Greenland and US National Security

Trump backed down for one reason.

The Market tanked

Our opinions differ. There is no reason to believe Trump backed down in the 1st place, it might be that he got the deal he wanted to begin with. And I doubt the stock market had anything to do with his decisions one way or another and there's no reason to believe that either. In any case, it appears the US is better off than it was with respect to Greenland and it's assets.
 
Our opinions differ. There is no reason to believe Trump backed down in the 1st place, it might be that he got the deal he wanted to begin with. And I doubt the stock market had anything to do with his decisions one way or another and there's no reason to believe that either. In any case, it appears the US is better off than it was with respect to Greenland and it's assets.
What deal did he get?

Of course he reacted to the stock market

Just like he did in his first Presidency with Covid
 
Have you ever wondered why Trump wants Greenland? There's no reason. It makes no practical sense, he just wants to be the president of a big country. Like Putin.
He looked at the map, saw that Greenland is huge, and wanted it for himself. That's where his claims to Canada and Mexico come from.
 
You obviously don't understand anything.

Denmark is a NATO member as is the USA. (at least for the time being-unless Trump destroys this alliance in the coming month or years) as such it isn't about Denmark solely defending Greenland from any aggressors - but NATO.

Besides your Canada annexation dude - not a single country - specifically not any NATO member has ever recorded Russian or Chinese military assets, anywhere near Greenland, that could or would invade Greenland.

It's pure fiction - used by your Golf of Trump nitwit, do come up with any daily bullshit, to distract from all the problems the narcissistic ****, had promised to solve to his clueless voters and brainwashed supporters.
So, the United States should remove all naval ships and submarines and close any military installations in Canada and Greenland. it costs money to do these things.
 

January 21 at 4:25 PM ·
DAVOS—In a much-praised resolution to a roiling diplomatic crisis, on Wednesday Denmark offered Donald J. Trump “full ownership” of a room in an assisted living facility in Greenland.
The deal was orchestrated by French President Emmanuel Macron and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, who were seen high-fiving moments after Trump signed the admission form.
Speaking to reporters, Carney said that Trump’s new home was actually located in Iceland, not Greenland, but added, “We’re pretty sure he doesn’t know the difference.”
For his part, President Macron acknowledged that the agreement represented a compromise, noting, “Our first choice was an ice floe.”
 

January 21 at 4:25 PM ·
DAVOS—In a much-praised resolution to a roiling diplomatic crisis, on Wednesday Denmark offered Donald J. Trump “full ownership” of a room in an assisted living facility in Greenland.
The deal was orchestrated by French President Emmanuel Macron and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, who were seen high-fiving moments after Trump signed the admission form.
Speaking to reporters, Carney said that Trump’s new home was actually located in Iceland, not Greenland, but added, “We’re pretty sure he doesn’t know the difference.”
For his part, President Macron acknowledged that the agreement represented a compromise, noting, “Our first choice was an ice floe.”
It turns out the room was already occupied by Joe Biden complete with a memory care staff specializing in advanced dementia
 
If one takes a polar view of Greenland, it is obvious that it sits directly between the US and Russia's ICBMs. As such, it is in an essential location for early warning systems and ICBM defense. Unless it becomes part of the US, there is no way to enforce territorial sovereignty over the waters surrounding it. Without this, US adversaries can place naval and air forces much closer to Greenland, allowing them to perform a quicker strike against US defenses.

Why is this so hard to understand?


In the time of President Yuri Andropov a plan was hatched against America.

This plan has been quite effective up until now.

In a August 24, 2006 article entitled, "Russian Footprints", Ion Mihai Pacepa writes:

By the end of the 1960s, the KGB was deeply involved in mass terrorism against Jews, carried out by various Palestinian client organizations. Here are some terrorist actions for which the KGB took credit while I was still in Romania: November 1969, armed attack on the El Al office in Athens, leaving 1 dead and 14 wounded; May 30, 1972, Ben Gurion Airport attack, leaving 22 dead and 76 wounded; December 1974, Tel Aviv movie theater bomb, leaving 2 dead and 66 wounded; March 1975, attack on a Tel Aviv hotel, leaving 25 dead and 6 wounded; May 1975, Jerusalem bomb, leaving 1 dead and 3 wounded; July 4, 1975, bomb in Zion Square, Jerusalem, leaving 15 dead and 62 wounded; April 1978, Brussels airport attack, leaving 12 wounded; May 1978, attack on an El Al plane in Paris, leaving 12 wounded. ... In 1972, the Kremlin decided to turn the whole Islamic world against Israel and the U.S. As KGB chairman Yury Andropov told me, a billion adversaries could inflict far greater damage on America than could a few millions. We needed to instill a Nazi-style hatred for the Jews throughout the Islamic world, and to turn this weapon of the emotions into a terrorist bloodbath against Israel and its main supporter, the United States. No one within the American/Zionist sphere of influence should any longer feel safe.
  • 1970 - Yasser Arafat, the father of modern terrorism:
    Arafat6.jpg
    In 1970 the Kremlin became interested in an obscure Arab construction engineer and collector of racecars, named Rahman al-Qudwa. Evidence shows, contrary to later claims, that this "construction engineer" was an Egyptian, born in Cairo during the summer of 1929. Rahman graduated from the University of Cairo and served as an officer in the Egyptian Army during the 1956 Suez campaign. Later he set up a business in Kuwait and made a fortune. He then entered politics, founding a hopelessly small terrorist organization.... According to the former head of Romanian intelligence, Lt. Gen. Ion Mihai Pacepa, one of the highest ranking communist defectors of all time, Rahman al-Qudwa became an important political ally of the communist bloc following the death of Egypt's president, Gamal Abdul Nasser, in 1970. Gen. Pacepa's account of Rahman's intimate relations with the communist bloc is related in a book entitled "Red Horizons."... Rahman al-Qudwa is better known as Yasser Arafat, the chairman of the PLO since 1968 and the president of the Palestinian Authority -- which is now at war with Israel. According to Gen. Pacepa's account, communist dictator Nicolae Ceausescu ordered his people to bring Arafat over to Romania. In late 1970 the chief of Romanian intelligence in Egypt, Gen. Constantine Munteanu, arrived in Bucharest with Arafat in tow. Munteanu had gathered an extensive file on Arafat, which characterized the PLO leader as "so much cleverness, blood, and filth all together in one man." Pacepa says that this was Munteanu's "standard definition of Arafat."
    Given Gen. Munteanu's extensive file, Arafat could not exactly refuse the communist's "friendly" overtures. There is little question that Arafat is fanatically devoted to destroying Israel, and would sell his soul to the devil to gain his devilish ends. Therefore, a compact between Arafat and the Soviet Union via communist Romania was not something that violated any sacred Islamic rule in Arafat's heart. Arafat is no Moslem. His fanaticism is completely secular. But since he operates within the Islamic world, he must sometimes appear as a would-be Muslim liberator. (“Kremlin puppets and how they work,” J.R. Nyquist, October 19, 2000) (read also Our Lady of the Roses prophecy about one who would come out of Egypt...)
  • 1972 - According to Ion Mihai Pacepa, “In 1972, the Kremlin decided to turn the whole Islamic world against Israel and the U.S. As KGB chairman Yury Andropov … [said], a billion adversaries could inflict far greater damage on America than could a few millions. We needed to instill Nazi-style hatred for the Jews throughout the Islamic world, and to turn this weapon … against Israel and its main supporter, the United States.”
  • 1973 - Soviet statements and preparations for an attack against Israel led the Pentagon to order U.S. nuclear forces to the highest state of peacetime readiness. The Joint Chiefs of Staff ordered the 82nd Airborne Division to prepare to head to the Middle East, and additional U.S. naval forces -- including American aircraft carriers -- moved into the Mediterranean, all out of a real and rising concern that the Soviets were about to make an unprecedented military move against Israel.
  • 1982 - Israeli forces battling PLO terrorists in southern Lebanon unexpectedly uncovered a secret but massive cache of Soviet weaponry in deep underground cellars and tunnels. The storehouses contained some 4,000 tons of ammunition, 144 armored vehicles and tanks, 12,500 pieces of small arms, and 515 heavy weapons. Then-Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin said that the Russians had prepositioned enough weapons to "equip not five brigades, but five or six [Soviet] divisions," adding that "we shall need literally thousands of trucks to evacuate these weapons from Lebanon."



There is an ancient Islamic Hadith that can be used effectively to shift the economy of the Middle East toward economic cooperation as opposed to military conflict and terrorism.

"Will world peace begin with immigrants from many nations who go to Canada and find out ways to address the root causes of the conflicts that were going on in the nations that they left?

I am hopeful that this will be the case, for example, immigrants to Canada from the Middle East may be able to turn the world away from the Al Gore Carbon Tax Theory and the Bill Gates, "Innovation to zero" emissions theory, and instead adopt the more down to earth approach to Climate Change advocated in the Jewish, Islamic and Christian scriptures as well as by a New Mexico biologist and coach.

Here is an ancient Islamic prediction that sounds like a brilliant response to both the threat of rising ocean levels... as well as to the Economic Crisis that it appears some influential people seem to want to occur."

Book 005, Number 2208:
"Abu Huraira reported Allah's Messenger (way peace be upon him) as saying: The Last Hour will not come before wealth becomes abundant and overflowing, so much so that a man takes Zakat out of his property and cannot find anyone to accept it from him and till the land of Arabia becomes meadows and rivers."
SAHIH MUSLIM, BOOK 25: The Book on General Behaviour (Kitab Al-Adab)




 
If one takes a polar view of Greenland, it is obvious that it sits directly between the US and Russia's ICBMs. As such, it is in an essential location for early warning systems and ICBM defense. Unless it becomes part of the US, there is no way to enforce territorial sovereignty over the waters surrounding it. Without this, US adversaries can place naval and air forces much closer to Greenland, allowing them to perform a quicker strike against US defenses.

Why is this so hard to understand?
/----/ Trump goes to Plan B.
WASHINGTON, D.C. — In a brilliant stroke of genius, President Donald Trump has just disguised himself as a Muslim migrant so that Europe now has to let him invade Greenland. Read more
1769374865320.webp
 
So, the United States should remove all naval ships and submarines and close any military installations in Canada and Greenland. it costs money to do these things.
Where did I state anything about the USA or it's military leaving???

If the USA would decide to do so, they would therefore quit their NATO membership - till then they have the OBLIGATION to ensure the safety and INTEGRITY of NATO territory and as such that of any NATO member state. (Article 5 - that so far only the USA ever enacted for their own interests).

Since neither Greenland nor Denmark or any other NATO member-states are being militarily actively threatened, nor theoretically by a non-NATO member state - then what the hell is your deranged & pathological fraudster blabbering about???

BTW - have you ever heard about Spitzbergen-(Svalbard) it's status and treaties??? Svalbard is factually (unlike Greenland) the key to access and control the Polar shipping route.

Since the Canada annexation dude and his spiritual followers are in denial of Climate Change !!! it's a HOAX right? then again WTF is he blabbering about???
 

Attachments

  • Spitzbergen.webp
    Spitzbergen.webp
    72.4 KB · Views: 4
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom