Gun free zone leaves a 61 year old woman brain dead from attack by 8 time convicted felon....

[M14 Shooter]

The perpetrator comes at you with a knife, so you pick up a knife to defend yourself, that's reasonable.

If I do not have a knife, but I do have a gun, how it is unreasonable to shoot him?

 

[1srelluc]

Make the "three strike" felony conviction laws great again.....Three felonies of any type and it's a life sentence on the third conviction.

 

[1srelluc]

Because those, like yourself, that wants to shoot others, is the gun problem. And you haven't got the fucking brains to realise that. Solid bone from the next up.

BS.....I've carried since the 70s and the only people I've shot were those in the line of duty.

I have cleared leather a couple of times as a civilian but they beat feet.

 

[M14 Shooter]

BS....

He's a troll. Post accordingly.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Why is an 8 times felon walking around with a gun???? Because anyone in the USA can get a gun. There is literally NOTHING to prevent it from happening, because there are so many guns on the streets that gun laws are unenforceable.

The felon was not walking around with a gun..He just used his hands and feet the beat the women into pulp... As for guns, a criminal can get a gun, just by finding the local Drug Cartel living in US cities(thanks to Joe Bidumb) and get one illegally.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

The problem is that an eight-time convicted felon is walking the streets. You guys want to keep blaming the guns, but the problem is we have an extremely weak justice system that's been watered down over the years by liberal politics. An eight-time felon should not be free, period. These slaps on the wrist help fuel these violent crime rates. At some point we need to come to the reality that some people simply cannot function in society without jeopardizing the safety of others and we need to lock them up permanently or just a stick a needle in their arm and be done with them.

Who is this person called Taz. Did an alien come down and take over the body?

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Because those, like yourself, that wants to shoot others, is the gun problem. And you haven't got the fucking brains to realise that. Solid bone from the next up.

Have you ever faced a rabid animal, yes or no? I have no problem with guns, neither should any other law abiding citizen, but those pesky criminals always seem to get one even when they are banned in certain areas, because they, the criminals dont follow gun laws. And you say i dont have a brain. Bwaaahhaaaaa,,,,,

 

[2aguy]

In gun humper fantasyland, all 61 year old women want to carry loaded guns on their hips. Give me a break.

If she had she might still be alive you dumb fuck..........

Do you think if you went back in time and gave her the option...carry a gun or be beaten to death by an 8X convicted felon....Which do you think she would choose? You idiot.

 

[2aguy]

They had better learn how to carry a loaded gun in their purses!
When that happens, the people like 2Aguy know that all Americans except the bad guys will be safe.

No, purse carry is dumb.....you can leave it unattended, it can be stolen.....carry on the body is the only way.

 

[2aguy]

Why is an 8 times felon walking around with a gun???? Because anyone in the USA can get a gun. There is literally NOTHING to prevent it from happening, because there are so many guns on the streets that gun laws are unenforceable.

No, shit bird....he didn't have a gun, you dumb ass....he beat her to death with his bare hands........and being 61, her Krav Maga was a little rusty.......

 

[2aguy]

Because criminals do not care about gun control laws.

Laws cannot prevent people from breaking other laws.

He didn't have a gun, he beat her with his hands....

 

[2aguy]

The problem is that an eight-time convicted felon is walking the streets. You guys want to keep blaming the guns, but the problem is we have an extremely weak justice system that's been watered down over the years by liberal politics. An eight-time felon should not be free, period. These slaps on the wrist help fuel these violent crime rates. At some point we need to come to the reality that some people simply cannot function in society without jeopardizing the safety of others and we need to lock them up permanently or just a stick a needle in their arm and be done with them.

This is why.....the democrat party....

Democrats and gun crime, Washington state....reducing penalties for drive by shootings...

Washington state Democratic lawmakers have proposed a new bill that would lessen penalities for drive-by shooting murderers to "promote racial equity" in the criminal justice system even though the state has been ranked among the worst in the country for drive-by shootings.
House Bill 1692, sponsored by Democratic representatives Tarra Simmons and David Hackney, was introduced to allegedly "...promote racial equity in the criminal legal system by eliminating drive-by shooting as a basis for elevating murder in the first degree to aggravated murder in the first degree."

WA state Democrats propose bill to lessen sentences for drive-by shooting murderers
=============

Two days after the Uvalde shooting in Texas, the California State Senate passed a bill that would allow schools not to report threats or attacks against employees to law enforcement.

----

According to the Bill, it would repeal the provision of existing law where it requires that “whenever any employee of a school district or county superintendent of schools is attacked, assaulted, or physically threatened by any pupil, the employee and any person under whose direction or supervision the employee is employed who has knowledge of the incident are required to promptly report the incident to specified law enforcement authorities.”

SB 1273 would then make such reports to law enforcement voluntary.

California Senate Passes Bill to Allow Schools Not to Report Threats to Police

=========

California Democrats hate the gun, not the gunman – Orange County Register

Now that Democrats have supermajorities in the California state Legislature, they’ve rolled into Sacramento with a zest for lowering the state’s prison population and have interpreted St. Augustine’s words of wisdom to mean, “Hate the gun, not the gunman.”

I say this because, once they finally took a break from preaching about the benefits of stricter gun control, the state Senate voted to loosen sentencing guidelines for criminals convicted of gun crimes.

Currently, California law requires anyone who uses a gun while committing a felony to have their sentence increased by 10 years or more in prison — on top of the normal criminal penalty. If enacted, Senate Bill 620 would eliminate that mandate.

The bill, which passed on a 22-14 party-line vote, with support only from Democrats, now heads to the state Assembly for consideration.

Republicans and the National Rifle Association have vowed to campaign against it.

Why have Democrats suddenly developed a soft spot for criminals convicted of gun crimes? The bill’s author, state Sen. Steve Bradford, D-Gardena, says that he was motivated to write the bill after a 17-year-old riding in a car involved in a drive-by shooting was sentenced to 25 years in prison, even though he claims that he wasn’t the one who pulled the trigger.
------------
Prop. 57, for example, very deceptively and fundamentally changed the definition of what constitutes a “non-violent” offense.


supplying a firearm to a gang member,

l
felon obtaining a firearm,

discharging a firearm on school grounds

 

[2aguy]

Because those, like yourself, that wants to shoot others, is the gun problem. And you haven't got the fucking brains to realise that. Solid bone from the next up.

You truly are insane......the thug beat her to death with his bare hands....and being 61, she just wasn't up to using her BJJ skills to take him on.....you twit...

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

No, purse carry is dumb.....you can leave it unattended, it can be stolen.....carry on the body is the only way.

Spot the gun.....Just dont drool when you see where she carries....

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

This is why.....the democrat party....

Democrats and gun crime, Washington state....reducing penalties for drive by shootings...

Washington state Democratic lawmakers have proposed a new bill that would lessen penalities for drive-by shooting murderers to "promote racial equity" in the criminal justice system even though the state has been ranked among the worst in the country for drive-by shootings.
House Bill 1692, sponsored by Democratic representatives Tarra Simmons and David Hackney, was introduced to allegedly "...promote racial equity in the criminal legal system by eliminating drive-by shooting as a basis for elevating murder in the first degree to aggravated murder in the first degree."

WA state Democrats propose bill to lessen sentences for drive-by shooting murderers
=============

Two days after the Uvalde shooting in Texas, the California State Senate passed a bill that would allow schools not to report threats or attacks against employees to law enforcement.

----

According to the Bill, it would repeal the provision of existing law where it requires that “whenever any employee of a school district or county superintendent of schools is attacked, assaulted, or physically threatened by any pupil, the employee and any person under whose direction or supervision the employee is employed who has knowledge of the incident are required to promptly report the incident to specified law enforcement authorities.”

SB 1273 would then make such reports to law enforcement voluntary.

California Senate Passes Bill to Allow Schools Not to Report Threats to Police

=========

California Democrats hate the gun, not the gunman – Orange County Register

Now that Democrats have supermajorities in the California state Legislature, they’ve rolled into Sacramento with a zest for lowering the state’s prison population and have interpreted St. Augustine’s words of wisdom to mean, “Hate the gun, not the gunman.”

I say this because, once they finally took a break from preaching about the benefits of stricter gun control, the state Senate voted to loosen sentencing guidelines for criminals convicted of gun crimes.

Currently, California law requires anyone who uses a gun while committing a felony to have their sentence increased by 10 years or more in prison — on top of the normal criminal penalty. If enacted, Senate Bill 620 would eliminate that mandate.

The bill, which passed on a 22-14 party-line vote, with support only from Democrats, now heads to the state Assembly for consideration.

Republicans and the National Rifle Association have vowed to campaign against it.

Why have Democrats suddenly developed a soft spot for criminals convicted of gun crimes? The bill’s author, state Sen. Steve Bradford, D-Gardena, says that he was motivated to write the bill after a 17-year-old riding in a car involved in a drive-by shooting was sentenced to 25 years in prison, even though he claims that he wasn’t the one who pulled the trigger.
------------
Prop. 57, for example, very deceptively and fundamentally changed the definition of what constitutes a “non-violent” offense.


supplying a firearm to a gang member,

l
felon obtaining a firearm,

discharging a firearm on school grounds

You can only hope those "Politicians" who have lessened the time served, end up getting shot in a drive by shooting.

Anti-cop Minnesota Democratic Party official left bloodied in violent carjacking — now calls for tougher crime laws

Shivanthi Sathanandan, the Second Vice Chairwoman for the DFL, shared news of her attack in a Wednesday Facebook post, where she fumed that the four young suspects need to be brought to justice.

nypost.com

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

You truly are insane......the thug beat her to death with his bare hands....and being 61, she just wasn't up to using her BJJ skills to take him on.....you twit...

Little does the Britstain idiot not realize is that i was trained to kill others because that is what military training is all about. Why do the soldiers in Britstain get to carry guns and use them on others?

 

[Yarddog]

Because those, like yourself, that wants to shoot others, is the gun problem. And you haven't got the fucking brains to realise that. Solid bone from the next up.

So tell us, what would you do to a 200 pound man if you see him stomping on an unconcioius old ladys head?
Are you going to ask him nicely sir? what do you think is going to happen to you next? You must be prepared to fight or just watch him continue. So which is it?

 

[LibertyKid]

In gun humper fantasyland, all 61 year old women want to carry loaded guns on their hips. Give me a break.

That's not what was said. Your mischaracterizing his statement. The right for people who want to carry, should be available to them, regardless of age or sex. What are you geriaphobic?

 

[Jarlaxle]

In gun humper fantasyland, all 61 year old women want to carry loaded guns on their hips. Give me a break.

You're lying again.

Why is an 8 times felon walking around with a gun???? Because anyone in the USA can get a gun. There is literally NOTHING to prevent it from happening, because there are so many guns on the streets that gun laws are unenforceable.

So...did you not read the post, did you not comprehend it, did you ignore it, or are you just lying as usual?

Because those, like yourself, that wants to shoot others, is the gun problem. And you haven't got the fucking brains to realise that. Solid bone from the next up.

So...you believe that it's better for a woman to be beaten to death tan to defend herself? You truly are subhuman.

 

[woodwork201]

In gun humper fantasyland, all 61 year old women want to carry loaded guns on their hips. Give me a break.

If everyone on the train had a gun the guy would have been dead instead of her, or in one of his previous 8 felonies.