Sherlock Holmes
Gold Member
- Jul 1, 2024
- 13,698
- 5,464
- 208
- Thread starter
- #141
No, the trial was widely reported as was the outcome.Errr, but, all that was mentioned in the article is the banner. So, where are you getting that he is dangerous to the church?
You made the claim, I'm asking you what you based it on.
Only the jury saw all the evidence.The complete failure to describe any harm that justifies the massive penalty laid on the Proud Boys.
The statutes they violated carry unlimited punitive damages.ALL we have heard of, is the banner and "other vandalism".
This level of punishment, it seems like it would be Just, if the church was at least, mostly destroyed.
The jury did and I agree with them.So, laws passed to deal with mass murderers, are instead brought down on banner tearer uppers....
And you support this?
Where did I say anything contrary?But, lot of white people opposed segregation and before that slavery. And fought against it, often paying quite a price up to and including DYING for it.
That does not serve as proof that the empire was not white supremacist - both things can be true at the same time.So, shitcanning what they have to say about it, because of their race, seems, very wrong. Racist even.
w.s. implies that the King of england pushed policy to server the interests fo white people as a whole, while keeping down the non-whites of the empire.
Yet, the king of england, was happy to deny white people in his own nation of ENGLAND, their full rights, let alone the white people of scotland or ireland, or even the American colonies, or the Austrialians, or the Canadians....
Who have I smeared?If he was a w.s., he was pretty bad at it. You seem to be just smearing people with that label, very recklessly.
I agree, how does this show that the United States before and after independence was not white supremacist and still is?I always thought of Imperialism as an intersically selfish system, set up to enrich the very top leadership of the empire, at the expense of pretty much everyone not them, with the price for empire paid, by pretty much everyone not them.
I really doubt that the king of england of say, 1770 felt any kinship or loyalty towards say... the average white farmer of say... colonial Ontairo.
The constitution was drafted and ratified by white men, most of British ancestry, The declaration of independence is the same, no black people, no native Americans participated and that's because these men - like the empire they emanated from - were white supremacist.

