Sweet_Caroline
Gold Member
- Jun 15, 2013
- 4,174
- 824
- 155
God does not have wrath against mankind
He kind of likes us.....we make him laugh
There are some that make Him cry though. There is a lot of evil in the world.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
God does not have wrath against mankind
He kind of likes us.....we make him laugh
God does not have wrath against mankind
He kind of likes us.....we make him laugh
There are some that make Him cry though. There is a lot of evil in the world.
Jeremiah may or may not mean well--I don't know what his motives are for this thread. But I tend to side with KG that we have no reason to believe his motives are anything but pure and that his witness is harmless. Also it is likely counterproductive as I suspect not a single soul will read much, if any, of his large blocks of cut and pasted text. Most especially when there is no effort to relate it to current day realities and it is more likely to trigger resentment and disgust at being 'preached at' rather than enter into a reasoned dialogue.
Bones probably also means well with her comments. She is wrong that Jesus came only for the Jews. She is right that he took strong exception to grandstanding by the 'religious' who did not live by what they preached; i.e. the hypocrites who professed the laws of scripture but failed to follow the spirit of the scripture while condemning others.
I agree with RW and others that God is not a distant, authoritarian God dictating rules and regulations and doling out wrath and punishment on those who fail to follow them. Jesus must have been personable and likable to have the following he did and to be invited as many places as he went. And, if we believe the passages that say he was God incarnate, then we do have an example of what God is like.
God/Jesus however, though he gave second chances and reserved judgment for the state of one's soul for himself to determine, was in no way soft on sin. To repent meant to cease sinning. And after some thought I am pretty sure that sin is defned as that which harms ourselves and/or others. And there are consequences for sin whether we are aware of or care about them or not. As the scriptures say in several places: "The sins of the fathers are visited upon the children even unto the fourth and fifth generation." (Interpretation: for a very long time.) The reason sin is bad is because it hurts everybody including the innocent in future generations. And that is why God is against it.
So the righteous are called to hate the sin but love the sinner.
Bones is 100% correct.Bones probably also means well with her comments. She is wrong that Jesus came only for the Jews.
Jeremiah may or may not mean well--I don't know what his motives are for this thread. But I tend to side with KG that we have no reason to believe his motives are anything but pure and that his witness is harmless. Also it is likely counterproductive as I suspect not a single soul will read much, if any, of his large blocks of cut and pasted text. Most especially when there is no effort to relate it to current day realities and it is more likely to trigger resentment and disgust at being 'preached at' rather than enter into a reasoned dialogue.
God is in many ways a lot like me....
I created my children, I raised them, fed them, protected them. To them, I was much like a god who is responsible for their well being
Yet I never demanded that my children spend one day a week praising me. I never made them give thanks for what I brought them. I never punished them for not praising me enough. I never threatened them if they failed to worship me
Personally, I find that stuff awkward and pretentious. I am not that vain that I demand constant praise. Neither is God
He is a Father.
He is a King.
He is a lot more.
If you don't require your children to honor you or their mother, are you being a parent?
If you don't teach your kids to be polite, are you being a parent?
Parents and other people get respect but they aren't as important as God.
I've worked for jobs where some people got excessive amounts of respect because the job wouldn't function without them. God's role requires that things work a certain way to have our cohesion in the world.
God hates cut and paste
Tell him how you really feel
God really does love cut and paste:
Jeremiah 1:9 ¶ Then the LORD put forth his hand, and touched my mouth. And the LORD said unto me, Behold, I have put my words in thy mouth.
Isaiah 51:16 And I have put my words in thy mouth, and I have covered thee in the shadow of mine hand, that I may plant the heavens, and lay the foundations of the earth, and say unto Zion, Thou art my people.
Deuteronomy 18:18 I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee, and will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him.
Usually the reason some Christian is speaking to you might be because God told them to say something to you.
Jeremiah may or may not mean well--I don't know what his motives are for this thread. But I tend to side with KG that we have no reason to believe his motives are anything but pure and that his witness is harmless. Also it is likely counterproductive as I suspect not a single soul will read much, if any, of his large blocks of cut and pasted text. Most especially when there is no effort to relate it to current day realities and it is more likely to trigger resentment and disgust at being 'preached at' rather than enter into a reasoned dialogue.
Bones probably also means well with her comments. She is wrong that Jesus came only for the Jews. She is right that he took strong exception to grandstanding by the 'religious' who did not live by what they preached; i.e. the hypocrites who professed the laws of scripture but failed to follow the spirit of the scripture while condemning others.
I agree with RW and others that God is not a distant, authoritarian God dictating rules and regulations and doling out wrath and punishment on those who fail to follow them. Jesus must have been personable and likable to have the following he did and to be invited as many places as he went. And, if we believe the passages that say he was God incarnate, then we do have an example of what God is like.
God/Jesus however, though he gave second chances and reserved judgment for the state of one's soul for himself to determine, was in no way soft on sin. To repent meant to cease sinning. And after some thought I am pretty sure that sin is defned as that which harms ourselves and/or others. And there are consequences for sin whether we are aware of or care about them or not. As the scriptures say in several places: "The sins of the fathers are visited upon the children even unto the fourth and fifth generation." (Interpretation: for a very long time.) The reason sin is bad is because it hurts everybody including the innocent in future generations. And that is why God is against it.
So the righteous are called to hate the sin but love the sinner.
Bones is 100% correct.Bones probably also means well with her comments. She is wrong that Jesus came only for the Jews.
Jesus said in his own words the he only came for the 'House of Israel' and not the gentiles.
Matthew 15:24 "But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
Jeremiah may or may not mean well--I don't know what his motives are for this thread. But I tend to side with KG that we have no reason to believe his motives are anything but pure and that his witness is harmless. Also it is likely counterproductive as I suspect not a single soul will read much, if any, of his large blocks of cut and pasted text. Most especially when there is no effort to relate it to current day realities and it is more likely to trigger resentment and disgust at being 'preached at' rather than enter into a reasoned dialogue.
Bones probably also means well with her comments. She is wrong that Jesus came only for the Jews. She is right that he took strong exception to grandstanding by the 'religious' who did not live by what they preached; i.e. the hypocrites who professed the laws of scripture but failed to follow the spirit of the scripture while condemning others.
I agree with RW and others that God is not a distant, authoritarian God dictating rules and regulations and doling out wrath and punishment on those who fail to follow them. Jesus must have been personable and likable to have the following he did and to be invited as many places as he went. And, if we believe the passages that say he was God incarnate, then we do have an example of what God is like.
God/Jesus however, though he gave second chances and reserved judgment for the state of one's soul for himself to determine, was in no way soft on sin. To repent meant to cease sinning. And after some thought I am pretty sure that sin is defned as that which harms ourselves and/or others. And there are consequences for sin whether we are aware of or care about them or not. As the scriptures say in several places: "The sins of the fathers are visited upon the children even unto the fourth and fifth generation." (Interpretation: for a very long time.) The reason sin is bad is because it hurts everybody including the innocent in future generations. And that is why God is against it.
So the righteous are called to hate the sin but love the sinner.
Foxfyre, the Holy Spirit led me this morning to write this out today with my own hands. It is what the Lord desires the people to hear today. I have not copied or pasted a single word in any of these posts on this thread. I would not offer the Lord that which cost me nothing. The Lord has given me a great love in my heart for the Jewish people, for the Gentile people here on this board and this was done in God's love. Nothing else. May God deal with me ever so severely if there would ever be any other motive than Love to compel me to preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ. God bless the people reading the Gospel today. Amen.