Bald faced lie.
The poster
EMH along with
westwall have produced tons of data to explain how the fundmental premise of the whole AGW argument is wrong.
Cut it out
schmidlap. Your lack of anything in the way of a study (you know will get shredded and which you can't stand behind because you appear to be pretty ignorant of science) is a glaring indication that you are projecting when you call others domatists.
And you can spare me a reference to the money grubbing Paris Accord.
You and your ilk lost your credibility when you started screaming like chicken little.
Here you go:
In recent years, a surprising shift has emerged within the scientific community regarding the severity of climate change warnings. Notable climate scientists such as Dr. Judith Curry and Dr. Steven Koonin have publicly challenged the most catastrophic scenarios often reported in the media, emphasizing that uncertainty remains high in climate models. According to a 2024 survey published by the journal Environmental Research Letters, about 28% of climate-related scientists expressed skepticism about high-end warming projections. These researchers argue that headlines sometimes exaggerate the speed and impact of climate changes, which can mislead the public. Some experts highlight that while greenhouse gases contribute to warming, the exact scale and timeline are still debated. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) itself has admitted that climate sensitivity estimates—how much the Earth warms with a doubling of CO2—carry significant uncertainty. This growing skepticism is fueling a more nuanced debate about the future of our climate.
Growing Number of Experts Question Dire Predictions Growing Number of Experts Question Dire Predictions (image credits: wikimedia) In recent years, a surprising shift has emerged within the scientific community regarding the severity of climate change
climatecosmos.com
In a recent
segment, “Are Americans Afraid of Climate Change?”
CNN’s Harry Enten incredulously noted that despite all “the bad weather” we’ve been seeing, only “40% of Americans are greatly worried about climate change. The same as in 2000!”
Forty seems high. Indeed, I’m skeptical that very many Americans spend much, if any, of their day “greatly” distressed about mild deviations in the climate. Sure, alarmism has calcified into a partisan position for many Democrats, and many young people have been convinced the future is bleak. They grow out of it. When asked specifically about their experiences with hurricanes, floods, tornadoes, droughts, heat waves, cold snaps, and winter storms, a considerable majority of people said they have witnessed no change one way or the other.
Why are climate activists losing? Sooner or later, fearmongering becomes noise. Reality crashes against predictions. Public schools, institutions of higher learning, governments, international organizations, the whole culture, and scientific institutions have spent billions and untold hours trying to normalize the idea that modernity and capitalistic gluttony have driven temperatures to dangerous extremes. When I was growing up, it was cooling. Now, it’s warming.
And with each surge of alarmism, the message depreciates.
The public awareness campaign to convince Americans that climate change is an existential threat has been an epic failure. In a recent segment, “Are
www.washingtonexaminer.com
And again.....nobody here gives a flying fig how many third world nations, hungry for money signed some politically expedient "accord". In fact, its just another cycle of the "surge of alarmism" mentioned above.
Put out your studies......zealot.
Let's see what you've got.
