Has the United States surrendered to anthropogenic climate change?

The EV car mandate in CA has ben canceled. Without subsidies no one wants them. How dumb is it to tax the middles to help the rich buy an EV car
China is demonstrably prospering and expanding its international influence, aided and abetted by the blowhard's contempt for science and anachronistic embrace of passé dirty fuel.

According to CPCA data, the 50-odd EV builders in mainland China exported a total of 2.01 million pure electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles overseas in the first eight months of the year, up 51 per cent from the same period a year earlier.
 
China is demonstrably prospering and expanding its international influence, aided and abetted by the blowhard's contempt for science and anachronistic embrace of passé dirty fuel.

According to CPCA data, the 50-odd EV builders in mainland China exported a total of 2.01 million pure electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles overseas in the first eight months of the year, up 51 per cent from the same period a year earlier.
They are also building more coal energy plants. Remember what they did to their real estate market. They are communists they dont use supply and demand. The government just demands and they always get it wrong.
 
They are also building more coal energy plants. Remember what they did to their real estate market. They are communists they dont use supply and demand. The government just demands and they always get it wrong.
 
They are also building more coal energy plants. Remember what they did to their real estate market. They are communists they dont use supply and demand. The government just demands and they always get it wrong.
I am in no way promoting China's energy policies.

I am conforming the expanding global market for clean energy technologies that the retrograde U.S. has surrendered.
 
I am in no way promoting China's energy policies.


You absolute are, you ******* lying traitor.

Your CO2 FRAUD is enriching China and weakening America. You are a TRAITOR for supporting it.
 
You absolute are, you ******* lying traitor.

Your CO2 FRAUD is enriching China and weakening America. You are a TRAITOR for supporting it.
Your inability to deal with reality is not enhanced by your blatant dishonesty and childish vituperation.

If you support China's exploiting Trump's surrender in the growing clean energy technology market, that is unfortunate, but it does not dispose me to sink to your level of churlish incivility and personal invective.

Tracking China's clean energy export dominance
 
Last edited:
Your inability to deal with reality


IT is YOU who cannot deal with reality, because the REALITY is that

1. EARTH is NOT WARMING
2. Increasing atmospheric CO2 does NOTHING


YOU have been asked to refute EMH. YOU cannot do that. The "climate scientists" cannot do that.

EMH is right.

CO2 FRAUD needs a PROSECUTION.
 
IT is YOU who cannot deal with reality, because the REALITY is that

1. EARTH is NOT WARMING
2. Increasing atmospheric CO2 does NOTHING


YOU have been asked to refute EMH. YOU cannot do that. The "climate scientists" cannot do that.

EMH is right.

CO2 FRAUD needs a PROSECUTION.
Yes, you keep repeating your denial and the paranoia upon which it is based.

I'll continue to respect the science.
 
Yes, you keep repeating your denial and the paranoia upon which it is based.

I'll continue to respect the science.
What "science" do you speak of?

All the AGW crowd produces is computer derived fiction.
 
What "science" do you speak of?
The consensus of the world's climatologists who have compiled and analyzed the empirical data, rather than an ideologue with no scientific expertise who brays that they are "stupid" and "evil," but cannot cite any countervailing data.
 
The consensus of the world's climatologists who have compiled and analyzed the empirical data, rather than an ideologue with no scientific expertise who brays that they are "stupid" and "evil," but cannot cite any countervailing data.
Consensus is a political term, not a scientific one. And, like I said, the only thing the AGW fraudsters produce is computer derived fiction.

There is no actual science at all.
 
I'll continue to respect the science

You phrased it correctly, you "respect" "the science." What is "the science?"

Parroting Dr. Fauxi.
Parroting MSNBC
Being certain of that which is actually 180 degrees from the truth

"The science" is bullshit. True SCIENCE OUTS it as BULLSHIT



the paranoia upon which it is based


gotta love the "paranoia" of noticing THE ACTUAL DATA shows Earth is not warming. No "paranoia" from the treasonous fudgebaking liars claiming it is warming.


SCIENCE is about THEORY and DATA. YOUR THEORY is that increasing atmospheric CO2 causes warming.

That THEORY is 100% REFUTED by ALL DATA on the subject, note the word DATA not FUDGE. DATA comes from INSTRUMENTS. FUDGE comes from CONFLICTED TREASONOUS TAXPAYER FUNDED FUDGEBAKING LIARS who do not like what the TRUTH of the DATA SHOWS (THAT THEY ARE COMPLETELY WRONG) and hence FUDGES THE DATA to show something that never existed....


highly correlated satellite and balloon data = NO WARMING in atmosphere despite rising CO2
surface air pressure = NO WARMING in atmosphere despite rising CO2


THEORY REJECTED
 
Fauci Dr Fauci I am the science meme Poster for Sale by Aracoth ...



 
Consensus is a political term, not a scientific one. And, like I said, the only thing the AGW fraudsters produce is computer derived fiction.

There is no actual science at all.
Ideologicaly-driven science deniers don't need no stinkin' empirical data.
 
Ideologicaly-driven science deniers don't need no stinkin' empirical data.
Ideologically driven fraudsters don't need no stinkin' empirical data.

They use computers to manufacture what they want.

DURRRRRR

Or, to put it simply for you....computer models AREN'T data.

They are fiction.
 
15th post
Consensus is a political term, not a scientific one. And, like I said, the only thing the AGW fraudsters produce is computer derived fiction.

There is no actual science at all.
Ideologically driven fraudsters don't need no stinkin' empirical data.

They use computers to manufacture what they want.

DURRRRRR

Or, to put it simply for you....computer models AREN'T data.

They are fiction.
If you can't handle the science, and are unable to concoct data to refute it, just call the cognescenti "stupid" and "evil."

(You could even whine that they eat pet cats and dogs.)

Meanwhile, hardcore denialists are running away from China and allowing it to dominate the global marketplace.

"China’s booming renewable energy sector is not only being driven by a large domestic market but also by robust green energy exports. Indeed, China’s green tech exports hit a record $20 billion in August alone, creating a ‘‘new energy system.’’

Interestingly, China’s clean energy sector is doing brisk business with less developed economies even as the U.S. retreats from the clean energy race."

 
If you can't handle the science, and are unable to concoct data to refute it, just call the cognescenti "stupid" and "evil."

(You could even whine that they eat pet cats and dogs.)

Meanwhile, hardcore denialists are running away from China and allowing it to dominate the global marketplace.

"China’s booming renewable energy sector is not only being driven by a large domestic market but also by robust green energy exports. Indeed, China’s green tech exports hit a record $20 billion in August alone, creating a ‘‘new energy system.’’

Interestingly, China’s clean energy sector is doing brisk business with less developed economies even as the U.S. retreats from the clean energy race."

You moron, there IS no science behind AGW. It's a FAILED THEORY. That's why they are forced to lie about everything now.

Your continued belief in volcano gods is merely further proof that you're not capable of serious discussions about anything of a scientific nature.
 
You moron, there IS no science behind AGW. It's a FAILED THEORY. That's why they are forced to lie about everything now.

Your continued belief in volcano gods is merely further proof that you're not capable of serious discussions about anything of a scientific nature.
Which of the 197 signatory nations have resigned from the Paris Climate Accord?

Which climatologists no longer acknowledge anthropogenic climate change?

Who among the world's climatologist are "stupid" and "evil"?
 
Which of the 197 signatory nations have resigned from the Paris Climate Accord?

Which climatologists no longer acknowledge anthropogenic climate change?

Who among the world's climatologist are "stupid" and "evil"?
Who gives a ****. AGW is now about power. It has NOTHING to do with science, and everything to do with giving government power over its people.
 
Back
Top Bottom