Here's the USAID robberies of the US taxpayer

Status
Not open for further replies.
What school did you go to that taught that it's appropriate to investigate people who disagree with you politically?

That's abhorrent to the constitution which made free speech a foundation of the country.
You seem to be hung up on this "disagree" notion. ( which makes no sense) Agree/disagree has nothing to do with it.

Sure we have free speech, but if someone exercises his free speech and says tomorrow a certain building will be bombed, you think police will ignore that, and let him peacefully walk away ?

If someone exercises his free speech and says something that only the violator of a crime would be likely to know, that he shouldn't be investigated, if not arrested with probable cause ?

What might be less credible than a liberal talking about law enforcement ? Perhaps nothing. :rolleyes:

BTW, it may interest you to know that free speech is one of the weakest parts of the Constitition, with numerous glaring exceptions.
. Here's a partial list >>>

  • slander
  • libel
  • perjury
  • inciting a riot
  • copyright infringment
  • obscenity laws
  • threats
  • plagiarism,
  • sedition,
  • false advertising,
  • filing a false police report.
  • declaration of supremacy
  • verbal abuse of elderly,
  • disturbing the peace
 
You seem to be hung up on this "disagree" notion. ( which makes no sense) Agree/disagree has nothing to do with it.

Sure we have free speech, but if someone exercises his free speech and says tomorrow a certain building will be bombed, you think police will ignore that, and let him peacefully walk away ?

If someone exercises his free speech and says something that only the violator of a crime would be likely to know, that he shouldn't be investigated, if not arrested with probable cause ?

What might be less credible than a liberal talking about law enforcement ? Perhaps nothing. :rolleyes:

BTW, it may interest you to know that free speech is one of the weakest parts of the Constitition, with numerous glaring exceptions.
. Here's a partial list >>>

  • slander
  • libel
  • perjury
  • inciting a riot
  • copyright infringment
  • obscenity laws
  • threats
  • plagiarism,
  • sedition,
  • false advertising,
  • filing a false police report.
  • declaration of supremacy
  • verbal abuse of elderly,
  • disturbing the peace
So explain how complaining that ending USAID indicates they're committing a crime and isn't just free speech and political disagreement.
 
So explain how complaining that ending USAID indicates they're committing a crime and isn't just free speech and political disagreement.
Often those who complain the loudest about investigation, are those who have the most to lose from it. Duh!
 
Not really funny, while we working average folks rip each other apart.
Those with money & power set them self's up to do what ever they want, & we will end up paying for it.
almost NONE OF THE POLITICANS work for us.
 
OMG Democrats caught red handed stealing money from taxpayers I'm so shocked and surprised. SSSSSSSSSSarcasm!
 
The GOP who is now fixing the problem, while Democrats are whining about that.

INVESTIGATE the ones who cry the loudest. Check their bank accounts and spending history, Any new Ferraris or luxury yachts, lately ?

Get the handcuffs ready, boys.
They have fixed what exactly?
 
15th post
This is why you lost everything in November.

Keep it up! 👍
Hilarious

Shitler! shoot his wad before the date even started.

How much more pootin praise are you willing to defend fuckup?
 
Not true. It has been reported by our government. THAT is "evidence" by definition. What evidence do you have that they are lying?
Nope. Evidence requires facts. Republican governments are notably short on those.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom