Hillary cannot win a non-rigged election

The only people rigging the election are Republicans with their purging of voters, voter intimidation and voting twice. All of the fraud is being committed by Republicans.

The OP and the rest of you deplorables can fuck right off back to the basket in 24 hours.




And why so hateful?





The illegals will vote for Hillary just to get the promised blow job from Madonna. She will be a tad busier than usual since she promised blow jobs for those who vote for Hillary and she didn't stipulate that the offer is only good if Killary wins. Bill Clinton will be first in line.
 
Ummm, you mean the same polls which accurately predicted the winner for every election since 1936 except 1976 where they were wrong by 1 percentage point and 1948 where they picked Dewey??

18 out of 20 were right ... 90% accuracy...

That's your idea of rigged?

Gee, I wonder why. Did it ever occur to you that the whole thing is rigged, polls and the outcome?
So Obama won twice because "they" decided not to rig it?


"They" wanted Obama and likely promised Hillary that she would get handed the office when he left. The DNC controls things, not the voters. If the voters in the primaries got their way, it would be Sanders running.
 
Ummm, you mean the same polls which accurately predicted the winner for every election since 1936 except 1976 where they were wrong by 1 percentage point and 1948 where they picked Dewey??

18 out of 20 were right ... 90% accuracy...

That's your idea of rigged?

Gee, I wonder why. Did it ever occur to you that the whole thing is rigged, polls and the outcome?
So Obama won twice because "they" decided not to rig it?
Oh it was rigged for obama both times. Its just that it was the republicans that did the rigging while the democrats sat back and laughed there asses off while it happened.
lets first take McCain. McCain lost big for the nomination against George Bush because the voters did not like him at all. He was after all a RINO and had never really done anything of value for the party.
Now move up to the last couple years of the Bush administration, Bush had lost his support even among the republican voters, If third terms were possible, he would not have won another run for office. So knowing that, who do the republicans pick to follow him? that's right, the guy that wasn't able to beat him for the nomination in the first place. There was little chance that McCain would have a shot at winning, and then add Barbie to the ticket? the republicans wanted to lose. They were successful and the Kenyan took an easy win.
Then after the fighting over the government destroying our health care, and the obvious disdain for any type of plan like this, the republicans decide its in their best interest to run a guy who's signature bill while governor was to implement social health care for the state, How could they lose right? Again, they wanted to lose and they were successful. Kenyan, round two.
And they tried again to throw in candidates that the republican voters did not care for this time around. The difference, Donald Trump screwed up their plans. This time, the democrats have to do the rigging because the republicans control of their candidate was lost.
obama took two legitimate wins, Clinton could not win without the cheating, and the cover ups that we have seen so far.
And there will be little to no resistance from the republicans in office because I think that in reality, whatever the ultimate goal for the one world government is, the republicans are in on it also. the only reason that the parties want their guy in position when it happens is so that they are the ones with the greatest chance of having whatever power and riches will be going along with the transition. This also tells me that the one world goal is not going to happen in the next 4 years, but the groundwork that has to be laid must continue regardless of who does it. Hillary will comply, Donald will not.
Hillary has to win for the good of both parties in power right now. You can expect the republicans to put up a serious contender in 4 years, and if Hillary wins a second term, it will be a miracle, both sides are going to be cheating their asses off to be the ones that hold the power when the ball drops.
 
Spin??

I'm the one quoting her verbatim while you're the one paraphrasing what she said.

I'm the one linking the entire video where Obama clearly states "...undocumented family and friends who may not have a voice. Who can't legally vote." While you're the one who linked an edited version of that video which cut out where clarifies undocumented aliens can't legally vote.

You're a brain-dead knuckle-dragging deplorable-rightard. You lied by posting an edited video and got caught. And because you're a conservative, you can't simply admit you fucked up by posting an edited video that cuts out the part where Obama says illegals can't legally vote, you double down on stupid and proceed to claim Rodriguez said something she didn't say by paraphrasing what she actually said.

She's an American citizen and she asked, "if I vote..."

Wow. I really touched a nerve with you. I like how you completely ignored my last post (except for one word in it) and you refuse to accept that people can have a different impression of the same interview.

I also like how you ignored my point that the crooks you support don't care about illegal voting, because they want people to vote for socialism (which illegals typically want). And they don't care about illegal immigration, because they want to change the demographics. In fact, the globalists you defend don't care about the law at all, but that's another topic.

Look, I'm not interested in talking to someone with so much hate and rage and vile, nasty language. I'm bored with the "Democrat vs Republican" football mentality that you display, I got tired of that years ago. So unless you can communicate in a more rational and mature way, please don't post to me. Thank you.
Yes, I find it offensive when people are stupid and/or bullshit.

Let's review.... you posted an edited video which edited out Obama saying it's illegal for undocumented aliens to vote. You then falsely claimed he's encouraging undocumented aliens to vote based on the edited video you posted. I call bullshit when I see it. Even after I showed you the unedited version of that video where he says illegals can't vote, you persist with this bullshit of yours.

If you want me to stop posting to you -- stop bullshitting.
 
Mitt Romney....

article-2179309-143A7FFF000005DC-267_634x333.jpg

John McCain....

0907_8a_large500.jpg

Sarah Palin....

0909_2_large500.jpg

Yup. This election has highlighted that this is not the first election to be stolen.In 08, there's was at least plausible deniability. In 12, I called it rigged from the start (and most conservatives here weren't exactly even embracing that). But now that the crowds have shrunk and the wikileaks have came out and the stories of cheating have become more pronounced and the media has become even more corrupt and the contrast has become more stark (running a felon for president), the truth has beome undeniable to anyone who is paying attention.

I remember up till the election of '12, in political science it was pretty SOP everywhere in the world to rely on exit polling as the best way to verify the accuracy of election results.

Then something strange happened. In all the acedemic literature, they started to question the accuracy of these polls. Naturally, there really is nothing to question about these polls. They are random sampled, they tend to skew a little bit toward younger voters, as older folks don't like to talk to pollsters as much, but overall, they are the MOST ACCURATE POLLS ever to tell how folks vote.

But now, the establishment doesn't like them. Actually, now that I think of it, they started this campaign to discredit them in acedemia and the press back when Bush stole his first election, and when they had outside observers notice how badly the election results from the '04 election did not match up with the exit polls, the media just didn't cover it.

The only election since '96 that has been legit has been the '08 election. I shit you not. Your masters have been pulling the wool over your eyes for a long time. No reason you should start caring now.

If you are interested, watch the documentaries Uncounted: The New Math of American Elections or American Blackout.

This shit goes on all the time.

I don't think 08 was legit, honestly. Voter machine manipulation and ballot box stuffing on a mass scale. Media sold Obama as a rock star really well; but in the end does it make much sense that we would vote for a nobody with that much corruption? Nah.

Well, I wish I could agree, but I could find no instances of large scale voter fraud, or exit polling that would make me think it was a stolen election, sorry.

On a personal note, even I know conservatives that drank the kool-aid. I wouldn't be surprised if you do as well.

You don't think that the corporate media can't easily manipulate the exit polls?

The Dems knew how Bush cheated in 04 and applied many of the same lessons and then some in 08. Dude, it's not like the truth about Obama wasn't mostly available for anyone wanting to find it. Sure, some of it came into focus over the years. You really think it makes sense that an invader Muslim wins the election 7 years after 911? Give me a break. I'll tell you who is drinking the kool aid; and it ain't me.

I don't think you know what exit polls are, how they are conducted, who does them, etc., if you did, you wouldn't think they can be manipulated. If you look at independent exit polls, and how they are done, they you wouldn't make such statements.

If you have evidence to the contrary, I'm willing to entertain it, certainly.

In the '08 election, nobody seriously believed, nor do sober Americans believe Obama is a "Muslim Invader," he is a member of Rev. Wright's liberation Theology. You don't remember?
 
Damn girl
You still trying to get someone to get drunk enough to agree to have sex with you?
Dont worry, just as soon as hillarys win is announced there will be plenty of socialists running around willing to bang even the nastiest of ho's
 
Trump filling arenas while Hillary is having to pay people to fill hallways. We've seen all the anecdotal and empirical evidence showing all the voter fraud as well. We know it's a sham if it's anything but a landslide for Trump. And we'll know it's rigged if HIllary wins. There is just no doubt about it.
If this was a rigged election, Trump wouldn't waste a hundred million dollars trying to buy the White House.
 
Trump filling arenas while Hillary is having to pay people to fill hallways. We've seen all the anecdotal and empirical evidence showing all the voter fraud as well. We know it's a sham if it's anything but a landslide for Trump. And we'll know it's rigged if HIllary wins. There is just no doubt about it.
If this was a rigged election, Trump wouldn't waste a hundred million dollars trying to buy the White House.
chump change compared to what hillary spent just on her depends.
 

Forum List

Back
Top