a link..

It should all be fully investigated, wouldn't you agree, soooo many questions need answers, don't you think..?

Your link has the questions and the answers. But at least you admit you didn't read it. Only "imagined" what it said.

Eh, I read and studied the graphs enough to post the link and have read several other articles on Politifact. You're welcome to submit your trust to Politifact or Wiccapedia, enjoy.

.

 

[Lumpy 1]