“Hell yes we are going to take your AR-15”

[MisterBeale]

Your own ******* article explains why the ban didn't work. LOOPHOLES!!! Close the mother ******* loopholes

How, exactly, do you plan to do that?
What specific language would you use?

So far while I disagree with his premise at least he's trying to talk more than just blind grabbing.

Nah.
She repeats the same nonsense over and over, and then runs away when you ask her to demonstrate the particulars of her posts.
She's a useful idiot, regurgitating talking points she doesn't understand, and nothing more.

Well sealy is usually on ignore so I have seen history of that.

Maybe today I'm just being overly optimistic.

I'm a dude dudes.

 

[rightwinger]

except i can do the same with almost any semi-automatic rifle.

what is "retarded" is you can't see that or comprehend it, so you/the left simply widens what you want banned cause you can't define it. it's a pure reactionary move that never works.

we had them banned at one point, DID GUN CRIMES GO DOWN?

I didn't say it's a cure all. We don't even blink when someone takes a handgun and commits a crime. Par for the course. Shit happens. What are you gonna do. I get that. No one said any of these regulations would be a cure all. But, maybe some of these guys wouldn't have gotten their hands on guns if we did better background checks. And maybe if the Vegas Shooter couldn't get his hands on such powerful weapons, a lot more people would be alive today. We can't let every man and woman in America have the kind of power a soldier has. Name one other country that does this? And we have more citizens die every year from gun violence than probably every other country combined.

P.S. There hasn't been a mass shooting in a couple weeks. This will die down and we will not pass any legislation. Don't worry about it. I'm just telling you what should happen. Better background checks and only 10 rounds in your mag pal.

the fact we don't blink where far more of the problem shows itself is quite telling on us as a whole. we focus on the big bright nasty things out there and react.

not think. react. 2 very different approaches with vastly different outcomes. but thinking takes time and usually requires putting emotion aside. putting emotion aside isn't easy these days. for any of us.

i'm all for better background checks. and while i don't see the "gun show loophole" as a huge issue, i also don't have much of a problem closing it. but will we enforce this new law or simply get mad and pass more if/when it doesn't have the intended results because it wasn't THOUGHT out, just a reaction to a problem?

if you're at a gun show buying from a private individual, great. go to the FFL dealer a booth down and have them run a background check for you. have the gov wave the fee for these one-off sales and now even the $25 isn't the issue.

but to date, our background checks have let a lot of shit through it should not have. fix that THEN put more people through it. this false sense of security given when reactionary laws are passed is why we keep demanding MORE laws. that request to me is a sign you don't want to think about it, just SOMETHING MUST BE DONE.

We need background checks on ALL gun purchases including private transactions

isn't this what i said?

i just also said we need to fix the background db before we flood it with even more.

and you never have answered direct questions i've asked. yet you wonder why i tag you "troll".

When the government does it's job background checks works. Nothing needs to be changed about what we already have.

Background checks are a joke. Just like the NRA wants them

Until they apply to the secondary market, there is nothing preventing a felon from getting a gun

 

[Daryl Hunt]

i wanna see *this* country free from the threat of school shootings dude.

So long as people know how to make guns, we will never be free from the threat of school shootings.

OK

Let’s stop producing guns and see what happens

You act like the only folks that can make them are big corporations. Are you really that dumb? Oh wait, everyone knows RWINGER.

I'll tell you what will happen, criminals will have them b/c of their motivation, and everyone else will be at the mercy of the incompetent STATE.

Banning guns is impossible now. That horse has left the barn, permanently.

Solid Concepts 3D Prints Another Metal Gun, ‘Reason’, a 10mm Auto 1911

Student jailed for making 3D printed gun

And exactly how will anyone ever ban firearms? You throw that word around when it is meant to cause hate and discontent. You Rumpsters sure are prolific in doing that.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Not really satire.

Beto: 'Hell Yes I'm Going To Violate My Oath To Defend The Constitution'

Horseshit - we've had Assault Weapons Ban in 1994-2004, it was never ruled to be unconstitutional.

Comrade;

{At a minimum, ex post facto prohibits legislatures from passing laws which retroactively criminalize behavior. However, this prohibition does not attach as strictly to judicial decisions. Appellate courts sometimes announce a new rule of law, but will not apply it to the case in front of it, in order to attempt to comply with ex post facto prohibitions. }

Ex Post Facto

 

[Daryl Hunt]

I didn't say it's a cure all. We don't even blink when someone takes a handgun and commits a crime. Par for the course. Shit happens. What are you gonna do. I get that. No one said any of these regulations would be a cure all. But, maybe some of these guys wouldn't have gotten their hands on guns if we did better background checks. And maybe if the Vegas Shooter couldn't get his hands on such powerful weapons, a lot more people would be alive today. We can't let every man and woman in America have the kind of power a soldier has. Name one other country that does this? And we have more citizens die every year from gun violence than probably every other country combined.

P.S. There hasn't been a mass shooting in a couple weeks. This will die down and we will not pass any legislation. Don't worry about it. I'm just telling you what should happen. Better background checks and only 10 rounds in your mag pal.

the fact we don't blink where far more of the problem shows itself is quite telling on us as a whole. we focus on the big bright nasty things out there and react.

not think. react. 2 very different approaches with vastly different outcomes. but thinking takes time and usually requires putting emotion aside. putting emotion aside isn't easy these days. for any of us.

i'm all for better background checks. and while i don't see the "gun show loophole" as a huge issue, i also don't have much of a problem closing it. but will we enforce this new law or simply get mad and pass more if/when it doesn't have the intended results because it wasn't THOUGHT out, just a reaction to a problem?

if you're at a gun show buying from a private individual, great. go to the FFL dealer a booth down and have them run a background check for you. have the gov wave the fee for these one-off sales and now even the $25 isn't the issue.

but to date, our background checks have let a lot of shit through it should not have. fix that THEN put more people through it. this false sense of security given when reactionary laws are passed is why we keep demanding MORE laws. that request to me is a sign you don't want to think about it, just SOMETHING MUST BE DONE.

We need background checks on ALL gun purchases including private transactions

isn't this what i said?

i just also said we need to fix the background db before we flood it with even more.

and you never have answered direct questions i've asked. yet you wonder why i tag you "troll".

When the government does it's job background checks works. Nothing needs to be changed about what we already have.

Background checks are a joke. Just like the NRA wants them

Until they apply to the secondary market, there is nothing preventing a felon from getting a gun

In 2013, Colorado went to Universal Background Checks. In 2016, there were 127 potential violent felons sent back to prison that violated their parole. And don't do the Cite crap. That's already been covered in here and we don't need to keep redoing the same crap over and over just s you can try and make a point that doesn't hold water.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Alex Jones Warns Beto: Keep Your Filthy Hands Off Our 2nd Amendment!
Establishment puppet Beto O’Rourke has become the mouthpiece of the victim disarmament lobby and has pledged, quote “Hell yes, we’re going to take your AR-15, your AK-47!” LMFAO!! you losers don't even know the half of reality..

Then Beto better be prepared to supply lots of body bags for all the dead people he is going to kill trying to take legal guns out of the hands of millions of peaceful, law-abiding people. I know the AK can carry a magazine that one alone can hold 100 rounds, and there are rifles out there capable of shooting a hole through an engine block, much less a man. Who are you going to send in first, Beto? Why not let it be you?

More justification why we need to take the guns

Anyone who reacts by wanting to kill people should not have guns

Is that also why you need to ban speech? Anyone who reacts by criticizing their rulers should not be allowed to speak..

 

[Lakhota]

Colt suspends production of AR-15s for civilian market.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Colt suspends production of AR-15s for civilian market.

You are correct but you may wish to include a URL to go with it.

 

[Uncensored2008]

I would ask him the same question I asked you
You talk tough, but would you shoot a police officer trying to lawfully confiscate your weapon?

Confiscating weapons from law abiding citizens is against the Constitution, the law of the land. Hence the officer would be illegally trying to steal weapons.

 

[Lakhota]

Colt suspends production of AR-15s for civilian market.

You are correct but you may wish to include a URL to go with it.

Don't have one. Rachel Maddow told me a few minutes ago.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Colt suspends production of AR-15s for civilian market.

You are correct but you may wish to include a URL to go with it.

Don't have one. Rachel Maddow told me a few minutes ago.

Comrade shitting bull, did traitor Madcow tell you that Colt was the only ones making ARMALITE 15? Perhaps the bull dyke told you they were the MAJOR manufacturer?

If so, she lied to you, as usual.....

 

[AntonToo]

Not really satire.

Beto: 'Hell Yes I'm Going To Violate My Oath To Defend The Constitution'

Horseshit - we've had Assault Weapons Ban in 1994-2004, it was never ruled to be unconstitutional.

Comrade;

{At a minimum, ex post facto prohibits legislatures from passing laws which retroactively criminalize behavior. However, this prohibition does not attach as strictly to judicial decisions. Appellate courts sometimes announce a new rule of law, but will not apply it to the case in front of it, in order to attempt to comply with ex post facto prohibitions. }

Ex Post Facto

Wtf does that have to do with anything?

We’ve had the assault weapon ban for a decade and it was never ruled unconstitutional.

 

[M14 Shooter]

We’ve had the assault weapon ban for a decade and it was never ruled unconstitutional.

I asked you this before :
Why do you think the current court would rule it constitutional?
Maybe this time you'll answer.

 

[iceberg]

Not really satire.

Beto: 'Hell Yes I'm Going To Violate My Oath To Defend The Constitution'

Horseshit - we've had Assault Weapons Ban in 1994-2004, it was never ruled to be unconstitutional.

Comrade;

{At a minimum, ex post facto prohibits legislatures from passing laws which retroactively criminalize behavior. However, this prohibition does not attach as strictly to judicial decisions. Appellate courts sometimes announce a new rule of law, but will not apply it to the case in front of it, in order to attempt to comply with ex post facto prohibitions. }

Ex Post Facto

Wtf does that have to do with anything?

We’ve had the assault weapon ban for a decade and it was never ruled unconstitutional.

It was never found to make a difference either, huh?

 

[iceberg]

I didn't say it's a cure all. We don't even blink when someone takes a handgun and commits a crime. Par for the course. Shit happens. What are you gonna do. I get that. No one said any of these regulations would be a cure all. But, maybe some of these guys wouldn't have gotten their hands on guns if we did better background checks. And maybe if the Vegas Shooter couldn't get his hands on such powerful weapons, a lot more people would be alive today. We can't let every man and woman in America have the kind of power a soldier has. Name one other country that does this? And we have more citizens die every year from gun violence than probably every other country combined.

P.S. There hasn't been a mass shooting in a couple weeks. This will die down and we will not pass any legislation. Don't worry about it. I'm just telling you what should happen. Better background checks and only 10 rounds in your mag pal.

the fact we don't blink where far more of the problem shows itself is quite telling on us as a whole. we focus on the big bright nasty things out there and react.

not think. react. 2 very different approaches with vastly different outcomes. but thinking takes time and usually requires putting emotion aside. putting emotion aside isn't easy these days. for any of us.

i'm all for better background checks. and while i don't see the "gun show loophole" as a huge issue, i also don't have much of a problem closing it. but will we enforce this new law or simply get mad and pass more if/when it doesn't have the intended results because it wasn't THOUGHT out, just a reaction to a problem?

if you're at a gun show buying from a private individual, great. go to the FFL dealer a booth down and have them run a background check for you. have the gov wave the fee for these one-off sales and now even the $25 isn't the issue.

but to date, our background checks have let a lot of shit through it should not have. fix that THEN put more people through it. this false sense of security given when reactionary laws are passed is why we keep demanding MORE laws. that request to me is a sign you don't want to think about it, just SOMETHING MUST BE DONE.

We need background checks on ALL gun purchases including private transactions

isn't this what i said?

i just also said we need to fix the background db before we flood it with even more.

and you never have answered direct questions i've asked. yet you wonder why i tag you "troll".

When the government does it's job background checks works. Nothing needs to be changed about what we already have.

Background checks are a joke. Just like the NRA wants them

Until they apply to the secondary market, there is nothing preventing a felon from getting a gun

So background checks are a joke but you demand they be done.

No not trolling at all.

 

[Leo123]

So, you are building/selling bomb-capable drones? How can I get one?

So you get my point then? The US Military has them and you want to be just as armed as they are? You people are insane.

the US military doesn't use the AR15.

Oh, stop this nonsense. They use the AR-15 Model 604. But they are stamped with M-16A-4 before it's delivered to comply with the Military identifying program.

The M-16a-4 is an ADAPTION of the AR-15. It is NOT an AR-15.

The M-16A-4 is an AR-15 Model 604 stamped to read M-16A-4 before it's delivered to the Military. Didn't we already cover this?

No, that's bullshit. Stop spreading lies.

 

[Leo123]

Good thing our forefathers didn't think that way.

Hey, good idea. Let's dig them up and ask them. Or have a seance.

No need Daryl, just read American history. Apparently you know nothing about it.

Facts get in their way. I also read the various court rulings and notice they are shying away from those with me around. So the only thing they have left is their little digs. I can live with that. It means they admit defeat on a regular basis and are too dense or stupid to see it.

Question is why do you fight every idea we throw out there. You like murder

What idea do you present? I haven't seen any real ideas as of yet. You scream "NO" or "You can't tell me what to do" every step of the way. I want the AR to be regulated but leave the traditional hunting rifles alone. Is that a bad idea? And I have clearly stated my reasoning why. Now clearly state your ideas.

Hunting rifles are deadlier.

 

[MisterBeale]

i wanna see *this* country free from the threat of school shootings dude.

So long as people know how to make guns, we will never be free from the threat of school shootings.

OK

Let’s stop producing guns and see what happens

You act like the only folks that can make them are big corporations. Are you really that dumb? Oh wait, everyone knows RWINGER.

I'll tell you what will happen, criminals will have them b/c of their motivation, and everyone else will be at the mercy of the incompetent STATE.

Banning guns is impossible now. That horse has left the barn, permanently.

Solid Concepts 3D Prints Another Metal Gun, ‘Reason’, a 10mm Auto 1911

Student jailed for making 3D printed gun

And exactly how will anyone ever ban firearms? You throw that word around when it is meant to cause hate and discontent. You Rumpsters sure are prolific in doing that.

First, I didn't vote in the current occupant of the oval office.

Second, I agree, no ban on owning fire arms is possible, we are in agreement.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Not really satire.

Beto: 'Hell Yes I'm Going To Violate My Oath To Defend The Constitution'

Horseshit - we've had Assault Weapons Ban in 1994-2004, it was never ruled to be unconstitutional.

Comrade;

{At a minimum, ex post facto prohibits legislatures from passing laws which retroactively criminalize behavior. However, this prohibition does not attach as strictly to judicial decisions. Appellate courts sometimes announce a new rule of law, but will not apply it to the case in front of it, in order to attempt to comply with ex post facto prohibitions. }

Ex Post Facto

Wtf does that have to do with anything?

We’ve had the assault weapon ban for a decade and it was never ruled unconstitutional.

Yeah stupid, it's illegal to pass laws that criminalize acts in the past. If you try to make people who legally own AR-15's into felons, it's YOU who are the criminals, and you'll be treated accordingly.

 

[Lakhota]

Hey, good idea. Let's dig them up and ask them. Or have a seance.

No need Daryl, just read American history. Apparently you know nothing about it.

Facts get in their way. I also read the various court rulings and notice they are shying away from those with me around. So the only thing they have left is their little digs. I can live with that. It means they admit defeat on a regular basis and are too dense or stupid to see it.

Question is why do you fight every idea we throw out there. You like murder

What idea do you present? I haven't seen any real ideas as of yet. You scream "NO" or "You can't tell me what to do" every step of the way. I want the AR to be regulated but leave the traditional hunting rifles alone. Is that a bad idea? And I have clearly stated my reasoning why. Now clearly state your ideas.

Hunting rifles are deadlier.

No, they aren't. Some are just more powerful (velocity vs. energy). I've never seen an elephant gun with a 100-round rotary magazine.