bigrebnc1775
][][][% NC Sheepdog
Yep them damn democratsYou mean ‘white people’ because at press time blacks weren’t considered people.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yep them damn democratsYou mean ‘white people’ because at press time blacks weren’t considered people.
Why are you jabbering about an off-topic piece of bullshit like this?White male property owners. Wasn't women, Wasn't negro slaves. Wasn't indentured servants. I believe a few states allows all free white men to vote from the beginning.
Here, let me catch you up...........Why are you jabbering about an off-topic piece of bullshit like this?
"the people" bozo are the entire population. Including criminals, thus "shall not be infringed" is a fiction in your "thinking".
You mean ‘white people’ because at press time blacks weren’t considered people.
It doesn’t say white people, but since white men were the only ones considered to be people, they meant white people.The amendment doesn't say "white people". It says "the people". See, the founders knew DemoKKKrats like you would be a problem one day.
P#1: I have a clear picture of the Bay Area having served for 32 years in law enforcement.Rye Catcher lives in the Bay Area of California and believe his world is perfect while ignoring reality.
You can pass all the laws you want but in the end criminals never obey them and the more laws we have the more we become a police state…
Are you trying to claim NYC and NY state don’t have gun control laws?![]()
10 people shot in Brooklyn subway attack
Ten people were shot in an attack on a subway train in Brooklyn, N.Y., on Tuesday morning, authorities said, and a manhunt for a suspect is underway.www.yahoo.com
I'm certain to see this thread put in the proper forum, one that will immediately be able to post off topic posts and an excuse that mass shooting of innocent human beings is rare and no excuse to have gun controls.
Is it trolling, or some other excuse to allow the gun lovers to use the same claim that mass shooting is no reason to deny them with their absolute right: "shall not be infringed"? And innocent men, women and children maimed and murdered is simply a rare event - almost daily in the United States - and their rights to own, possess and have in their custody and control this right, and of course, their right to be armed to everyone will be the solution to these rare events.
The militia is defined in Art I, sec 8 clauses 15 & 16. There is no "local militia".
Militia was the People of a Region or State ( Until early stages of WW2 ).
Nothing in the 2nd Amendment forbids a State or Local Government from forming, arming or regulating a Militia, without infringing on the Rights of the People.
Any absence of such a law does not grant the Federal Government the power to infringe upon the Rights of the People.
The Second Amendment does not grant the Federal Government the power to infringe upon a citizen's right to bear arms if they aren't in a militia.
.
You are either very dumb and/or incapable of writing a substantive, logical and comprehensive comment.The amendment doesn't say "white people". It says "the people". See, the founders knew DemoKKKrats like you would be a problem one day.
![]()
10 people shot in Brooklyn subway attack
Ten people were shot in an attack on a subway train in Brooklyn, N.Y., on Tuesday morning, authorities said, and a manhunt for a suspect is underway.www.yahoo.com
I'm certain to see this thread put in the proper forum, one that will immediately be able to post off topic posts and an excuse that mass shooting of innocent human beings is rare and no excuse to have gun controls.
Is it trolling, or some other excuse to allow the gun lovers to use the same claim that mass shooting is no reason to deny them with their absolute right: "shall not be infringed"? And innocent men, women and children maimed and murdered is simply a rare event - almost daily in the United States - and their rights to own, possess and have in their custody and control this right, and of course, their right to be armed to everyone will be the solution to these rare events.
Militia was the People of a Region or State ( Until early stages of WW2 )
Did you notice you have not provided a primary source to back your claim, as I asked?White male property owners. Wasn't women, Wasn't negro slaves. Wasn't indentured servants. I believe a few states allows all free white men to vote from the beginning.
The % of the 423,000,000 gun in the US to abused says otherwise.The United States has a serious problem, and that problem is the use of firearms everyday causing the death and wounding of innocent people.
In California Constitution (All Males from age 18-54 can be called upon by Governor to form Militia only exceptions being if they are Members of the Legislature , Law Enforcement or Active Duty Military ) So we Train & prepare here for just such a situation Legally ..
Nothing in the 2nd Amendment forbids a State or Local Government from forming, arming or regulating a Militia, without infringing on the Rights of the People.
Any absence of such a law does not grant the Federal Government the power to infringe upon the Rights of the People.
The Second Amendment does not grant the Federal Government the power to infringe upon a citizen's right to bear arms if they aren't in a militia.
.
The 2nd amendment does not grant any rights to any person.It bestowed the right on Citizens and it went hand in hand with the obligation of property owners to join their local Militia. Not every Tom, Dick or Harriette was a Citizen when was written either.
The only viable way to change it however is a new Amendment and that ain't happening any time soon.