Goodbye Proud Boys

You didn't say it, but you are acting like it. You see "unlimited" and using that to justify a two million dollar punishment for a banner.

Thus, my counter point, that it was NOT required, so your justification is simply not true.




Wow. That really justifies the two million dollar fine, for the destruction of a banner.





Your goal is not to discourage repetition, it is just to destroy your enemies. Have the moral courage to admit it.




You can stop trying to rephrase the point to avoid addressing it.

You have a POLITICAL PROBLEM with them, and thus you support the use of state power against them. That is what your this is about. The dems using their state power against their political enemies.

Historically, such behavior is common in oppressive tryannies.





Yet, you support an clearly political court punishment against a political organization.




I didn't make any argument that it was, and it was shitty of you to pretend that I did.

Such behavior is common well libs lose an argument, as you are doing.


Your support of this absurd punishment for the destruction of a banner, is clearly you supporting the violation of the civil rights of your political enemies, the Proud Boys.





This issue isn't about the crime, it is about the way that the dems, with your support, used it as a justification to bring the power of the state down against their political enemies.

Please stop pretending to not get that, and address the point.

Defend your position in this issue, if you can.

Yep, the fine is justified, and your defenses are silly.
 
That is simply not true.

I have pointed out, correctly that this level of punishment does not fit the crime.

Thus, what we have here, is a violation of the rights of the accused.

That the libs in the thread, are all supportive of this clear act of oppression,

is them revealing just how much they really care about civil rights,

which is not at all.
What we have is you trying to pervert the course of justice.
 
Yep, the fine is justified, and your defenses are silly.


I like how your counter argument is to simply reassert your claim.

That is the logical fallacy of proof by assertion.

It is you revealing that you have no ability to defend your position at all.


You are in the wrong AND YOU KNOW IT.
 
What we have is you trying to pervert the course of justice.


The title of this thread is not "Enrique Tarrio faces justice", but "good bye" to a political organization.

This is about POLITICS, not JUSTICE.


The absurdly excessive fine, for destroying a banner, is an INJUSTICE, and you know it. That is why you are refusing to be drawn into actually discussing the case.

Because you know you are on the wrong side of this.
 
The "Terror" of the Proud Boys, is limited to a church banner and some involvement in the 1/6 riot.

That is not justification to call a group, "terrorist".

You're trying and failing dancing the head of a pin. The Proud Punks attacked a BLACK CHURCH. They are a terrorist organization. "Limited" is a cop out. It is like saying woman is "Little Pregnant" They attacked a BLACK CHURCH. They engaged in a terrorist action. Their attack was a HATE CRIME!
 
The adjudication is that 'yes, it is.'


And again, all you have as a supporting argument, is an Appeal to Authority.


You sure you want to play that card? After all TRUMP is the ultimate authority in this country now. For now.


Wait, what am I saying. Of course you expect to just reverse and apply different standards if we try playing your same game.

Have you noticed yet, that we have stopped letting you do that kind of shit?
 
You're trying and failing dancing the head of a pin. The Proud Punks attacked a BLACK CHURCH. They are a terrorist organization. "Limited" is a cop out. It is like saying woman is "Little Pregnant" They attacked a BLACK CHURCH. They engaged in a terrorist action. Their attack was a HATE CRIME!

They pulled down a banner and burned it.

To try to spin that as justification to label them a Terrorist Organization, is an insult to all the victims of real terrorism.
 
They pulled down a banner and burned it.

To try to spin that as justification to label them a Terrorist Organization, is an insult to all the victims of real terrorism.

It was a hate crime and YOU are justifying at hate crime.
 
I like how your counter argument is to simply reassert your claim.

That is the logical fallacy of proof by assertion.

It is you revealing that you have no ability to defend your position at all.


You are in the wrong AND YOU KNOW IT.

Gaslighting. You assert and double down. The judge would kick you out of court.
 
It ain't your decision to make, it was the judge. **** Off you traitorous insurrectionist asshole!


The judge made a political decision. Every post made my you lefties are making POLITICAL EXCUSES for the clearly POLITICAL DECISION.


Which, is of course, a massive violation of the rights of hte Proud Boys.


Your inability to be coherent on this, is clear.
 
The adjudication is that 'yes, it is.'


The "abjudication" is clearly wrong. That is the point.

YOur inability to even address teh point, is becasue you don't have ANTYHING, to say, even a complete lefty hack, can pretend to justify this absurd level of overpunishment.
 
It was a hate crime and YOU are justifying at hate crime.


I've clearly stated that, if the facts of the case are as presented, that they should be tried and punished for their crime of destroying that paper banner.


I just don't want them punished based not the facts of hte case, but on the left's political hate of them.


That is the point. EVERY TIME you lie about what the point is, that is you admitting that I am right.

You get that, right?
 
15th post
I've clearly stated that, if the facts of the case are as presented, that they should be tried and punished for their crime of destroying that paper banner.


I just don't want them punished based not the facts of hte case, but on the left's political hate of them.


That is the point. EVERY TIME you lie about what the point is, that is you admitting that I am right.

You get that, righI

I have NOT lied. The attack on the BLACK CHURCH was a hate crime. The Proud Punks are a terrorist organization. YOU are defending a hate crime. YOU are defending a terrorist organization.!
 
I have NOT lied. The attack on the BLACK CHURCH was a hate crime. The Proud Punks are a terrorist organization. YOU are defending a hate crime. YOU are defending a terrorist organization.!

By "attack", you mean they destroyed that paper banner.


You are supporting bringing the hammer down, because you hate them politically.

That makes this not a court ruling, but a political operation.
 
Correll, you are wrong, and all you can do is yell. Go for it, if it makes you feel any better.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom