Happy Columbus Day!

[ESay]

Segregation and discrimination were common if not universal world wide, especially among former slave states. It wasn’t always enforced by law, nor were there any legal protections against it. You might as well condemn the US for having blue skies. Again few if any countries did more to promote equality than America and it’s civil rights leaders (I know the plural form of that word confuses you).

In the United Kingdom, racial segregationoccurred in pubs, workplaces, shops and other commercial premises, which operated a colour bar where non-white customers were banned from using certain rooms and facilities.[1]Segregation also operated in the 20th century in certain professions,[2] in housing[3] and at Buckingham Palace.[4] There were no British laws requiring racial segregation, but until 1965, there were no laws prohibiting racial segregation either

Racial segregation in the United Kingdom - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Latin America-

Racism in South America - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

The hidden racism in Latin America

The cases of racism in some European contexts show that this problem is growing in the world, and Latin America is no exception.

globalvoices.org

Without a doubt. See my post 319.

 

[el midgetron]

What kind of dipshit logic is that?

We don't blame natural processes because they aren't making choices. People get blamed for the shit they do and even children can recognize everyone else was doing it too isn't a valid excuse. What's your excuse Chump?

Well, obviously since your ancestors participated in slavery, your are the last person anyone should listen to on the subject.

 

[el midgetron]

Yes, they were. But only one country is uttering nonsense about being a beacon of freedom and civil rights.

Well, France disagrees with you.

 

[el midgetron]

Now I am supposed to measure vacuum? How are you going to measure 'a greater impact', without it being your subjective biased opinion?

It’s not rocket science. You support your argument with evidence, rather than just assuming anyone should accept your word as gospel.

 

[el midgetron]

Without a doubt. See my post 319.

And you have yet to demonstrate that anyone beyond Britain and France contributed more to the abolition movement than the US. And that’s because there is no one.

Maybe I wouldn't have put my objections had you claimed at least 'one of the leaders'.

I find it curious that even after helping you with your reading compensation, you continue to object despite suggesting you wouldn’t. It’s like everything you say lacks sincerity. You can’t even speak authoritatively about your own motivations, let alone world history.

 

[ESay]

Well, France disagrees with you.


View attachment 1032860

You do understand that France used you in their struggle with Britain, right?

 

[ESay]

It’s not rocket science. You support your argument with evidence, rather than just assuming anyone should accept your word as gospel.

There is no other 'evidence' to measure it except of your subjective biased opinion.

 

[ESay]

And you have yet to demonstrate that anyone beyond Britain and France contributed more to the abolition movement than the US. And that’s because there is no one.


I find it curious that even after helping you with your reading compensation, you continue to object despite suggesting you wouldn’t. It’s like everything you say lacks sincerity. You can’t even speak authoritatively about your own motivations, let alone world history.

I said I wouldn't have put my objections, but that didn't mean I hadn't ones. Any grammar lessons?

 

[el midgetron]

I said I wouldn't have put my objections, but that didn't mean I hadn't ones. Any grammar lessons?

Exactly. Yet here you are putting your objections….

 

[el midgetron]

There is no other 'evidence' to measure it except of your subjective biased opinion.

The fact that you don’t understand the basics of supporting an argument is ridiculous. Even worse, you don’t seem to believe it’s even possible.

 

[el midgetron]

You do understand that France used you in their struggle with Britain, right?

Oh, please explain.

 

[ESay]

Exactly. Yet here you are putting your objections….

Because you chose the wording that you chose.

 

[ESay]

The fact that you don’t understand the basics of supporting an argument is ridiculous. Even worse, you don’t seem to believe it’s even possible.

Because you don't have any basics in that your claim. Just your personal bigoted opinion.

 

[ESay]

Oh, please explain.

France supported American struggle for independence because it wanted to undermine British influence. What can't you get in that?

 

[Curried Goats]

Well, obviously since your ancestors participated in slavery, your are the last person anyone should listen to on the subject.

Why? Explain that dipshit logic.