Grand Jury returns a no bill in indicting Letitia James

[SweetTea]

By “the right friends in the Washington D.C. region,” you mean 23 random strangers in the state of Virginia.

Democrats in particular are taught(indoctrinated) to do anything to protect their own. In their minds, legal or illegal is irrelevant when politics come into play, especially if Trump is involved. A grand jury in another state would result in a different outcome.

 

[SweetTea]

I don't think it matters. These cases are about revenge and intimidation.

Pretty ironic considering the cases they are revenging were nothing more than political theatre and law fare. But your TDS cult doesn’t care. All of you may as well go full TDS and have Orange Man Bad tattooed on your foreheads.

 

[SaxonJackson]

Grand jury declines to re-indict Letitia James in Virginia

The Department of Justice was unable to secure a grand jury indictment against New York Attorney General Letitia James in Norfolk, Virginia, a source said.

www.foxnews.com

So, let me ask this for all those who claim James committed crimes.

To DOJ tried to re-indict her. In order to succeed they need to get 12 out of 23 to agree that there MIGHT have been a crime committed. They couldn't do that.

So how strong of a case do you think the DOJ has when the standard in a court case is a unanimous decision that a crime was committed beyond a reasonable doubt?

And the Swamp lives on. Anyone surprised? Even if she HAD been indicted ... she'd likely get an immediate pardon. It's the trend these days.

 

[forkup]

Democrats in particular are taught(indoctrinated) to do anything to protect their own. In their minds, legal or illegal is irrelevant when politics come into play, especially if Trump is involved. A grand jury in another state would result in a different outcome.

And you base this on what exactly?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2025/11/11/covid-relief-fraud-ibraheem-samirah/

Not this..For instance.

 

[MarcATL]

It’s striking how quickly the logic falls apart. They can’t hold a consistent position for more than a post or two.

What else do you expect from the "daddy hasn't told me what to say yet" set?

 

[MarcATL]

Pretty ironic considering the cases they are revenging were nothing more than political theatre and law fare. But your TDS cult doesn’t care. All of you may as well go full TDS and have Orange Man Bad tattooed on your foreheads.

What statute did James break?

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

For now what?

You guys can't get over the first and by far the lowest hurdle.

You think a case that doesn't even convince a majority of the Grand Jury that a crime has been committed will magically become convincing to a full jury to the point that they say there's no reasonable doubt that a crime did occur? Or for that matter a judge who will have to decide over about 2 dozen motions to dismiss?

.

For now.

tick-tick-tick-tick-tick






.

 

[forkup]

And the Swamp lives on. Anyone surprised? Even if she HAD been indicted ... she'd likely get an immediate pardon. It's the trend these days.

Lol there's only one person issuing pardons at the moment. Usually to white collar criminals and/or corrupt politicians.

As for the rest. It never seizes to amaze me how predictable the responses are.

The facts don't support my position. "No worries I'll just invent a conspiracy."
.
Again and for about the fourth time. A grand jury is 23 random individuals. And the only people presenting the case are the people who literally are trying to charge someone with a crime.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Oh, I see, so what exactly is “the law” in your view? That the DOJ says someone committed a crime, and therefore the grand jury doesn’t matter?

Basically, I mean, the left hunted for years for a crime for trump and managed to stumble onto a case where they had to fanagle the charges to get something they could prosecute, then James comes along and does something similar and suddenly nobody thinks its a crime anymore.

Once again proving, democrats are never held accountable.

 

[forkup]

.

For now.

tick-tick-tick-tick-tick






.

Strong rebuttal.

Nothing says “I’ve got nothing left” like repeating the same cryptic line and hoping it lands better the second time.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Cite the statute she broke.

USC 18 1014
USC 18 1344

 

[ThisIsMe]

Which actually reinforces my point.

If the prosecutor can “frame the questions,” then James was the fish to fry here, and even with that advantage, they still couldn’t get a simple majority of 23 citizens to indict.

Or, they weren't trying to "fry" her

 

[ThisIsMe]

I don't think it matters. These cases are about revenge and intimidation. They want revenge on anyone who tried to hold their new God accountable, and they want to send a message to anyone who wants to try in the future.

If/when the cases get thrown out or lose, they can just claim that they were rigged. Because they know that their new God never lies, never breaks the rules, is brilliant and sincere, and is going to save America from Satan.

This is a cult.

Rofl...yeah...

 

[forkup]

Basically, I mean, the left hunted for years for a crime for trump and managed to stumble onto a case where they had to fanagle the charges to get something they could prosecute, then James comes along and does something similar and suddenly nobody thinks its a crime anymore.

Once again proving, democrats are never held accountable.

They didn't finagle anything. They got a grand jury to indict, a judge to reject all motions to dismiss. And a jury to convict... twice. Three times of you count to Carroll case.

Compare and contrast.

You guys can't even "finagle" enough to get to an indictment.

 

[ThisIsMe]

They didn't finagle anything. They got a grand jury to indict, a judge to reject all motions to dismiss. And a jury to convict... twice. Three times of you count to Carroll case.

Compare and contrast.

You guys can't even "finagle" enough to get to an indictment.

Lol, alvin bragg had to fanagle a crime to charge trump. Other people passed on the case, and even when Bragg filed the charges, other NY attorneys gave him the side eye because they thought the case was a bad case.

And yes, I know they got a jury to convict trump and I am contrasting, we see that, in 2 cases here, leftys will get away with it because nobody ever holds them accountable.

 

[Mac1958]

Lol there's only one person issuing pardons at the moment. Usually to white collar criminals and/or corrupt politicians.

As for the rest. It never seizes to amaze me how predictable the responses are.

The facts don't support my position. "No worries I'll just invent a conspiracy."
.
Again and for about the fourth time. A grand jury is 23 random individuals. And the only people presenting the case are the people who literally are trying to charge someone with a crime.

I observe their arguments and I'm reminded that there is MAGA reality, and a reality for the rest of the planet.

Pretty much everything becomes completely inverted as it crosses a line. I don't know how this changes.

 

[SweetTea]

What statute did James break?

Bank fraud and false statements to a financial institution. What, those don’t matter all of a sudden? Weren’t those the statutes that James pursued against Trump?

 

[ThisIsMe]

I observe their arguments and I'm reminded that there is MAGA reality, and a reality for the rest of the planet.

Pretty much everything becomes completely inverted as it crosses a line. I don't know how this changes.

Because your hatred for trump allows you to see all this from a different perspective

 

[iamwhatiseem]

By “the right friends in the Washington D.C. region,” you mean 23 random strangers in the state of Virginia.

Strangers who sat in a room with no judge, no defense, just DOJ prosecutors and a stenographer, and still weren’t convinced a crime even might have been committed.

You would have to find 23 people who have no idea who she is, and never heard of her.
That is a tall order. Anyone paying even nominal attention to news for several years knows she is the woman who went after Trump anyway she could.
Every Democrat in the room is going to be an automatic "No" - so trying to circumvent that is almost impossible.
Trump hate tops everything to Democrats. Everything.

 

[berg80]

@progressive hunter doesn’t operate on statutes; he operates on vibes. And in his version of rock-paper-scissors, there are only two plays:
He's right or everybody else's wrong

It's a MAGA thing, and it's all encompassing. Including the belief anything required to maintain power is justified because only they have the right to govern.