96% of the temperature data in the U.S. is flawed? Of course it is, it isn't about accuracy, it's about advocacy....

2aguy

Diamond Member
Jul 19, 2014
111,970
52,237
2,290
We know man made global warming is a scam. They know man made global warming is a scam..... but it is a scam that grants them money and power so that scam will continue until so many people are dead from heat and cold that one day, people rise up and end it...

That’s because more than 90% of the data is “corrupted.” And the reason for that is the reality that the vast majority of thermometers that NOAA relies on are improperly installed and maintained, leading to the recording of artificially higher temperatures.

A new study, Corrupted Climate Stations: The Official U.S. Surface Temperature Record Remains Fatally Flawed, finds approximately 96 percent of U.S. temperature stations used to measure climate change fail to meet what the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) considers to be “acceptable” and uncorrupted placement by its own published standards.
The report, published by The Heartland Institute, was compiled via satellite and in-person survey visits to NOAA weather stations that contribute to the “official” land temperature data in the United States. The research shows that 96% of these stations are corrupted by localized effects of urbanization – producing heat-bias because of their close proximity to asphalt, machinery, and other heat-producing, heat-trapping, or heat-accentuating objects.


In order to produce accurate temperature readings based on NOAA’s own published standards, thermometers are supposed to be in natural, “pristine” locations like fields, forests, hilltops, etc. But Dr. Watts’ research has revealed that more than 90% of NOAA thermometers are in inappropriate places. 96% are in parking lots, on buildings, against brick walls, or in other artificial environments.
The bricks, asphalt and other human construction materials used in these environments artificially trap heat, leading to a “warming bias” in the collected data. Thermometers placed in natural settings register lower average temperatures.
That’s not to say that the cities, parking lots, and highways aren’t warmer. They clearly are. But it’s not because the planet overall is getting warmer. It’s because we build things that trap and retain more heat than Mother Nature would capture and retain if left to her own devices. This is one more excellent piece of data supporting a plan that I’ve been endorsing here for quite some time.


 
Last edited:
We know man made global warming is a scam. They know man made global warming is a scam..... but it is a scam that grants them money and power so that scam will continue until so many people are dead from heat and cold that one day, people rise up and end it...

That’s because more than 90% of the data is “corrupted.” And the reason for that is the reality that the vast majority of thermometers that NOAA relies on are improperly installed and maintained, leading to the recording of artificially higher temperatures.




In order to produce accurate temperature readings based on NOAA’s own published standards, thermometers are supposed to be in natural, “pristine” locations like fields, forests, hilltops, etc. But Dr. Watts’ research has revealed that more than 90% of NOAA thermometers are in inappropriate places. 96% are in parking lots, on buildings, against brick walls, or in other artificial environments.


Your entire OP is "opinion". I'm not sure what frightens you and the rest of your ilk about climate change? It happens. Man may not cause it, but he does exacerbate it.
Sorry, I'll trust the science. NOAA has been a standout organization for its existence.

 
Your entire OP is "opinion". I'm not sure what frightens you and the rest of your ilk about climate change? It happens. Man may not cause it, but he does exacerbate it.
Sorry, I'll trust the science. NOAA has been a standout organization for its existence.



:auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :laughing0301: :laughing0301: :laughing0301: :laughing0301: :laughing0301: :laughing0301: :laughing0301: :laughing0301:

A "stand out" organization............?:auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:

Stop....please.....I can't laugh this hard this early in the morning.......it is as corrupt an organization as you can get.....
 
I don't think we are supposed to notice the corruption of the data they use or the failure of their biased climate forecast models- just listen to them, do what they say & "trust the science".
The climate bed wetters are some of the dumbest people that ever lived.
I'd bet they are frequently targeted by Nigerian princes looking to move some money
 
We know man made global warming is a scam. They know man made global warming is a scam..... but it is a scam that grants them money and power so that scam will continue until so many people are dead from heat and cold that one day, people rise up and end it...

That’s because more than 90% of the data is “corrupted.” And the reason for that is the reality that the vast majority of thermometers that NOAA relies on are improperly installed and maintained, leading to the recording of artificially higher temperatures.




In order to produce accurate temperature readings based on NOAA’s own published standards, thermometers are supposed to be in natural, “pristine” locations like fields, forests, hilltops, etc. But Dr. Watts’ research has revealed that more than 90% of NOAA thermometers are in inappropriate places. 96% are in parking lots, on buildings, against brick walls, or in other artificial environments.
The bricks, asphalt and other human construction materials used in these environments artificially trap heat, leading to a “warming bias” in the collected data. Thermometers placed in natural settings register lower average temperatures.
That’s not to say that the cities, parking lots, and highways aren’t warmer. They clearly are. But it’s not because the planet overall is getting warmer. It’s because we build things that trap and retain more heat than Mother Nature would capture and retain if left to her own devices. This is one more excellent piece of data supporting a plan that I’ve been endorsing here for quite some time.






NON shocker to anyone paying attention the last quarter century...

The only real warming they have is Urban Heat Sink Effect. The rest of Earth data is as follows



NO WARMING in the ATMOSPHERE
NO WARMING in the OCEANS
NO ongoing NET ICE MELT
NO OCEAN RISE
NO Breakout in CANE ACTIVITY


R.f07e1807c72566c03e0787136917b2c4


 
I don't think we are supposed to notice the corruption of the data they use or the failure of their biased climate forecast models- just listen to them, do what they say & "trust the science".
The climate bed wetters are some of the dumbest people that ever lived.
I'd bet they are frequently targeted by Nigerian princes looking to move some money


trust "the science" because "the science" is not science it is taxpayer funded politicized FUDGE
 
I don't think we are supposed to notice the corruption of the data they use or the failure of their biased climate forecast models- just listen to them, do what they say & "trust the science".
The climate bed wetters are some of the dumbest people that ever lived.
I'd bet they are frequently targeted by Nigerian princes looking to move some money


If only they were just dumb..........the leadership of the movement is evil......willing to allow hundreds of millions to die from hunger, cold and heat.....all to appease their green god....
 
trust "the science" because "the science" is not science it is taxpayer funded politicized FUDGE
Butt fudge is more accurate. Nothing but a steaming pile of BS they plop on a plate for the minions that eat it up & ask for more

If only they were just dumb..........the leadership of the movement is evil......willing to allow hundreds of millions to die from hunger, cold and heat.....all to appease their green god....
Those pulling the strings know what they are doing & I doubt they actually believe their own BS.
The lemmings that follow them are just clueless rubes that these grifters use like a $2 dollar hooker
 
The Climate Change Cult has been caught faking the temperatures.

Leaked climate change emails scientist 'hid' data flaws

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2010/f…
Feb 1, 2010 · Jones and a collaborator have been accused by a climate change sceptic and researcher of scientific fraud for attempting to …

The Stunning Statistical Fraud Behind The Global …

This year has been a particularly spectacular episode of data tampering by NOAA, as they introduce nearly 2.5 degrees of fake warming since 1895." So the global warming scare is basically a...

University of East Anglia 'Climategate' scandal to be …

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-norfolk-5…
Jun 9, 2021 · The "Climategate" computer hacking scandal that rocked the scientific world is to be made into a BBC film. Hackers stole thousands of emails and documents from the University of East Anglia's...
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: EMH
We know man made global warming is a scam.
You know no such thing.
They know man made global warming is a scam.....
We know no such thing.

No one knows such a thing because it is simply not true
but it is a scam that grants them money and power
Who is "them" and what money and power have they been granted?
so that scam will continue until so many people are dead from heat and cold that one day, people rise up and end it...
The data is not flawed. People are going to die from global warming and its effects but not because anything is wrong with these data.
That is multiply refuted nonsense.
And the reason for that is the reality that the vast majority of thermometers that NOAA relies on are improperly installed and maintained, leading to the recording of artificially higher temperatures.

"
This summer, NOAA and citizen scientists will map the hottest parts of 18 communities in 14 states across the country and in one international city. Identifying these hotspots, called urban heat islands, helps local decision-makers take actions to reduce the health impacts of extreme heat, which often target the most vulnerable.

Now in its seventh year, the NOAA Urban Heat Island (UHI) mapping campaign addresses extreme heat, the number one weather-related cause of death in the U.S. for the last three decades. Urban heat islands — areas with few trees and more pavement that absorbs heat — can be up to 20 degrees fahrenheit hotter than nearby neighborhoods with more trees, grass and less black asphalt.

“The burden of heat is not shared equally in our urban areas,” said NOAA Administrator Rick Spinrad. “Gathering this type of environmental intelligence helps communities measure their hottest places so they can develop strategies to reduce the dangerous effects of heat. Community by community, we’re working to create a Climate-Ready Nation that is resilient in a changing world.”"
 
The Climate Change Cult has been caught faking the temperatures.

Leaked climate change emails scientist 'hid' data flaws

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2010/f…
Feb 1, 2010 · Jones and a collaborator have been accused by a climate change sceptic and researcher of scientific fraud for attempting to …
A climate sceptic accused...

The Stunning Statistical Fraud Behind The Global …

This year has been a particularly spectacular episode of data tampering by NOAA, as they introduce nearly 2.5 degrees of fake warming since 1895." So the global warming scare is basically a...
Investors. Not scientists, but investors.

University of East Anglia 'Climategate' scandal to be …

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-norfolk-5…
Jun 9, 2021 · The "Climategate" computer hacking scandal that rocked the scientific world is to be made into a BBC film. Hackers stole thousands of emails and documents from the University of East Anglia's...
All the investigation by the US and UK governments and several universities found NOTHING WRONG WITH THE DATA.
 
Atmospheric temp data = satellites and balloons - both showed NO WARMING during rising Co2 = THEORY REJECTED


but crick's heroes FUDGED the data with laughable excuses, and crick to date has shown no ability to differentiate fudge and data...
 
We know man made global warming is a scam.

Your proof? ... are you just being a bitch or do you have actual science to back up your bullshit claims? ...

Bubba didn't finish Middle School ...

NOAA posts the EXACT procedure they use to determine this data ... would you please go over that procedure and tell us what you disagree with? ... keep in mind, this data is intended for PILOTS and FARMERS ... so give or take FIVE WHOLE DEGREES ... and we're still good ... do you nothing of science ...

Better .. find me a station that DOESN'T fit the temperature curve NOAA posts ... let's see how big of a LIAR you are ...
 
Your proof? ... are you just being a bitch or do you have actual science to back up your bullshit claims? ...

Bubba didn't finish Middle School ...

NOAA posts the EXACT procedure they use to determine this data ... would you please go over that procedure and tell us what you disagree with? ... keep in mind, this data is intended for PILOTS and FARMERS ... so give or take FIVE WHOLE DEGREES ... and we're still good ... do you nothing of science ...

Better .. find me a station that DOESN'T fit the temperature curve NOAA posts ... let's see how big of a LIAR you are ...


No....NOAA is made up of human beings, and they are corrupt......we saw the scandal years ago, and yet they are still trusted.....Climategate was real, and it shows that the bureaucrats are incentivized to make up their data...
 
No....NOAA is made up of human beings, and they are corrupt......we saw the scandal years ago, and yet they are still trusted.....Climategate was real, and it shows that the bureaucrats are incentivized to make up their data...
What scandal did you see? NOAA was not involved in Climategate.
 
Your entire OP is "opinion". I'm not sure what frightens you and the rest of your ilk about climate change? It happens. Man may not cause it, but he does exacerbate it.
Sorry, I'll trust the science. NOAA has been a standout organization for its existence.

You are confused Moon Bat.

No, it is not opinion. It is a fact.

We have caught the scammers using fraudulent and cherry picked data. No once but many times. They admit doing it. Including government agencies like NOAA, NASA and the UN Climate Commission.

If AGW was real there would be no need for lies and manipulated data but we see it all the time.

If AGW was real then all those dire predictions made a couple of decades would come true but they haven't.

Post glacial climate change is real but this AGW crap is nothing but a scam and the article is correct. It is you and all the other stupid uneducated Moon Bats that are confused.

You Moon Bats are just as confused about Climate Science as you about Economics, History, Biology, Ethics and the Constitution.
 
You are confused Moon Bat.

No, it is not opinion. It is a fact.

We have caught the scammers using fraudulent and cherry picked data. No once but many times. They admit doing it. Including government agencies like NOAA, NASA and the UN Climate Commission.

If AGW was real there would be no need for lies and manipulated data but we see it all the time.

If AGW was real then all those dire predictions made a couple of decades would come true but they haven't.

Post glacial climate change is real but this AGW crap is nothing but a scam and the article is correct. It is you and all the other stupid uneducated Moon Bats that are confused.

You Moon Bats are just as confused about Climate Science as you about Economics, History, Biology, Ethics and the Constitution.
If it's a fact, you should have no problem posting some links or quotes supporting your claim, as USMB rules REQUIRE.
 
You are confused Moon Bat.

No, it is not opinion. It is a fact.

We have caught the scammers using fraudulent and cherry picked data. No once but many times. They admit doing it. Including government agencies like NOAA, NASA and the UN Climate Commission.

If AGW was real there would be no need for lies and manipulated data but we see it all the time.

If AGW was real then all those dire predictions made a couple of decades would come true but they haven't.

Post glacial climate change is real but this AGW crap is nothing but a scam and the article is correct. It is you and all the other stupid uneducated Moon Bats that are confused.

You Moon Bats are just as confused about Climate Science as you about Economics, History, Biology, Ethics and the Constitution.
Climate change is real. I understand this scares you but hiding your head in the sand won't make it go away.
If your own Defense Dept says it's an issue....it's probably an issue. :)
 
No....NOAA is made up of human beings, and they are corrupt......we saw the scandal years ago, and yet they are still trusted.....Climategate was real, and it shows that the bureaucrats are incentivized to make up their data...


Here ya go, Captain, we have two and only two measures of atmospheric temps, satellites and balloons. Both showed no warming in the atmosphere during rising Co2 and hence disproved the theory that increasing atmospheric Co2 causes atmospheric warming....





satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.

Scientists were left with two choices: either the atmosphere wasn't warming up, or something was wrong with the data.



NO CONFLICT THERE. ADMIT increasing Co2 in the atmosphere did not warm atmosphere, terminate Co2 funding, file for unemployment...

OR

FUDGE THE DATA and keep BILKING THE TAXPAYER


TOUGH CHOICE ....
 

Forum List

Back
Top