Blues Man
Diamond Member
- Aug 28, 2016
- 35,513
- 14,915
- 1,530
Not it's not a separate being until it van live without being attached to the mother.B.S, that is science, you know Biology, deal with it, it is a separate human
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not it's not a separate being until it van live without being attached to the mother.B.S, that is science, you know Biology, deal with it, it is a separate human
That's not what YOUR SIDE says.
Prove it!Even then you still have no authority to tell anyone what they can and cannot choose to do to their own bodies.
If you believe in and trust your god you should know that it is your god and only your god hat has the authority to judge you or anyone else.
You keep saying that yet it is false it has it's own brain function heartbeat and dna, the rest its the biology of pro creationNot it's not a separate being until it van live without being attached to the mother.
No it doesn'tProve it!
When someone is murdering a completely separate human in the womb, because ooops, it is everyone's business, it leads to being able to see those living outside the womb with less regard
You keep saying that yet it is false it has it's own brain function heartbeat and dna, the rest its the biology of pro creation
I have an adopted daughter, my pastor has two, and another pastor has two, keep trying and by the way, the issue is self control, and not getting pregnant, which is a very viable optionNo it doesn't
Tell me how many pregnant women who were going to have abortions did you make the offer to adopt their child?
You really don't care what happens after the child is born like most of you religious people. You'll criticize the mother for going on welfare though.
fetus is a term used to describe the developing human, you say it as if it is something different, like a parasite, or an alien.Which is why I have always said viability outside the womb is the line that delineates a fetus from a person
Were they going to be aborted before you adopted them? Did you specifically offer to adopt the child of a woman who was going to get an abortion?I have an adopted daughter, my pastor has two, and another pastor has two, keep trying and by the way, the issue is self control, and not getting pregnant, which is a very viable option
fetus is a term used to describe the developing human, you say it as if it is something different, like a parasite, or an alien.
Why does that matter and how could I know? that changes nothing she was adopted by my wife and I which you said Christians don't do. it also would not change the fact that a pregnant woman knows how it happened.Were they going to be aborted before you adopted them? Did you specifically offer to adopt the child of a woman who was going to get an abortion?
Or did you adopt them through an agency?
It is a human, a developing human, fetus is a term for developing human, you use it to dehumanize that person, plain and simple as it assuages your guiltSo what?
I never said a fetus wasn't human I said it wasn't a person yet
If you really cared about abortion you would seek out babies about to be aborted to save. And I never superficially mentioned Christians. I said religious peopleWhy does that matter and how could I know? that changes nothing she was adopted by my wife and I which you said Christians don't do. it also would not change the fact that a pregnant woman knows how it happened.
Not a person yet.It is a human, a developing human, fetus is a term for developing human, you use it to dehumanize that person, plain and simple as it assuages your guilt
It is a person, it is in the developing stages yes, but has separate DNA it is a separate human. The woman carrying it is simply how we procreate, and should give her no special right to kill it.Not a person yet.
Only a potential person. And I have no guilt. And I am not responsible for the acts of other people.
You can't even understand that while I support free choice of other people that I might not want my wife to get an abortion can you?
I only have the authority to make decisions for myself and have no desire to force other people to make the decisions I would make.
So now a child that may have ended up in group homes but instead is being raised in a loving home isn't good enough. How about people just be responsible, or be accountable for what they doIf you really cared about abortion you would seek out babies about to be aborted to save. And I never superficially mentioned Christians. I said religious people
And why do you have a right to force her to bear a child?It is a person, it is in the developing stages yes, but has separate DNA it is a separate human. The woman carrying it is simply how we procreate, and should give her no special right to kill it.
No more than you can't understand that people could control their sexual urges.
I am simply asking people to be responsible, and not have to kill their children.
So now a child that may have ended up in group homes but instead is being raised in a loving home isn't good enough. How about people just be responsible, or be accountable for what they do
I am simply asking people to be responsible, and not have to kill their children.And why do you have a right to force her to bear a child?
Why do you want more unwanted children in the world?
Until the fetus is viable outside the womb the mother's rights always take precedence when the fetus is viable outside the womb then it can be considered to have it's own rights.
How about people just be responsible, or be accountable for what they do. I mean does that not sound the least bit understandable tyo you you seem to skip over the part where NOBODY FORCED HER TO GET PREGNANTHey you're the one crying about aborted babies but it seems you do care more about the kids that are already born than the ones not born yet.