Has the United States surrendered to anthropogenic climate change?

It obviously is not a hoax since we clearly have doubled the CO2 concentration.

Look it up.
CO2 is opaque to infrared heat that would otherwise have left the planet and radiated out into space.
CO2 converts infrared photonic energy into vibratory heat energy that can't conduct out into space.
.

And nursery owners double (or more) CO2 concentrations in their greenhouses.

Plants love it.

What was it y'all said about not having enough food to feed the world?

1752597279734.webp



.
 
LOL!!!

.... because your beaked birdbrain says so??

LOL!!!






Notice the verbiage change here... "impacts the atmosphere..." not WARMING...

LOL!!!

YOUR THEORY IS THAT INCREASING ATMOSPHERIC CO2 IS WARMING ATMOSPHERE. YOUR SIDE HAS ZERO, NO DATA AT ALL, FROM ACTUAL INSTRUMENTS TO BACK UP THAT CLAIM. ALL IT HAS IS FUDGED FRAUD.







YOU ARE THE ONE IN DENIAL HERE. You cannot answer basic climate questions, you "denied" your right to respond like the intellectual COWARD you are. You cannot refute the NBC article documenting the FUDGING of the atmospheric temp readings. You cannot refute that Earth's surface air pressure ACTUAL DATA proves EARTH IS NEITHER WARMING NOR EXPERIENCING AN ONGOING NET ICE MELT. You cannot refute that the ACTUAL HURRICANE DATA shows NO INCREASE. You cannot find us ONE SINGLE PHOTO OF OCEAN RISE...



"paranoia" isn't required. An IQ over 5 and a molecule of patriotism to America is, and YOU HAVE NEITHER.

WE are out $20 trillion over this bullshit...
The most-qualified scientists in climatology globally have compiled and analyzed a monumental amount of corroborative empirical data and have reach a consensus regarding the consequences of spewing thousands of industrial gases into the atmosphere.
What we are experiencing in global temperature and sea level rise, and more frequent extreme weather events comports with their predictions.


Ideologues with no credentials in the discipline sputtering inanely that they are all wrong and that the ideologues are right is ludicrous.
 
You are NO AUTHORITY on that subject. You cannot even answer basic climate questions...

You are a SCIENCE INVALID.
Nor do I claim to be an expert in cardiology, dendrology, geology, gastroenterology, lepidopterology, nor in a vast number of other scientific disciplines - although I have no doubt that I could concoct questions regarding the consensus conclusions of scientists in all of them if my ideological dogma prevented me from accepting the science.

In what other scientific disciplines do you insist a consensus of experts are all wrong and you are right?
 
Last edited:
The most-qualified scientists in climatology globally have compiled and analyzed a monumental amount of corroborative empirical data and have reach a consensus regarding the consequences of spewing thousands of industrial gases into the atmosphere.
What we are experiencing in global temperature and sea level rise, and more frequent extreme weather events comports with their predictions.


Ideologues with no credentials in the discipline sputtering inanely that they are all wrong and that the ideologues are right is ludicrous.
.


Thanks for sharing your opinion.




.
 
The most-qualified scientists in climatology globally have compiled and analyzed a monumental amount of corroborative empirical data and have reach a consensus regarding the consequences of spewing thousands of industrial gases into the atmosphere.
What we are experiencing in global temperature and sea level rise, and more frequent extreme weather events comports with their predictions.


Ideologues with no credentials in the discipline sputtering inanely that they are all wrong and that the ideologues are right is ludicrous.
My authority is the empirical climate evidence from the geologic record. There’s no higher authority than that.
 
  • Fake News
Reactions: EMH
And a whole lot of other big words that you think will impress people.
If you are impressed by "big words," that was not my intent.

I posted the following on a different topic, but it may relate to hardcore MAGA types' need to reject accepted science that their dogma casts as a monumental hoax being perpetrated by the world's climatologists:


...The denizens of MAGA world tend to think differently from many other Americans. They are drawn to conspiracy theories, which provide a feeling of belonging and community, a core identity, and an us-versus-them narrative. Conspiratorial thinking provides them a sense of order in a world of vicissitudes, a feeling of control in a world that is often complicated and hard to decode, a feeling of power when a sense of powerlessness threatens paralysis. It can give people who have felt dishonored the belief that they have special knowledge, that they’re in the know and have access to hidden truths not available to the rest of us, that they can see patterns that don’t actually exist. For people with high levels of paranoia, conspiracy theories can be a comfort, and the dopamine rush they provide can be addictive.
 
If you are impressed by "big words," that was not my intent.

I posted the following on a different topic, but it may relate to hardcore MAGA types' need to reject accepted science that their dogma casts as a monumental hoax being perpetrated by the world's climatologists:


...The denizens of MAGA world tend to think differently from many other Americans. They are drawn to conspiracy theories, which provide a feeling of belonging and community, a core identity, and an us-versus-them narrative. Conspiratorial thinking provides them a sense of order in a world of vicissitudes, a feeling of control in a world that is often complicated and hard to decode, a feeling of power when a sense of powerlessness threatens paralysis. It can give people who have felt dishonored the belief that they have special knowledge, that they’re in the know and have access to hidden truths not available to the rest of us, that they can see patterns that don’t actually exist. For people with high levels of paranoia, conspiracy theories can be a comfort, and the dopamine rush they provide can be addictive.
It’s not political for me. It’s just science. I wish you knew some.
 
My authority is the empirical climate evidence from the geologic record. There’s no higher authority than that.



What you define as "the geological record" is easily dismantled in a court of law, and hopefully will be very soon...

Surface Air Pressure is actually the best measure of planetary temperature change, since it is truly "planetary."


Mars proves it...

Seasonal variation of Mars' global mean surface pressure at five ...





unless you wish to argue that somehow Mars does not get warmer when it gets closer to Sun on its highly elliptical orbit...

which you may very well be dumb enough to try....
 
What you define as "the geological record" is easily dismantled in a court of law, and hopefully will be very soon...

Surface Air Pressure is actually the best measure of planetary temperature change, since it is truly "planetary."


Mars proves it...

Seasonal variation of Mars' global mean surface pressure at five ...' global mean surface pressure at five ...





unless you wish to argue that somehow Mars does not get warmer when it gets closer to Sun on its highly elliptical orbit...

which you may very well be dumb enough to try....
You are tilting at windmills, Donny.
 
^^^^^^^^^^^^

When you cannot refute what EMH posts, try some BS....
 
15th post
You don’t need to be. Can you read the annotations?

View attachment 1137455
Climatologists who compile and analyze all the climatological data have reached a consensus concerning the certitude of anthropogenic climate change, just as is the case in other scientific disciplines.

MAGA dogmatists like to think they're being scientific when they cherry-pick climatologists' data to fit their dogma.
 
Climatologists who compile and analyze all the climatological data have reached a consensus concerning the certitude of anthropogenic climate change, just as is the case in other scientific disciplines.

MAGA dogmatists like to think they're being scientific when they cherry-pick climatologists' data to fit their dogma.
They should be studying the empirical climate evidence of the geologic record. Computer models are not evidence. Especially flawed ones that produce feedback 4 times greater than the instantaneous effect itself.
 
The consensus among the world’s climatologists, scientists in general, national and local governments, and savvy folks everywhere is that humans cannot endlessness poop into the heavens with impunity. The consequences are predictable, and are already exacting a hefty toll.



Trump… seeks to shut down the laboratory atop a peak in Hawaii where scientists have gathered the most conclusive evidence of human-caused climate change since the 1950s.
The Mauna Loa laboratory in Hawaii has measured atmospheric carbon dioxide, which — along with other planet-warming pollution — has led directly to climate change, driving sea level rise, supercharging weather and destroying food systems.
Trump’s budget proposal would also defund many other climate labs, including instrument sites comprising the US government’s greenhouse gas monitoring network, which stretches from northern Alaska to the South Pole.
But it’s the Mauna Loa laboratory that is the most prominent target of Trump’s climate ire, as measurements that began there in 1958 have steadily shown CO2’s upward march as human activities have emitted more and more of the planet-warming gas each year.

Trump, monumentally ignorant concerning climatology, has been spewing his baseless crap for many years, and has presented no scientific evidence to support his ludicrous dogma:

View attachment 1131458
"The concept of global warming was created by and for the
Chinese in order to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive.”

View attachment 1131453
"This very expensive GLOBAL WARMING bullshit has got to stop.
Our planet is freezing, record low temps,and our GW scientists are stuck in ice.”

View attachment 1131454

“It's a hoax. I mean, it's a money-making industry, OK?”


The U.S. Under Trump: Alone in Its Climate Denial
View attachment 1131456


Climate change will cost about $38 trillion a year by 2049.

Has the United States surrendered to anthropogenic climate change?​


Libs sure sound smart when the use big words such as “anthropogenic” instead of just saying “man-made” the way normal people would

I’m soooooo impressed
 
The most-qualified scientists in climatology globally have compiled and analyzed a monumental amount of corroborative empirical data and have reach a consensus regarding the consequences of spewing thousands of industrial gases into the atmosphere.
What we are experiencing in global temperature and sea level rise, and more frequent extreme weather events comports with their predictions.


Ideologues with no credentials in the discipline sputtering inanely that they are all wrong and that the ideologues are right is ludicrous.
Blah, blah, blah. More dishonest appeals to authority. You can't get any stupider than schitflap mewing about his religion.
 
Back
Top Bottom