Has the United States surrendered to anthropogenic climate change?

[schmidlap]

The Trumpy ideologues who oppose the scientific consensus are obviously unable to refute the science, so they cast science as a religion.

Welcome to the new Dark Ages.

 

[ding]

The Trumpy ideologues who oppose the scientific consensus are obviously unable to refute the science, so they cast science as a religion.

Welcome to the new Dark Ages.

What science? Science is based upon evidence. What evidence do you suppose exists for a climate catastrophe?

 

[Frankenstein]

To serve the dirty fuel profiteers, the science deniers are now pretending that climatology is a religion because they are unable to concoct empirical data to refute the scientific consensus.

Trump’s bogus claim about a ‘climate religion’ is a pathetic political dodge
​

Earlier this year, Lee Zeldin, Trump’s administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, announced a broad attack on environmental regulations. A chief target of Zeldin’s EPA is the 16-year-old endangerment finding, based on a veritable mountain of scientific evidence that greenhouse gases are a threat to public health for current and future generations...​

​

Revoking the EPA’s authority to regulate these emissions, experts warn, will accelerate climate impacts like this summer’s extreme weather events, and worsen heat-related deaths and climate-induced spread of disease...​

​

Repealing a key piece of science-based policy normally requires amassing considerable counter-evidence — in this case, to show that greenhouse gas emissions do not cause or contribute to these dangers.​

​

But Zeldin is sidestepping science, preferring religious language to facts. “The endangerment finding is considered the holy grail of the climate religion,” Zeldin states on the EPA’s website. “We are driving a dagger through the heart of the climate religion.”​

Empirical data shows windmills, and solar farms, not only provide little energy, they are bad for the environment through the micro climate they create, which also then changes weather pattern farther down the line, it shows that blades for windmill cannot be disposed of other than burying them, and they do not break down in the ground

 

[ding]

To serve the dirty fuel profiteers, the science deniers are now pretending that climatology is a religion

You’re saying “dirty fuel profiteers” and “science deniers” kind of proves it is a religion, shitlap.

 

[schmidlap]

You’re saying “dirty fuel profiteers” and “science deniers” kind of proves it is a religion, shitlap.

Trump has again embarrassed America, incapable of articulating a scientific refutation of the climatological consensus, he spewed his data-free bullshit that is contradicted by corroborative empirical data and incontrovertible reality:

Trump called the idea of a carbon footprint “nonsense” and a “hoax made up by people with evil intentions.” ...​

​

“If you don’t get away from this green scam your country is going to fail,” Trump said. “And I’m really good at predicting things.”​

​

“All of these predictions made by the United Nations and many others, often for bad reasons, were wrong,” ... “They were made by stupid people ​

​

Trump called the idea of a carbon footprint “nonsense” and a “hoax made up by people with evil intentions.” ​

​

Loading…

thehill.com

​

 

[ding]

Trump has again embarrassed America, incapable of articulating a scientific refutation of the climatological consensus, he spewed his data-free bullshit that is contradicted by corroborative empirical data and incontrovertible reality:

Trump called the idea of a carbon footprint “nonsense” and a “hoax made up by people with evil intentions.” ...​

​

“If you don’t get away from this green scam your country is going to fail,” Trump said. “And I’m really good at predicting things.”​

​

“All of these predictions made by the United Nations and many others, often for bad reasons, were wrong,” ... “They were made by stupid people ​

​

Trump called the idea of a carbon footprint “nonsense” and a “hoax made up by people with evil intentions.” ​

​

Loading…

thehill.com

​

IDGAF. I'm not a political ideologue like you.

 

[schmidlap]

IDGAF. I'm not a political ideologue like you.

Respecting science rather than swallowing data-free ideological dogma is a good thing.

 

[JimH52]

Respecting science rather than swallowing data-free ideological dogma is a good thing.

Pregnant women need to listen to a Moron, convicted Felon (34), and a man that admits he had a worm in his brain rather than their own Doctor?

 

[ding]

Respecting science rather than swallowing data-free ideological dogma is a good thing.

You don’t know the first thing about science. Give it a rest.

 

[schmidlap]

You don’t know the first thing about science. Give it a rest.

The world's climatologists, based upon analysis of a plethora of empirical data, concur that spewing millions of tonnes of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere impacts the atmosphere, and the blowhard, who is woefully deficient in scientific expertise, citing no data, brays that "they" are "stupid" and "evil."

In challenging the science, a very, very slow, stubborn four-year-old could do better.

 

[ding]

The world's climatologists, based upon analysis of a plethora of empirical data, concur that spewing millions of tonnes of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere impacts the atmosphere, and the blowhard, who is woefully deficient in scientific expertise, citing no data, brays that "they" are "stupid" and "evil."

In challenging the science, a very, very slow, stubborn four-year-old could do better.

Who wound you up today, shitlap?

 

[Frankenstein]

The world's climatologists, based upon analysis of a plethora of empirical data, concur that spewing millions of tonnes of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere impacts the atmosphere, and the blowhard, who is woefully deficient in scientific expertise, citing no data, brays that "they" are "stupid" and "evil."

In challenging the science, a very, very slow, stubborn four-year-old could do better.

Paid political jack Scientists, who depend on funding from the leftists in Government, said the sky is falling.

 

[EMH]

analysis of a plethora of empirical data

repeatedly documented as completely false. The ACTUAL DATA refuted their claim completely, then they FUDGED the data in 2005...

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

"satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.

Scientists were left with two choices: either the atmosphere wasn't warming up, or something was wrong with the data."



LOL!!!

Hence there is a "plethora" of FUDGED FRAUD that science invalid morons call "empirical data" no matter how many times it is documented as FUDGE not data.


Is the atmosphere warming?

satellite DATA = NO
balloon DATA = NO
Surface Air Pressure Data = NO


There is precisely NO ACTUAL DATA documenting atmospheric warming, NONE.

 

[EMH]

Respecting science

Your side does not practice SCIENCE, it practices "The Science = parroting MSNBC."

SCIENCE involves ANSWERING QUESTIONS before branding "truth" to a theory. Have at it again...

Thread 'Any honest media person with the courage to actually ask climate questions?'

Feb 12, 2024

Apparently not.

Not on Faux

Not on RAV or OANN


What questions will the media never ask?


1. Why does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other?
2. Why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?
3. If the oceans are "warming" why is the record decade for canes still the 1940s?
4. If the oceans are "rising" why can't we see one single photo of land sinking?
5. How did Co2 thaw North America and freeze Greenland at the same time?



The Co2 Fraud is bilking America out of $200 billion per...

• EMH
• Replies: 92
• Forum: Media

• 
• 
• 

 

[EMH]

Trump called the idea of a carbon footprint “nonsense”

which is 100% spot on correct considering the FACT that there is NO ACTUAL DATA to support the theory that adding CO2 to atmosphere causes warming.

 

[schmidlap]

Who wound you up today, shitlap?

Whining "stupid" and "evil" is the blowhard's refutation of the overwhelming climatological consensus of corroborative empirical data? That's it?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

 

[EMH]

View attachment 1165436

The ACTUAL EMPIRICAL DATA has always 100% refuted CO2 FRAUD.

Oceans are not rising = no ongoing net ice melt = Earth not warming.

 

[schmidlap]

The ACTUAL EMPIRICAL DATA has always 100% refuted CO2 FRAUD.

Oceans are not rising = no ongoing net ice melt = Earth not warming.

and then there is the irrefutable empirical reality:​

The Past Three Summers Were the Three Hottest on Record​

 

[EMH]

and then there is the irrefutable empirical reality:​

The Past Three Summers Were the Three Hottest on Record​

The idiot who falls for CO2 FRAUD never bothers to understand the difference between DATA and FUDGE.

AT least for Nashville we have all three of those "hottest summers on record" and we never got a "record high" during summer in any of those, we didn't even get to 100F this summer, and every summer day in Nashville the "record high" is at least 102F.

Thread 'Observing the "warmest ever year" from Nashville...'

Aug 7, 2023

Well, Nashville regularly gets to 100 F. It is a "benchmark" for a warm summer. So far in 2023, the high is 99.

What's up now with the "warmest ever" year?

Nashville, TN Monthly Weather Forecast - weather.com

Weather.com brings you the most accurate monthly weather forecast for Nashville, TN with average/record and high/low temperatures, precipitation and more.

weather.com

One day in August so far got to 90 and no more are in the forecast.

Today's data...

LOL!!!

Aug 7	High	Low	Precip
Averages	91°F	70°	--
Records	104°(1930)	56°(2004)

So, our record high...

• EMH
• Replies: 151
• Forum: Environment

• 
• 
•