Goodbye Proud Boys

Last edited:
Sherlock Holmes said:
You need to get out more, meet some Jews, learn about Zionism.
Yea.
But your racist Arab palestinazis still target these non zionist ultra orthodox Jews to murder them.
 
ARAB PALESTINAZIS

THEN

AND

NOW




E1dG7I-XMAAiEUm (1).webp


images - 2025-01-29T185952.654.jpeg
Hk2nTMBfp_13_0_1087_612_0_large.jpg
J0Z1ZCgdG1M85C.jpg
sydsyn.jpg
GUIqQs3XwAAoSMA (1).jpeg
IMG_5705.jpeg
Screenshot-2024-08-22-at-12.29.17 PM-696x327.png

gazaswastika (1).jpg
fffff-1024x640.jpg
GPJWMJEXgAAa3wW (1).jpeg
 

Attachments

  • download (72).webp
    download (72).webp
    1.8 KB · Views: 13
Last edited:
How does a church own the term “Proud Boys”? What a ridiculous ruling from a lunatic judge that will be overturned.

What a ridiculous comment from a lunatic Magamunchkin. No change of it being overruled.
 
Good to see some good old fashioned law and order:
---Defiant Proud Boys Founder Vows to Seek Vengeance Against Black Church---

 
NAZISM AND ARAB PALESTINE SINCE 1932


1932:

"Palestine Arabs Are with Hitler in His Enmity to Jews Says Grand Mufti’s Organ.."
March 31, 1932.

____

1933:

"Noble Hitler" — Says "Falastin " — The Palestine Post 22 May 1933

View attachment 1076860

___


1934-1936: Arabs boycott Jews with Swastikas

gunther_in_1939-_hitler_is_tremendously_popular_with_the_arabs-_the_greatest_contemporary_arab-png.1029757


Arabs Use Swastika in Fight for Trade of Jews in Holy Land.
JTA, Aug 14, 1934 .

___


1936:

Hitler's "Mein Kampf" in Arabic best seller in Palestine, Iraq, Syria and other Arabic land...

img-20241029-wa0002-jpg.1033166


The Canadian Jewish Chronicle, Dec 4, 1936 (p.7)

____


1937:

All Arabs in Palestine celebrate Muhammad's birthday with Hitler photos...

New York Times, May 23, 1937.

gunther_in_1939-_hitler_is_tremendously_popular_with_the_arabs-_the_greatest_contemporary_arab-png.1029759


___


Arabs Hail Hitler As Racial Friend (Sep. 1938)

gunther_in_1939-_hitler_is_tremendously_popular_with_the_arabs-_the_greatest_contemporary_arab-png.1029753


Prescott Evening Courier, Sep 13, 1938 (p.1)


_____


Goebbels in 1938: "in Palestine... the Arabs admire the fuhrer as though he were holy".

Zimmermann, Moshe. Germans Against Germans: The Fate of the Jews, 1938–1945. United States, Indiana University Press, 2022, p. 201.

600px-1938-_goebbels-_wrote_in_diary-__in_palestine-_riots_with_multiple_fatalities_again-_it_-jpg.1032654


____


Journalist John Gunther in 1939: "Hitler is tremendously popular with the Arabs... The greatest contemporary Arab hero is – Adolf Hitler."

Gunther, John. Inside Asia. United Kingdom, Harper, 1939, p.528.

gunther_in_1939-_hitler_is_tremendously_popular_with_the_arabs-_the_greatest_contemporary_arab-png.1029752


Link

____


1941 poll: 88% of Palestine Arabs for Hitler.

Nakba was result of Palestinians backing Nazis during WWII.

gunther_in_1939-_hitler_is_tremendously_popular_with_the_arabs-_the_greatest_contemporary_arab-png.1029755


____


Photographic Evidence Shows Palestinian Leader Amin al-Husseini at a Nazi Concentration Camp
An analysis of photographs sold at a Jerusalem auction house offers new insight into the role of foreign accomplices in Hitler’s Final Solution

gunther_in_1939-_hitler_is_tremendously_popular_with_the_arabs-_the_greatest_contemporary_arab-png.1029756


____


Palestine pan Arab leader, the Mufti: 1942, planned crematorium in the holy land.

chrome_screenshot_oct-28-2024-8_12_44-am-edt-png.1032658



____


CONFESSIONS:

Ahmad Shukeiri (Shukairy, Shuqayri):

We prayed and cheered for Hitler.

*Encounter. United Kingdom, Encounter Limited, 1972, p.76 .

*Kedourie, Elie. Arabic Political Memoirs and Other Studies. United Kingdom, Taylor & Francis, 2012, p. 190 .

*Milstein, Uri. History of the War of Independence: A nation girds for war. United Kingdom, University Press of America, 1996, p. 160.

Aḥmad Shuqayrī, Beirut: Dār al-Nahār, 1969, p.196:
"Our sympathies were with the Axis countries, headed by Hitler who led them from victory to victory. With our sympathies, our prayers were for victory for Germany."

content-2024-10-29t164618-822-png.1033330


_____


PLO:


img-20241029-wa0008-jpg.1033305


PLO Official: We Supported the Nazis in WWII. INN, Dec 9, 2013.

Former political bureau head of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) removes any doubt over Arab support for Nazi Germany....
Qaddoumi replied, “Germany, yes. This was common among the Palestinians, especially since our enemy was Zionism, and we saw that Zionism was hostile to Germany, and vice versa.”
These remarks are just the latest evidence of the Arab support for Nazis and for genocide of Jews....



1948:

Hitler's army are active with many groups of Arab invaders in Palestine.

Palestine. (1948). United States: AZC, vol. 5, p. 31.


content-2024-11-07t110451-860-png.1038201



____


1970s/1980s


img-20241110-wa0003-jpg.1040051


Report Confirms Cooperation Between Neo-nazis and PLO.
The annual report of the West German security services released here today for the first time officially confirms that there is cooperation between neo-Nazis in this country and the Palestine Liberation Organization.
August 11, 1981

_____


Today

'Wake up Hitler, there are still people to burn,' in Palestinian textbooks.
Despite promises to the contrary, UNRWA continues to employ educational staff that routinely advocate hatred and violence against Jews, even going so far as praising Hitler; 'UNRWA is fully culpable in this fiasco,' says UN watchdog.

Itamar Eichner | published: 03.15.23 .

___


img-20241110-wa0004-jpg.1040052


Why Nazis attend Palestinian college rallies.
Nov 9, 2023 — Why Nazis attend Palestinian college rallies ... Why are white supremacist and neo-Nazi groups popping up at pro-Palestinian...

__

De-Nazify the Palestinian leadership
Moderates can only emerge if the dark legacy of the Mufti is expunged.

(Sep. 24, 2023 / JNS)

__

Mein Kampf in Gaza—and Beyond.
In more recent years, Hitler’s manifesto has continued to enjoy considerable popularity in the Arab world.
November 25, 2023.

__

No need to apologize: Hamas are indeed the New Nazis.
The PalestiNazis, if we are to put this in a nutshell, aspire to complete what the Nazis failed to do – the destruction of the Jewish people. The time has come for us to finally take them seriously and simply believe them, that they fully intend to do what they say. As now, it is not only their words that speak for themselves, but their actions too.

03-03-2024.

"Hitler" – the preacher Massoud Rian once informed his audience – "was sent by Allah to punish the Jews for their bad behavior... and the Jews well and truly deserve their punishment." Rian delivered his inflammatory filth as part of the "enlightened" Jewish-Arab struggle against the demolition of the illegal construction site of Khan al-Ahmar, not far from the location of the fatal terrorist attack perpetrated by three PalestiNazis near the town of Ma'ale Adumim just last week. His "illuminating" words were broadcast live on Palestinian TV.
Hitler (of cursed memory) has a number of advocates among the Palestinians. And not only among Hamas.

__

...calls out student 'Hitlers,' antisemitism on college campuses: 'Open your eyes'...



__
 
Good.

Tarrio is nothing but a nark anywho.

That speaks to the fact that this is just a hang-out. And folks wonder why and how the QAnon nonsense started. smh


Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio was an FBI informant​

This article is more than 4 years old
Extremist leader repeatedly worked undercover for investigators after his arrest in 2012, former prosecutor and court files reveal


Which, raises all kinds of questions about what the fbi knew, when they knew it and why they did nothing to warn the capitol police.


OR, even more obviously, if they had that kind of control of the Proud BOys, why didn't they just have the guy order them to stand down?
 
Which, raises all kinds of questions about what the fbi knew, when they knew it and why they did nothing to warn the capitol police.


OR, even more obviously, if they had that kind of control of the Proud BOys, why didn't they just have the guy order them to stand down?
Why were the CP not allowed to use fire arms?
 
Why were the CP not allowed to use fire arms?


The police have not been using shooting of rioters as a response for a very long time. Indeed, I don't think in my lifetime.


It's really a very odd question. Did they use gunfire to disperse any of the hundreds of lefty riots, of the trump era? I saw video from many riots, and never saw anything like that. I heard no reports of mass causaulties from rioters. THe death toll, though tragic, certainly doesn't seem to reflect anything like the numbers one would expect if the police were gunning down the rioters like dogs.


How does this relate to my point(s) regarding the leader of the proud boys supposedly being a fbi informant?
 
The police have not been using shooting of rioters as a response for a very long time. Indeed, I don't think in my lifetime.


It's really a very odd question. Did they use gunfire to disperse any of the hundreds of lefty riots, of the trump era? I saw video from many riots, and never saw anything like that. I heard no reports of mass causaulties from rioters. THe death toll, though tragic, certainly doesn't seem to reflect anything like the numbers one would expect if the police were gunning down the rioters like dogs.


How does this relate to my point(s) regarding the leader of the proud boys supposedly being a fbi informant?
Yes, the police should have had far more information.
 
Yes, the police should have had far more information.


Are you sure they didn't? Are you sure the fbi did not pass along everything they had?

Maybe the failure is on the part of the capitol police that... for some reason dismissed the reports of how angry and aggressive the Proud BOys and the Oath Keepers were.


It really looks like AT BEST, someone really, really, REALLY, fucked up, and that person should bde held to account for their incompetence, and the results of that incompetence.


It is also well within the realm of possiblity, that the fbi wanted trouble, so that they could get ARRESTS from the investment of all their assets and money.


That would be a different type of failure, a more serious one, and one that would also need the person or people responsible held to account and more importantly REMOVED FROM ANY POSITION TO DO MORE HARM.


Yet, as a society, we seem unconcerned about this.....
 
Correll appears not to be sure of whethery the FBI did or did not have info. Right?


Correct.

It SEEMS like they should have had COMPLETE knowledge of what was planned.


But if that is the case, then their lack of action makes no sense or raises many questions.


If they did NOT have ALL the information, then why didn't they? Did their asset betray them? If that is all it is, then why not release that information and bring the hammer down on him?


OR, does this mean that the riot was an UNPLANNED spontaneous event? If that is the case, then the public should have been informed of that and it casts a very dark shadow on ALL the following discussions from the Biden Administration about the supposed insurrection.
 
Dangerous.

True. We know that he is prepared to tear up large pieces of paper.


It is very brave of that black church to use their political allies to bring down the power of the state against their political enemies.
 
15th post
True. We know that he is prepared to tear up large pieces of paper.
The jury didn't find them guilt of that though.
It is very brave of that black church to use their political allies to bring down the power of the state against their political enemies.
They used the Ku Klux Klan Act and DC hate crime statutes, grown men who do that and act that way must be punished to the full extent of the law.

The US has always been white supremacist, ask any black person.
 
The jury didn't find them guilt of that though.

Are you implying that he committed more serious acts of violence, that shows that he should be feared by the black church? And if so, what were those acts of violence?


They used the Ku Klux Klan Act and DC hate crime statutes, grown men who do that and act that way must be punished to the full extent of the law.

You're conflating the destruction of a banner, with the crimes of the KLAN, back when they actually had the numbers and political protection to be dangerous?


So, the Proud BOys attacked this church supposedly. How many people did they kill or lynch? Since you set the bar here, of the freaking KKK.



The US has always been white supremacist, ask any black person.

Now THAT'S a lot to unpack.


I think I will just ask, do you not ask any white people, because white people are too dumb to know, or because you assume that white people are too white supremacist to be trusted?

Or is your answer something else? I don't want to limit your answers.
 
Are you implying that he committed more serious acts of violence, that shows that he should be feared by the black church? And if so, what were those acts of violence?
No, I'm saying exactly what I said.
You're conflating the destruction of a banner, with the crimes of the KLAN, back when they actually had the numbers and political protection to be dangerous?
The Jury found them guilty and they saw all relevant evidence, you and I have not so on what basis can you imply the conviction wasn't sound?
So, the Proud BOys attacked this church supposedly. How many people did they kill or lynch? Since you set the bar here, of the freaking KKK.
Nobody was killed and nobody said anybody was. The activity was filmed.
Now THAT'S a lot to unpack.

I think I will just ask, do you not ask any white people, because white people are too dumb to know, or because you assume that white people are too white supremacist to be trusted?
White people have not been the victims of segregation here as have blacks, their experiences are well documented.
Or is your answer something else? I don't want to limit your answers.
The US was since before independence, a white supremacist society as were many colonies created by the British Empire all over the world. The British Empire was the most expansive empire in human history and all of it was founded on white supremacy. If this is new to you I must ask why?
 
No, I'm saying exactly what I said.

Errr, but, all that was mentioned in the article is the banner. So, where are you getting that he is dangerous to the church?

You made the claim, I'm asking you what you based it on.



The Jury found them guilty and they saw all relevant evidence, you and I have not so on what basis can you imply the conviction wasn't sound?

The complete failure to describe any harm that justifies the massive penalty laid on the Proud Boys.

ALL we have heard of, is the banner and "other vandalism".

This level of punishment, it seems like it would be Just, if the church was at least, mostly destroyed.



Nobody was killed and nobody said anybody was. The activity was filmed.

So, laws passed to deal with mass murderers, are instead brought down on banner tearer uppers....

And you support this?


White people have not been the victims of segregation here as have blacks, their experiences are well documented.

But, lot of white people opposed segregation and before that slavery. And fought against it, often paying quite a price up to and including DYING for it.

So, shitcanning what they have to say about it, because of their race, seems, very wrong. Racist even.


The US was since before independence, a white supremacist society as were many colonies created by the British Empire all over the world. The British Empire was the most expansive empire in human history and all of it was founded on white supremacy. If this is new to you I must ask why?

w.s. implies that the King of england pushed policy to server the interests fo white people as a whole, while keeping down the non-whites of the empire.

Yet, the king of england, was happy to deny white people in his own nation of ENGLAND, their full rights, let alone the white people of scotland or ireland, or even the American colonies, or the Austrialians, or the Canadians....



If he was a w.s., he was pretty bad at it. You seem to be just smearing people with that label, very recklessly.


I always thought of Imperialism as an intersically selfish system, set up to enrich the very top leadership of the empire, at the expense of pretty much everyone not them, with the price for empire paid, by pretty much everyone not them.

I really doubt that the king of england of say, 1770 felt any kinship or loyalty towards say... the average white farmer of say... colonial Ontairo.
 
Back
Top Bottom