Obama-backed $2.2B green energy 'boondoggle' leaves taxpayers on the hook

You have it backwards. The old supreme leader had already agreed Iran would not make a nuke.

Well he's dead, and the new supreme leader is probably in favor of Iran making a nuclear weapon.

The $50 B spent, only pushed Iran closer to wanting a nuclear weapon

And a 2 billion dollar B2 Stealth bomber ended the dream
 
Solar is great for heating your pool.

Run the water through small black tubes that get hot from the sun. One still has to use a pump for the water, but it is a reasonable use of solar.

As the tech stands currently, Solar and Wind are not a reasonable replacement for fossil and nuclear.

Nuclear energy allows GIANT AIRCRAFT CARRIERS to stay at sea for over 20 years without refueling.

MAYBE THAT COULD WORK ON LAND?!!!

🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔

Read More: How Nuclear Energy Powers American Aircraft Carriers - BGR
 
Solar is great for heating your pool.

Run the water through small black tubes that get hot from the sun. One still has to use a pump for the water, but it is a reasonable use of solar.

As the tech stands currently, Solar and Wind are not a reasonable replacement for fossil and nuclear.

Nuclear energy allows GIANT AIRCRAFT CARRIERS to stay at sea for over 20 years without refueling.

MAYBE THAT COULD WORK ON LAND?!!!

🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔

Read More: How Nuclear Energy Powers American Aircraft Carriers - BGR

Our pool has rooftop solar piping. Works great but I'd never consider solar for anything more than that
 
You're the one supporting, defending and bragging on Trump, not me.

Exposing Trump, throwing away $1 billion US taxpayer $$$, must have triggered you.
The fact you can’t post without whining and crying ORANGE MAN BAD in a thread that has nothing to do with him proves he is right, and you are full of shit.
 
What do you think your political propaganda proves? That Trump was pandering to voters in Pennsylvania to win an election?

People don’t want coal but you’re shoving it down our throats anyway.
What people?

Gotta link?
 
Our pool has rooftop solar piping. Works great but I'd never consider solar for anything more than that
Exactly!

The manufacturing of solar panels, and the solid waste are tremendously bad for the environment.

The surface area needed with regards to energy production is just not there.

To power your average 2500 square foot home, one needs about 400 square feet of solar panels.

Install is roughly $25,000.

If your electric bill is $400/month….that is 5 years to break even. Not taking into account any repairs or replacements.

This is just for homes with a significant south face in very sunny areas.

If your home is surrounded by trees in Washington State, solar is NOT A VIABLE OPTION.

South face in the Arizona desert? Solar is a reasonable option.

SOLAR AND WIND TO REPLACE FOSSIL AND NUCLEAR IS A BULLSHIT GRIFT.
 
Pam Bondi wouldn't prosecute CO2 FRAUD, one of the reasons why Fox Faux News loved her.

Will Blanche?
 
I blame the Jews.
🕍🕎✡️



And this is what the "ANTIFA of the GOP" has to say about it.

Pam Bondi could have prosecuted CO2 FRAUD a year ago. She chose not to. Why?

The above Left Wing Zionist Fascist Traitor doesn't care.
 
The fact you can’t post without whining and crying ORANGE MAN BAD in a thread that has nothing to do with him proves he is right, and you are full of shit.
Poor Q-NUT.
You little SNOWFLAKE Trump cult members, whine about Obama or Biden doing this or that, but when your hypocritical whiny, dear leader gets exposed for doing even worse shit............It's an "Orange Man Bad or TDS", response.
 
Wind Turbines are a disaster, they kill animals pollute the air with carbon fibers, cost too much, and fall apart in 10 years.
Thanks for watching FOX news, so I don't have to.
And theyre ugly too. They are a monument to progressive stupidity

Wind turbines are ageing – what happens next?​

1777900482467.webp
Power Technology
https://www.power-technology.com › features › wind-t...

Mar 18, 2024 — With an average lifespan of 25 years, a high proportion of wind turbines across the world are approaching retirement.

“In the US, retired wind turbine blades are primarily sent to one of a small number of landfills that accept them in Iowa, South Dakota or Wyoming. This option is becoming increasingly less feasible with several countries, notably Germany and the Netherlands, banning the practice.”

Considering alternative disposal methods for fibreglass blades, Singh adds: “Nacelles and blades are generally made of fibreglass and are ground down to be used as fuel in cement factories or filler in road construction. Innovative solutions such as repurposing blades into playgrounds or bike sheds have been shown to be effective at a local level.”

So, we should ban Corvettes and Tractor Trailers running down the highways?
 
Thanks for watching FOX news, so I don't have to.

Wind turbines are ageing – what happens next?

View attachment 1252195
Power Technology
https://www.power-technology.com › features › wind-t...

Mar 18, 2024 — With an average lifespan of 25 years, a high proportion of wind turbines across the world are approaching retirement.

“In the US, retired wind turbine blades are primarily sent to one of a small number of landfills that accept them in Iowa, South Dakota or Wyoming. This option is becoming increasingly less feasible with several countries, notably Germany and the Netherlands, banning the practice.”

Considering alternative disposal methods for fibreglass blades, Singh adds: “Nacelles and blades are generally made of fibreglass and are ground down to be used as fuel in cement factories or filler in road construction. Innovative solutions such as repurposing blades into playgrounds or bike sheds have been shown to be effective at a local level.”

So, we should ban Corvettes and Tractor Trailers running down the highways?
Wind turbines will all be scrap in 10 years.
 
15th post
Wind turbines will all be scrap in 10 years.
We know.

1777901481323.webp
 
I actually have a good reason to support clean renewable energy.

The only reason Trump has to push coal down our throats is to win votes.
Look, I don’t mind an “all of the above” approach, but dems take it too far.

With your mandates on combustion engines, canceling strategic pipelines, and putting federal lands off limits to drilling…

Clearly, y’all can’t be trusted.
 
Look, I don’t mind an “all of the above” approach, but dems take it too far.

With your mandates on combustion engines, canceling strategic pipelines, and putting federal lands off limits to drilling…

Clearly, y’all can’t be trusted.
The Trump administration is the opposite of that approach.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom