GOP, Morning Joe blast Obama for not being an effective "leader".

R

rdean

Guest
Today's Morning Joe had JS going on and on about how this gun legislation should have been a "slam dunk" because 90% of Americans wanted it.

He said Obama should have threatened Senators and told them that he will "make calls" to ensure they will fail at fundraising. That he would personally support their opponents. That he should, how did they put it? Make them "bend over"?

Now this is the hilarious part. The people on the show described the legislation as very "mild" that does almost nothing.

So Republicans are calling Obama weak and saying he should spend all this political capital for legislation that would only pass the Senate? For sure would never pass the House? That everyone refers to as "weak and mild"?

See? This is why he's president. He understands "strategy". He understands which fight to fight. Now all those Republicans will have to face the voters. You can see them now with a split screen, side by side with the al Qaeda terrorist video, both agreeing on how easy it is to get guns. And they both want them for the same reason. To kill Americans. Clearly you don't go deer hunting with a gun that will only leave half a deer.

Obama will have led us out of two wars. In spite of Republicans, he has gone after al Qaeda and taken them down one at a time using modern technology. He is leading us out of recession with Republicans fighting every step of the way. Obama has chosen to fight China when Romney moved jobs to the China the very month of the election.

WTO hands Obama victory in U.S.-China steel case

And he would waste his political capital on something "mild"?

In fact, the reason 90% of Americans are for it is because of what it's called. How many actually understand it would do basically nothing?
 
awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww, they are still whining because the Dear leader lost?

how cute

and don't ya love how there was this 90%, wonder why they just didn't make it 100%..
they are so FULL OF SHIT, that's why
 
coffee.gif
What else is new?
 
it would end the end the gun show loop holes which isnt nothing.

but other than that I agree.

Obama jsut keeps out manuvering them at every turn even when it not at first apperent why he making the moves he does make.


Hes fighting in a maze of insane republiicans and disfunctional government while trying to improve the maze by taking down whatever walls he can.


He will go down as great president.
 
it would end the end the gun show loop holes which isnt nothing.

But other than that i agree.

Obama jsut keeps out manuvering them at every turn even when it not at first apperent why he making the moves he does make.


Hes fighting in a maze of insane republiicans and disfunctional government while trying to improve the maze by taking down whatever walls he can.


He will go down as great president.

lol,
 
awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww, they are still whining because the Dear leader lost?

how cute

and don't ya love how there was this 90%, wonder why they just didn't make it 100%..
they are so FULL OF SHIT, that's why

hey steppy go step abnd fetch it for your bush.


heres a little fact for you.

Your party lied for months about how all the polls were "fixed" nfor Obama and that Robmoney was really going to win by 5%


Now those lies made you feel really good while you were losing an election but they turned out to be nothing but lies huh?


Now you want us to buy more of your lies?
 
awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww, they are still whining because the Dear leader lost?

how cute

and don't ya love how there was this 90%, wonder why they just didn't make it 100%..
they are so FULL OF SHIT, that's why

hey steppy go step abnd fetch it for your bush.


heres a little fact for you.

Your party lied for months about how all the polls were "fixed" nfor Obama and that Robmoney was really going to win by 5%


Now those lies made you feel really good while you were losing an election but they turned out to be nothing but lies huh?


Now you want us to buy more of your lies?

LOL, your mouse again?
 
Today's Morning Joe had JS going on and on about how this gun legislation should have been a "slam dunk" because 90% of Americans wanted it.

He said Obama should have threatened Senators and told them that he will "make calls" to ensure they will fail at fundraising. That he would personally support their opponents. That he should, how did they put it? Make them "bend over"?

Now this is the hilarious part. The people on the show described the legislation as very "mild" that does almost nothing.

So Republicans are calling Obama weak and saying he should spend all this political capital for legislation that would only pass the Senate? For sure would never pass the House? That everyone refers to as "weak and mild"?

See? This is why he's president. He understands "strategy". He understands which fight to fight. Now all those Republicans will have to face the voters. You can see them now with a split screen, side by side with the al Qaeda terrorist video, both agreeing on how easy it is to get guns. And they both want them for the same reason. To kill Americans. Clearly you don't go deer hunting with a gun that will only leave half a deer.

Obama will have led us out of two wars. In spite of Republicans, he has gone after al Qaeda and taken them down one at a time using modern technology. He is leading us out of recession with Republicans fighting every step of the way. Obama has chosen to fight China when Romney moved jobs to the China the very month of the election.

WTO hands Obama victory in U.S.-China steel case

And he would waste his political capital on something "mild"?

In fact, the reason 90% of Americans are for it is because of what it's called. How many actually understand it would do basically nothing?

You should have seen all the faces he was making during his followup address when he was administered one of the biggest smack downs of his political life. He and Joe Biden were priceless.

This political campaign rhetoric is old. Romney has moved on, you have not. One question, when Obama failed to pass this gun legislation, you suddenly pivot to his successes against the Chinese, which have nothing to do with gun legislation, nor does it prove that there is a necessary stratagem to his madness. How is this relevant?

Obama started two more wars and one more than Bush started. You can't honestly sit there and try to play that card. Once again, what does this have to do with gun control? Stop trying to cover his failure with other alleged successes in his career. Get over it, he lost, Liberals lost, the rights of law abiding gun owners won.
 
Last edited:
awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww, they are still whining because the Dear leader lost?

how cute

and don't ya love how there was this 90%, wonder why they just didn't make it 100%..
they are so FULL OF SHIT, that's why

hey steppy go step abnd fetch it for your bush.


heres a little fact for you.

Your party lied for months about how all the polls were "fixed" nfor Obama and that Robmoney was really going to win by 5%


Now those lies made you feel really good while you were losing an election but they turned out to be nothing but lies huh?


Now you want us to buy more of your lies?

LOL, your mouse again?

Why do you criticize others when you clearly believe in so much loony right wing bullshit. Or didn't you know it was bullshit? When facts come out, it doesn't embarrass you? It should.
 
Today's Morning Joe had JS going on and on about how this gun legislation should have been a "slam dunk" because 90% of Americans wanted it.

He said Obama should have threatened Senators and told them that he will "make calls" to ensure they will fail at fundraising. That he would personally support their opponents. That he should, how did they put it? Make them "bend over"?

Now this is the hilarious part. The people on the show described the legislation as very "mild" that does almost nothing.

So Republicans are calling Obama weak and saying he should spend all this political capital for legislation that would only pass the Senate? For sure would never pass the House? That everyone refers to as "weak and mild"?

See? This is why he's president. He understands "strategy". He understands which fight to fight. Now all those Republicans will have to face the voters. You can see them now with a split screen, side by side with the al Qaeda terrorist video, both agreeing on how easy it is to get guns. And they both want them for the same reason. To kill Americans. Clearly you don't go deer hunting with a gun that will only leave half a deer.

Obama will have led us out of two wars. In spite of Republicans, he has gone after al Qaeda and taken them down one at a time using modern technology. He is leading us out of recession with Republicans fighting every step of the way. Obama has chosen to fight China when Romney moved jobs to the China the very month of the election.

WTO hands Obama victory in U.S.-China steel case

And he would waste his political capital on something "mild"?

In fact, the reason 90% of Americans are for it is because of what it's called. How many actually understand it would do basically nothing?

You should have seen all the faces he was making during his followup address when he was administered one of the biggest smack downs of his political life. He and Joe Biden were priceless.

This political campaign rhetoric is old. Romney has moved on, you have not. One question, when Obama failed to pass this gun legislation, you suddenly pivot to his successes against the Chinese, which have nothing to do with gun legislation, nor does it prove that there is a necessary stratagem to his madness.

Obama started two more wars and one more than Bush started. You can't honestly sit there and try to play that card. Once again, what does this have to do with gun control? Stop trying to cover his failure with other alleged successes in his career. Get over it, he lost, Liberals lost, the rights of law abiding gun owners won.

Losing a vote on legislation Republicans refer to as "weak and mild" is one of the biggest loses of his career? Winning in the World Trade Court is nothing? Obama "started" THREE wars? And I lied even when I provided a reputable link?

Dude, you are seriously deranged.
 
hey steppy go step abnd fetch it for your bush.


heres a little fact for you.

Your party lied for months about how all the polls were "fixed" nfor Obama and that Robmoney was really going to win by 5%


Now those lies made you feel really good while you were losing an election but they turned out to be nothing but lies huh?


Now you want us to buy more of your lies?

LOL, your mouse again?

Why do you criticize others when you clearly believe in so much loony right wing bullshit. Or didn't you know it was bullshit? When facts come out, it doesn't embarrass you? It should.

you posted this crap about how 90% of Americans wanted this and you all know that was a LIE...YOU took on damn poll from abc or cbs or something and tried to turn it into how all the people in this country wanted Obama to DO SOMETHING against us..
you are the one who can't see, bullshit...you are faithful about spreading it around though
 
The thing I'm excited about for today is Glenn Beck sycophants being disappointed yet again.

Seems to me that you two are the ones who are disappointed. Why this thread guys? Huh?

...DISAPPOINTED? Nah, I bet it goes a lot farther and deeper than that. You people just can't stand to lose.

:badgrin:

You understand that if President Obama remains President in spite of the big bad WMD that Glenn Beck claims to be releasing today that the idiots dumb enough to listen to Beck will be disappoint and Beck will be discredited yet again? Or do obvious things tend to regularly fly above your dome?
 
LOL, your mouse again?

Why do you criticize others when you clearly believe in so much loony right wing bullshit. Or didn't you know it was bullshit? When facts come out, it doesn't embarrass you? It should.

you posted this crap about how 90% of Americans wanted this and you all know that was a LIE...YOU took on damn poll from abc or cbs or something and tried to turn it into how all the people in this country wanted Obama to DO SOMETHING against us..
you are the one who can't see, bullshit...you are faithful about spreading it around though


90 percent of Americans want expanded background checks on guns. Why isn?t this a political slam dunk?

Over 90 percent of Americans support gun background checks: poll | Reuters

9 in 10 back universal gun background checks - Political Eye - CBS News

Steffy, Steffy, Steffy. You have just won this years title of "Chlamydia Swirl".

For lying, calling others a liar and being too ignorant to look it up on Google.

kori.jpg
 
Where did this 90% stuff come from? Media Matters? The left's assumption that 90% of Americans who allegedly support restrictive gun laws and will forget about it next election is insulting. Politicians know their constituents and they know that 90% is a myth and Americans are a hell of a lot smarter than the ignorant left, with their phony push-polls, give them credit for.
 
Where did this 90% stuff come from? Media Matters? The left's assumption that 90% of Americans who allegedly support restrictive gun laws and will forget about it next election is insulting. Politicians know their constituents and they know that 90% is a myth and Americans are a hell of a lot smarter than the ignorant left, with their phony push-polls, give them credit for.

Why are you asking me? Don't you know how to use Google?

The first time I even heard that number was from Fox News.
 
Today's Morning Joe had JS going on and on about how this gun legislation should have been a "slam dunk" because 90% of Americans wanted it.

He said Obama should have threatened Senators and told them that he will "make calls" to ensure they will fail at fundraising. That he would personally support their opponents. That he should, how did they put it? Make them "bend over"?

Now this is the hilarious part. The people on the show described the legislation as very "mild" that does almost nothing.

So Republicans are calling Obama weak and saying he should spend all this political capital for legislation that would only pass the Senate? For sure would never pass the House? That everyone refers to as "weak and mild"?

See? This is why he's president. He understands "strategy". He understands which fight to fight. Now all those Republicans will have to face the voters. You can see them now with a split screen, side by side with the al Qaeda terrorist video, both agreeing on how easy it is to get guns. And they both want them for the same reason. To kill Americans. Clearly you don't go deer hunting with a gun that will only leave half a deer.

Obama will have led us out of two wars. In spite of Republicans, he has gone after al Qaeda and taken them down one at a time using modern technology. He is leading us out of recession with Republicans fighting every step of the way. Obama has chosen to fight China when Romney moved jobs to the China the very month of the election.

WTO hands Obama victory in U.S.-China steel case

And he would waste his political capital on something "mild"?

In fact, the reason 90% of Americans are for it is because of what it's called. How many actually understand it would do basically nothing?

It's awfully strange how he is a "weak leader" and a "dictator" at the same time, huh?
 

Forum List

Back
Top