“Hell yes we are going to take your AR-15”

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Colt suspends production of AR-15s for civilian market.

You are correct but you may wish to include a URL to go with it.

Don't have one. Rachel Maddow told me a few minutes ago.

Comrade shitting bull, did traitor Madcow tell you that Colt was the only ones making ARMALITE 15? Perhaps the bull dyke told you they were the MAJOR manufacturer?

If so, she lied to you, as usual.....

Shhhhhh.

Maybe they'll think ARs are go for good and leave it alone.


.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

I've never seen an elephant gun with a 100-round rotary magazine.

They're really easy to make, but stupid. You know how much 100 rounds of .577 Nitro Express weighs?

I want to watch you stand, aim, and fire the entire100-round drum of .577.



.

 

[Rustic]

“Hell yes we are going to take your AR-15”


good - come get it, I DON'T OWN ONE !

Soldiers need one, not me.

 

[Rustic]

I didn't say it's a cure all. We don't even blink when someone takes a handgun and commits a crime. Par for the course. Shit happens. What are you gonna do. I get that. No one said any of these regulations would be a cure all. But, maybe some of these guys wouldn't have gotten their hands on guns if we did better background checks. And maybe if the Vegas Shooter couldn't get his hands on such powerful weapons, a lot more people would be alive today. We can't let every man and woman in America have the kind of power a soldier has. Name one other country that does this? And we have more citizens die every year from gun violence than probably every other country combined.

P.S. There hasn't been a mass shooting in a couple weeks. This will die down and we will not pass any legislation. Don't worry about it. I'm just telling you what should happen. Better background checks and only 10 rounds in your mag pal.

the fact we don't blink where far more of the problem shows itself is quite telling on us as a whole. we focus on the big bright nasty things out there and react.

not think. react. 2 very different approaches with vastly different outcomes. but thinking takes time and usually requires putting emotion aside. putting emotion aside isn't easy these days. for any of us.

i'm all for better background checks. and while i don't see the "gun show loophole" as a huge issue, i also don't have much of a problem closing it. but will we enforce this new law or simply get mad and pass more if/when it doesn't have the intended results because it wasn't THOUGHT out, just a reaction to a problem?

if you're at a gun show buying from a private individual, great. go to the FFL dealer a booth down and have them run a background check for you. have the gov wave the fee for these one-off sales and now even the $25 isn't the issue.

but to date, our background checks have let a lot of shit through it should not have. fix that THEN put more people through it. this false sense of security given when reactionary laws are passed is why we keep demanding MORE laws. that request to me is a sign you don't want to think about it, just SOMETHING MUST BE DONE.

We need background checks on ALL gun purchases including private transactions

isn't this what i said?

i just also said we need to fix the background db before we flood it with even more.

and you never have answered direct questions i've asked. yet you wonder why i tag you "troll".

When the government does it's job background checks works. Nothing needs to be changed about what we already have.

Background checks are a joke. Just like the NRA wants them

Until they apply to the secondary market, there is nothing preventing a felon from getting a gun

Lol
Felons obeying the law, best joke I’ve heard all day

 

[Tijn Von Ingersleben]

The country decided gay people had a right to get married, and we got gay marriage. The country decided weed should be legalized, and weed is being legalized. The country decided we need universal background checks and a ban on large capacity magazines and guns designed for combat. The NRA and gun nuts will whine, but we will achieve that too.

The masses are asses.

 

[Rustic]

Colt suspends production of AR-15s for civilian market.

Lol
Washington redskin,
Complete List of AR-15 Manufacturers

 

[Rustic]

No need Daryl, just read American history. Apparently you know nothing about it.

Facts get in their way. I also read the various court rulings and notice they are shying away from those with me around. So the only thing they have left is their little digs. I can live with that. It means they admit defeat on a regular basis and are too dense or stupid to see it.

Question is why do you fight every idea we throw out there. You like murder

What idea do you present? I haven't seen any real ideas as of yet. You scream "NO" or "You can't tell me what to do" every step of the way. I want the AR to be regulated but leave the traditional hunting rifles alone. Is that a bad idea? And I have clearly stated my reasoning why. Now clearly state your ideas.

Hunting rifles are deadlier.

No, they aren't. Some are just more powerful (velocity vs. energy). I've never seen an elephant gun with a 100-round rotary magazine.

Lol
Washington redskin,

 

[toobfreak]

Colt suspends production of AR-15s for civilian market.

That's OK. Anyone who wanted an AR-15 was well-warned in advance by Obama and probably has at least 5 of them by now.

 

[toobfreak]

I didn't say it's a cure all. We don't even blink when someone takes a handgun and commits a crime. Par for the course. Shit happens. What are you gonna do. I get that. No one said any of these regulations would be a cure all. But, maybe some of these guys wouldn't have gotten their hands on guns if we did better background checks. And maybe if the Vegas Shooter couldn't get his hands on such powerful weapons, a lot more people would be alive today. We can't let every man and woman in America have the kind of power a soldier has. Name one other country that does this? And we have more citizens die every year from gun violence than probably every other country combined.

P.S. There hasn't been a mass shooting in a couple weeks. This will die down and we will not pass any legislation. Don't worry about it. I'm just telling you what should happen. Better background checks and only 10 rounds in your mag pal.

the fact we don't blink where far more of the problem shows itself is quite telling on us as a whole. we focus on the big bright nasty things out there and react.

not think. react. 2 very different approaches with vastly different outcomes. but thinking takes time and usually requires putting emotion aside. putting emotion aside isn't easy these days. for any of us.

i'm all for better background checks. and while i don't see the "gun show loophole" as a huge issue, i also don't have much of a problem closing it. but will we enforce this new law or simply get mad and pass more if/when it doesn't have the intended results because it wasn't THOUGHT out, just a reaction to a problem?

if you're at a gun show buying from a private individual, great. go to the FFL dealer a booth down and have them run a background check for you. have the gov wave the fee for these one-off sales and now even the $25 isn't the issue.

but to date, our background checks have let a lot of shit through it should not have. fix that THEN put more people through it. this false sense of security given when reactionary laws are passed is why we keep demanding MORE laws. that request to me is a sign you don't want to think about it, just SOMETHING MUST BE DONE.

We need background checks on ALL gun purchases including private transactions

isn't this what i said?

i just also said we need to fix the background db before we flood it with even more.

and you never have answered direct questions i've asked. yet you wonder why i tag you "troll".

When the government does it's job background checks works. Nothing needs to be changed about what we already have.

Background checks are a joke. Just like the NRA wants them

Until they apply to the secondary market, there is nothing preventing a felon from getting a gun

That's funny, Dweeb, you want rigorous, ironclad background checks to buy a gun for self defense even though the massive lion's share of them, 99.99% of them are all used responsibly for lawful purposes, yet you'll staunchly fight to block simple voter ID to check that a person electing a US president to run the country is a legal vote.

 

[9thIDdoc]

"What’s the purpose for an AR15?"
Exactly like any other firearm it's purpose is make holes in things that are out of reach. It is used for target shooting/competition, hunting to feed families, defense of home family livestock and self, emergency preparedness, collection, and investment. The reasons a person might want one are none of your business.

"Like a machine gun we might deem ar15s too dangerous for the general public to possess."
You do not have the right or the authority to do. UnConstitutional. Nor is the AR-15 any more dangerous than any other gun car or jet aircraft.

"We can’t stop nuts from taking a semi auto pistol that carries ten rounds. But at least most of the people hav a chance to get away."
Really? Exactly how do you intend to do that? High capacity magazines are common and long-lasting and easily fabricated? Also almost all weapons that use any sort of magazine can be converted to handle high capacity magazines. And even if could make such a ban effective I doubt if the police and military will appreciate the handicap.

"Your right is taking the rights away from all the people who die because even dumb Americans can buy wmds."
Untrue. Obviously you are the one advocating taking people's rights away. Does the word "tyranny" ring any bells with you.?

That's a good point. A semi auto handgun is just as powerful or can be but it's not as good from far away. So if you take one into a crowd and people start running you'll kill much fewer people with the handgun. And a CCW holder in the room might have a chance against you. I say ban assault rifles. I have a pretty powerful Ruger 450 Bushmaster. It only holds 4 rounds. That should be legal. It's a hunting gun. I like the person who said the purpose of a AR15 is to put holes in things. What things? Is it used to hunt deer or bear? Ok, how many bullets do you need? We should only allow 4 round magazines. If you can't hit the bear in 4 shots you suck and should be eaten by the bear.

If you are shooting paper plates then you just have to reload after 4 shots. Apparently you guys say that won't slow you down one bit so don't cry about nuthin.

AR-15s are not assault rifles. Nor are they especially powerful. What do you really want banned? They are indeed used to hunt all manner of things. They are especially favored by women and other smallish people who have difficulty handling more powerful rounds. They are indeed used to hunt deer and bear. They are also used to hunt wild hogs which can be quite dangerous and may show up in groups of two doz. or more and in many places there is no limit on how many you can or should kill due to the damage they do to the land and other species. View attachment 280039 View attachment 280039 View attachment 280039 View attachment 280039 View attachment 280044

My ruger 450 bushmaster only holds 3 in the mag and one in the chamber.

So you want to allow wmd's that are killing American citizens on a daily basis for the rare time that DOZENS of wild dogs will attack someone? What a crock of bullshit.

Show me the last time a person was attacked by DOZENS of wild dogs and used an AR15 to save their lives.

You can have a AR15 as long as you pass the background check.

And as all of you have said, limiting the number of rounds you can have in your magazine isn't going to slow you up one bit. So now PLEASE make the argument that you NEED 10 rounds in the mag because any less will slow you up. I want to see you guys contradict yourselves on this one.

Someone who doesn't know and understand the difference between wild dogs and wild hogs isn't well enough informed about hunting and hunters to have a valid opinion.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Colt suspends production of AR-15s for civilian market.

You are correct but you may wish to include a URL to go with it.

Don't have one. Rachel Maddow told me a few minutes ago.

You may wish to google it and get a good URL on it. It's out there. the UP reported it.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Hey, good idea. Let's dig them up and ask them. Or have a seance.

No need Daryl, just read American history. Apparently you know nothing about it.

Facts get in their way. I also read the various court rulings and notice they are shying away from those with me around. So the only thing they have left is their little digs. I can live with that. It means they admit defeat on a regular basis and are too dense or stupid to see it.

Question is why do you fight every idea we throw out there. You like murder

What idea do you present? I haven't seen any real ideas as of yet. You scream "NO" or "You can't tell me what to do" every step of the way. I want the AR to be regulated but leave the traditional hunting rifles alone. Is that a bad idea? And I have clearly stated my reasoning why. Now clearly state your ideas.

Hunting rifles are deadlier.

And how is a traditional Hunting Rifle deadlier in a mass shooting? I be good but, damned, I ain't that good and never was.

 

[9thIDdoc]

No need Daryl, just read American history. Apparently you know nothing about it.

Facts get in their way. I also read the various court rulings and notice they are shying away from those with me around. So the only thing they have left is their little digs. I can live with that. It means they admit defeat on a regular basis and are too dense or stupid to see it.

Question is why do you fight every idea we throw out there. You like murder

What idea do you present? I haven't seen any real ideas as of yet. You scream "NO" or "You can't tell me what to do" every step of the way. I want the AR to be regulated but leave the traditional hunting rifles alone. Is that a bad idea? And I have clearly stated my reasoning why. Now clearly state your ideas.

Hunting rifles are deadlier.

No, they aren't. Some are just more powerful (velocity vs. energy). I've never seen an elephant gun with a 100-round rotary magazine.

Take one average run-of-mill duck gun. Load with OO buckshot (at 9 shot per shell) and three pulls of the trigger will put 27 projectiles in the air. Many have magazines able to hold five which will yield 45 projectiles with five trigger pulls and no reloading. Whereas an AR-15 requires 20 trigger pulls to fire 20rnds with a 20rnd. mag. If both are fired into a packed crowd of people which is more deadly?

 

[Daryl Hunt]

i wanna see *this* country free from the threat of school shootings dude.

So long as people know how to make guns, we will never be free from the threat of school shootings.

OK

Let’s stop producing guns and see what happens

You act like the only folks that can make them are big corporations. Are you really that dumb? Oh wait, everyone knows RWINGER.

I'll tell you what will happen, criminals will have them b/c of their motivation, and everyone else will be at the mercy of the incompetent STATE.

Banning guns is impossible now. That horse has left the barn, permanently.

Solid Concepts 3D Prints Another Metal Gun, ‘Reason’, a 10mm Auto 1911

Student jailed for making 3D printed gun

And exactly how will anyone ever ban firearms? You throw that word around when it is meant to cause hate and discontent. You Rumpsters sure are prolific in doing that.

First, I didn't vote in the current occupant of the oval office.

Second, I agree, no ban on owning fire arms is possible, we are in agreement.

And there are NO bans on any firearms of any kind. You have the right to own any of them. Simple as that. Now, they may make it difficult bu they can't make it impossible on any firearm including dummy live bombs.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Facts get in their way. I also read the various court rulings and notice they are shying away from those with me around. So the only thing they have left is their little digs. I can live with that. It means they admit defeat on a regular basis and are too dense or stupid to see it.

Question is why do you fight every idea we throw out there. You like murder

What idea do you present? I haven't seen any real ideas as of yet. You scream "NO" or "You can't tell me what to do" every step of the way. I want the AR to be regulated but leave the traditional hunting rifles alone. Is that a bad idea? And I have clearly stated my reasoning why. Now clearly state your ideas.

Hunting rifles are deadlier.

No, they aren't. Some are just more powerful (velocity vs. energy). I've never seen an elephant gun with a 100-round rotary magazine.

Take one average run-of-mill duck gun. Load with OO buckshot (at 9 shot per shell) and three pulls of the trigger will put 27 projectiles in the air. Many have magazines able to hold five which will yield 45 projectiles with five trigger pulls and no reloading. Whereas an AR-15 requires 20 trigger pulls to fire 20rnds with a 20rnd. mag. If both are fired into a packed crowd of people which is more deadly?

The AR. The AR will penetrate up to 3 bodies and probably lodge in the forth. The OO buck won't go much past the first person although it's going to make one hell of a mess.

 

[2aguy]

Schumer is, he's gone out and demonized Beto's rant. Why do you supposed Schumer made this statement? just asking cause you think you're cute.

Chuck Schumer Says He Doesn’t Know Any Democrats Who Support Beto’s Gun Grab

That is his opinion, I don't want to grab all guns, you can keep your hunting rifles and pistols, no bigger than a 10 magazine and you are allowed to only have one.

Yes....your baby steps to the mass graves.....you will not stop at hunting rifles, pistols or 10 round magazines.

Yes we will. Way too many of us liberals hunt.

You are delusional......you probably thought the left wing anti-smoker would stop at separate areas for smokers in bars and restaurants.....

You think it should be ok to smoke in a bar? I smoke and even I know no one wants to breath that shit. Christopher Reeves wife never smoked but got lung cancer because she used to sing in night clubs where other people smoked. Go outside and smoke if you want to smoke.

If a bar wants to allow smoking they should be allowed to do it......you can go there or not.....

 

[Daryl Hunt]

No need Daryl, just read American history. Apparently you know nothing about it.

Facts get in their way. I also read the various court rulings and notice they are shying away from those with me around. So the only thing they have left is their little digs. I can live with that. It means they admit defeat on a regular basis and are too dense or stupid to see it.

Question is why do you fight every idea we throw out there. You like murder

What idea do you present? I haven't seen any real ideas as of yet. You scream "NO" or "You can't tell me what to do" every step of the way. I want the AR to be regulated but leave the traditional hunting rifles alone. Is that a bad idea? And I have clearly stated my reasoning why. Now clearly state your ideas.

Hunting rifles are deadlier.

No, they aren't. Some are just more powerful (velocity vs. energy). I've never seen an elephant gun with a 100-round rotary magazine.

Can you imagine trying to hold a 100 round mag rifle powered by a 600 nitro express? Or a 50 or even a 30.

 

[2aguy]

Alex Jones Warns Beto: Keep Your Filthy Hands Off Our 2nd Amendment!
Establishment puppet Beto O’Rourke has become the mouthpiece of the victim disarmament lobby and has pledged, quote “Hell yes, we’re going to take your AR-15, your AK-47!”





LMFAO!! you losers don't even know the half of reality..

Alex Jones, I bet he is shaking in his pants. LOL

Schumer is, he's gone out and demonized Beto's rant. Why do you supposed Schumer made this statement? just asking cause you think you're cute.

Chuck Schumer Says He Doesn’t Know Any Democrats Who Support Beto’s Gun Grab

That is his opinion, I don't want to grab all guns, you can keep your hunting rifles and pistols, no bigger than a 10 magazine and you are allowed to only have one.

Who would need more?

After you shoot your ten rounds, you can reload it

And according to these rambo's here having to reload won't slow them down one bit. But then they cry if we suggest outlawing 20 round magazines. Reloading them when target practicing is too inconvenient they say. Shooting paper plates.

Mass shooters are different from normal people defending themselves...you have been told this over and over again...

Mass shooters are shooting unarmed people...they are under no pressure, and are relaxed as they kill...we know this from actual survivor testimony....so give them 10 round magazines and they will just change them...easily, in fact, the Sandy Hook shooter changed his magazines after only partially using them...this is a combat reload...you don't wait to run dry.

A normal person is different. They are under attack, they are suffering from an adrenaline dump and may very likely be injured. If they have to reload, the simple process is complicated by the pressure of the combat stress that a mass shooter does not have. If they are injured, and/or suffering from adraline, having more bullets in the magazine means they won't have to change that magazine while they are fighting for their lives...

Two very different situations.....

 

[Lakhota]

Facts get in their way. I also read the various court rulings and notice they are shying away from those with me around. So the only thing they have left is their little digs. I can live with that. It means they admit defeat on a regular basis and are too dense or stupid to see it.

Question is why do you fight every idea we throw out there. You like murder

What idea do you present? I haven't seen any real ideas as of yet. You scream "NO" or "You can't tell me what to do" every step of the way. I want the AR to be regulated but leave the traditional hunting rifles alone. Is that a bad idea? And I have clearly stated my reasoning why. Now clearly state your ideas.

Hunting rifles are deadlier.

No, they aren't. Some are just more powerful (velocity vs. energy). I've never seen an elephant gun with a 100-round rotary magazine.

Can you imagine trying to hold a 100 round mag rifle powered by a 600 nitro express? Or a 50 or even a 30.

That's my point.

 

[Lakhota]

That is his opinion, I don't want to grab all guns, you can keep your hunting rifles and pistols, no bigger than a 10 magazine and you are allowed to only have one.

Yes....your baby steps to the mass graves.....you will not stop at hunting rifles, pistols or 10 round magazines.

Yes we will. Way too many of us liberals hunt.

You are delusional......you probably thought the left wing anti-smoker would stop at separate areas for smokers in bars and restaurants.....

You think it should be ok to smoke in a bar? I smoke and even I know no one wants to breath that shit. Christopher Reeves wife never smoked but got lung cancer because she used to sing in night clubs where other people smoked. Go outside and smoke if you want to smoke.

If a bar wants to allow smoking they should be allowed to do it......you can go there or not.....

Holy shit, you finally said something I agree with.