Government Data Show U.S. in Decade-Long Cooling

[daveman]

Government Data Show U.S. in Decade-Long Cooling

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s most accurate, up-to-date temperature data confirm the United States has been cooling for at least the past decade. The NOAA temperature data are driving a stake through the heart of alarmists claiming accelerating global warming.

Responding to widespread criticism that its temperature station readings were corrupted by poor citing issues and suspect adjustments, NOAA established a network of 114 pristinely cited temperature stations spread out fairly uniformly throughout the United States. Because the network, known as the U.S. Climate Reference Network (USCRN), is so uniformly and pristinely situated, the temperature data require no adjustments to provide an accurate nationwide temperature record. USCRN began compiling temperature data in January 2005. Now, nearly a decade later, NOAA has finally made the USCRN temperature readings available.

According to the USCRN temperature readings, U.S. temperatures are not rising at all – at least not since the network became operational 10 years ago. Instead, the United States has cooled by approximately 0.4 degrees Celsius, which is more than half of the claimed global warming of the twentieth century.

 

[skookerasbil]

Russian scientists concur >>>


http://www.forbes.com/fdc/welcome_mjx.shtml



more AGW k00k losing

 

[daveman]

That's what happens when your temperature stations are sited correctly and you don't cherry-pick the warmest ones to use and you don't apply any fudge factors to the data.

Yes, the cultists are gonna screech, "But that's just the US, not the whole world! -- as if that changes anything.

But remember...the cherry-picked and fudged stations show warming. Correctly sited stations don't.

 

[skookerasbil]

That's what happens when your temperature stations are sited correctly and you don't cherry-pick the warmest ones to use and you don't apply any fudge factors to the data.

Yes, the cultists are gonna screech, "But that's just the US, not the whole world! -- as if that changes anything.

But remember...the cherry-picked and fudged stations show warming. Correctly sited stations don't.

Hey Dave......perhaps global warming hasn't made its way to the US yet but in any case, here in New York, we are upon July 1st in a couple of days and have not had a sniff of near 90 degree's yet. Never in my lifetime!!!

 

[Crick]

Government Data Show U.S. in Decade-Long Cooling

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s most accurate, up-to-date temperature data confirm the United States has been cooling for at least the past decade. The NOAA temperature data are driving a stake through the heart of alarmists claiming accelerating global warming.

Responding to widespread criticism that its temperature station readings were corrupted by poor citing issues and suspect adjustments, NOAA established a network of 114 pristinely cited temperature stations spread out fairly uniformly throughout the United States. Because the network, known as the U.S. Climate Reference Network (USCRN), is so uniformly and pristinely situated, the temperature data require no adjustments to provide an accurate nationwide temperature record. USCRN began compiling temperature data in January 2005. Now, nearly a decade later, NOAA has finally made the USCRN temperature readings available.

According to the USCRN temperature readings, U.S. temperatures are not rising at all – at least not since the network became operational 10 years ago. Instead, the United States has cooled by approximately 0.4 degrees Celsius, which is more than half of the claimed global warming of the twentieth century.

Do you know why WUWT's graphic is in degrees Farenheit? To make it look bigger to the ignorant.

Do you know how significant these data are given that surface warming across much of the planet slowed to a crawl over this same period? Zero, Zip, Zilch, Nada.

Do you know what the planet's total heat content did over the same period? Climbed like a big dog.

 

[skookerasbil]

Government Data Show U.S. in Decade-Long Cooling

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s most accurate, up-to-date temperature data confirm the United States has been cooling for at least the past decade. The NOAA temperature data are driving a stake through the heart of alarmists claiming accelerating global warming.

Responding to widespread criticism that its temperature station readings were corrupted by poor citing issues and suspect adjustments, NOAA established a network of 114 pristinely cited temperature stations spread out fairly uniformly throughout the United States. Because the network, known as the U.S. Climate Reference Network (USCRN), is so uniformly and pristinely situated, the temperature data require no adjustments to provide an accurate nationwide temperature record. USCRN began compiling temperature data in January 2005. Now, nearly a decade later, NOAA has finally made the USCRN temperature readings available.

According to the USCRN temperature readings, U.S. temperatures are not rising at all – at least not since the network became operational 10 years ago. Instead, the United States has cooled by approximately 0.4 degrees Celsius, which is more than half of the claimed global warming of the twentieth century.

Do you know why WUWT's graphic is in degrees Farenheit? To make it look bigger to the ignorant.

Do you know how significant these data are given that surface warming across much of the planet slowed to a crawl over this same period? Zero, Zip, Zilch, Nada.

Do you know what the planet's total heat content did over the same period? Climbed like a big dog.

Look at the graph. Look at the fine print......the source. It has already been established that the data is bogus!! ( well documented in this forum)!!!


lOsInG

 

[editec]

A completely insignificant bit of data when it comes to the issue of GLOBAL CLIMATE.

Why?

Because that data is measuring less than 2% of the world's surface area and even that is only for the last ten years.

Divide the area of the U.S. by the area of the world:

1. Proportion of total surface area:
Area of U.S.: 3,790,000 sq. mi.
Earth's total surface area: 197,000,000 sq. mi.

3,790,000 / 197,000,000 = 0.0192385787 = about 1.9 %

2. Proportion of total land area (using total area of U.S., including a small amount of water):
Total land area of world: 57,268,900 sq. mi.

3,790,000 / 57,268,900 = 0.0661790256 = about 6.6 %

Completely meaningless data, amigo.

Nice try tho

 

[skookerasbil]

A completely insignificant bit of data when it comes to the issue of GLOBAL CLIMATE.

Why?

Because that data is measuring less than 2% of the world's surface area and even that is only for the last ten years.

Divide the area of the U.S. by the area of the world:

1. Proportion of total surface area:
Area of U.S.: 3,790,000 sq. mi.
Earth's total surface area: 197,000,000 sq. mi.

3,790,000 / 197,000,000 = 0.0192385787 = about 1.9 %

2. Proportion of total land area (using total area of U.S., including a small amount of water):
Total land area of world: 57,268,900 sq. mi.

3,790,000 / 57,268,900 = 0.0661790256 = about 6.6 %

Completely meaningless data, amigo.

Nice try tho

That's right......clearly, their only goal is to screw with the US data!!! Oh.....and I guess somehow, global warming hasn't hovered its was into the USA!!!


s0n....check DRUDGE this am......your side is losing.



Nobody cares about this shit!!

 

[Kosh]

A serious error was found in the NASA temperature data for the United States in 2007. When corrected, it was determined that the warmest year in the past 100 years was not in 1998 and 2006 as previously believed, but was 1934, followed 1998. 1921 became the third hottest year, followed by 2006 and 1933. Out of the five hottest years, three occurred in the 1920s and 30s and only two were in the past 10 years. Notice that the US data do not have the same steep increase in temperature shown in the corrupted data of Britain's Climate Research Unit's data in the graph above. This dramatically changes scientists understanding of the importance of the warming that has occurred since 1975. The period between 1995 and 2009 is no warmer than the period between 1920 and 1935. This error in the NASA data has lead to discoveries of other errors in the data which are raising concern about data integrity of NASA's Goddard Institute of Space Studies.

 

[dilloduck]

Shit----so now the kOOks are going to be telling us we have to change our entire lives because of ACC.

 

[mamooth]

Cherrypicking fallacy thread from Dave.

The sad thing is he's not bright enough to understand what a dimbulb he is. Everyone outside of his cult sees it instantly, hence the laughter, but poor Dave doesn't have a clue.

Same with almost all deniers. In their minds, if everyone is laughing at them, it can't be because they keep acting like such dumbasses. No, it has to be because of the vast global socialist conspiracy.

 

[daveman]

Government Data Show U.S. in Decade-Long Cooling

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s most accurate, up-to-date temperature data confirm the United States has been cooling for at least the past decade. The NOAA temperature data are driving a stake through the heart of alarmists claiming accelerating global warming.

Responding to widespread criticism that its temperature station readings were corrupted by poor citing issues and suspect adjustments, NOAA established a network of 114 pristinely cited temperature stations spread out fairly uniformly throughout the United States. Because the network, known as the U.S. Climate Reference Network (USCRN), is so uniformly and pristinely situated, the temperature data require no adjustments to provide an accurate nationwide temperature record. USCRN began compiling temperature data in January 2005. Now, nearly a decade later, NOAA has finally made the USCRN temperature readings available.

According to the USCRN temperature readings, U.S. temperatures are not rising at all – at least not since the network became operational 10 years ago. Instead, the United States has cooled by approximately 0.4 degrees Celsius, which is more than half of the claimed global warming of the twentieth century.

Do you know why WUWT's graphic is in degrees Farenheit? To make it look bigger to the ignorant.

Do you know how significant these data are given that surface warming across much of the planet slowed to a crawl over this same period? Zero, Zip, Zilch, Nada.

Do you know what the planet's total heat content did over the same period? Climbed like a big dog.

Do you know what the climate cult insisted the US did the last 10 years?

You morons said it's gotten warmer.

You were wrong. Reality steadfastly refuses to alter itself to follow your dogma.

Run along now, kid.

 

[daveman]

A completely insignificant bit of data when it comes to the issue of GLOBAL CLIMATE.

Why?

Because that data is measuring less than 2% of the world's surface area and even that is only for the last ten years.

Divide the area of the U.S. by the area of the world:

1. Proportion of total surface area:
Area of U.S.: 3,790,000 sq. mi.
Earth's total surface area: 197,000,000 sq. mi.

3,790,000 / 197,000,000 = 0.0192385787 = about 1.9 %

2. Proportion of total land area (using total area of U.S., including a small amount of water):
Total land area of world: 57,268,900 sq. mi.

3,790,000 / 57,268,900 = 0.0661790256 = about 6.6 %

Completely meaningless data, amigo.

Nice try tho

Oh, you mean the rest of the world is warming based on cherry-picked and fudged numbers from incorrectly sited weather stations?

You realize, don't you, you're merely highlighting the dishonesty of the AGW cult?

No. You probably don't.

 

[daveman]

A serious error was found in the NASA temperature data for the United States in 2007. When corrected, it was determined that the warmest year in the past 100 years was not in 1998 and 2006 as previously believed, but was 1934, followed 1998. 1921 became the third hottest year, followed by 2006 and 1933. Out of the five hottest years, three occurred in the 1920s and 30s and only two were in the past 10 years. Notice that the US data do not have the same steep increase in temperature shown in the corrupted data of Britain's Climate Research Unit's data in the graph above. This dramatically changes scientists understanding of the importance of the warming that has occurred since 1975. The period between 1995 and 2009 is no warmer than the period between 1920 and 1935. This error in the NASA data has lead to discoveries of other errors in the data which are raising concern about data integrity of NASA's Goddard Institute of Space Studies.

The cult wants us the believe that the vast majority of climate scientists support AGW.

They may be right...but not for the right reasons.

ALL climate science is based on the same bogus temperature figures.

Garbage in, garbage out. It's simply bad science. The cult has ZERO credibility.

 

[daveman]

Cherrypicking fallacy thread from Dave.

The sad thing is he's not bright enough to understand what a dimbulb he is. Everyone outside of his cult sees it instantly, hence the laughter, but poor Dave doesn't have a clue.

Same with almost all deniers. In their minds, if everyone is laughing at them, it can't be because they keep acting like such dumbasses. No, it has to be because of the vast global socialist conspiracy.

Lots of yappy-yappy -- but nothing to back it up.

You and your projection bullshit are dismissed.

 

[IanC]

while the US is only a small percentage of the world's land mass, and even less of the total surface, it has the best temperature coverage. there are more stations, with more complete coverage, in any one state than there are in the total area of Africa. yet Africa counts more in the global temperature because it has more area even though the records are atrocious. no warming in the US with good thermometers, lots of warming in Africa with few and poorly reporting thermometers. and even in the US the thermometers may be good but the massaging of the figures leaves a lot of questions open.

 

[SSDD]

Government Data Show U.S. in Decade-Long Cooling

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s most accurate, up-to-date temperature data confirm the United States has been cooling for at least the past decade. The NOAA temperature data are driving a stake through the heart of alarmists claiming accelerating global warming.

Responding to widespread criticism that its temperature station readings were corrupted by poor citing issues and suspect adjustments, NOAA established a network of 114 pristinely cited temperature stations spread out fairly uniformly throughout the United States. Because the network, known as the U.S. Climate Reference Network (USCRN), is so uniformly and pristinely situated, the temperature data require no adjustments to provide an accurate nationwide temperature record. USCRN began compiling temperature data in January 2005. Now, nearly a decade later, NOAA has finally made the USCRN temperature readings available.

According to the USCRN temperature readings, U.S. temperatures are not rising at all – at least not since the network became operational 10 years ago. Instead, the United States has cooled by approximately 0.4 degrees Celsius, which is more than half of the claimed global warming of the twentieth century.

Do you know why WUWT's graphic is in degrees Farenheit? To make it look bigger to the ignorant.

Do you know how significant these data are given that surface warming across much of the planet slowed to a crawl over this same period? Zero, Zip, Zilch, Nada.

Do you know what the planet's total heat content did over the same period? Climbed like a big dog.

Considering that a well situated, modern, triple redundant network that doesn't require adjustment doesn't show warming across the US, where the tamper at will network does, here in the modern US, what makes you think the networks across the globe wouldn't show cooling as well if they were the equivalent of the CRN network. Look at the global picture...the warmest places on earth, the ones that make it seem as if the earth were warming are invariably the places with the poorest most scattered data coverage....doesn't that make you wonder?

 

[SSDD]

A completely insignificant bit of data when it comes to the issue of GLOBAL CLIMATE.

Why?

Because that data is measuring less than 2% of the world's surface area and even that is only for the last ten years.

Divide the area of the U.S. by the area of the world:

1. Proportion of total surface area:
Area of U.S.: 3,790,000 sq. mi.
Earth's total surface area: 197,000,000 sq. mi.

3,790,000 / 197,000,000 = 0.0192385787 = about 1.9 %

2. Proportion of total land area (using total area of U.S., including a small amount of water):
Total land area of world: 57,268,900 sq. mi.

3,790,000 / 57,268,900 = 0.0661790256 = about 6.6 %

Completely meaningless data, amigo.

Nice try tho

Oh, you mean the rest of the world is warming based on cherry-picked and fudged numbers from incorrectly sited weather stations?

You realize, don't you, you're merely highlighting the dishonesty of the AGW cult?

No. You probably don't.

Nah...they don't realize that. They are perfectly wiling to ignore the most advanced network on the face of the earth and what it says in favor of the old tamper at will system. They never give a thought to what the data may look like if a system like CRN were in place globally. The thought is just to much for them to deal with.

 

[SSDD]

while the US is only a small percentage of the world's land mass, and even less of the total surface, it has the best temperature coverage. there are more stations, with more complete coverage, in any one state than there are in the total area of Africa. yet Africa counts more in the global temperature because it has more area even though the records are atrocious. no warming in the US with good thermometers, lots of warming in Africa with few and poorly reporting thermometers. and even in the US the thermometers may be good but the massaging of the figures leaves a lot of questions open.

The warmest places on earth are invariably the places with the poorest coverage requiring the most infilling of data...bit of land with the best coverage shows an entirely different picture but does this prompt questions on the part of warmers? Of course not.

 

[Crick]

while the US is only a small percentage of the world's land mass, and even less of the total surface

What is this statement supposed to mean Ian? What is the difference between "land mass" and "total surface"? Does the US have a larger geocentric radius than the rest of the planet?