gun control as castration

[ABikerSailor]

Castration? Give me a break. Who writes this stuff, the same people who threatened to ruin the economy of North Carolina unless they let confused men powder their noses in the ladies room?

Apparently, someone didn't bother to read the link, because if you had, you would have seen it is on a far right website, and if you had read the whole article, you would have seen that they were speaking out in support of gun rights and talking bad about anyone that wanted to limit them.

 

[MaryL]

It is noticable that most proponents of infringment and violation of rights are not only left wing, but generally ugly leftist women.
this article takes on that subject

As opposed to obese pot bellied confederate flag waving middle aged white male pro gun nuts that equate gun ownership with sexuality?

wrong again
gun owners a diverse group, and the only people who equate gun ownership with sexuality are the infringment lobby

Yeah, this thread equates gun control with castration. The OP states that in the title. The folks that want gun control are a diverse group and last thing we want is to infringe on anyone's rights.

 

[miketx]

It is noticable that most proponents of infringment and violation of rights are not only left wing, but generally ugly leftist women.
this article takes on that subject
Gun Control as Castration

When we talk about protesters generally, do we discuss if they're pretty or ugly? Only if they're women. Do we talk about men's paraphenalia every time we mention a name, like we seem to need to include **** or vagina if talking about a woman? Interesting.

That article didn't appear to be about Code Pink wanting to take away anyone's virility. Just their killing machines. I believe women are more respectful of life because they carry life and they are usually the ones to care for the young ones. Maybe it's in our wiring, I don't know. And there are plenty of women who DON'T want their guns taken away, so I don't mean it as a stereotype, but it was moms who got drunk drivers off the road with MADD and it is mothers who don't want to see their kids shot who will pipe up about gun control.

if you truly care about life, you will oppose gun control.
it's that simple.
There is no good intention in anyone's mind who is pro gun control. Every single gun control activist is pro-rape, pro-mass shooting and pro-stalin/mao tyranny. The only exception are those too stupid and easily manipulated to know better.
any gun control efforts should be violently opposed. That is one reason why I no longer am a member of the National rifle association, because they refuse to face the truth about what needs to be done to stop this war on our god given rights.
Infringement activists are deliberately ignorant of the bloodshed that they are calling for. If one tenth of one percent of gun owners violently resist, it will be a bloodbath that would make the war between the states look like a pillow fight. Remember Chris Dorner, the former LAPD who went after cops? That was one man, and he shut down america's second largest city and had the powers that be pissing themselves.
and one other thing to remember is that this country has been at war for almost a generation, so a large portionof those who make the decision to resist tyranny will have skills and experience wiith warfare.

Sez the guy who assured me the other day that he and his militia organization just want to LIVE peacefully and let everyone else live peacefully too. Only if everyone else does exactly what you like, though, huh?
I'm not scared of you and neither is anyone else.

again, why do you lie about me.
I never said that I want anyone, much less everyone to do as I like. Only that I have certain rights, along with my fellow americans, and that I am willing to defend those rights against those who would deprive me of them. You are exposing yourself as a bully who doesnt want their victims to be able to stop you from attacking them.

The left are TERRIFIED of law abiding gun owners, not so much violent criminals and people who enjoy beheadings.

 

[bitter clinging swiftie]

It is noticable that most proponents of infringment and violation of rights are not only left wing, but generally ugly leftist women.
this article takes on that subject

As opposed to obese pot bellied confederate flag waving middle aged white male pro gun nuts that equate gun ownership with sexuality?

wrong again
gun owners a diverse group, and the only people who equate gun ownership with sexuality are the infringment lobby

Yeah, this thread equates gun control with castration. The OP states that in the title. The folks that want gun control are a diverse group and last thing we want is to infringe on anyone's rights.

that is an oxymoron, gun control is infringment, period. ther eis no such thing as "reasonable/common sense" gun control. any and all gun control laws are tyrannical and oppressive infringements.

 

[RightyTighty]

View attachment 139935

It is noticable that most proponents of infringment and violation of rights are not only left wing, but generally ugly leftist women.
this article takes on that subject
Gun Control as Castration

The more guns, and the larger the guns, the smaller the penis.

If that were true I would never have bought a revolver with a 2 inch barrel.

That was so you had a matching set. One from God, one from Walmart.

 

[MaryL]

It is noticable that most proponents of infringment and violation of rights are not only left wing, but generally ugly leftist women.
this article takes on that subject

As opposed to obese pot bellied confederate flag waving middle aged white male pro gun nuts that equate gun ownership with sexuality?

wrong again
gun owners a diverse group, and the only people who equate gun ownership with sexuality are the infringment lobby

Yeah, this thread equates gun control with castration. The OP states that in the title. The folks that want gun control are a diverse group and last thing we want is to infringe on anyone's rights.

that is an oxymoron, gun control is infringment, period. ther eis no such thing as "reasonable/common sense" gun control. any and all gun control laws are tyrannical and oppressive infringements.

How so? Tyrannical? 100 years ago, 60 years ago, we didn't have the huge rise in firearms related deaths or mass murders. Common sense would tell anyone this society is having issues with gun violence. There is a valid issue here. It needs to be addressed, we just don't need guns like we did in 1776, they are a huge problem now our forefathers didn't have the foresight to see coming. I am so tired of this argument, it needs to end.

 

[miketx]

View attachment 139935

It is noticable that most proponents of infringment and violation of rights are not only left wing, but generally ugly leftist women.
this article takes on that subject
Gun Control as Castration

The more guns, and the larger the guns, the smaller the penis.

If that were true I would never have bought a revolver with a 2 inch barrel.

That was so you had a matching set. One from God, one from Walmart.

As ignorant as you are, let my just tell you that walmart doesn't sell guns like that. Don't let that stop your false claims though.

 

[bitter clinging swiftie]

It is noticable that most proponents of infringment and violation of rights are not only left wing, but generally ugly leftist women.
this article takes on that subject

As opposed to obese pot bellied confederate flag waving middle aged white male pro gun nuts that equate gun ownership with sexuality?

wrong again
gun owners a diverse group, and the only people who equate gun ownership with sexuality are the infringment lobby

Yeah, this thread equates gun control with castration. The OP states that in the title. The folks that want gun control are a diverse group and last thing we want is to infringe on anyone's rights.

that is an oxymoron, gun control is infringment, period. ther eis no such thing as "reasonable/common sense" gun control. any and all gun control laws are tyrannical and oppressive infringements.

How so? Tyrannical? 100 years ago, 60 years ago, we didn't have the huge rise in firearms related deaths or mass murders. Common sense would tell anyone this society is having issues with gun violence. There is a valid issue here. It needs to be addressed, we just don't need guns like we did in 1776, they are a huge problem now our forefathers didn't have the foresight to see coming. I am so tired of this argument, it needs to end.

and it can end when people stop advocating for the infringement of our god given, constituutionally protected right to self defense tools of our choice.

 

[bitter clinging swiftie]

It is noticable that most proponents of infringment and violation of rights are not only left wing, but generally ugly leftist women.
this article takes on that subject
Gun Control as Castration

When we talk about protesters generally, do we discuss if they're pretty or ugly? Only if they're women. Do we talk about men's paraphenalia every time we mention a name, like we seem to need to include **** or vagina if talking about a woman? Interesting.

That article didn't appear to be about Code Pink wanting to take away anyone's virility. Just their killing machines. I believe women are more respectful of life because they carry life and they are usually the ones to care for the young ones. Maybe it's in our wiring, I don't know. And there are plenty of women who DON'T want their guns taken away, so I don't mean it as a stereotype, but it was moms who got drunk drivers off the road with MADD and it is mothers who don't want to see their kids shot who will pipe up about gun control.

if you truly care about life, you will oppose gun control.
it's that simple.
There is no good intention in anyone's mind who is pro gun control. Every single gun control activist is pro-rape, pro-mass shooting and pro-stalin/mao tyranny. The only exception are those too stupid and easily manipulated to know better.
any gun control efforts should be violently opposed. That is one reason why I no longer am a member of the National rifle association, because they refuse to face the truth about what needs to be done to stop this war on our god given rights.
Infringement activists are deliberately ignorant of the bloodshed that they are calling for. If one tenth of one percent of gun owners violently resist, it will be a bloodbath that would make the war between the states look like a pillow fight. Remember Chris Dorner, the former LAPD who went after cops? That was one man, and he shut down america's second largest city and had the powers that be pissing themselves.
and one other thing to remember is that this country has been at war for almost a generation, so a large portionof those who make the decision to resist tyranny will have skills and experience wiith warfare.

Sez the guy who assured me the other day that he and his militia organization just want to LIVE peacefully and let everyone else live peacefully too. Only if everyone else does exactly what you like, though, huh?
I'm not scared of you and neither is anyone else.

again, why do you lie about me.
I never said that I want anyone, much less everyone to do as I like. Only that I have certain rights, along with my fellow americans, and that I am willing to defend those rights against those who would deprive me of them. You are exposing yourself as a bully who doesnt want their victims to be able to stop you from attacking them.

The left are TERRIFIED of law abiding gun owners, not so much violent criminals and people who enjoy beheadings.

yeah, but oldbictch take it to a whole new level. I posted a Kerodin article the other day about the government bullying people and she accused me of wanting to bully people.
the broad is either senile or a liar or most likely both

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Most people already know that guns take the place of that which you wish you had but do not.

Quit whining and buy some Viagra.

Are you sure you're talking about guns? Kinda sounds like left wing men...sorry I mean feminists wearing ***** hats, skinny jeans and man buns. With a side order of transvestite.

 

[MaryL]

We have to grow up people. The right to arms is man made, and arbitrary rule ,not "god given" right. What the hell malarkey is that? It's sentimental. When the framers wrote the Constitution, firearms consisted of muzzle loading flintlocks and were used primarily for hunting food. Well, those days are long gone, in case you haven't noticed. Now we have mass shootings by unstable people that are in gangs using AK 47 or mentally ill kids getting buku guns slaughtering other kids. I kind of doubt the people that created the second amendment realized such of thing was possible.

 

[RightyTighty]

As opposed to obese pot bellied confederate flag waving middle aged white male pro gun nuts that equate gun ownership with sexuality?

wrong again
gun owners a diverse group, and the only people who equate gun ownership with sexuality are the infringment lobby

Yeah, this thread equates gun control with castration. The OP states that in the title. The folks that want gun control are a diverse group and last thing we want is to infringe on anyone's rights.

that is an oxymoron, gun control is infringment, period. ther eis no such thing as "reasonable/common sense" gun control. any and all gun control laws are tyrannical and oppressive infringements.

How so? Tyrannical? 100 years ago, 60 years ago, we didn't have the huge rise in firearms related deaths or mass murders. Common sense would tell anyone this society is having issues with gun violence. There is a valid issue here. It needs to be addressed, we just don't need guns like we did in 1776, they are a huge problem now our forefathers didn't have the foresight to see coming. I am so tired of this argument, it needs to end.

and it can end when people stop advocating for the infringement of our god given, constituutionally protected right to self defense tools of our choice.

I choose biological and nuclear weapons. My right to be armed with a nuke, at all times.

 

[miketx]

We have to grow up people. The right to arms is man made, and arbitrary rule ,not "god given" right. What the hell malarkey is that? It's sentimental. When the framers wrote the Constitution, firearms consisted of muzzle loading flintlocks and were used primarily for hunting food. Well, those days are long gone, in case you haven't noticed. Now we have mass shootings by unstable people that are in gangs using AK 47 or mentally ill kids getting buku guns slaughtering other kids. I kind of doubt the people that created the second amendment realized such of thing was possible.

Quill pens instead of computers!

 

[bitter clinging swiftie]

We have to grow up people. The right to arms is man made, and arbitrary rule ,not "god given" right. What the hell malarkey is that? It's sentimental. When the framers wrote the Constitution, firearms consisted of muzzle loading flintlocks and were used primarily for hunting food. Well, those days are long gone, in case you haven't noticed. Now we have mass shootings by unstable people that are in gangs using AK 47 or mentally ill kids getting buku guns slaughtering other kids. I kind of doubt the people that created the second amendment realized such of thing was possible.

well, you are wrong....the founders knew technology would evolve. so do you think the first amendment should only apply to quill pens?

 

[OldLady]

When we talk about protesters generally, do we discuss if they're pretty or ugly? Only if they're women. Do we talk about men's paraphenalia every time we mention a name, like we seem to need to include **** or vagina if talking about a woman? Interesting.

That article didn't appear to be about Code Pink wanting to take away anyone's virility. Just their killing machines. I believe women are more respectful of life because they carry life and they are usually the ones to care for the young ones. Maybe it's in our wiring, I don't know. And there are plenty of women who DON'T want their guns taken away, so I don't mean it as a stereotype, but it was moms who got drunk drivers off the road with MADD and it is mothers who don't want to see their kids shot who will pipe up about gun control.

if you truly care about life, you will oppose gun control.
it's that simple.
There is no good intention in anyone's mind who is pro gun control. Every single gun control activist is pro-rape, pro-mass shooting and pro-stalin/mao tyranny. The only exception are those too stupid and easily manipulated to know better.
any gun control efforts should be violently opposed. That is one reason why I no longer am a member of the National rifle association, because they refuse to face the truth about what needs to be done to stop this war on our god given rights.
Infringement activists are deliberately ignorant of the bloodshed that they are calling for. If one tenth of one percent of gun owners violently resist, it will be a bloodbath that would make the war between the states look like a pillow fight. Remember Chris Dorner, the former LAPD who went after cops? That was one man, and he shut down america's second largest city and had the powers that be pissing themselves.
and one other thing to remember is that this country has been at war for almost a generation, so a large portionof those who make the decision to resist tyranny will have skills and experience wiith warfare.

Sez the guy who assured me the other day that he and his militia organization just want to LIVE peacefully and let everyone else live peacefully too. Only if everyone else does exactly what you like, though, huh?
I'm not scared of you and neither is anyone else.

again, why do you lie about me.
I never said that I want anyone, much less everyone to do as I like. Only that I have certain rights, along with my fellow americans, and that I am willing to defend those rights against those who would deprive me of them. You are exposing yourself as a bully who doesnt want their victims to be able to stop you from attacking them.

The left are TERRIFIED of law abiding gun owners, not so much violent criminals and people who enjoy beheadings.

yeah, but oldbictch take it to a whole new level. I posted a Kerodin article the other day about the government bullying people and she accused me of wanting to bully people.
the broad is either senile or a liar or most likely both

Three attempts to bait me, all in a two page thread. Shows how serious you are about your OP, to immediately and doggedly try to derail your own argument.
Interesting, dogpile. You want to take it up, do it where it belongs.

 

[OldLady]

It is noticable that most proponents of infringment and violation of rights are not only left wing, but generally ugly leftist women.
this article takes on that subject
Gun Control as Castration

When we talk about protesters generally, do we discuss if they're pretty or ugly? Only if they're women. Do we talk about men's paraphenalia every time we mention a name, like we seem to need to include **** or vagina if talking about a woman? Interesting.

That article didn't appear to be about Code Pink wanting to take away anyone's virility. Just their killing machines. I believe women are more respectful of life because they carry life and they are usually the ones to care for the young ones. Maybe it's in our wiring, I don't know. And there are plenty of women who DON'T want their guns taken away, so I don't mean it as a stereotype, but it was moms who got drunk drivers off the road with MADD and it is mothers who don't want to see their kids shot who will pipe up about gun control.

if you truly care about life, you will oppose gun control.
it's that simple.
There is no good intention in anyone's mind who is pro gun control. Every single gun control activist is pro-rape, pro-mass shooting and pro-stalin/mao tyranny. The only exception are those too stupid and easily manipulated to know better.
any gun control efforts should be violently opposed. That is one reason why I no longer am a member of the National rifle association, because they refuse to face the truth about what needs to be done to stop this war on our god given rights.
Infringement activists are deliberately ignorant of the bloodshed that they are calling for. If one tenth of one percent of gun owners violently resist, it will be a bloodbath that would make the war between the states look like a pillow fight. Remember Chris Dorner, the former LAPD who went after cops? That was one man, and he shut down america's second largest city and had the powers that be pissing themselves.
and one other thing to remember is that this country has been at war for almost a generation, so a large portionof those who make the decision to resist tyranny will have skills and experience wiith warfare.

Sez the guy who assured me the other day that he and his militia organization just want to LIVE peacefully and let everyone else live peacefully too. Only if everyone else does exactly what you like, though, huh?
I'm not scared of you and neither is anyone else.

so you are saying that I have no right to defend myself? correct. My whole post is about SELF DEFENSE....I want nothing from you people but to be left alone. As long as you dont attempt to violate my person or property, either directly or by proxy, then I have no problem with you.
Is that simple enough for you to wrap all 3 of your brain cells around.
I really like how you deliberately lie and say I make threats when I do no such thing. I shouldnt be surprised at that though, given how you think its ok for another poster to call my children assholes.

they refuse to face the truth about what needs to be done to stop this war on our god given rights.
Infringement activists are deliberately ignorant of the bloodshed that they are calling for. If one tenth of one percent of gun owners violently resist, it will be a bloodbath that would make the war between the states look like a pillow fight. Remember Chris Dorner, the former LAPD who went after cops? That was one man, and he shut down america's second largest city and had the powers that be pissing themselves.
and one other thing to remember is that this country has been at war for almost a generation, so a large portionof those who make the decision to resist tyranny will have skills and experience wiith warfare.
Yeah, why would I think such language was meant to be threatening?

 

[bitter clinging swiftie]

It is noticable that most proponents of infringment and violation of rights are not only left wing, but generally ugly leftist women.
this article takes on that subject
Gun Control as Castration

When we talk about protesters generally, do we discuss if they're pretty or ugly? Only if they're women. Do we talk about men's paraphenalia every time we mention a name, like we seem to need to include **** or vagina if talking about a woman? Interesting.

That article didn't appear to be about Code Pink wanting to take away anyone's virility. Just their killing machines. I believe women are more respectful of life because they carry life and they are usually the ones to care for the young ones. Maybe it's in our wiring, I don't know. And there are plenty of women who DON'T want their guns taken away, so I don't mean it as a stereotype, but it was moms who got drunk drivers off the road with MADD and it is mothers who don't want to see their kids shot who will pipe up about gun control.

if you truly care about life, you will oppose gun control.
it's that simple.
There is no good intention in anyone's mind who is pro gun control. Every single gun control activist is pro-rape, pro-mass shooting and pro-stalin/mao tyranny. The only exception are those too stupid and easily manipulated to know better.
any gun control efforts should be violently opposed. That is one reason why I no longer am a member of the National rifle association, because they refuse to face the truth about what needs to be done to stop this war on our god given rights.
Infringement activists are deliberately ignorant of the bloodshed that they are calling for. If one tenth of one percent of gun owners violently resist, it will be a bloodbath that would make the war between the states look like a pillow fight. Remember Chris Dorner, the former LAPD who went after cops? That was one man, and he shut down america's second largest city and had the powers that be pissing themselves.
and one other thing to remember is that this country has been at war for almost a generation, so a large portionof those who make the decision to resist tyranny will have skills and experience wiith warfare.

Sez the guy who assured me the other day that he and his militia organization just want to LIVE peacefully and let everyone else live peacefully too. Only if everyone else does exactly what you like, though, huh?
I'm not scared of you and neither is anyone else.

so you are saying that I have no right to defend myself? correct. My whole post is about SELF DEFENSE....I want nothing from you people but to be left alone. As long as you dont attempt to violate my person or property, either directly or by proxy, then I have no problem with you.
Is that simple enough for you to wrap all 3 of your brain cells around.
I really like how you deliberately lie and say I make threats when I do no such thing. I shouldnt be surprised at that though, given how you think its ok for another poster to call my children assholes.

they refuse to face the truth about what needs to be done to stop this war on our god given rights.
Infringement activists are deliberately ignorant of the bloodshed that they are calling for. If one tenth of one percent of gun owners violently resist, it will be a bloodbath that would make the war between the states look like a pillow fight. Remember Chris Dorner, the former LAPD who went after cops? That was one man, and he shut down america's second largest city and had the powers that be pissing themselves.
and one other thing to remember is that this country has been at war for almost a generation, so a large portionof those who make the decision to resist tyranny will have skills and experience wiith warfare.
Yeah, why would I think such language was meant to be threatening?

because you are stupid and have no reading comprehension
oh, and thanks for reporting me, too

 

[OldLady]

It is noticable that most proponents of infringment and violation of rights are not only left wing, but generally ugly leftist women.
this article takes on that subject
Gun Control as Castration

When we talk about protesters generally, do we discuss if they're pretty or ugly? Only if they're women. Do we talk about men's paraphenalia every time we mention a name, like we seem to need to include **** or vagina if talking about a woman? Interesting.

That article didn't appear to be about Code Pink wanting to take away anyone's virility. Just their killing machines. I believe women are more respectful of life because they carry life and they are usually the ones to care for the young ones. Maybe it's in our wiring, I don't know. And there are plenty of women who DON'T want their guns taken away, so I don't mean it as a stereotype, but it was moms who got drunk drivers off the road with MADD and it is mothers who don't want to see their kids shot who will pipe up about gun control.

if you truly care about life, you will oppose gun control.
it's that simple.
There is no good intention in anyone's mind who is pro gun control. Every single gun control activist is pro-rape, pro-mass shooting and pro-stalin/mao tyranny. The only exception are those too stupid and easily manipulated to know better.
any gun control efforts should be violently opposed. That is one reason why I no longer am a member of the National rifle association, because they refuse to face the truth about what needs to be done to stop this war on our god given rights.
Infringement activists are deliberately ignorant of the bloodshed that they are calling for. If one tenth of one percent of gun owners violently resist, it will be a bloodbath that would make the war between the states look like a pillow fight. Remember Chris Dorner, the former LAPD who went after cops? That was one man, and he shut down america's second largest city and had the powers that be pissing themselves.
and one other thing to remember is that this country has been at war for almost a generation, so a large portionof those who make the decision to resist tyranny will have skills and experience wiith warfare.

Sez the guy who assured me the other day that he and his militia organization just want to LIVE peacefully and let everyone else live peacefully too. Only if everyone else does exactly what you like, though, huh?
I'm not scared of you and neither is anyone else.

again, why do you lie about me.
I never said that I want anyone, much less everyone to do as I like. Only that I have certain rights, along with my fellow americans, and that I am willing to defend those rights against those who would deprive me of them. You are exposing yourself as a bully who doesnt want their victims to be able to stop you from attacking them.

I'm not making you a victim--you are. No one has taken your killing toys away from you, yet, but buddy, you'd be one of the first I'd visit if that legislation ever went through, because in my estimation you are dangerous--at least the way you're flapping your gums sounds that way. That's not being a bully, that's being an old lady who has been reading your posts and is quite concerned with your war language and your not so veiled threats of violence if anyone tries to take away your killing machines. We use the voting process and special interest groups to support our way of thinking, and if we lose to the majority, well then tough shit. We don't take to the streets and start a war over it.

 

[OldLady]

When we talk about protesters generally, do we discuss if they're pretty or ugly? Only if they're women. Do we talk about men's paraphenalia every time we mention a name, like we seem to need to include **** or vagina if talking about a woman? Interesting.

That article didn't appear to be about Code Pink wanting to take away anyone's virility. Just their killing machines. I believe women are more respectful of life because they carry life and they are usually the ones to care for the young ones. Maybe it's in our wiring, I don't know. And there are plenty of women who DON'T want their guns taken away, so I don't mean it as a stereotype, but it was moms who got drunk drivers off the road with MADD and it is mothers who don't want to see their kids shot who will pipe up about gun control.

if you truly care about life, you will oppose gun control.
it's that simple.
There is no good intention in anyone's mind who is pro gun control. Every single gun control activist is pro-rape, pro-mass shooting and pro-stalin/mao tyranny. The only exception are those too stupid and easily manipulated to know better.
any gun control efforts should be violently opposed. That is one reason why I no longer am a member of the National rifle association, because they refuse to face the truth about what needs to be done to stop this war on our god given rights.
Infringement activists are deliberately ignorant of the bloodshed that they are calling for. If one tenth of one percent of gun owners violently resist, it will be a bloodbath that would make the war between the states look like a pillow fight. Remember Chris Dorner, the former LAPD who went after cops? That was one man, and he shut down america's second largest city and had the powers that be pissing themselves.
and one other thing to remember is that this country has been at war for almost a generation, so a large portionof those who make the decision to resist tyranny will have skills and experience wiith warfare.

Sez the guy who assured me the other day that he and his militia organization just want to LIVE peacefully and let everyone else live peacefully too. Only if everyone else does exactly what you like, though, huh?
I'm not scared of you and neither is anyone else.

so you are saying that I have no right to defend myself? correct. My whole post is about SELF DEFENSE....I want nothing from you people but to be left alone. As long as you dont attempt to violate my person or property, either directly or by proxy, then I have no problem with you.
Is that simple enough for you to wrap all 3 of your brain cells around.
I really like how you deliberately lie and say I make threats when I do no such thing. I shouldnt be surprised at that though, given how you think its ok for another poster to call my children assholes.

they refuse to face the truth about what needs to be done to stop this war on our god given rights.
Infringement activists are deliberately ignorant of the bloodshed that they are calling for. If one tenth of one percent of gun owners violently resist, it will be a bloodbath that would make the war between the states look like a pillow fight. Remember Chris Dorner, the former LAPD who went after cops? That was one man, and he shut down america's second largest city and had the powers that be pissing themselves.
and one other thing to remember is that this country has been at war for almost a generation, so a large portionof those who make the decision to resist tyranny will have skills and experience wiith warfare.
Yeah, why would I think such language was meant to be threatening?

because you are stupid and have no reading comprehension
oh, and thanks for reporting me, too

Anytime, sweetie. Now I can respond to you.

See, the thing is, I actually know how to read between the lines, even though I'm pretty sure a 7th grader would agree with me on this one.

 

[OldLady]

When we talk about protesters generally, do we discuss if they're pretty or ugly? Only if they're women. Do we talk about men's paraphenalia every time we mention a name, like we seem to need to include **** or vagina if talking about a woman? Interesting.

That article didn't appear to be about Code Pink wanting to take away anyone's virility. Just their killing machines. I believe women are more respectful of life because they carry life and they are usually the ones to care for the young ones. Maybe it's in our wiring, I don't know. And there are plenty of women who DON'T want their guns taken away, so I don't mean it as a stereotype, but it was moms who got drunk drivers off the road with MADD and it is mothers who don't want to see their kids shot who will pipe up about gun control.

if you truly care about life, you will oppose gun control.
it's that simple.
There is no good intention in anyone's mind who is pro gun control. Every single gun control activist is pro-rape, pro-mass shooting and pro-stalin/mao tyranny. The only exception are those too stupid and easily manipulated to know better.
any gun control efforts should be violently opposed. That is one reason why I no longer am a member of the National rifle association, because they refuse to face the truth about what needs to be done to stop this war on our god given rights.
Infringement activists are deliberately ignorant of the bloodshed that they are calling for. If one tenth of one percent of gun owners violently resist, it will be a bloodbath that would make the war between the states look like a pillow fight. Remember Chris Dorner, the former LAPD who went after cops? That was one man, and he shut down america's second largest city and had the powers that be pissing themselves.
and one other thing to remember is that this country has been at war for almost a generation, so a large portionof those who make the decision to resist tyranny will have skills and experience wiith warfare.

Sez the guy who assured me the other day that he and his militia organization just want to LIVE peacefully and let everyone else live peacefully too. Only if everyone else does exactly what you like, though, huh?
I'm not scared of you and neither is anyone else.

so you are saying that I have no right to defend myself? correct. My whole post is about SELF DEFENSE....I want nothing from you people but to be left alone. As long as you dont attempt to violate my person or property, either directly or by proxy, then I have no problem with you.
Is that simple enough for you to wrap all 3 of your brain cells around.
I really like how you deliberately lie and say I make threats when I do no such thing. I shouldnt be surprised at that though, given how you think its ok for another poster to call my children assholes.

they refuse to face the truth about what needs to be done to stop this war on our god given rights.
Infringement activists are deliberately ignorant of the bloodshed that they are calling for. If one tenth of one percent of gun owners violently resist, it will be a bloodbath that would make the war between the states look like a pillow fight. Remember Chris Dorner, the former LAPD who went after cops? That was one man, and he shut down america's second largest city and had the powers that be pissing themselves.
and one other thing to remember is that this country has been at war for almost a generation, so a large portionof those who make the decision to resist tyranny will have skills and experience wiith warfare.
Yeah, why would I think such language was meant to be threatening?

because you are stupid and have no reading comprehension
oh, and thanks for reporting me, too

stop this war on our god given rights.
ignorant of the bloodshed that they are calling for.
it will be a bloodbath that would make the war between the states look like a pillow fight.
those who make the decision to resist tyranny will have skills and experience wiith warfare.

You need to explain to me how those word choices do not threaten violence.
I'm an English teacher, yet I can't for the life of me figure out why you would you write those words if you were not hoping to invoke a certain picture in the readers' brains. A picture of war, bloodshed, by those with skills in warfare, if anyone tries to take away your killing toys. That is a threat in this society.