BlindBoo
Diamond Member
- Sep 28, 2010
- 57,376
- 17,026
- 2,180
The property owing citizens, many of whom were obligated to join their local militia.Who do you think "the people" is referring to?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The property owing citizens, many of whom were obligated to join their local militia.Who do you think "the people" is referring to?
got any proof of that??The property owing citizens, many of whom were obligated to join their local militia.
You cannot demonstrate this to be true, because there is no original source material that says any such thing.The property owing citizens, many of whom were obligated to join their local militia.
![]()
10 people shot in Brooklyn subway attack
Ten people were shot in an attack on a subway train in Brooklyn, N.Y., on Tuesday morning, authorities said, and a manhunt for a suspect is underway.www.yahoo.com
I'm certain to see this thread put in the proper forum, one that will immediately be able to post off topic posts and an excuse that mass shooting of innocent human beings is rare and no excuse to have gun controls.
Is it trolling, or some other excuse to allow the gun lovers to use the same claim that mass shooting is no reason to deny them with their absolute right: "shall not be infringed"? And innocent men, women and children maimed and murdered is simply a rare event - almost daily in the United States - and their rights to own, possess and have in their custody and control this right, and of course, their right to be armed to everyone will be the solution to these rare events.
got any proof of that??
I will continue to do everything legal or illegal within my power to END all gun control of any kind.
I will not rest until it is legal for violent felons to carry belt-fed machine guns in every school and courthouse in America.
![]()
10 people shot in Brooklyn subway attack
Ten people were shot in an attack on a subway train in Brooklyn, N.Y., on Tuesday morning, authorities said, and a manhunt for a suspect is underway.www.yahoo.com
I'm certain to see this thread put in the proper forum, one that will immediately be able to post off topic posts and an excuse that mass shooting of innocent human beings is rare and no excuse to have gun controls.
Is it trolling, or some other excuse to allow the gun lovers to use the same claim that mass shooting is no reason to deny them with their absolute right: "shall not be infringed"? And innocent men, women and children maimed and murdered is simply a rare event - almost daily in the United States - and their rights to own, possess and have in their custody and control this right, and of course, their right to be armed to everyone will be the solution to these rare events.
The militia is defined in Art I, sec 8 clauses 15 & 16. There is no "local militia".
dont change the subject,,It wasn't until the 1830 that all white men were given the right to vote regardless of if they owned property or not.
Which does nothing to support your position that those who wrote the 2nd amendment held that "the people" referred, in its entirety, to property owners.It wasn't until the 1830 that all white men were given the right to vote regardless of if they owned property or not.
Let people shoot back, you dumb fuck.How many people singularly shoot innocent people in schools, movie theaters, restaurants, at concerts, parks, public buildings and even military bases, who have never committed a crime?
Your solution doesn't unbury the dead.
You're one ignorant motherfucker.The militia is defined in Art I, sec 8 clauses 15 & 16. There is no "local militia".
Look at my avi picture, dipshit.
The only way to stop the nonsense to end it all. When they have nothing left they will reminisce about how great things are right now.That seems a bit too far.
There is nothing about the 2nd that precludes guns from not being allowed in certain places.
Should you be allowed to carry a belt-fed machine gun into the White House?
It wasn't until the 1830 that all white men were given the right to vote regardless of if they owned property or not.
White male property owners. Wasn't women, Wasn't negro slaves. Wasn't indentured servants. I believe a few states allows all free white men to vote from the beginning.Which does nothing to support your position that those who wrote the 2nd amendment held that "the people" referred, in its entirety, to property owners.
You mean ‘white people’ because at press time blacks weren’t considered people.That's why the amendment doesn't say "the voters". It says "the people".
yes they were,,You mean ‘white people’ because at press time blacks weren’t considered people.
Unorganized militiagot any proof of that??