ShootSpeeders
Gold Member
- May 13, 2012
- 20,232
- 2,363
- 280
- Banned
- #21
Cool,
no one should have their rights taken away.
HAHAHA. So you're opposed to prisons!!??? THINK
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Cool,
no one should have their rights taken away.
I applaud JB for this move. Its amazing how you conservatives hate people having the right to vote.Gov. Brown Signs Bill Allowing Felons To Vote In Jail
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) – Gov. Jerry Brown has agreed to restore the voting rights of convicted felons serving time in county jails.
------------------------------------------------------------------
This guy has totally gone off the deep end of lunatic syndrome. You can bet most of them are Democratic morons no doubt.
Good then they also should get their 2nd amendment right back too.Cool,
no one should have their rights taken away.
Good then they also should get their 2nd amendment right back too.Cool,
no one should have their rights taken away.
Cool, so if someone took away one of your loved ones right, say to live, they shouldn't have their right to vote taken away?Cool,
no one should have their rights taken away.
Cool, so if someone took away one of your loved ones right, say to live, they shouldn't have their right to vote taken away?Cool,
no one should have their rights taken away.
Good then they also should get their 2nd amendment right back too.Cool,
no one should have their rights taken away.
Gov. Brown Signs Bill Allowing Felons To Vote In Jail
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) – Gov. Jerry Brown has agreed to restore the voting rights of convicted felons serving time in county jails.
------------------------------------------------------------------
This guy has totally gone off the deep end of lunatic syndrome. You can bet most of them are Democratic morons no doubt.
Gov. Brown Signs Bill Allowing Felons To Vote In Jail
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) – Gov. Jerry Brown has agreed to restore the voting rights of convicted felons serving time in county jails.
------------------------------------------------------------------
This guy has totally gone off the deep end of lunatic syndrome. You can bet most of them are Democratic morons no doubt.
I wonder which side of the political spectrum they're going to vote?Gov. Brown Signs Bill Allowing Felons To Vote In Jail
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) – Gov. Jerry Brown has agreed to restore the voting rights of convicted felons serving time in county jails.
------------------------------------------------------------------
This guy has totally gone off the deep end of lunatic syndrome. You can bet most of them are Democratic morons no doubt.
Ha ha ha! You must be high.I wonder which side of the political spectrum they're going to vote?Gov. Brown Signs Bill Allowing Felons To Vote In Jail
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) – Gov. Jerry Brown has agreed to restore the voting rights of convicted felons serving time in county jails.
------------------------------------------------------------------
This guy has totally gone off the deep end of lunatic syndrome. You can bet most of them are Democratic morons no doubt.
Since there are only 2 parties I'll say it's a 50-50 chance
I suspect most posters here can't even say what a felony is. It's any crime for which you could (not did, but could) have gotten a year or more in prison. That is a very low bar and should be raised to say 15 years.
The laws of the land still apply to them, so their voice should not be silenced.When you violate the rights of other citizens by committing a crime, your's should get take away as well, part of which is the right to vote.Cool,
no one should have their rights taken away.
"Unlike most laws that burden the right of citizens to vote based on some form of social status, felony disenfranchisement laws have been held to be constitutional. In Richardson v. Ramirez (1974), the United States Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of felon disenfranchisement statutes, finding that the practice did not deny equal protection to disenfranchised voters. The Court looked to Section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which proclaims that States which deny the vote to male citizens, except by "participation in rebellion, or other crime," will suffer a reduction in representation. Based on this language, the Court found that this amounted to an "affirmative sanction" of the practice of felon disenfranchisement, and the 14th Amendment could not prohibit in one section that which is expressly authorized in another."
The laws of the land say that your right to vote can get taken away when you take away other people's right to freedom, life, property, and Liberty.The laws of the land still apply to them, so their voice should not be silenced.When you violate the rights of other citizens by committing a crime, your's should get take away as well, part of which is the right to vote.Cool,
no one should have their rights taken away.
"Unlike most laws that burden the right of citizens to vote based on some form of social status, felony disenfranchisement laws have been held to be constitutional. In Richardson v. Ramirez (1974), the United States Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of felon disenfranchisement statutes, finding that the practice did not deny equal protection to disenfranchised voters. The Court looked to Section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which proclaims that States which deny the vote to male citizens, except by "participation in rebellion, or other crime," will suffer a reduction in representation. Based on this language, the Court found that this amounted to an "affirmative sanction" of the practice of felon disenfranchisement, and the 14th Amendment could not prohibit in one section that which is expressly authorized in another."