“Hell yes we are going to take your AR-15”

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

The country decided gay people had a right to get married, and we got gay marriage. The country decided weed should be legalized, and weed is being legalized. The country decided we need universal background checks and a ban on large capacity magazines and guns designed for combat. The NRA and gun nuts will whine, but we will achieve that too.

Go ahead an introduce an amendment repealing the 2nd Amendment. Right now! Do it, and see how far you get!

What possible reason would anyone have to do that? It didn't take an amendment to get fully automatic weapons off the street.

That's funny! I can buy a fully automatic weapon at any number of gun stores in my local area. You are an idiot of the highest caliber!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

The country decided gay people had a right to get married, and we got gay marriage. The country decided weed should be legalized, and weed is being legalized. The country decided we need universal background checks and a ban on large capacity magazines and guns designed for combat. The NRA and gun nuts will whine, but we will achieve that too.

Go right ahead, amend the constitution...oh wait you don't have nearly enough votes.

Don't need to.

Yes you do. Just like a stupid libtard to think otherwise. Idiot.

We limited access to fully automatic weapons without an amendment. How is this different?

Limited access? In what way?

 

[BULLDOG]

We limited access to fully automatic weapons without an amendment. How is this different?

No you didn't, any law abiding citizen can apply for the tax stamp and own one.

Well who do you think did limit access to fully automatic weapons?

Nobody limited access. You are not the brightest bulb are you.

You think there is the same access to fully auto weapons as there is to ar15s? Really?

Sure is, does that trigger you snowflake?

Yep. You're still nuts. No, fully automatic weapons are not as accessible as other types of guns.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

We limited access to fully automatic weapons without an amendment. How is this different?

Decent people are more attuned to rights.

If you Stalinist pigs could have ended civil rights, you would have, long ago. We will fight you, we will take up arms. If you REALLY think the military is going to support your destruction of the Constitution they swore to uphold, you're a whole lot stupider than I thought, and I thought you were pretty stupid....

The military will obey their officers orders,

Yes, and many of those officers were born and raised in the south around weapons. They fully support the Constitution. You will lose.

 

[BULLDOG]

The country decided gay people had a right to get married, and we got gay marriage. The country decided weed should be legalized, and weed is being legalized. The country decided we need universal background checks and a ban on large capacity magazines and guns designed for combat. The NRA and gun nuts will whine, but we will achieve that too.

Go ahead an introduce an amendment repealing the 2nd Amendment. Right now! Do it, and see how far you get!

What possible reason would anyone have to do that? It didn't take an amendment to get fully automatic weapons off the street.

That's funny! I can buy a fully automatic weapon at any number of gun stores in my local area. You are an idiot of the highest caliber!

You have now reached the credibility point of an idiot who argues that the world is flat. While there is a rout for an average person to own a fully automatic weapon, they are no where near as accessible as other types of guns. I'll leave you to your silly babbling now.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

No you didn't, any law abiding citizen can apply for the tax stamp and own one.

Well who do you think did limit access to fully automatic weapons?

Nobody limited access. You are not the brightest bulb are you.

You think there is the same access to fully auto weapons as there is to ar15s? Really?

Sure is, does that trigger you snowflake?

Yep. You're still nuts. No, fully automatic weapons are not as accessible as other types of guns.

Why not?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

The country decided gay people had a right to get married, and we got gay marriage. The country decided weed should be legalized, and weed is being legalized. The country decided we need universal background checks and a ban on large capacity magazines and guns designed for combat. The NRA and gun nuts will whine, but we will achieve that too.

Go ahead an introduce an amendment repealing the 2nd Amendment. Right now! Do it, and see how far you get!

What possible reason would anyone have to do that? It didn't take an amendment to get fully automatic weapons off the street.

That's funny! I can buy a fully automatic weapon at any number of gun stores in my local area. You are an idiot of the highest caliber!

You have now reached the credibility point of an idiot who argues that the world is flat. While there is a rout for an average person to own a fully automatic weapon, they are no where near as accessible as other types of guns. I'll leave you to your silly babbling now.

You said it was impossible or words to that effect. Failure!

 

[BULLDOG]

The country decided gay people had a right to get married, and we got gay marriage. The country decided weed should be legalized, and weed is being legalized. The country decided we need universal background checks and a ban on large capacity magazines and guns designed for combat. The NRA and gun nuts will whine, but we will achieve that too.

Go ahead an introduce an amendment repealing the 2nd Amendment. Right now! Do it, and see how far you get!

What possible reason would anyone have to do that? It didn't take an amendment to get fully automatic weapons off the street.

That's funny! I can buy a fully automatic weapon at any number of gun stores in my local area. You are an idiot of the highest caliber!

You have now reached the credibility point of an idiot who argues that the world is flat. While there is a rout for an average person to own a fully automatic weapon, they are no where near as accessible as other types of guns. I'll leave you to your silly babbling now.

You said it was impossible or words to that effect. Failure!

Please point to the post where I said impossible, or words to that effect.

 

[LeftofLeft]

I actually would have supported Beto O’Rourke had this been primarily directed at criminals, unlawfuls, etc. but, no, it was directred at Law-abiding citizens. Here it comes: “but law-abiding citizens don’t need an AR-15”. Really? The criminals are using AR-15s and now the first step is too take it out of law-abiding citizens and put them at a further disadvantage with criminals who get to keep their guns of any and all size and automation?

I think many on the Left - not all - hate Law-abiding citizens having guns more than they do criminals having guns.

law-abiding citizens don’t need an AR-15”. Really?
Yes, really.

why are you worried about what law abiding citizens have?

Because liberals want to control citizens. The fact US Citizens can own guns pisses them off. If you look at most of the socialist and communist thought leaders in history, one of the first things they did was to take away guns from citizens. Notice how liberals don’t lose their shit when someone uses a car, a machete, or knife to kill innocents. Or, notice the difference when a non-citizen uses a gun to kill innocents vs. a citizen doing the same thing.

The fact that 32,000 Americans are killed by guns each year pisses us off. 20 six year olds killed at Sandy Hook pisses us off

It does not piss you off that the same motivation to use a means you don’t like use knives, cars, and bombs? You take away the guns of lawful people yet the unlawful will still have them. From 1791 to 1965 there are no recorded mass shootings of innocents. From 1965 to today there have been countless shootings.... almost 100 percent by people who got guns illegally.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Go ahead an introduce an amendment repealing the 2nd Amendment. Right now! Do it, and see how far you get!

What possible reason would anyone have to do that? It didn't take an amendment to get fully automatic weapons off the street.

That's funny! I can buy a fully automatic weapon at any number of gun stores in my local area. You are an idiot of the highest caliber!

You have now reached the credibility point of an idiot who argues that the world is flat. While there is a rout for an average person to own a fully automatic weapon, they are no where near as accessible as other types of guns. I'll leave you to your silly babbling now.

You said it was impossible or words to that effect. Failure!

Please point to the post where I said impossible, or words to that effect.

"It didn't take an amendment to get fully automatic weapons off the street."

There! Automatic weapons are not "off the street". You are either in error or you lied.

 

[LeftofLeft]

We limited access to fully automatic weapons without an amendment. How is this different?

Decent people are more attuned to rights.

If you Stalinist pigs could have ended civil rights, you would have, long ago. We will fight you, we will take up arms. If you REALLY think the military is going to support your destruction of the Constitution they swore to uphold, you're a whole lot stupider than I thought, and I thought you were pretty stupid....

The military will obey their officers orders,

The Left is already all over the police for using guns. What makes you believe the military will meet your standards?

 

[BULLDOG]

What possible reason would anyone have to do that? It didn't take an amendment to get fully automatic weapons off the street.

That's funny! I can buy a fully automatic weapon at any number of gun stores in my local area. You are an idiot of the highest caliber!

You have now reached the credibility point of an idiot who argues that the world is flat. While there is a rout for an average person to own a fully automatic weapon, they are no where near as accessible as other types of guns. I'll leave you to your silly babbling now.

You said it was impossible or words to that effect. Failure!

Please point to the post where I said impossible, or words to that effect.

"It didn't take an amendment to get fully automatic weapons off the street."

There! Automatic weapons are not "off the street". You are either in error or you lied.

You saying that doesn't make it true. I'm surprised you would make such an obviously dumb remark. On second thought, I'm not that surprised.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Decent people are more attuned to rights.

If you Stalinist pigs could have ended civil rights, you would have, long ago. We will fight you, we will take up arms. If you REALLY think the military is going to support your destruction of the Constitution they swore to uphold, you're a whole lot stupider than I thought, and I thought you were pretty stupid....

Calm down sweet pea. There won't be a civil war, no matter how much you fantasize about it.

So you admit that your dream of disarming people is just a fantasy? If Beta the fuckwad Dork attempted to go through with his unconstitutional threat, there would indeed be a shooting war.

Spoiler Alert: You Nazis lose....

I have no doubt that is exactly how it finishes in your fantasy world.

As I have no doubt that in your fantasy it ends with 3 day lines for toilet paper and starving peasants eating zoo Animals. But you nor any other Nazi here can explain just how you're going to pull this off? You're just going to tell the peasants to disarm and they'll be say "Yaza massa suh, we sho nuff gunna scrap and bow to ewe"

So you pass an unconstitutional law, then what?

How did they get fully auto weapons off the street?

They didn't. There are still fully automatic weapons on the street. It something you Nazis just can't grasp, criminals don't care much about the laws you pass, Otherwise you would just make a law against mass shootings and be done with it.

 

[Uncensored2008]

The military will obey their officers orders,

What makes you think the Officers would violate their oath and attack the Constitution?

 

[beagle9]

What's more dangerous than any AR-15/AK-47 and/or etc in the world ??

A child raised into adulthood by a parent or by parent's that were to weak to ever be in the child parenting busines? Bingo !!!

Compare such a thing to a gun, and the gun loses everytime.

 

[Cellblock2429]

I actually would have supported Beto O’Rourke had this been primarily directed at criminals, unlawfuls, etc. but, no, it was directred at Law-abiding citizens. Here it comes: “but law-abiding citizens don’t need an AR-15”. Really? The criminals are using AR-15s and now the first step is too take it out of law-abiding citizens and put them at a further disadvantage with criminals who get to keep their guns of any and all size and automation?

I think many on the Left - not all - hate Law-abiding citizens having guns more than they do criminals having guns.

law-abiding citizens don’t need an AR-15”. Really?
Yes, really.

why are you worried about what law abiding citizens have?

Because liberals want to control citizens. The fact US Citizens can own guns pisses them off. If you look at most of the socialist and communist thought leaders in history, one of the first things they did was to take away guns from citizens. Notice how liberals don’t lose their shit when someone uses a car, a machete, or knife to kill innocents. Or, notice the difference when a non-citizen uses a gun to kill innocents vs. a citizen doing the same thing.

The fact that 32,000 Americans are killed by guns each year pisses us off. 20 six year olds killed at Sandy Hook pisses us off

/—-/ No it doesn’t. You don’t give a rat’s azz about dead kids otherwise you’d be protesting at Planned Parenthood.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Calm down sweet pea. There won't be a civil war, no matter how much you fantasize about it.

So you admit that your dream of disarming people is just a fantasy? If Beta the fuckwad Dork attempted to go through with his unconstitutional threat, there would indeed be a shooting war.

Spoiler Alert: You Nazis lose....

I have no doubt that is exactly how it finishes in your fantasy world.

As I have no doubt that in your fantasy it ends with 3 day lines for toilet paper and starving peasants eating zoo Animals. But you nor any other Nazi here can explain just how you're going to pull this off? You're just going to tell the peasants to disarm and they'll be say "Yaza massa suh, we sho nuff gunna scrap and bow to ewe"

So you pass an unconstitutional law, then what?

How did they get fully auto weapons off the street?

They didn't. There are still fully automatic weapons on the street. It something you Nazis just can't grasp, criminals don't care much about the laws you pass, Otherwise you would just make a law against mass shootings and be done with it.

You can see it in the eyes of the anti-gun crowd. They rage about the mass shooting at hand and their vitriol is at the John Q. Public gun owner. They also have no problem with their liberal elite Hollywood gods putting out content after content of gun violence being glorified.

 

[beagle9]

So you admit that your dream of disarming people is just a fantasy? If Beta the fuckwad Dork attempted to go through with his unconstitutional threat, there would indeed be a shooting war.

Spoiler Alert: You Nazis lose....

I have no doubt that is exactly how it finishes in your fantasy world.

As I have no doubt that in your fantasy it ends with 3 day lines for toilet paper and starving peasants eating zoo Animals. But you nor any other Nazi here can explain just how you're going to pull this off? You're just going to tell the peasants to disarm and they'll be say "Yaza massa suh, we sho nuff gunna scrap and bow to ewe"

So you pass an unconstitutional law, then what?

How did they get fully auto weapons off the street?

They didn't. There are still fully automatic weapons on the street. It something you Nazis just can't grasp, criminals don't care much about the laws you pass, Otherwise you would just make a law against mass shootings and be done with it.

You can see it in the eyes of the anti-gun crowd. They rage about the mass shooting at hand and their vitriol is at the John Q. Public gun owner. They also have no problem with their liberal elite Hollywood gods putting out content after content of gun violence being glorified.

Exactly... Great analysis.

 

[BULLDOG]

So you admit that your dream of disarming people is just a fantasy? If Beta the fuckwad Dork attempted to go through with his unconstitutional threat, there would indeed be a shooting war.

Spoiler Alert: You Nazis lose....

I have no doubt that is exactly how it finishes in your fantasy world.

As I have no doubt that in your fantasy it ends with 3 day lines for toilet paper and starving peasants eating zoo Animals. But you nor any other Nazi here can explain just how you're going to pull this off? You're just going to tell the peasants to disarm and they'll be say "Yaza massa suh, we sho nuff gunna scrap and bow to ewe"

So you pass an unconstitutional law, then what?

How did they get fully auto weapons off the street?

They didn't. There are still fully automatic weapons on the street. It something you Nazis just can't grasp, criminals don't care much about the laws you pass, Otherwise you would just make a law against mass shootings and be done with it.

You can see it in the eyes of the anti-gun crowd. They rage about the mass shooting at hand and their vitriol is at the John Q. Public gun owner. They also have no problem with their liberal elite Hollywood gods putting out content after content of gun violence being glorified.

Big difference between a gun owner and a gun nut. They are not the same.

 

[Votto]

We limited access to fully automatic weapons without an amendment. How is this different?

Decent people are more attuned to rights.

If you Stalinist pigs could have ended civil rights, you would have, long ago. We will fight you, we will take up arms. If you REALLY think the military is going to support your destruction of the Constitution they swore to uphold, you're a whole lot stupider than I thought, and I thought you were pretty stupid....

The military will obey their officers orders,

The Left is already all over the police for using guns. What makes you believe the military will meet your standards?

Well the Left needs those guns so they can sell them to drug lords in Mexico.

Duh!