Here’s What’s Comin’

[beagle9]

Most of you of course are looking for the specific moments in time that caused systemic racism. Like a meeting where it was decided to screw black people recorded on tape. That’s not how it works. A good quote from a recommendation up thread:

“For example, many African American World War II veterans did not apply for government-guaranteed mortgages for suburban purchases because they knew that the Veterans Administration would reject them on account of their race, so applications were pointless. Those veterans then did not gain wealth from home equity appreciation as did white veterans, and their descendants could then not inherit that wealth as did white veterans’ descendants. With less inherited wealth, African Americans today are generally less able than their white peers to afford to attend good colleges.”

Excerpt From
The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America
Richard Rothstein

Have you ever once thought, that back in the days when the Africans were so far behind, that they appeared to have a primitive culture amongst the African race early on in America, and this otherwise where you had an European culture made up of mostly white's who were finding it hard to totally trust and except the African culture into the mainstream European led American cultural settings back then ????? Otherwise until time proved overwhelmingly that the African race could be assimilated into the mainstream cultures that were active as the majority in the United States throughout certain time periods, this is where change began to happen for the betterment of the country as a whole.

If you think cultural problems are a thing of the past, then you had best guess again. Many races have assimilated into mainstream American culture, and they are living the dream together, but we still have hold outs in races and cultures that are those whom don't like others based upon either their skin color (in which is really stupid) along with them having a specific culture involved that exist underneath that skin color if coupled together in specific groups, gangs etc.

This goes for all colors who seek to stick together in these ways whether white, black or other.

Otherwise you might have blacks who have a specific culture (gang maybe) that exist amongst the black people who don't like whites, but this doesn't mean that all blacks are like this nor do all blacks agree to this separate culture in which exist amongst the black race. So they separate from it, but they are considered as race traitor's, uncle Tom's and Tomasena's.

The same goes for white's (the KKK maybe).

It is why Martin Luther King added the content of Character part to his speech. Yes, character is highly important in all of this, but the race baiter's who want to keep the pot stirred up, well they try to deflect or confuse these issues for political purposes and power now.

Beware America, beware of the race baiter's and brainwashers.

 

[irosie91]

oh---chic----I think I commented on an emoji you used------in relation to Kamala Harris who has designated
herself black. I did not quote you

I don't use emojis.

oh----well----the whole post seems scrambled. emojis are lots of fun. I find the current general DESIRE to be "a person of color" a very interesting phenomenon since it has hit us concurrently with a general consensus that being a person of color is an horrific social and economic handicap

 

[IM2]

Today’s racial wealth gap is perhaps the most glaring legacy of American slavery and the violent economic dispossession that followed. When legal slavery ended in 1865, there was great hope for formerly enslaved people. Between 1865 and 1870, the Reconstruction Amendments established birthright citizenship — making all black people citizens and granting them equal protection under the law — and gave black men the right to vote. There was also the promise of compensation. In January 1865, Gen. William Sherman issued an order reallocating hundreds of thousands of acres of white-owned land along the coasts of Florida, Georgia and South Carolina for settlement by black families in 40-acre plots. Congress established the Freedmen’s Bureau to oversee the transition from slavery to freedom, and the Freedman’s Savings Bank was formed to help four million formerly enslaved people gain financial freedom.

When Lincoln was assassinated, Vice President Andrew Johnson effectively rescinded Sherman’s order by pardoning white plantation owners and returning to them the land on which 40,000 or so black families had settled. “This is a country for white men, and by God, as long as I am President, it shall be a government for white men,” Johnson declared in 1866. The Freedmen’s Bureau, always meant to be temporary, was dismantled in 1872. More than 60,000 black people deposited more than $1 million into the Freedman’s Savings Bank, but its all-white trustees began issuing speculative loans to white investors and corporations, and when it failed in 1874, many black depositors lost much of their savings.

“The origins of the racial wealth gap start with the failure to provide the formerly enslaved with the land grants of 40 acres,” says William A. Darity Jr., a professor of public policy and African-American studies at Duke University. Any financial progress that black people made was regarded as an affront to white supremacy. After a decade of black gains under Reconstruction, a much longer period of racial violence would wipe nearly all of it away.

To assuage Southern white people, the federal government pulled out the Union troops who were stationed in the South to keep order. During this period of so-called Redemption, lawmakers throughout the South enacted Black Codes and Jim Crow laws that stripped black people of many of their freedoms and property. Other white people, often aided by law enforcement, waged a campaign of violence against black people that would rob them of an incalculable amount of wealth.

Armed white people stormed prosperous majority-black Wilmington, N.C., in 1898 to murder dozens of black people, force 2,000 others off their property and overthrow the city government. In the Red Summer of 1919, at least 240 black people were murdered across the country. And in 1921, in one of the bloodiest racial attacks in United States history, Greenwood, a prosperous black neighborhood in Tulsa, Okla., was burned and looted. It is estimated that as many as 300 black people were murdered and 10,000 were rendered homeless. Thirty-five square blocks were destroyed. No one was ever convicted in any of these acts of racist violence.

“You have limited opportunity to accumulate wealth, and then you have a process where that wealth is destroyed or taken away,” Darity says. “And all of that is prior to the effects of restrictive covenants — redlining, the discriminatory application of the G.I. Bill and other federal programs.”

The post-Reconstruction plundering of black wealth was not just a product of spontaneous violence, but etched in law and public policy. Through the first half of the 20th century, the federal government actively excluded black people from government wealth-building programs. In the 1930s, President Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal helped build a solid middle class through sweeping social programs, including Social Security and the minimum wage. But a majority of black people at the time were agricultural laborers or domestic workers, occupations that were ineligible for these benefits. The establishment of the Home Owners Loan Corporation in 1933 helped save the collapsing housing market, but it largely excluded black neighborhoods from government-insured loans. Those neighborhoods were deemed “hazardous” and colored in with red on maps, a practice that came to be known as “redlining.”

The G.I. Bill is often hailed as one of Roosevelt’s most enduring legacies. It helped usher millions of working-class veterans through college and into new homes and the middle class. But it discriminatorily benefited white people. While the bill didn’t explicitly exclude black veterans, the way it was administered often did. The bill gave veterans access to mortgages with no down payments, but the Veterans Administration adopted the same racially restrictive policies as the Federal Housing Administration, which guaranteed bank loans only to developers who wouldn’t sell to black people. “The major way in which people have an opportunity to accumulate wealth is contingent on the wealth positions of their parents and their grandparents,” Darity says. “To the extent that blacks have the capacity to accumulate wealth, we have not had the ability to transfer the same kinds of resources across generations.”

How America’s Vast Racial Wealth Gap Grew: By Plunder (Published 2019)

It wasn’t just slavery but segregation, redlining, evictions, exclusion — and outright theft.

www.nytimes.com

Blacks have not failed. The failure was in whites. The consistent insecurity and fear of blacks surpassing whites made whites enact laws to exclude. Now today we have whites like many here who have sucked on the tit of government so hard and so long that it's nipples have begun to bleed bragging about their success after they denied equal access to blacks by every manner they could. If you get a 90 yard lead in a 100 yard dash, you should win the race by 90 yards. White racists and this Asian nitwit have nothing to brag about. Whether it be an H1 or H1B visa which meant you had a job waiting for you when you got here, or the limitless handouts government has given to whites since this place was a colony, by the standards you put on us, you are failures who could not make it without the government giving you something it denied others. This is fact that is documented and undisputed.

​

 

[IM2]

Most of you of course are looking for the specific moments in time that caused systemic racism. Like a meeting where it was decided to screw black people recorded on tape. That’s not how it works. A good quote from a recommendation up thread:

“For example, many African American World War II veterans did not apply for government-guaranteed mortgages for suburban purchases because they knew that the Veterans Administration would reject them on account of their race, so applications were pointless. Those veterans then did not gain wealth from home equity appreciation as did white veterans, and their descendants could then not inherit that wealth as did white veterans’ descendants. With less inherited wealth, African Americans today are generally less able than their white peers to afford to attend good colleges.”

Excerpt From
The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America
Richard Rothstein

Have you ever once thought, that back in the days when the Africans were so far behind, that they appeared to have a primitive culture amongst the African race early on in America, and this otherwise where you had an European culture made up of mostly white's who were finding it hard to totally trust and except the African culture into the mainstream European led American cultural settings back then ????? Otherwise until time proved overwhelmingly that the African race could be assimilated into the mainstream cultures that were active as the majority in the United States throughout certain time periods, this is where change began to happen for the betterment of the country as a whole.

If you think cultural problems are a thing of the past, then you had best guess again. Many races have assimilated into mainstream American culture, and they are living the dream together, but we still have hold outs in races and cultures that are those whom don't like others based upon either their skin color (in which is really stupid) along with them having a specific culture involved that exist underneath that skin color if coupled together in specific groups, gangs etc.

This goes for all colors who seek to stick together in these ways whether white, black or other.

Otherwise you might have blacks who have a specific culture (gang maybe) that exist amongst the black people who don't like whites, but this doesn't mean that all blacks are like this nor do all blacks agree to this separate culture in which exist amongst the black race. So they separate from it, but they are considered as race traitor's, uncle Tom's and Tomasena's.

The same goes for white's (the KKK maybe).

It is why Martin Luther King added the content of Character part to his speech. Yes, character is highly important in all of this, but the race baiter's who want to keep the pot stirred up, well they try to deflect or confuse these issues for political purposes and power now.

Beware America, beware of the race baiter's and brainwashers.

Nothing said here is correct.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Today’s racial wealth gap is perhaps the most glaring legacy of American slavery and the violent economic dispossession that followed. When legal slavery ended in 1865, there was great hope for formerly enslaved people. Between 1865 and 1870, the Reconstruction Amendments established birthright citizenship — making all black people citizens and granting them equal protection under the law — and gave black men the right to vote. There was also the promise of compensation. In January 1865, Gen. William Sherman issued an order reallocating hundreds of thousands of acres of white-owned land along the coasts of Florida, Georgia and South Carolina for settlement by black families in 40-acre plots. Congress established the Freedmen’s Bureau to oversee the transition from slavery to freedom, and the Freedman’s Savings Bank was formed to help four million formerly enslaved people gain financial freedom.

When Lincoln was assassinated, Vice President Andrew Johnson effectively rescinded Sherman’s order by pardoning white plantation owners and returning to them the land on which 40,000 or so black families had settled. “This is a country for white men, and by God, as long as I am President, it shall be a government for white men,” Johnson declared in 1866. The Freedmen’s Bureau, always meant to be temporary, was dismantled in 1872. More than 60,000 black people deposited more than $1 million into the Freedman’s Savings Bank, but its all-white trustees began issuing speculative loans to white investors and corporations, and when it failed in 1874, many black depositors lost much of their savings.

“The origins of the racial wealth gap start with the failure to provide the formerly enslaved with the land grants of 40 acres,” says William A. Darity Jr., a professor of public policy and African-American studies at Duke University. Any financial progress that black people made was regarded as an affront to white supremacy. After a decade of black gains under Reconstruction, a much longer period of racial violence would wipe nearly all of it away.

To assuage Southern white people, the federal government pulled out the Union troops who were stationed in the South to keep order. During this period of so-called Redemption, lawmakers throughout the South enacted Black Codes and Jim Crow laws that stripped black people of many of their freedoms and property. Other white people, often aided by law enforcement, waged a campaign of violence against black people that would rob them of an incalculable amount of wealth.

Armed white people stormed prosperous majority-black Wilmington, N.C., in 1898 to murder dozens of black people, force 2,000 others off their property and overthrow the city government. In the Red Summer of 1919, at least 240 black people were murdered across the country. And in 1921, in one of the bloodiest racial attacks in United States history, Greenwood, a prosperous black neighborhood in Tulsa, Okla., was burned and looted. It is estimated that as many as 300 black people were murdered and 10,000 were rendered homeless. Thirty-five square blocks were destroyed. No one was ever convicted in any of these acts of racist violence.

“You have limited opportunity to accumulate wealth, and then you have a process where that wealth is destroyed or taken away,” Darity says. “And all of that is prior to the effects of restrictive covenants — redlining, the discriminatory application of the G.I. Bill and other federal programs.”

The post-Reconstruction plundering of black wealth was not just a product of spontaneous violence, but etched in law and public policy. Through the first half of the 20th century, the federal government actively excluded black people from government wealth-building programs. In the 1930s, President Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal helped build a solid middle class through sweeping social programs, including Social Security and the minimum wage. But a majority of black people at the time were agricultural laborers or domestic workers, occupations that were ineligible for these benefits. The establishment of the Home Owners Loan Corporation in 1933 helped save the collapsing housing market, but it largely excluded black neighborhoods from government-insured loans. Those neighborhoods were deemed “hazardous” and colored in with red on maps, a practice that came to be known as “redlining.”

The G.I. Bill is often hailed as one of Roosevelt’s most enduring legacies. It helped usher millions of working-class veterans through college and into new homes and the middle class. But it discriminatorily benefited white people. While the bill didn’t explicitly exclude black veterans, the way it was administered often did. The bill gave veterans access to mortgages with no down payments, but the Veterans Administration adopted the same racially restrictive policies as the Federal Housing Administration, which guaranteed bank loans only to developers who wouldn’t sell to black people. “The major way in which people have an opportunity to accumulate wealth is contingent on the wealth positions of their parents and their grandparents,” Darity says. “To the extent that blacks have the capacity to accumulate wealth, we have not had the ability to transfer the same kinds of resources across generations.”

How America’s Vast Racial Wealth Gap Grew: By Plunder (Published 2019)

It wasn’t just slavery but segregation, redlining, evictions, exclusion — and outright theft.

www.nytimes.com

Blacks have not failed. The failure was in whites. The consistent insecurity and fear of blacks surpassing whites made whites enact laws to exclude. Now today we have whites like many here who have sucked on the tit of government so hard and so long that it's nipples have begun to bleed bragging about their success after they denied equal access to blacks by every manner they could. If you get a 90 yard lead in a 100 yard dash, you should win the race by 90 yards. White racists and this Asian nitwit have nothing to brag about. Whether it be an H1 or H1B visa which meant you had a job waiting for you when you got here, or the limitless handouts government has given to whites since this place was a colony, by the standards you put on us, you are failures who could not make it without the government giving you something it denied others. This is fact that is documented and undisputed.
View attachment 370026

​

Why would you post Hussein's pic when he stabbed his black brethren in the back???

Have you no self-esteem????


Obama's US Civil Rights Commission, 2010 Report:
"The United States Commission on Civil Rights (Commission) is pleased to transmit this report, The Impact of Illegal Immigration on the Wages and Employment Opportunities of Black Workers. A panel of experts briefed members of the Commission on April 4, 2008 regarding the evidence for economic loss and job opportunity costs to black workers attributable to illegal immigration. The panelists also described non-economic factors contributing to the depression of black wages and employment rates.

Illegal immigration to the United States in recent decades has tended to depress both wages and employment rates for low-skilled American citizens, a disproportionate number of whom are black men."
USCCR: Page Not Found

https://www.usccr.gov/pubs/docs/IllegImmig_10-14-10_430pm.pdf




He doesn't care about the conditions of black Americans, he cares only for the power of Democrats.

That's why he told illegals to come on in, and go and vote.

 

[PoliticalChic]

oh---chic----I think I commented on an emoji you used------in relation to Kamala Harris who has designated
herself black. I did not quote you

I don't use emojis.

oh----well----the whole post seems scrambled. emojis are lots of fun. I find the current general DESIRE to be "a person of color" a very interesting phenomenon since it has hit us concurrently with a general consensus that being a person of color is an horrific social and economic handicap

You appear to have a great deal of trouble admitting to having made a mistake.

 

[irosie91]

oh---chic----I think I commented on an emoji you used------in relation to Kamala Harris who has designated
herself black. I did not quote you

I don't use emojis.

oh----well----the whole post seems scrambled. emojis are lots of fun. I find the current general DESIRE to be "a person of color" a very interesting phenomenon since it has hit us concurrently with a general consensus that being a person of color is an horrific social and economic handicap

You appear to have a great deal of trouble admitting to having made a mistake.

no I DON'T I said that the post seems jumbled to me----and IT IS------I thought you answered with a GRINNING emoji------what do you want ----REPARATIONS?

 

[PoliticalChic]

oh---chic----I think I commented on an emoji you used------in relation to Kamala Harris who has designated
herself black. I did not quote you

I don't use emojis.

oh----well----the whole post seems scrambled. emojis are lots of fun. I find the current general DESIRE to be "a person of color" a very interesting phenomenon since it has hit us concurrently with a general consensus that being a person of color is an horrific social and economic handicap

You appear to have a great deal of trouble admitting to having made a mistake.

no I DON'T I said that the post seems jumbled to me----and IT IS------I thought you answered with a GRINNING emoji------what do you want ----REPARATIONS?

I never used that quote in any way, I don't use emojis....yet you appeared to attribute it, incorrectly, to me.


It would have been simple and appropriate to say it was your mistake.

Yet, you didn't.

Seems a character flaw.

 

[irosie91]

oh---chic----I think I commented on an emoji you used------in relation to Kamala Harris who has designated
herself black. I did not quote you

I don't use emojis.

oh----well----the whole post seems scrambled. emojis are lots of fun. I find the current general DESIRE to be "a person of color" a very interesting phenomenon since it has hit us concurrently with a general consensus that being a person of color is an horrific social and economic handicap

You appear to have a great deal of trouble admitting to having made a mistake.

no I DON'T I said that the post seems jumbled to me----and IT IS------I thought you answered with a GRINNING emoji------what do you want ----REPARATIONS?

I never used that quote in any way, I don't use emojis....yet you appeared to attribute it, incorrectly, to me.


It would have been simple and appropriate to say it was your mistake.

Yet, you didn't.

Seems a character flaw.

seems to WHOM? you have no experience in detecting CHARACTER FLAWS -----you did not
provide the DSM-5 code thereof.

 

[PoliticalChic]

oh---chic----I think I commented on an emoji you used------in relation to Kamala Harris who has designated
herself black. I did not quote you

I don't use emojis.

oh----well----the whole post seems scrambled. emojis are lots of fun. I find the current general DESIRE to be "a person of color" a very interesting phenomenon since it has hit us concurrently with a general consensus that being a person of color is an horrific social and economic handicap

You appear to have a great deal of trouble admitting to having made a mistake.

no I DON'T I said that the post seems jumbled to me----and IT IS------I thought you answered with a GRINNING emoji------what do you want ----REPARATIONS?

I never used that quote in any way, I don't use emojis....yet you appeared to attribute it, incorrectly, to me.


It would have been simple and appropriate to say it was your mistake.

Yet, you didn't.

Seems a character flaw.

seems to WHOM? you have no experience in detecting CHARACTER FLAWS -----you did not
provide the DSM-5 code thereof.

Wow!

Squealing like a stick pig.


It appears I hit a nerve.


Bet I'm not the first to point out your.....defect.

 

[jc456]

Today’s racial wealth gap

Prove that

 

[Erinwltr]

1.The only way to make sense of Democrat plans for Americans is to see those plans through a prism of bizarro world. They’ve announced that they stand for the same evils that Americans once fought against, such as racism, and they see their path to power via a paradigm of anti-white racism. And whites will become slaves via reparations.
I dare ya' to say 'impossible!'

PC is regretting that blepharoplasty she got to look more white.

Look, we are already slaves to the One Percenters... I'm just not worrying all that much that we might spend a little money on reparations. Frankly, I just don't see a problem with it. We paid reparations to Japanese Americans interned during WWII, and it was fine.

"Blepharoplasty (BLEF-uh-roe-plas-tee) is a type of surgery that repairs droopy eyelids and may involve removing excess skin, muscle and fat. As you age, your eyelids stretch, and the muscles supporting them weaken.Jun 19, 2020"

You Fuck. I had to look that up. How dare you!

 

[irosie91]

oh---chic----I think I commented on an emoji you used------in relation to Kamala Harris who has designated
herself black. I did not quote you

I don't use emojis.

oh----well----the whole post seems scrambled. emojis are lots of fun. I find the current general DESIRE to be "a person of color" a very interesting phenomenon since it has hit us concurrently with a general consensus that being a person of color is an horrific social and economic handicap

You appear to have a great deal of trouble admitting to having made a mistake.

no I DON'T I said that the post seems jumbled to me----and IT IS------I thought you answered with a GRINNING emoji------what do you want ----REPARATIONS?

I never used that quote in any way, I don't use emojis....yet you appeared to attribute it, incorrectly, to me.


It would have been simple and appropriate to say it was your mistake.

Yet, you didn't.

Seems a character flaw.

seems to WHOM? you have no experience in detecting CHARACTER FLAWS -----you did not
provide the DSM-5 code thereof.

Wow!

Squealing like a stick pig.


It appears I hit a nerve.


Bet I'm not the first to point out your.....defect.

of course not-------I have run into lots of bitches handcuffed in the ER Padded room.

 

[Dragonlady]

oh---chic----I think I commented on an emoji you used------in relation to Kamala Harris who has designated
herself black. I did not quote you

I don't use emojis.

oh----well----the whole post seems scrambled. emojis are lots of fun. I find the current general DESIRE to be "a person of color" a very interesting phenomenon since it has hit us concurrently with a general consensus that being a person of color is an horrific social and economic handicap

Where is there a desire to be a "person of colour"? Supporting people of colour, and acknowledging the systemic racism minorities live under is not the same thing as wanting to be a person of colour. Just the fact those you acknowledge that no rational person would want to be a brown or black minority in the USA, shows how deeply affected minorities are by that inequity.

 

[PoliticalChic]

oh---chic----I think I commented on an emoji you used------in relation to Kamala Harris who has designated
herself black. I did not quote you

I don't use emojis.

oh----well----the whole post seems scrambled. emojis are lots of fun. I find the current general DESIRE to be "a person of color" a very interesting phenomenon since it has hit us concurrently with a general consensus that being a person of color is an horrific social and economic handicap

You appear to have a great deal of trouble admitting to having made a mistake.

no I DON'T I said that the post seems jumbled to me----and IT IS------I thought you answered with a GRINNING emoji------what do you want ----REPARATIONS?

I never used that quote in any way, I don't use emojis....yet you appeared to attribute it, incorrectly, to me.


It would have been simple and appropriate to say it was your mistake.

Yet, you didn't.

Seems a character flaw.

seems to WHOM? you have no experience in detecting CHARACTER FLAWS -----you did not
provide the DSM-5 code thereof.

Wow!

Squealing like a stick pig.


It appears I hit a nerve.


Bet I'm not the first to point out your.....defect.

of course not-------I have run into lots of bitches handcuffed in the ER Padded room.

Try to remember your mistake next time you slander someone.

 

[irosie91]

oh---chic----I think I commented on an emoji you used------in relation to Kamala Harris who has designated
herself black. I did not quote you

I don't use emojis.

oh----well----the whole post seems scrambled. emojis are lots of fun. I find the current general DESIRE to be "a person of color" a very interesting phenomenon since it has hit us concurrently with a general consensus that being a person of color is an horrific social and economic handicap

Where is there a desire to be a "person of colour"? Supporting people of colour, and acknowledging the systemic racism minorities live under is not the same thing as wanting to be a person of colour. Just the fact those you acknowledge that no rational person would want to be a brown or black minority in the USA, shows how deeply affected minorities are by that inequity.

you are utterly clueless ----or very dishonest. CLAIMING "color" is a very vibrant trend----in fact the ever voracious Linda Sarsour----of caucasian arab heritage PROUDLY advertised the fact that before she donned a colorful rag on her head-----she was, simply, an ordinary white girl from Brooklyn-----but THEN SHE DID put the rag on her head and is NOW ----SUDDENLY ----- a PERSON OF COLOR with special
"minority rights" ------and morons like you SWALLOW- THE SWILL. As a "SOCIAL WORKER" she advises similar caucasian arabs to MAKE THE SAME FRAUDULENT claim on all questionaires. The rest of the voracious frauds THANK YOU for supporting their moronic and fraudulent self-seeking filth----so EAGER to be an "OPPRESSED MINORITY" ----like Pocahantis

 

[irosie91]

oh---chic----I think I commented on an emoji you used------in relation to Kamala Harris who has designated
herself black. I did not quote you

I don't use emojis.

oh----well----the whole post seems scrambled. emojis are lots of fun. I find the current general DESIRE to be "a person of color" a very interesting phenomenon since it has hit us concurrently with a general consensus that being a person of color is an horrific social and economic handicap

You appear to have a great deal of trouble admitting to having made a mistake.

no I DON'T I said that the post seems jumbled to me----and IT IS------I thought you answered with a GRINNING emoji------what do you want ----REPARATIONS?

I never used that quote in any way, I don't use emojis....yet you appeared to attribute it, incorrectly, to me.


It would have been simple and appropriate to say it was your mistake.

Yet, you didn't.

Seems a character flaw.

seems to WHOM? you have no experience in detecting CHARACTER FLAWS -----you did not
provide the DSM-5 code thereof.

Wow!

Squealing like a stick pig.


It appears I hit a nerve.


Bet I'm not the first to point out your.....defect.

of course not-------I have run into lots of bitches handcuffed in the ER Padded room.

Try to remember your mistake next time you slander someone.

I have never slandered anyone. -----try to learn the DEFINITION of SLANDER

 

[PoliticalChic]

oh---chic----I think I commented on an emoji you used------in relation to Kamala Harris who has designated
herself black. I did not quote you

I don't use emojis.

oh----well----the whole post seems scrambled. emojis are lots of fun. I find the current general DESIRE to be "a person of color" a very interesting phenomenon since it has hit us concurrently with a general consensus that being a person of color is an horrific social and economic handicap

Where is there a desire to be a "person of colour"? Supporting people of colour, and acknowledging the systemic racism minorities live under is not the same thing as wanting to be a person of colour. Just the fact those you acknowledge that no rational person would want to be a brown or black minority in the USA, shows how deeply affected minorities are by that inequity.

There is no " systemic racism "....other than the anti-white racism instituted by the same party that blocked every anti-lynching bill that came to congress.


For your edification:

1. The Democrats are, and have always been, the party of slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship, the party that stood in schoolhouse doors to block black school children….until Republicans sent in the 101st airborne

2. It is the party of Jefferson Davis, of Nathan Bedford Forrest and the Knights of the KKK, Planned Parenthood, concentration camps for American citizens, and restrictions on free speech.

3. It is the party of Mao ornaments on the White House Christmas tree, and of James Hodgkinson, and of Communist Bernie Sanders, of pretend genders.

4. The Democrat Party is the oldest racist organization in America, the trail of tears, the author of Jim Crow and the bigotry of low expectations, filibustered against women getting the vote and killed every anti-lynching bill to get to Congress

5. The Democrat Party is the number one funder of the Islamic Revolution in Tehran….to the tune of $100 billion to the Ayatollahs….and gave Hezbollah the go-ahead to sell cocaine in America.

6. It is the party of anti-Semitism and Louis Farrakhan, and of the first Cabinet member ever to be held in contempt of Congress.

7. It is the party that admits its future depends on flooding the country with illegal aliens, and telling them to vote.

8. It is the party that couldn't suck up to the Castro Brothers enough, and treats the Bill of Rights like a Chinese menu..

9. The Democrats got us into the Civil War…Jefferson Davis .... Woodrow Wilson, WWI….FDR, WWII……Truman, Korean War….VietNam, JFK and LBJ…..yet they want to weaken our military.

10. The Democrats are the party that looks at the mayhem their gun laws have produced in Chicago, ……and this is their model for the nation.

11. I should mention that the Democrat Party was used as a model by Adolph Hitler and the Nazi Party….another ‘feather’ in the party’s cap?

12. The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism.

13. It's the party of felons over law-abiding actual citizens

14. No shared values, not an American party…they oppose free speech, the second amendment, and the free practice of one’s religion.

15. Recent development prove the Democrats to be, as well, the party of rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists.

Democrats: Bull Connor, George Wallace, Orval Faubus, Lester Maddox, Al Gore, Sr., Bill Clinton….all racists, all Democrats.

 

[PoliticalChic]

oh---chic----I think I commented on an emoji you used------in relation to Kamala Harris who has designated
herself black. I did not quote you

I don't use emojis.

oh----well----the whole post seems scrambled. emojis are lots of fun. I find the current general DESIRE to be "a person of color" a very interesting phenomenon since it has hit us concurrently with a general consensus that being a person of color is an horrific social and economic handicap

You appear to have a great deal of trouble admitting to having made a mistake.

no I DON'T I said that the post seems jumbled to me----and IT IS------I thought you answered with a GRINNING emoji------what do you want ----REPARATIONS?

I never used that quote in any way, I don't use emojis....yet you appeared to attribute it, incorrectly, to me.


It would have been simple and appropriate to say it was your mistake.

Yet, you didn't.

Seems a character flaw.

seems to WHOM? you have no experience in detecting CHARACTER FLAWS -----you did not
provide the DSM-5 code thereof.

Wow!

Squealing like a stick pig.


It appears I hit a nerve.


Bet I'm not the first to point out your.....defect.

of course not-------I have run into lots of bitches handcuffed in the ER Padded room.

Try to remember your mistake next time you slander someone.

I have never slandered anyone. -----try to learn the DEFINITION of SLANDER

You attributed words about the color of an individual to me, words I never said.



Now, another lesson for you: I'll teach the definition.
Slander:
the action or crime of making a false spoken statement damaging to a person's reputation. Google.


So, you did slander me, and lied about doing so, and lack the character to admit same, and say so.

Quite the small person, you.


You should stop digging per the hole you've put yourself in.

 

[irosie91]

oh---chic----I think I commented on an emoji you used------in relation to Kamala Harris who has designated
herself black. I did not quote you

I don't use emojis.

oh----well----the whole post seems scrambled. emojis are lots of fun. I find the current general DESIRE to be "a person of color" a very interesting phenomenon since it has hit us concurrently with a general consensus that being a person of color is an horrific social and economic handicap

You appear to have a great deal of trouble admitting to having made a mistake.

no I DON'T I said that the post seems jumbled to me----and IT IS------I thought you answered with a GRINNING emoji------what do you want ----REPARATIONS?

I never used that quote in any way, I don't use emojis....yet you appeared to attribute it, incorrectly, to me.


It would have been simple and appropriate to say it was your mistake.

Yet, you didn't.

Seems a character flaw.

seems to WHOM? you have no experience in detecting CHARACTER FLAWS -----you did not
provide the DSM-5 code thereof.

Wow!

Squealing like a stick pig.


It appears I hit a nerve.


Bet I'm not the first to point out your.....defect.

of course not-------I have run into lots of bitches handcuffed in the ER Padded room.

Try to remember your mistake next time you slander someone.

I have never slandered anyone. -----try to learn the DEFINITION of SLANDER

You attributed words about the color of an individual to me, words I never said.



Now, another lesson for you: I'll teach the definition.
Slander:
the action or crime of making a false spoken statement damaging to a person's reputation. Google.


So, you did slander me, and lied about doing so, and lack the character to admit same, and say so.

Quite the small person, you.


You should stop digging per the hole you've put yourself in.

can you quote this alleged "lie" -----about a person's "COLOR" which you FALSELY claim that I attributed to your----LIAR? ----