Hillary Clinton questions 'legitimacy' of Trump's victory in 2016 election

[Ray From Cleveland]

STOP PICKING ON HER. Every morning she wakes up and sees Bill sleeping there and realizes he got a bj and she lost an election to the serial groperinchief. She put up with YEARS of Bill, and ran a car over untold numbers of bimbos ... just to be the first female potus .... only to lose to that guy who ran her through all the dirty deals she did to preserve the Clinton power. And she even went to Ivanka's wedding. The poor woman is humiliated. Any person with a iota of humility would never appear in public ever again. She's trying to COPE

I will have to admit I was really wrong about this one.

I predicted that once the election was over, we'd never get rid of DumBama. He'd be calling the press every two days for interviews or to print something he said in regards to Trump and his administration. But again, I was wrong. Instead, it's Hilary we can't seem to get rid of.

 

[BluesLegend]

STOP PICKING ON HER. Every morning she wakes up and sees Bill sleeping there and realizes he got a bj and she lost an election to the serial groperinchief. She put up with YEARS of Bill, and ran a car over untold numbers of bimbos ... just to be the first female potus .... only to lose to that guy who ran her through all the dirty deals she did to preserve the Clinton power. And she even went to Ivanka's wedding. The poor woman is humiliated. Any person with a iota of humility would never appear in public ever again. She's trying to COPE

I will have to admit I was really wrong about this one.

I predicted that once the election was over, we'd never get rid of DumBama. He'd be calling the press every two days for interviews or to print something he said in regards to Trump and his administration. But again, I was wrong. Instead, it's Hilary we can't seem to get rid of.

Obama was always in it for the money, he's happy to rake in his cash and leave politics behind. Look at his resume, it reeks of being a lazy do nothing.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Told you she was a POS filthy liberal. We held a legitimate election and she lost fair and square. To attempt to question the legitimacy of our presidential election is un-American, tell that Russian collaborator lying wench to shut the hell up.

It's all part of an evil plan really.

Democrats have been telling their constituents that America is turning more liberal every day. Republicans are nothing more than old white men who are dying off every year.

Since the Democrats can't be honest with their constituents and just say that America is not turning liberal, they need to lie instead.

So how do you convince people of something that really isn't happening? Simple, lie about it.

Hillary didn't lose, it's just that Republicans relied on help from Russia to steal the election.
Kerry didn't lose, Bush had buddies in the Diebold company rig the machines.
Gore didn't lose, Bush was selected by the Supreme Court.

If Democrats were capable of telling the truth and just admit failure, it would knock the wind out of their voters. They may stop coming out to vote realizing the country is not turning liberal, Socialist or Communist. So they need to tell them Democrats really won, it's just they got cheated somehow.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

The fact that she couldn't even muster up a concession speech suggests that she absolutely expected to win and left no room for doubt in her mind.

Actually, as rumor has it, she was too drunk to give any kind of speech.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

That's ok. We question the legitimacy of Chelsea......

Has there ever been a DNA test? It seems unlikely that the spawn of two of the most evil political people in modern history could turn out somewhat normal.

She's been in the limelight long before becoming first lady. Yet nobody can find a picture of Hilary pregnant in public.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Hillary is pathetic. Rumor has it that Bill is done with her craziness and threw her book in the trash.

Hillary has turned into the crazy ex girlfriend that is stalking the man that dumped her. She's certain that she can break up that marriage once the poor guy realizes that he loves her all along.

 

[MarathonMike]

Then: “He became the first person, Republican or Democrat, who refused to say that he would respect the results of this election. Now, that is a direct threat to our democracy,”


Now: "Clinton lamented how “we don’t have a method for contesting” the election in the United States and called for an independent commission to “get to the bottom of what happened.”




We don't need an independent commission. Trump got more electoral votes and won. End of story. Too bad, so sad. Time to accept it, Hilly.....

Ergo, Hillary has defined herself as a direct threat to Democracy. She certainly would have been had Donald Trump not rescued America on November 8th 2016.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Then: “He became the first person, Republican or Democrat, who refused to say that he would respect the results of this election. Now, that is a direct threat to our democracy,”


Now: "Clinton lamented how “we don’t have a method for contesting” the election in the United States and called for an independent commission to “get to the bottom of what happened.”




We don't need an independent commission. Trump got more electoral votes and won. End of story. Too bad, so sad. Time to accept it, Hilly.....

The difference being, she raises legitimate questions, while Trump was squawking about made up bullshit.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Hillary is pathetic. Rumor has it that Bill is done with her craziness and threw her book in the trash.

Hillary has turned into the crazy ex girlfriend that is stalking the man that dumped her. She's certain that she can break up that marriage once the poor guy realizes that he loves her all along.

I don't believe it was ever a real marriage. It was a business partnership. Once their business is over, they will break up officially.

 

[Fueri]

Then: “He became the first person, Republican or Democrat, who refused to say that he would respect the results of this election. Now, that is a direct threat to our democracy,”


Now: "Clinton lamented how “we don’t have a method for contesting” the election in the United States and called for an independent commission to “get to the bottom of what happened.”




We don't need an independent commission. Trump got more electoral votes and won. End of story. Too bad, so sad. Time to accept it, Hilly.....

The difference being, she raises legitimate questions, while Trump was squawking about made up bullshit.

So not respecting the results after saying what she said is ok as long as she or the opposing party thinks she's justified.

What a wonderful example of the hyper partisan 'logic' that is destroying our country, not to mention an example of the hypocrisy of the political spin doctors and those that carry their water so willingly.

Trump won. There were many factors that fed into this but the election is long over at this point

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Then: “He became the first person, Republican or Democrat, who refused to say that he would respect the results of this election. Now, that is a direct threat to our democracy,”


Now: "Clinton lamented how “we don’t have a method for contesting” the election in the United States and called for an independent commission to “get to the bottom of what happened.”




We don't need an independent commission. Trump got more electoral votes and won. End of story. Too bad, so sad. Time to accept it, Hilly.....

The difference being, she raises legitimate questions, while Trump was squawking about made up bullshit.

So not respecting the results after saying what she said is ok as long as she or the opposing party thinks she's justified.

What a wonderful example of the hyper partisan 'logic' that is destroying our country, not to mention an example of the hypocrisy of the political spin doctors and those that carry their water so willingly.

Trump won. There were many factors that fed into this but the election is long over at this point

She's not disreapecting the results, she's asking questions. That's a far cry from the embarrassing shit Trump said. Also, her questions are legitimate and should be asked.

I know that you really really really want these two things to be the same, but they just aren't.

 

[Fueri]

Then: “He became the first person, Republican or Democrat, who refused to say that he would respect the results of this election. Now, that is a direct threat to our democracy,”


Now: "Clinton lamented how “we don’t have a method for contesting” the election in the United States and called for an independent commission to “get to the bottom of what happened.”




We don't need an independent commission. Trump got more electoral votes and won. End of story. Too bad, so sad. Time to accept it, Hilly.....

The difference being, she raises legitimate questions, while Trump was squawking about made up bullshit.

So not respecting the results after saying what she said is ok as long as she or the opposing party thinks she's justified.

What a wonderful example of the hyper partisan 'logic' that is destroying our country, not to mention an example of the hypocrisy of the political spin doctors and those that carry their water so willingly.

Trump won. There were many factors that fed into this but the election is long over at this point

She's not disreapecting the results, she's asking questions. That's a far cry from the embarrassing shit Trump said. Also, her questions are legitimate and should be asked.

I know that you really really really want these two things to be the same, but they just aren't.

She isn't?

her response to the interviewer asking "do you think it was a legitimate election" was “I think that there are lots of questions about its legitimacy,” and that's not questioning the legitimacy/disrespecting the results?

she is simply reiterating the "he's illegitimate" message the dems have been spinning out since Nov 8.

and, (more importantly actually), for either of these things (Rooshins! or these claims of voter suppression) to have any bearing on the actual 'legitimacy' of Trump's election we would have to have 2 things:

1. Proof that Trump or his campaign had direct involvement, maybe the RNC I guess could be stuffed in there, but if Trump had nothing to do with it, Trump had nothing to do with it.
2. Proof that either of these things actually impacted the ultimate outcome. anything other than direct causality of her loss fails to meet any standard of delegitimizing the result.

given that 2, above, is something that almost certainly can never be conclusively be proven, and dems know it, all they're doing is using this as a smokescreen to continue to interfere with Trump in any way they can. That's not a legitimate anything, unless you want to count business as usual as 'legitimate'

 

[Kosh]

See the far left is still pushing the same old debunked religious dogma.

Remember they did this in 2000 as well..

 

[BluesLegend]

Hillary shot off her big mouth and Trump humiliated her again with, "Crooked Hillary Clinton is the worse (and biggest) loser of all time." Then Trump told her to get a life and dared her to run again in 2020

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Woman with 'F--k Trump' sticker jailed day after sheriff threatened charges

This woman agrees with Hillary.

She shouldn't have been jailed for this, it's an affront to free speech, but I heard it was because of an unrelated warrant.

It sounds to me as if the sheriff might have overstepped in an effort to avoid any potential confrontation that may have ensued, but again I heard it was an arrest based on an unrelated issue. Someone should have spoken to her and educated her on how offensive it is to label every voter in such a manner, as it went further than just cursing the president, in and of itself silly; but it also cursed those who voted for him. Quite a broad indictment proudly on display in the form of a bumper sticker.

Give me a five minute chat with her about socialist, over reaching police states such as that of Canada and what Clinton would have pursued if she had won and I'm guessing if she is reasonable she will at least consider the alternative as not being as appealing as she once did. One thing to hear theories, quite another to hear it from someone who experienced it in practice. Sort of like Venezuela...

She had a felony warrant for fraud.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Then: “He became the first person, Republican or Democrat, who refused to say that he would respect the results of this election. Now, that is a direct threat to our democracy,”


Now: "Clinton lamented how “we don’t have a method for contesting” the election in the United States and called for an independent commission to “get to the bottom of what happened.”




We don't need an independent commission. Trump got more electoral votes and won. End of story. Too bad, so sad. Time to accept it, Hilly.....

The difference being, she raises legitimate questions, while Trump was squawking about made up bullshit.

What legitimate questions would those be?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Then: “He became the first person, Republican or Democrat, who refused to say that he would respect the results of this election. Now, that is a direct threat to our democracy,”


Now: "Clinton lamented how “we don’t have a method for contesting” the election in the United States and called for an independent commission to “get to the bottom of what happened.”




We don't need an independent commission. Trump got more electoral votes and won. End of story. Too bad, so sad. Time to accept it, Hilly.....

The difference being, she raises legitimate questions, while Trump was squawking about made up bullshit.

So not respecting the results after saying what she said is ok as long as she or the opposing party thinks she's justified.

What a wonderful example of the hyper partisan 'logic' that is destroying our country, not to mention an example of the hypocrisy of the political spin doctors and those that carry their water so willingly.

Trump won. There were many factors that fed into this but the election is long over at this point

She's not disreapecting the results, she's asking questions. That's a far cry from the embarrassing shit Trump said. Also, her questions are legitimate and should be asked.

I know that you really really really want these two things to be the same, but they just aren't.

She isn't?

her response to the interviewer asking "do you think it was a legitimate election" was “I think that there are lots of questions about its legitimacy,” and that's not questioning the legitimacy/disrespecting the results?

she is simply reiterating the "he's illegitimate" message the dems have been spinning out since Nov 8.

and, (more importantly actually), for either of these things (Rooshins! or these claims of voter suppression) to have any bearing on the actual 'legitimacy' of Trump's election we would have to have 2 things:

1. Proof that Trump or his campaign had direct involvement, maybe the RNC I guess could be stuffed in there, but if Trump had nothing to do with it, Trump had nothing to do with it.
2. Proof that either of these things actually impacted the ultimate outcome. anything other than direct causality of her loss fails to meet any standard of delegitimizing the result.

given that 2, above, is something that almost certainly can never be conclusively be proven, and dems know it, all they're doing is using this as a smokescreen to continue to interfere with Trump in any way they can. That's not a legitimate anything, unless you want to count business as usual as 'legitimate'

She stated that she has questions. Then stated those questions. She did not assume the answers. You made that leap yourself.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Then: “He became the first person, Republican or Democrat, who refused to say that he would respect the results of this election. Now, that is a direct threat to our democracy,”


Now: "Clinton lamented how “we don’t have a method for contesting” the election in the United States and called for an independent commission to “get to the bottom of what happened.”




We don't need an independent commission. Trump got more electoral votes and won. End of story. Too bad, so sad. Time to accept it, Hilly.....

The difference being, she raises legitimate questions, while Trump was squawking about made up bullshit.

What legitimate questions would those be?

For one, did his campaign collude with Russia in an information campaign effort that actually changed the result of thelection? And welcome back from your 2 year coma!

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Then: “He became the first person, Republican or Democrat, who refused to say that he would respect the results of this election. Now, that is a direct threat to our democracy,”


Now: "Clinton lamented how “we don’t have a method for contesting” the election in the United States and called for an independent commission to “get to the bottom of what happened.”




We don't need an independent commission. Trump got more electoral votes and won. End of story. Too bad, so sad. Time to accept it, Hilly.....

The difference being, she raises legitimate questions, while Trump was squawking about made up bullshit.

What legitimate questions would those be?

For one, did his campaign collude with Russia in an information campaign effort that actually changed the result of thelection? And welcome back from your 2 year coma!

You've plenty of time to come up with evidence of collusion yet nothings come of it. Even dems are saying there's nothing there.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Then: “He became the first person, Republican or Democrat, who refused to say that he would respect the results of this election. Now, that is a direct threat to our democracy,”


Now: "Clinton lamented how “we don’t have a method for contesting” the election in the United States and called for an independent commission to “get to the bottom of what happened.”




We don't need an independent commission. Trump got more electoral votes and won. End of story. Too bad, so sad. Time to accept it, Hilly.....

The difference being, she raises legitimate questions, while Trump was squawking about made up bullshit.

What legitimate questions would those be?

For one, did his campaign collude with Russia in an information campaign effort that actually changed the result of thelection? And welcome back from your 2 year coma!

You've plenty of time to come up with evidence of collusion yet nothings come of it. Even dems are saying there's nothing there.

Dumb post on several levels. For one, it is now fact on record that Trump campaign officials attempted to collude with Russian officials. Second, new lies by people in the Trump circle regarding Russian contacts and Wikileaks contacts are still being revealed on a weekly basis. Third, the investigation is still ongoing. Fourth, anyone who claims to know what evidence the Mueller team does or does not possess (that's you, in this case) is either a liar or delusional.