Big Fitz
User Quit *****
- Nov 23, 2009
- 16,917
- 2,522
- 48
Conservatives are opposed the privacy rights with regard to abortion.
Two points you need to answer first. 1. Is a minor entitled to the rights of an adult and therefore autonomy from their parent's responsibilities and rights? 2. where is the right to privacy in the constitution? I fail to see that in the amendments.
Conversely, should your money be used to promote abstinence by religious groups seeking to cut down on teenage pregnancy, or just to social workers doling out condoms against parental wishes, giving tacit permission to statutory rape?
Conservatives are opposed to religious rights with regard to Muslims and where they may worship.
I see. So now zoning laws and the deference of good taste is the same to opposing islam?
That's how you're trying to skew it?
So, you aren't opposed to Nativity scenes on public property then?
Also, name one law on the books that imprisons another person in this nation for being a religion other than Christian.
Conservatives are opposed to same sex marriage.
With the degree of 'shacking up' without social stigma, is this an issue????
We're also opposed to different species marriage. Aren't you? How about polygamy? Group 'marriages'? Maybe marrying little girls? are you opposed to any of that?
Secondly, a sexual act is not the same as a genetic trait. The two are not equivalent. Marriage is, in essence a religious ceremony by nature and you're just trying to push your religion, or hatred there of on the churches by law. If you want the legal rights of marriage, fine, prepare a contract and have it entered into law at the courthouse. Fine, done, next?
Your examples are non issues compared to my examples.
You want to take away my ability to control how I heat my house.
You want to tell me what to eat.
You want to tell me where I can worship.
You want to tell me who to give to.
You want to tell me who I must hire based on skin color.
You want to tell me how much or little I may be paid.
And if I don't obey, you will imprison me or sue me till I am impoverished and destroyed financially.
Who's the greater threat to people here? The one who says they don't want to be paying for some dippy ***** to abort her child, or the one who says you must live in a green housing project to prevent 'urban sprawl'?

