Happy Columbus Day!

Unfortunate to see this type of behavior from the left wing. When most people, including right wingers want to mutually respect each other‘s history. You have these radical lefties that are trying to single out of the history of European people.. that’s not how you build bridges.
No one in decent society wants to build a bridge to redneck ville.... :lmao:

Why the fuck do you think they call it fly over country? :dunno: :lol:
 
Columbus was a great man. He is really the pride of Italians.

People who criticize Columbus as some kind of an evil Doer have no idea what they’re talking about. They haven’t studied the man they don’t care about how people in general acted centuries ago. They go by media soundbites.

In truth Columbus was once quoted as calling the Taino people which he encountered during his discoveries…. as the most beautiful people in the world.

He was a man of his time same as the Indian, Jew or black of his time. Those who attempt to label Columbus as some kind of a monster have anti-Italian racist proclivities.
I take it you approve of selling pre teen girls as sex slaves.
 
I take it you approve of selling pre teen girls as sex slaves.
You’re spewing nonsense. No substance. Looks like you bought into the black legend something you might not have been aware of.

You’re one-sided and if you do not respect the history of my people, the Italians well who the hell do you think you are my friend. I respect the history of all peoples.
 
Columbus wrote about it in his diary.

Myth 2: He committed genocide.

There was no “genocide” during these early voyages, though many natives died from unfamiliar diseases and clashes between two very different cultures. The Americas had been isolated from the rest of the world for millennia, which is why people here, though they had had their own plagues, were especially vulnerable to diseases from outside. Nonetheless, the Spaniards never intended to commit “genocide.” In even a cynical reading, a ready supply of native workers served Spanish interests.

Myth 3: He instituted the slave trade.

Columbus was not interested in the slave trade; his goal was to set up a trading post or, later, an agricultural colony on the island of Hispaniola, today’s Dominican Republic and Haiti. He did, however, take slaves as prisoners of war, or where he found violations of natural law, such as human sacrifice or cannibalism — the only reasons Spain permitted. Slavery was never the admiral’s intention, except as a — not very effective — way to maintain order in unprecedented circumstances.


You’re taking things wildly out of context and being one-sided. Various Indian tribes like the Europeans engaged in expansionist warfare and taking prisoners of war as slaves. These were men and women of their time. You’re at fault here big time for being one-sided. Try and have some mutual respect for different people like I do. I respect the history of the Indians, and you should respect the history of the Italians.
 
So, would the Aztec and other Indian cultures have had the same genocidal intentions then?
Yes, they would. Though, I wouldn't call these genocidal intentions 'the same'. They killed not for fertile land. They did so because they viewed themselves - 'warriors' - as hunters and the others as prey.

Since there was not the same geographical reasons, Why didn’t the British wipe out all the Indians in North America?
Because some - a tiny minority - were lucky not to be wiped out but pushed away into some remote areas where they were allowed to live in isolated communities in dirt and poverty.

Another question?
 
You’re spewing nonsense. No substance. Looks like you bought into the black legend something you might not have been aware of.

You’re one-sided and if you do not respect the history of my people, the Italians well who the hell do you think you are my friend. I respect the history of all peoples.
You don't respect your own history if your aren't going to take Columbus's own word for it.
 

Myth 2: He committed genocide.

There was no “genocide” during these early voyages, though many natives died from unfamiliar diseases and clashes between two very different cultures. The Americas had been isolated from the rest of the world for millennia, which is why people here, though they had had their own plagues, were especially vulnerable to diseases from outside. Nonetheless, the Spaniards never intended to commit “genocide.” In even a cynical reading, a ready supply of native workers served Spanish interests.

Myth 3: He instituted the slave trade.

Columbus was not interested in the slave trade; his goal was to set up a trading post or, later, an agricultural colony on the island of Hispaniola, today’s Dominican Republic and Haiti. He did, however, take slaves as prisoners of war, or where he found violations of natural law, such as human sacrifice or cannibalism — the only reasons Spain permitted. Slavery was never the admiral’s intention, except as a — not very effective — way to maintain order in unprecedented circumstances.


You’re taking things wildly out of context and being one-sided. Various Indian tribes like the Europeans engaged in expansionist warfare and taking prisoners of war as slaves. These were men and women of their time. You’re at fault here big time for being one-sided. Try and have some mutual respect for different people like I do. I respect the history of the Indians, and you should respect the history of the Italians.
100% bullshit.
 
Who needs luck when this nation is full of whites who'll allow themselves to be demographically and culturally replaced, passively and peacefully? :dunno:
…”replaced” by anti-white racists who plan to absorbed white people into their own racial identities…. It’s such a retard plan that it’s funny. You hate white people so much, you plan to have your future generations be more white…. Most racists are stupid but not that stupid. It just sounds like like you unconsciously want to be white….
 
…”replaced” by anti-white racists who plan to absorbed white people into their own racial identities…. It’s such a retard plan that it’s funny. You hate white people so much, you plan to have your future generations be more white…. Most racists are stupid but not that stupid. It just sounds like like you unconsciously want to be white….
What are you even talking about get more white? My grandson has more African than I do because his dad is Black American. :dunno:

Also have you met mixed white people? Obama is one and does he claim his white side? White people mixing with other people is death for bland ass white culture. :lol:
 
Yes, they would. Though, I wouldn't call these genocidal intentions 'the same'. They killed not for fertile land. They did so because they viewed themselves - 'warriors' - as hunters and the others as prey.
Oh yeah, even on genocide you believe the myth of the Nobel Indian. The same Indians who built giant pyramids for ritual human sacrifice no less.

Because some - a tiny minority - were lucky not to be wiped out but pushed away into some remote areas where they were allowed to live in isolated communities in dirt and poverty.
The Europeans in North America literally had to round-up all the remaining Indians and move them onto reservations. Why not just kill them? Heck of a lot easier. Heck of a lot more cost effective. What kind of “genocide” is that?

Has there ever been another genocide where they purposely preserved 10% of the population. Granted them land and legal sovereignty? Attempted to educate them to attempt to integrate them into their own society? Then venerated those people as symbols of their National heritage and Identity?
 
Last edited:
What are you even talking about get more white? My grandson has more African than I do because his dad is Black American. :dunno:

Also have you met mixed white people? Obama is one and does he claim his white side? White people mixing with other people is death for bland ass white culture. :lol:
if there is something inherent in racial differences, then it’s genetic. In your blood. I you Told you already, I don’t care about your superficial cosmetic differences.

You have to be the only racist I’ve ever met that could achieve your master-plan with a sun-tan.

Unless you can muster something intelligent, I wish you the best of luck.
 
if there is something inherent in racial differences, then it’s genetic. In your blood. I you Told you already, I don’t care about your superficial cosmetic differences.
Racial differences aren't in the blood you moron. There is no biological trait for race. It was made up by morons. There is more genetic diversity among Africans than between Africans and Europeans.
You have to be the only racist I’ve ever met that could achieve your master-plan with a sun-tan.
I'm not a racist. Race is a social construct. I'm for remodeling a system designed on ignorant racial hierarchy.
Unless you can muster something intelligent, I wish you the best of luck.
I don't care what you wish. Hopes and wishes are for the incapable.
 
Racial differences aren't in the blood you moron. There is no biological trait for race. It was made up by morons.
Is that why two white people can’t give birth to a black baby?

I'm not a racist. Race is a social construct.
OH, so Rachel Dolezal is black then?

Well, you are obviously a racist, but I’ll admit you aren’t a very good one.
 
Is that why two white people can’t give birth to a black baby?
It's why two people with thousands of genetic differences, born to different cultures, and on the other side of the world can be considered white because they share the singular commonality of similar melanin absorption.
OH, so Rachel Dolezal is black then?
She can imagine herself to be whatever she wants but it won't get her respect or African DNA.
Well, you are obviously a racist, but I’ll admit you aren’t a very good one.
You're obviously a Moron. An exemplary one.
 
It's why two people with thousands of genetic differences, born to different cultures, and on the other side of the world can be considered white because they share the singular commonality of similar melanin absorption.

She can imagine herself to be whatever she wants but it won't get her respect or African DNA.


If race is a social construct then Dolezal doesn’t need “respect” or “African DNA” to be black. So, she is black. Conversely, your future generations will carry “European DNA” just like black-Dolezal thanks to your half-witted racial-conquest mixed with liberal-ideology. But don’t worry, they will still be able to identify how ever they want :)
 
If race is a social construct then Dolezal doesn’t need “respect” or “African DNA” to be black. So, she is black.
According to her feelings. Whether she gets accepted as black by anyone or has any african dna is a different matter.
Conversely, your future generations will carry “European DNA” just like black-Dolezal thanks to your half-witted racial-conquest mixed with liberal-ideology. But don’t worry, they will still be able to identify how ever they want :)
How do you know what the genetic makeup of my future generations will be? :dunno: :lol:
 
Just like your future generations with European DNA just like Dolezal.
I don't even know what you think that means. Just because race is a construct doesn't mean genetic inheritance or geographic diversity is as well. Dolezal isn't genetically from Africa anytime recent. That's not a social construct. That's genetics, moron. :lol:
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom