Growing Need

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

The argument from the open botders crowd

Are you ok with deporting illegal alien parents and if so what happens to the anchor baby children?

Deport them also even though have have US citizenship?

You need to work on your proofreading if your spell check is being ignored.

Unk and I are not the open borders crowd. Get your facts straight and then take it up with them. We are merely saving you the time at being wrong.

 

[Unkotare]

Thankyou. White6 was nice to me this time.

I get a little loose, crazy and frustrated on the small phone reading thru UNK stuff about
"no such thing as Anchor baby over and over" or "Illegals don't get benefits" as EBT cards are handed out.

I see hundreds of posts with F-you in them or worse all day every day. I get sloppy as I wade thru it.

Now I am calm with keyboard/Big screen on the PC....but it won't last. I need to move off here soon.
I wish I was more perfect. I also thought some were targeting me. Baiting me, then pounce.
Probably paranoia from lack of medication.

 

[Unkotare]

...

I get a little loose, crazy and frustrated on the small phone reading thru UNK stuff about
"no such thing as Anchor baby ...

You get frustrated at reading the truth?

 

[leftwinger]

You get frustrated at reading the truth?

Oh Lord.....give me my pills. He is at it again.

 

[Foxfyre]

"Strongly mitigate..." Don't you have any self-respect?

The truth is the truth.

If you had bothered to read up on it, you would know I am speaking a larger truth than you want to admit exists. The legal status of the mother is only part of the issue.

It's like saying X owned slaves and therefore was an evil slave owner. Technically he was a slave owner, but to leave out the mitigating fact that he inherited those slaves from his family and he freed them would seriously distort that history.

It's like saying X was charged with statutory rape. Technically he is guilty, but to leave out the mitigating fact that the 'rape' was of his 17-year-old fiance' who would turn 18 in two weeks at which time they married and have been happily married for 30 years would seriously distort the impression one would have of the 'rapist.'

You yourself used the analogy of a kid giving a customer the wrong change and the customer is convinced the kid is incompetent. The mitigating factor is that it was likely a one time incident and the kid is capable of making the right change and not at all incompetent.

But you would rather become vulgar at my argument rather than counter it with intelligent debate. Also not cool for an educator.

 

[BackAgain]

Thankyou. White6 was nice to me this time.

I get a little loose, crazy and frustrated on the small phone reading thru UNK stuff about
"no such thing as Anchor baby over and over" or "Illegals don't get benefits" as EBT cards are handed out.

I see hundreds of posts with F-you in them or worse all day every day. I get sloppy as I wade thru it.

Now I am calm with keyboard/Big screen on the PC....but it won't last. I need to move off here soon.
I wish I was more perfect. I also thought some were targeting me. Baiting me, then pounce.
Probably paranoia from lack of medication.

You’re a good guy.

I’d hate to see you get a mod sanction. But even without one, I’d hate to see you getting overly worked up by the imbeciles who seek to be irritating and nothing more.

It’s ok to take a temporary break of your own volition.

As for meds? I don’t know about those in your case. I hope you’re ok.

 

[Foxfyre]

You’re a good guy.

I’d hate to see you get a mod sanction. But even without one, I’d hate to see you getting overly worked up by the imbeciles who seek to be irritating and nothing more.

It’s ok to take a temporary break of your own volition.

As for meds? I don’t know about those in your case. I hope you’re ok.

You're probably right that we're dealing with people intentionally being irritating.

I should implement my New Year's Resolution: I resolve not to feed the trolls, argue with idiots, or engage in other exercises of futility. I shouldn't hold out the hope that some people can be reasoned with I guess.

 

[Unkotare]

...The legal status of the mother is only part of the issue.
...

That's the whole issue in trying to use a false term like "anchor baby." The mother would be the one "anchored" in your misnomer.

 

[Unkotare]

...

It's like saying X owned slaves and therefore was an evil slave owner. Technically he was a slave owner, but to leave out the mitigating fact that he inherited those slaves from his family and he freed them would seriously distort that history.
...

No, it wouldn't. If he owned slaves, he was a slave owner.

 

[Foxfyre]

No, it wouldn't. If he owned slaves, he was a slave owner.

Good grief. I grieve for your students. If you teach them that mitigating circumstances are irrelevant and insist they leave those out in evaluating a whole problem, they are woefully uneducated.

But I am done. I won't bother engaging you further on this. You have a wonderful day.

 

[Unkotare]

...

It's like saying X was charged with statutory rape. Technically he is guilty, but to leave out the mitigating fact that the 'rape' was of his 17-year-old fiance' [sic] who would turn 18 in two weeks at which time they married and have been happily married for 30 years would seriously distort the impression one would have of the 'rapist.'
...

No, it wouldn't. If he committed statutory rape, he was a statutory rapist. Of course, your little story is bullshit as a 17- & 18-year-old could get parental permission to marry if they lived in a state where the age of consent was 18 (or maybe just wait two weeks?).

 

[Unkotare]

...

You yourself used the analogy of a kid giving a customer the wrong change and the customer is convinced the kid is incompetent. The mitigating factor is that it was likely a one time [sic] incident and the kid is capable of making the right change and not at all incompetent.
...

I don't think you understand what "mitigating factor" means.

 

[Unkotare]

Good grief. I grieve for your students. If you teach them that mitigating circumstances are irrelevant ...

Again, it's pretty clear you don't understand what that term means.

 

[OKTexas]

Untrue, as long as the arrow is present, you may shorten quotes.

Wrong again:

Editing quotes. You may selectively quote, provided that it does not change the context or meaning of the quote.

.

 

[Moonglow]

Wrong again:

Editing quotes. You may selectively quote, provided that it does not change the context or meaning of the quote.

.

Then it has been changed since 2011. The last time I read TOS.

 

[Foxfyre]

I don't think you understand what "mitigating factor" means.

I know it is officially a term for arguments used to possibly lessen consequences for a crime. It can definitely be a a factor in a jury's and/or judge's perception so any good attorney will utilize mitigating factors at every opportunity.

It also has uses in non legal contexts. From an AI example:
". . .The phrase "it should have a mitigating effect on the frequency of minor flooding events" suggests that certain measures or actions can help reduce the occurrence of minor flooding events.

• Mitigating refers to making something less severe or painful, which implies that actions taken can lessen the impact of flooding. . .

Again any teacher that does not include the mitigating circumstances in legal situations, history, events, etc, and encouraging critical thinking about that, that teacher is not educating but indoctrinating the students.

 

[Unkotare]

I know it is officially a term for arguments used to possibly lessen consequences for a crime. ...

Only when the crime has been proven or admitted. Otherwise, what has been mitigated?

 

[Unkotare]

...
". . .The phrase "it should have a mitigating effect on the frequency of minor flooding events" suggests that certain measures or actions can help reduce the occurrence of minor flooding events.

• ....

Meaning there WAS a flooding event.

 

[OKTexas]

Fake news. Where is your link to this ridiculous claim?

Some maybe. Many? Not a chance.

I fully support deporting illegals. Where did you fantasize that I did not? Is it because I keep proving you to be a know-nothing harpie?

How Unions Can Fight Back Against Deportations

The battle won’t be fought only in the courts. “We need to expand our base beyond the already converted,” Goodner says. “We need to go and talk to people, including Trump supporters, and win them o…

www.bing.com

https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=f6dd423359e18300f8707156ecc04f889dcf7c834eb08ba862fc666a7809294cJmltdHM9MTc1OTI3NjgwMA&ptn=3&ver=2&hsh=4&fclid=2ed03d60-58a8-6b15-06ee-287759236a2f&u=a1aHR0cHM6Ly90aGVoaWxsLmNvbS9vcGluaW9uL2ltbWlncmF0aW9uLzUzNTc2ODctdW5pb25zLWFyZS1yaWdodC10by1zdGFuZC13aXRoLWltbWlncmFudHMtYWdhaW5zdC1pY2UtZGVwb3J0YXRpb25zLw

.

 

[Mac-7]

Fake news. Where is your link to this ridiculous claim?

Some maybe. Many? Not a chance.

I fully support deporting illegals. Where did you fantasize that I did not? Is it because I keep proving you to be a know-nothing harpie?

I have not found a public educator who supported Trump’s migrant policy

In your case talk is cheap

Do you support trump or not?

Your denial that anchor babies exist is a dead giveaway